Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES AND INTERACTIONS

Vibrio fischeri LuxS and AinS: Comparative Study of Two Signal Synthases

Claudia Lupp, Edward G. Ruby
Claudia Lupp
Pacific Biomedical Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward G. Ruby
Pacific Biomedical Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: eruby@hawaii.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3873-3881.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Luminescence of luxS mutants in the symbiotic light organ. Animal luminescence was monitored during the initial stages of E. scolopes colonization by V. fischeri wild-type (solid diamonds), ainS mutant (solid squares), luxS mutant (solid triangles), and ainS luxS mutant (solid circles) strains. For each time point, mean values of 24 animals were calculated and standard errors of the mean are indicated. The experiment was repeated with the same outcome.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Colonization competence of quorum-sensing mutants. Colonization levels of the ainS mutant (A), luxS mutant (S), ainS luxS mutant (A S), and ainS-luxS-luxO (A S O) mutant relative to V. fischeri wild type (wt) were measured at 24 and 48 h postinoculation. Each bar represents the mean value of 15 animals with the associated standard errors. The experiment was conducted twice with the same outcome.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Relationship between luminescence and quorum-sensing signal activity during growth of V. fischeri in culture. The relative level of LuxS signal activity (solid diamonds) in the culture supernatant is given as a percentage of the level produced by the positive control, an overnight V. harveyi BB152 culture (see Materials and Methods). The concentration of the AinS signal, C8-HSL (solid circles), in the V. fischeri culture was determined with synthetically produced C8-HSL as standard. Luminescence of the culture (crosses) is presented for comparison. Shown is a representative experiment; standard deviation bars are indicated.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Transcriptional activity of luxS and ainS in culture. β-Galactosidase activity of V. fischeri wild-type cells carrying either a luxS::lacZ fusion (solid diamonds) or an ainS::lacZ fusion (open diamonds) in trans on low-copy-number plasmids pCL152 and pCL154, respectively, was measured during growth. Shown are the cumulative data of three cultures; standard deviation bars were smaller than the symbols.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Conceptual model for the regulation of luminescence and colonization genes by V. fischeri LuxS and AinS. Arrows indicate positive, inducing effects, and bars indicate negative, inhibitory ones. (See Discussion for explanation.)

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

    Strain or plasmidDescriptionSource or reference
    Strains
        V. fischeri
            ES114Wild-type isolate from E. scolopes light organ 5
            ainS mutant CL21 ainS gene partially deleted and replaced by chloramphenicol resistance (cat) marker 24
            litR mutant PMF8 litR gene inactivated by insertion of kanamycin resistance marker (kanR) 10
            luxI mutant VCW2G7 luxI gene inactivated by a frameshift mutation 24
            luxO mutant CL42 luxO gene inactivated by insertion of kanamycin resistance marker (kanR) 24
            luxR mutant CL53 luxR gene inactivated by insertion of erythromycin resistance marker (ermR)This study
            luxS mutant CL39 luxS gene inactivated by insertion of kanamycin resistance marker (kanR)This study
            ainS luxS mutant CL41Double mutant carrying mutations as described above for CL21 and CL39This study
            luxS luxO mutant CL90Double mutant carrying mutations as described above for CL39 and CL42This study
            ainS luxS luxO mutant CL91Triple mutant carrying mutations as described above for CL21, CL39 and CL42This study
        V. harveyi
            BB120Wild type 1
            BB152AI-2 producer 1
            BB170AI-2 sensor 1
            BB886AI-2 sensor mutant 1
    Plasmids
        pCL1122.1-kb HaeIII fragment carrying ainS gene in pVO8 24
        pCL1152.7-kb V. fischeri ES114 DNA with luxS gene cloned into pEVS79This study
        pCL122pCL115 with random TnKan insertion 70 bp downstream of the luxS transcriptional start siteThis study
        pCL1251.1-kb V. fischeri ES114 DNA with luxS gene cloned into pVO8This study
        pCL1451.8-kb V. fischeri ES114 DNA with luxO gene cloned into pEVS79 24
        pCL149Allelic exchange vector pEVS79 carrying partially deleted luxR gene replaced by erythromycin resistance (erm) markerThis study
        pCL152pCL112 with lacZ gene from pKV124 cloned into EcoRV site approximately 200 bp downstream of translational start siteThis study
        pCL154pCL125 with the lacZ gene from pKV124 cloned into the EcoRV site approximately 200 bp downstream of translational start siteThis study
        pCL155pCL145 with luxO gene inactivated by insertion of ermR-marker into NsiI siteThis study
        pEVS79Allelic exchange vector, camR 41
        pEVS94Source of the ermR cassette 41
        pKV30Cloning vector carrying partially deleted luxR gene replaced by erythromycin resistance (erm) marker 44
        pKV124Source of lacZ gene 47
        pMU106Allelic exchange vector carrying partially deleted ainS gene replaced by chloramphenicol resistance (cat) marker 24
        pVO8 V. fischeri cloning vector, ermR 45
  • TABLE 2.

    LuxS activity of V. fischeri a

    Strainb% LuxS activity in V. harveyi reporter strain:
    BB170 (AI-2 sensor)BB886 (AI-2 sensor mutant)
    V. harveyi
        Wild-type BB120147 (14)100 (37)
        AI-1 mutant BB152100 (18)1 (12)
    V. fischeri
        Wild type (vector)49 (3)0 (1)
        luxS (vector)0 (3)1 (2)
        Wild type (pCL125)44 (8)2 (2)
        luxS (pCL125)41 (16)2 (2)
    • ↵ a The V. harveyi reporter strains BB170 (AI-2 sensor) and BB886 (AI-2 sensor mutant) were incubated in medium containing 10% (vol/vol) culture supernatants of either the V. fischeri wild type or the luxS mutant carrying in trans either a vector control (pVO8) or a functional copy of the luxS gene on pCL125 (Table 1). Shown is the normalized response of a representative experiment. Standard errors are indicated in parentheses.

    • ↵ b The addition of culture supernatants from either wild-type V. harveyi BB120 (which produces both V. harveyi AI-1, an acyl-HSL, and AI-2) or V. harveyi BB152 (which produces only AI-2) served as positive controls.

  • TABLE 3.

    Luminescence of V. fischeri luxS mutantsa

    Strain typeLuminescence values (10−2 quanta s−1 cell−1) with addition ofb:
    NoneC8-HSL3-Oxo-C6-HSL
    Wild type5.7 (0.1)8.2 (1.1)17,000 (3,900)
    luxS 4.2 (0.2)5.1 (0.4)22,000 (3,600)
    ainS BDc 4.3 (0.2)5 (1)
    ainS luxS BD2.6 (0.1)4 (1)
    luxO 6.8 (0.8)12.2 (2.9)24,000 (4,000)
    luxS luxO 8.3 (1.1)17.2 (4.0)37,000 (1,500)
    • ↵ a Specific luminescence values are the means of cultures with an OD600 of between 1.0 and 5.0; standard errors of the means are indicated in parentheses. The results shown are from a representative experiment.

    • ↵ b Cultures were grown in SWT either without additions or with the addition of either 120 nM C8-HSL or 120 nM 3-oxo-C6-HSL.

    • ↵ c BD, below detection (<0.02 quanta s−1 cell−1).

  • TABLE 4.

    Transcriptional activity of V. fischeri luxS and ainS

    Strain typeβ-Galactosidase activity (Miller units) from fusion toa:
    luxSainS
    Wild type205 (46)17.8 (4.4)
    ainS 189 (15)2.0 (0.1)
    ainS (+ C8-HSL)b NDc 17.2 (4.1)
    luxS 204 (23)16.0 (4.1)
    ainS luxS 216 (35)1.9 (0.1)
    luxO 225 (46)18.9 (3.9)
    ainS luxO ND15.1 (6.0)
    litR 181 (30)2.7 (0.4)
    luxR 167 (24)17.4 (4.3)
    luxI 206 (36)17.4 (3.8)
    • ↵ a Shown is transcriptional activity of luxS and ainS in different genetic backgrounds. β-Galactosidase activity was measured during growth and averaged for several measurements taken at ODs of between 1 and 5. Shown is a representative experiment, with standard errors in parentheses.

    • ↵ b The ainS mutant was grown in the presence of 120 nM C8-HSL.

    • ↵ c ND, not determined.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Vibrio fischeri LuxS and AinS: Comparative Study of Two Signal Synthases
Claudia Lupp, Edward G. Ruby
Journal of Bacteriology Jun 2004, 186 (12) 3873-3881; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3873-3881.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vibrio fischeri LuxS and AinS: Comparative Study of Two Signal Synthases
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Vibrio fischeri LuxS and AinS: Comparative Study of Two Signal Synthases
Claudia Lupp, Edward G. Ruby
Journal of Bacteriology Jun 2004, 186 (12) 3873-3881; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3873-3881.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Homoserine
signal transduction
Vibrio

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530