Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Null Mutation of HvrA Compensates for Loss of an Essential relA/spoT-Like Gene in Rhodobacter capsulatus

Shinji Masuda, Carl E. Bauer
Shinji Masuda
1Laboratory for Photobiology, RIKEN Photodynamics Research Center, Sendai 980-0845, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: smasuda@postman.riken.go.jp
Carl E. Bauer
2Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.1.235-239.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We report that a single relA/spoT-like gene exists on the Rhodobacter capsulatus chromosome, and its mutational loss is lethal. This gene could be mutated only under a mutational background of a null mutation in the nucleoid protein HvrA. This result suggests that there may be a direct link between HvrA-regulated promoters and the ppGpp-related stringent response.

The stringent response is a global regulatory system that controls gene expression in bacterial cells that are undergoing starvation for amino acids and/or carbon sources (for review, see reference 6). The stringent response has been extensively studied for almost 40 years, mainly in the γ-proteobacterium Escherichia coli. These studies have established that the stringent response is mediated through the synthesis of guanosine 3′,5′-bisdiphosphate (ppGpp) that is maintained in E. coli cells by two enzymes, RelA and SpoT. Amino acid limitation and the subsequent increase in the proportion of uncharged tRNA induce activation of a ribosome-bound ppGpp synthase called RelA. Biochemical and genetic analyses of the regulatory function of ppGpp have indicated that it controls the transcription of a large number of genes (e.g., rRNA operons and amino acid biosynthesis genes) through direct interaction of ppGpp with RNA polymerase (7, 24). Thus, changes in the amount of ppGpp rapidly send a signal to the transcriptional apparatus that there is a change in translational conditions. This allows cells to adapt to an environment of variable nutrient availability. The role of SpoT is to degrade ppGpp, which prevents prolongation of the stringent response. Under certain conditions, such as carbon deficiency, SpoT also exhibits ppGpp synthase activity, which is essential for maintaining the basal level of ppGpp that is needed for amino acid biosynthesis in E. coli (6).

Phylogenetic and biochemical studies indicate that there are three classes of bacterial RelA/SpoT orthologs: (i) ppGpp synthetase I, termed “RelA,” which synthesizes ppGpp only during amino acid limitation; (ii) ppGpp synthetase II, termed “SpoT,” which synthesizes ppGpp primarily during carbon limitation; and (iii) ppGpp synthetase III, termed “Rel,” which synthesizes ppGpp after either amino acid or carbon limitation. SpoT and Rel, but not RelA, are also capable of hydrolyzing ppGpp in a manganese-dependent reaction (16, 27). From phylogenetic studies, a theory for the evolution of paralogous relA and spoT genes in proteobacteria was proposed, which suggests that there was an ancestral rel-like gene that underwent gene duplication, giving rise to the relA and spoT lineages that subsequently evolved into their specialized functions for ppGpp synthetase and hydrolase activity, respectively (16).

Recent genomic sequence data indicate that RelA/SpoT-like proteins are widely conserved in bacteria, with homologs also present in the higher plant Arabidopsis and in the green alga Chlamydomonas (13, 25). The Chlamydomonas RelA/SpoT-like protein exhibits ppGpp synthetase and hydrolase activities and was shown to localize in the chloroplast. The protoplast location suggests that the plant stringent response may be derived from a photosynthetic bacterial symbiont during evolution of the chloroplast. Genome sequencing indicates that RelA and SpoT homologs are exclusively found in the β and γ subdivisions of proteobacteria, whereas the Rel homologs are found in gram-positive bacteria, such as Bacillus, Clostridium, and/or Mycobacterium species. Phylogenetic analyses also suggests that the α-subdivision proteobacteria Bradyrhizobium japonicum, Caulobacter crescentus, and Rhodobacter capsulatus possess a unique relA/spoT-related gene that comprises a new branch on the RelA, SpoT, and Rel phylogenetic tree (16). Given that the subdivision of the α subgroup is earlier than that of β- and γ-subdivision event in the proteobacterial lineage (28), the RelA/SpoT-related proteins in the α-proteobacteria may retain characteristics that are ancestral to RelA and SpoT proteins. Thus, it was of interest to characterize the function of the relA/spoT-related genes in α-subdivision proteobacteria. In this study, we have chosen the α-proteobacterium R. capsulatus as a model organism to genetically characterize the unique relA/spoT-related branch. The advantage of R. capsulatus is that it exhibits remarkable bioenergetic versatility, allowing respiratory growth under aerobic (oxygen as an electron acceptor) and anaerobic conditions (dimethyl sulfoxide as an electron acceptor), as well as growth by photosynthesis (26). Genetic tools for this organism have also been well established (18). Our results indicate that R. capsulatus possesses only a single relA/spoT-related gene, which was found to be essential for its viability.

A single spoT-like gene is conserved in the α subdivision of proteobacteria.

We identified relA/spoT homologous genes in several sequenced genomes of the α-subdivision proteobacteria by using a computer-aided similarity search. For this application, the amino acid sequence of the E. coli RelA protein was used as a homology probe of translated regions of sequenced genome from R. capsulatus, Mesorhizobium loti, B. japonicum, and Sinorhizobium meliloti. The sequence of R. capsulatus was obtained from the R. capsulatus genome project site at http://wit.mcs.anl.gov/WIT2/ , and those of S. meliloti, M. loti, and B. japonicum were obtained from the Kazusa DNA Research Institute site at http://www.kazusa.or.jp/en/ . In each organism, only a single open reading frame was found that exhibits similarity to the amino acid sequence of the E. coli RelA protein. Figure 1A shows a phylogenetic tree derived from deduced amino acid sequences of relA/spoT-related genes from various species. The tree was drawn with the programs ClustalX (22) and MEGA2 (15). All gaps in the sequence alignment were omitted in a pairwise manner, and the construction of the tree was performed by neighbor-joining methods (17). As suggested previously, putative RelA/SpoT-related proteins from α-proteobacteria form an independent cluster with closer similarity to SpoT than to RelA (16). An amino acid alignment of RelA, Rel, and SpoT homologs indicates that Rel and SpoT (but not RelA) conserve a part of the HD domain found in a superfamily of metal-dependent phosphohydrolases (1) that is thought to be involved in the ppGpp degradation (11, 13). The SpoT-like homologs in α-proteobacteria also have the HD domain (Fig. 1B). These observations suggest that α-proteobacteria contain a single SpoT-like protein that may be responsible for both synthesizing and hydrolyzing ppGpp, as is the case for SpoT and Rel proteins.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

(A) Phylogenetic tree based on the amino acid sequences of RelA/SpoT/Rel homologs. The bootstrap values obtained by 1,000 replications are given beside the nodes. The accession numbers of the sequences used for sequence comparison and construction of the phylogenetic tree are as follows: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, AAG04323 and AAG08723 ; E. coli, J04039 and P17580 ; Xylella fastidiosa, AE003964 and AE003887 ; Neisseria meningitides, CAB85211 and CAB85138 ; Streptococcus pyogenes, AAK34667 ; Streptococcus pneumoniae, AAL00291 ; Enterococcus faecalis, AAO81720 ; Bacillus subtilis, U86377 ; C. crescentus, AAK23532 ; and Arabidopsis thaliana, AAD25787 . The cluster of single spoT-like gene conserved in α-proteobacteria is indicated as SpoT*. (B) Partial amino acid sequence alignment of SpoT-like protein from R. capsulatus (R.cap), S. meliloti (S.mel), B. japonicum (B.jap), and M. loti; RelA and SpoT proteins from E. coli; and Rel protein from B. subtilis. The HD domain thought to be involved in the ppGpp degradation activity is boxed (see the text). The conserved amino acids are indicated by asterisks.

Previously, Mittenhuber (16) suggested that an ancestral spoT gene was duplicated in the β and γ branches of the proteobacteria and that the duplicated copy subsequently lost ppGpp-hydrolyzing activity and then adapted ppGpp synthesis to amino acid starvation (16). It was proposed that the duplicated copy then evolved to form the relA genes found in β- and γ-proteobacteria (16). However, our phylogenetic tree in Fig. 1 indicates that spoT/relA must have diverged before the separation of gram-positive bacteria and proteobacteria. This indicates that the ancestor to α-proteobacteria most likely had a relA gene that was lost after separation from the β and γ branches.

Disruption of the R. capsulatus spoT gene is lethal.

To investigate the biological function of the spoT gene in R. capsulatus, we first constructed a suicide plasmid that contained a tetracycline resistance (Tcr) cassette (9) that replaces amino acids 140 to 623 of the R. capsulatus spoT coding region. The suicide vector used for mutagenesis was constructed as follows. First, two 600-bp DNA fragments corresponding to N- and C-terminal regions of the R. capsulatus spoT gene were amplified by PCR using the following two sets of primer pairs, respectively: RelA-F1 (5′-GGGAGCTCATGATCGATGTCGAAGACCTG-3′) and RelA-R1 (5′-GGGATATCCCGGGCAAGCTTGACC-3′) and RelA-F2 (5′-GGGATATCATCGGGCTTGCCGCGGATC-3′) and RelA-R2 (5′-GGTCTAGAAGCAGCCGGTGCAGATGTTC-3′). RelA-F1 and RelA-R2 have a SacI and XbaI restriction site, respectively, whereas, both RelA-R1 and RelA-F2 have EcoRV restriction sites (underlined). These two fragments were digested with SacI, EcoRV, and XbaI and then cloned into a gentamicin resistance (Gmr) suicide vector, pZJD29A (Z. Jiang and C. E. Bauer, unpublished strain construction) at its SacI and XbaI sites with the SmaI-digested Tcr cassette (9). The resulting Tcr Gmr suicide vector was transferred to R. capsulatus wild-type strain SB1003 by using S17-1, an E. coli mobilizing strain (19) with single-crossover recombinants obtained at a frequency of 2 × 10−7 per recipient (single crossovers were selected for tetracycline [1 μg/ml] and gentamicin [10 μg/ml] resistance). The single-crossover recombinants were then grown for several generations with no gentamicin and subsequently plated on medium containing tetracycline and 5% sucrose. Because the suicide vector also encodes a sacB gene coding for levansucrase, which causes cell lethality when grown in the presence of sucrose (10), recombinants that undergo a second chromosomal cross that leads to loss of the plasmid with retention of chromosomal spoT::Tcr can be directly selected by growth on tetracycline and sucrose followed by scoring for gentamicin sensitivity (Gms). Interestingly, when the single-crossover recombinants were grown without gentamicin and then plated onto plates containing tetracycline plus sucrose, we were unable to observe any recombinants that underwent a second genetic exchange. The failure to perform allelic replacement occurred regardless of growth medium (minimal versus complex medium) or physiological growth conditions (dark aerobic, dark anaerobic, or photosynthetic). These results indicated that the loss of function of the spoT-like gene in R. capsulatus is lethal.

The R. capsulatus spoT gene can be disrupted in an hvrA-null mutation background.

It was recently shown that E. coli strains lacking the two nucleoid proteins H-NS and StpA have a slow-growth phenotype that can be suppressed by null mutations in spoT and relA genes (12). This result let us address whether the R. capsulatus spoT gene could be mutated in an R. capsulatus strain that is disrupted for a nucleoid-like protein. Genome sequence analysis indicates that this species codes for a single H-NS-like protein called HvrA (3, 5; data not shown). We attempted the same insertional mutagenesis of the spoT gene in an hvrA mutant strain, MS03 (5), using an identical suicide vector to test whether the hvrA mutation suppresses the lethality of the loss of function of spoT. In contrast to our failure to obtain double recombinants in wild-type cells, double-crossover events could be readily obtained when grow on medium containing tetracycline and 5% sucrose. Double recombination leading to proper integration of the Tcr cassette into the chromosomal copy of spoT in the hvrA-disrupted strain was confirmed by PCR analysis; the resulting recombinant was named “SM05.” From these results, it was concluded that the R. capsulatus spoT gene is essential, but can be eliminated by a compensating null mutation in the hvrA gene.

In vivo ppGpp synthesis.

We next determined the effect of a nonfunctional spoT gene on the ppGpp metabolism in the hvrA spoT double-mutant strain SM05 after subjecting the cells to stringent growth conditions. In this experiment, cells were grown in MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) medium (4) containing 0.2% Casamino Acids, minerals, and vitamins (26) at 34°C under aerobic-dark respiratory conditions to an optical density at 660 nm (OD660) of 0.05. The cells were then labeled with H332PO4 (100 μCi/ml; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with further incubation to OD660 of 0.4. In vivo (p)ppGpp synthesis was induced by supplying 1 mM serine hydroxamate (SerOHX) (Sigma), which inhibits tRNASer aminoacylation (23). After further incubation for 1 h, the 32P-labeled cells were mixed with an equal volume of 8 M formic acid and subjected to extraction by three cycles of freezing and thawing. The extracts were centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 10 min, and the resulting supernatant was analyzed by thin-layer chromatography on PEI-cellulose (Merck) with 1.5 M KH2PO4. As shown in Fig. 2, before supplying SerOHX, there was no detectable (p)ppGpp found in the wild-type parent cell line SB1003, in the hvrA mutant strain MS03, and in the hvrA spoT double-mutant strain SM05 (lanes 1 to 3, respectively). However, after SerOHX induction of the stringent response, significant quantities of (p)ppGpp were observed in nucleotide extracts from strains SB1003 and MS03 (lanes 4 and 5, respectively). In contrast, there was no detectable (p)ppGpp accumulation in SM05 after addition of SerOHX (lane 6). We also found that shorter and/or longer incubation after addition of SerOHX (for 15 min and 2 h, respectively) results in no ppGpp accumulation in strain SM05 (data not shown). These findings indicate that synthesis of (p)ppGpp in R. capsulatus upon induction of a stringent response requires a functional spoT gene.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Autoradiography of PEI thin-layer chromatography of formic acid cell extract from R. capsulatus strain SB1003 (wild type), MS03 (ΔhvrA), and SM05 (ΔhvrA ΔspoT). Labeled mononucleotides from SerOHX-untreated (lanes 1 to 3) and SerOHX-treated (lanes 4 to 6) cultures are shown.

Involvement of R. capsulatus spoT gene in photosystem synthesis.

The H-NS-like nucleoid protein, HvrA, was originally found to function as a trans-acting factor needed for optimal photosynthesis gene expression (5). Since our mutational analysis can compensate for a defect in ppGpp synthesis, there may be a functional overlap between genes that are controlled by HvrA and those controlled by ppGpp. Interestingly, strain SM05 (ΔhvrA ΔspoT) forms colonies that are completely devoid of pigmentation when cells are grown on rich medium (PY plates) (30) under aerobic-dark respiratory conditions (Fig. 3A). Even more surprisingly, the pigmentation-defective phenotype of SM05 can be suppressed when these cells are grown under anaerobic (photosynthetic) conditions (Fig. 3B). Additionally, supplementation with a carbon source (e.g., glucose, malate and/or succinate) results in the comparable photopigment synthesis under aerobic conditions (Fig. 3C). Given that SM05 has the ppGpp0 phenotype (Fig. 2), these results indicate that basal levels of ppGpp produced by SpoT protein are required for aerobic photosystem synthesis in the absence of a rich carbon source in R. capsulatus.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Growth and colony pigmentation of R. capsulatus strain SB1003 (wild type), MS03 (ΔhvrA), and SM05 (ΔhvrA ΔspoT). (A) Growth on a PY medium (30) without glucose under aerobic-dark respiratory conditions. (B) Growth on a PY medium without glucose under anaerobic-light photosynthetic conditions. (C) Growth on a PY medium with 0.5% glucose under aerobic-dark respiratory conditions.

Concluding remarks.

In this study, we found that mutational loss of a single spoT-like gene exhibits lethality in the α-proteobacterium R. capsulatus. In E. coli, spoT has also been shown to be essential for the growth. In this case, loss of SpoT results in prohibitively high intracellular levels of ppGpp that is constitutively produced by RelA, leading to cell death (21, 29). However, this is clearly not the case for the spoT mutation in R. capsulatus, which causes the inability to synthesize ppGpp (Fig. 2). Furthermore, there is no homologous relA gene on the sequenced genome of R. capsulatus. This suggests that there is a functional difference in the RelA/SpoT homologs in these two organisms.

The R. capsulatus spoT-like gene was successfully disrupted in the hvrA mutant strain, suggesting a link between ppGpp-related regulatory pathway and the function of the nucleoid protein HvrA. The hvrA-spoT double-mutant strain has an unusual phenotype of being unable to synthesize photopigments under dark semiaerobic conditions (Fig. 3A). The mechanism for the conditional phenotype on photosystem synthesis in SM05 is open to speculation. In E. coli, a direct link between ppGpp regulons and the function of nucleoid proteins H-NS and StpA was reported (12). It was shown that the level of ppGpp normally present in the cells has a regulatory role for certain promoters, and the effect of the molecule is influenced by the supercoiled state of these promoters that is controlled by the function of H-NS and StpA (12). It therefore seems that ppGpp may have a regulatory role in the promoter activity that is coregulated by the nucleoid protein HvrA in R. capsulatus. Recent studies have shown that the role of HvrA in R. capsulatus is not limited to regulate photosynthesis gene expression, but HvrA is also involved in regulating nitrogen fixation, ubiquinol oxidase and cytochrome oxidase genes (14, 20). In addition, expression of HvrA is regulated by the global redox-responsible two-component system, RegA and RegB (2, 8). Perhaps HvrA and SpoT-like proteins are functionally linked in this bacterium to efficiently capture the available energy source under different environmental changes (e.g., oxygen, light, nitrogen, amino acids, and/or the carbon source). Clearly, further biochemical and genetic analyses of the R. capsulatus spoT-like gene are needed to test this hypothesis, and such studies are currently under way.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

S. M. thanks T. Koshiba, Tokyo Metropolitan University, for thin-layer chromatography equipment.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 4 August 2003.
    • Accepted 3 October 2003.
  • Copyright © 2004 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Aravind, L., and E. V. Koonin. 1998. The HD domain defines a new superfamily of metal dependent phosphohydrolases. Trends Biochem. Sci.23:469-472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Bauer, C. E., S. Elsen, L. R. Swem, D. L. Swem, and S. Masuda. 2002. Redox and light regulation of gene expression in photosynthetic prokaryotes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B358:147-154.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Bertin, P., N. Benhabiles, E. Krin, C. Laurent-Winter, C. Tendeng, E. Turlin, A. Thomas, A. Danchin, and R. Brasseur. 1999. The structural and functional organization of H-NS-like proteins is evolutionarily conserved in gram-negative bacteria. Mol. Microbiol.31:319-329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Bochner, B. R., and B. N. Ames. 1982. Complete analysis of cellular nucleotide by two-dimensional thin layer chromatography. J. Biol. Chem.257:9759-9769.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Buggy, J. J., M. W. Sganga, and C. E. Bauer. 1994. Characterization of a light-responding trans-activator responsible for differentially controlling reaction center and light-harvesting-I gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus.J. Bacteriol.176:6936-6943.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Cashel, M., D. R. Gentry, V. J. Hernandez, and D. Vinella. 1996. The stringent response, p. 1458-1496. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  7. 7.↵
    Chatterji, D., N. Fujita, and A. Ishihama. 1998. The mediator for stringent control, ppGpp, binds to the β-subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Genes Cells3:279-287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Du, S., J.-L. K. Kouadio, and C. E. Bauer. 1999. Regulated expression of a highly conserved regulatory gene cluster is necessary for controlling photosynthesis gene expression in response to anaerobiosis in Rhodobacter capsulatus.J. Bacteriol.181:4334-4341.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Fellay, R., J. Frey, and H. Krisch. 1987. Interposon mutagenesis of soil and water bacteria: a family of DNA fragments designed for in vitro insertional mutagenesis of gram-negative bacteria. Gene52:147-154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Gay, P., D. Le Coq, M. Steinmetz, T. Berkelman, and C. I. Kado. 1985. Positive selection procedure for entrapment of insertion sequence elements in gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol.164:918-921.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Gentry, D. R., and M. Cashel. 1996. Mutational analysis of the Escherichia coli spoT gene identifies distinct but overlapping regions involved in ppGpp synthesis and degradation. Mol. Microbiol.19:1373-1384.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Johansson, J., C. Balsalobre, S. Wang, J. Urbonaviciene, D. J. Jin, B. Sondén, and B. E. Uhlin. 2000. Nucleoid proteins stimulate stringently controlled bacterial promoters: a link between the cAMP-CRP and the (p)ppGpp regulons in Escherichia coli.Cell102:475-485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Kasai, K., S. Usami, T. Yamada, Y. Endo, K. Ochi, and Y. Tozawa. 2002. A RelA-SpoT homolog (Cr-RSH) identified in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii generates stringent factor in vivo and localizes to chloroplasts in vitro.Nucleic Acids Res.30:4985-4992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Kern, M., P.-B. Kamp, A. Paschen, B. Masepohl, and W. Klipp. 1998. Evidence for a regulatory link of nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis in Rhodobacter capsulatus via HvrA. J. Bacteriol.180:1965-1969.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Kumar, S., K. Tamura, and M. Nei. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics17:1244-1245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Mittenhuber, G. 2001. Comparative genomics and evolution of genes encoding bacterial (p)ppGpp synthetases/hydrolases (the Rel, RelA and SpoT proteins). J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol.3:585-600.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining methods: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol.4:406-425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Scolnik, P. A., and B. L. Marrs. 1987. Genetic research with photosynthetic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.41:703-726.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Simon, R., U. Priefer, and A. Pühler. 1983. A broad host range mobilizing system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram-negative bacteria. Bio/Technology1:784-791.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Swem, D. L., and C. E. Bauer. 2002. Coordination of ubiquinol oxidase and cytochrome cbb3 oxidase expression by multiple regulators in Rhodobacter capsulatus.J. Bacteriol.184:2815-2820.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Tedin, K., and H. Bremer. 1992. Toxic effects of high levels of ppGpp in Escherichia coli are relieved by rpoB mutations. J. Biol. Chem.267:2337-2344.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. G. Higgins. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4876-4882.
  23. 23.↵
    Tosa, T., and L. I. Pizer. 1971. Biochemical bases for the antimetabolite action of l-serine hydroxamate. J. Bacteriol.106:972-982.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Toulokhonov, I. I., I. Shulgina, and V. J. Hernandez. 2001. Binding of the transcription effecter ppGpp to Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is allosteric, modular and occurs near the N-terminus of the β′-subunit. J. Biol. Chem.276:1220-1225.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    van der Biezen, E. A., J. Sun, M. J. Coleman, M. J. Bibb, and J. D. G. Jones. 2000. Arabidopsis RelA/SpoT homologs implicate (p)ppGpp in plant signalling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:3747-3752.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Weaver, P. F., J. D. Wall, and H. Gest. 1975. Characterization of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata.Arch. Microbiol.105:207-216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Wendrich, T. M., C. L. Beckering, and M. A. Marahiel. 2000. Characterization of the relA/spoT gene from Bacillus stearothermophilus.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.190:195-201.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Woese, C. R. 1987. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol. Rev.51:221-271.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Xiao, H., M. Kalman, K. Ikehara, S. Zemel, G. Glaser, and M. Cashel. 1991. Residual guanosine 3′, 5′-bispyrophosphate synthetic activity of relA null mutants can be eliminated by spoT null mutations. J. Biol. Chem.266:5980-5990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Young, D. A., C. E. Bauer, J. C. Williams, and B. L. Marrs. 1989. Genetic evidence for superoperonal organization of genes for photosynthetic pigments and pigment-binding proteins in Rhodobacter capsulatus.Mol. Gen. Genet.218:1-12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Null Mutation of HvrA Compensates for Loss of an Essential relA/spoT-Like Gene in Rhodobacter capsulatus
Shinji Masuda, Carl E. Bauer
Journal of Bacteriology Dec 2003, 186 (1) 235-239; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.1.235-239.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Null Mutation of HvrA Compensates for Loss of an Essential relA/spoT-Like Gene in Rhodobacter capsulatus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Null Mutation of HvrA Compensates for Loss of an Essential relA/spoT-Like Gene in Rhodobacter capsulatus
Shinji Masuda, Carl E. Bauer
Journal of Bacteriology Dec 2003, 186 (1) 235-239; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.1.235-239.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • A single spoT-like gene is conserved in the α subdivision of proteobacteria.
    • Disruption of the R. capsulatus spoT gene is lethal.
    • The R. capsulatus spoT gene can be disrupted in an hvrA-null mutation background.
    • In vivo ppGpp synthesis.
    • Involvement of R. capsulatus spoT gene in photosystem synthesis.
    • Concluding remarks.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
NF-kappa B
Pyrophosphatases
Trans-Activators

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530