Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Dialog

Rebuttal: Adaptive Point Mutation (Rosenberg and Hastings)

John R. Roth, Dan I. Andersson
John R. Roth
1Microbiology Section, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jrroth@ucdavis.edu
Dan I. Andersson
2Department of Bacteriology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, S-171 82 Solna
3Microbiology and Tumour Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77, Solna, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.15.4844.2004
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Rosenberg-Hastings paper (4) defends a model much like that of Foster (1) and argues that the observed mutagenesis contradicts predictions of the amplification model. On the contrary, amplification indirectly causes weak mutagenesis and allows that mutagenesis to have a detectable effect on lac reversion. However, this mutagenesis is a minor side effect that is neither sufficient nor necessary to explain reversion. Mutagenesis has distracted attention from the main message of this system—a target number increase during growth under selection.

SELECTION INCREASES REVERTANT YIELD 104-FOLD

Seen in the light of the amplification mutagenesis (AM) model, 100 lac+ revertant colonies arise from 106 plated cells that carry a lac duplication and can therefore grow under selection. This revertant frequency (10−4) is 104-fold higher than that seen without selection (10−8). Selection increases both target number and (indirectly) mutation rate. The whole effect of selection is the product of these two factors, because the mutation rate affects all lac copies. Target number increase (amplification and growth) provides a factor of more that 103; mutagenesis provides a factor of 4 or 5.

FIVEFOLD EFFECT OF MUTAGENESIS

Elimination of dinB (and general mutagenesis) reduces revertant yield less than fivefold. Without mutagenesis, selection still causes a RecA-dependent 25-fold increase in revertant yield (based on revertant colony number). This importance of RecA in the absence of mutagenesis suggests that recombination (i.e., amplification) is central (7).

MUTAGENESIS CAUSES 80% OF REVERTANTS

To be responsible for 80% of point mutations, DinB must increase the basal mutation rate only fivefold (6). This small increase would produce five lac revertants if applied to 108 nongrowing cells as suggested by the HM model. However, it produces 100 revertants if applied to 107 growing cells (within colonies), each cell with 200 lac copies (2).

INDUCTION OF DinB

We suggest that the mutation rate increases fivefold when one dinB gene is induced (SOS) by single-stranded DNA produced by the F′ replication origin aided by DNA fragments released by amplification segregation (6). This small increase explains revertant number, if applied to a pool of target lac copies enlarged by growth and amplification, but is too low to be detectable (by the methods used) as an increase in frequency of associated mutations.

ORIGINS OF ASSOCIATED MUTATIONS

A detectable level of associated unselected mutations forms in about 10% of lac revertants (3)—the subset that coamplifies dinB with lac. In these clones, SOS induces many dinB+ copies and thereby increases the mutation rate several hundred fold.

GROWTH—WITH OR WITHOUT SELECTION

This system showcases effects of selection on mutation in growing cells. With selection, cells reach the goal (Lac+) by a succession of genetic events, each allowing a clonal expansion. Each event is made more frequent by increases in target number provided by the previous expansion. Without selection (or without growth), the same goal can be reached only by rare single-step events. A diagram of this process is in reference 5.

  • Copyright © 2004 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Foster, P. L. 2004. Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 186 : 4846-4852.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Hendrickson, H., E. S. Slechta, U. Bergthorsson, D. I. Andersson, and J. R. Roth. 2002. Amplification mutagenesis: evidence that growth with a selected gene amplification causes adaptive mutation and hyper-mutability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 : 2164-2169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Rosche, W. A., and P. L. Foster. 1999. The role of transient hypermutators in adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 : 6862-6867.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Rosenberg, S. M., and P. J. Hastings. 2004. Adaptive point mutation and adaptive amplification pathways in the Escherichia coli Lac system: stress responses producing genetic change. J. Bacteriol. 186 : 4838-4843.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Roth, J. R., and D. I. Andersson. 2004. Amplification-mutagenesis—how growth under selection contributes to the origin of genetic diversity and explains the phenomenon of adaptive mutation. Res. Microbiol. 155:342-351.
  6. 6.↵
    Slechta, E. S., K. L. Bunny, E. Kugelberg, E. Kofoid, D. I. Andersson, and J. R. Roth. 2003. Adaptive mutation: general mutagenesis is not a programmed response to stress, but results from rare co-amplification of dinB with lac. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 : 12847-12852.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Slechta, S., J. Liu, D. I. Andersson, and J. R. Roth. 2002. Evidence that selected amplification of a bacterial lac frameshift allele stimulates Lac(+) reversion (adaptive mutation) with or without general hypermutability. Genetics 161 : 945-956.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Rebuttal: Adaptive Point Mutation (Rosenberg and Hastings)
John R. Roth, Dan I. Andersson
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2004, 186 (15) 4844; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.15.4844.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rebuttal: Adaptive Point Mutation (Rosenberg and Hastings)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Rebuttal: Adaptive Point Mutation (Rosenberg and Hastings)
John R. Roth, Dan I. Andersson
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2004, 186 (15) 4844; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.15.4844.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • SELECTION INCREASES REVERTANT YIELD 104-FOLD
    • FIVEFOLD EFFECT OF MUTAGENESIS
    • MUTAGENESIS CAUSES 80% OF REVERTANTS
    • INDUCTION OF DinB
    • ORIGINS OF ASSOCIATED MUTATIONS
    • GROWTH—WITH OR WITHOUT SELECTION
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Adaptation, Physiological
Escherichia coli
lac operon
Models, Genetic
Point Mutation

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530