Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

In Vivo Phosphorylation of Partner Switching Regulators Correlates with Stress Transmission in the Environmental Signaling Pathway of Bacillus subtilis

Tae-Jong Kim, Tatiana A. Gaidenko, Chester W. Price
Tae-Jong Kim
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tatiana A. Gaidenko
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chester W. Price
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cwprice@ucdavis.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.18.6124-6132.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Model of the σB signal transduction network. (A) Two independent signaling pathways converge on the RsbV anti-anti-σ and the RsbW anti-σ, the direct regulators of σB activity. The energy pathway terminates with the RsbP phosphatase (Energy PP2C), which contains a PAS domain implicated in energy sensing; the environmental pathway terminates with the RsbU phosphatase (Environmental PP2C), which is activated by upstream signaling elements. Phosphorylated RsbV (RsbV-P) is the antagonist form found in unstressed cells. When activated by stress, either RsbP or RsbU can dephosphorylate RsbV-P, allowing it to bind and inactivate the RsbW anti-σ. (B) In the environmental signaling pathway, RsbS and RsbT are paralogs of RsbV and RsbW, respectively. RsbS is the antagonist form in unstressed cells, and RsbRA, RsbRB, RsbRC, and RsbRD are redundant coantagonists that function with RsbS to bind the RsbT kinase in an inactive complex. Following environmental stress, RsbT phosphorylates RsbRA and RsbS, releasing RsbT to bind and activate the RsbU phosphatase. The RsbX feedback phosphatase returns the system to its prestress condition. Phosphorylation of RsbRB, RsbRC, and RsbRD is not shown but is thought to resemble that of RsbRA. (C) RsbR coantagonist proteins share a carboxyl-terminal domain (shaded) with the smaller RsbS antagonist (1, 25). In the RsbR family, this domain contains two conserved threonine (T) residues, and RsbT is known to phosphorylate RsbRA on T171 and T205 in vitro (12). In contrast, RsbS bears an aspartate (D) and a serine (S) at these corresponding positions. Genetic evidence suggests that phosphorylation of S59 is required to relieve RsbS antagonist function (16, 30).

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Identification of the RsbS and RsbRA isoforms separated by IEF. Wild-type and mutant cell extracts were analyzed by IEF, and the RsbS or RsbRA signals were detected with specific antibodies, as described in Materials and Methods. In all panels, gel images are oriented with their alkaline regions uppermost, toward the cathode, and the numbered lines to the right indicate the approximate positions of unmodified, singly modified, and doubly modified isoforms. (A) Lane 1, wild-type strain (PB2) (wt); lane 2, the rsbS deletion mutant (PB422) (ΔS). Wild-type extracts were also used for the λPP assays and were incubated for 18 h at 30°C (lanes 3 to 5). Lane 3, cell extract (CE) alone; lane 4, addition of λ reaction buffer and MnCl2 (+λB); lane 5, further addition of λPP (+λPP). (B) Wild-type extracts are in lanes 1 and 4; mutant extracts are in lanes 2 and 3. Lane 2, strain with the RsbS S59A alteration (PB465); lane 3, RsbS S59D (PB477). (C) Lane 1, the wild-type strain (PB2) (wt); lane 2, the rsbRA deletion mutant (PB427) (ΔRA). Wild-type extracts were also used for the λPP assays shown in lanes 3 to 5, labeled as described for panel A. (D) Wild-type extracts are in lanes 1 and 8, and mutant extracts are in lanes 2 to 7. Lane 2, strain with the RsbRA T171A alteration (PB829); lane 3, RsbRA T171D (PB557); lane 4, RsbRA T205A (PB505); lane 5, RsbRA T205D (PB502); lane 6, RsbRA T171A-T205A (PB556); lane 7, RsbRA T171D-T205D (PB558).

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Isoform balance of RsbS and RsbRA changes after stress. Wild-type (PB2) cells were stressed by either salt or ethanol addition and then rapidly harvested by filtration at the indicated times (minutes). Samples were analyzed by IEF and immunoblotting as described in Materials and Methods. (A and D) Gel images, oriented with their alkaline regions uppermost and with isoform positions indicated on the right. (B and E) Quantification of the digitized images from panels A and D. Note the discontinuity (≈) in the y axis, designating the fraction of phosphorylated RsbS and RsbRA. ▪, RsbS-P/total RsbS; ▴, RsbRA-P/total RsbRA; ○, β-galactosidase activity of a σB-dependent lacZ reporter fusion carried by strain PB198, cultured in parallel with the cells used for the IEF assay. (C and F) RsbS-P/total RsbS (dark grey bars) and RsbRA-P/total RsbRA (light grey bars) found in three independent stress experiments (average ± standard deviation).

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Dependence of RsbS and RsbRA phosphorylation on the RsbT environmental signaling kinase and the T171 residue of RsbRA. Wild-type and mutant cells were stressed by ethanol addition and then rapidly harvested by filtration at the indicated times (minutes). Gel images are oriented with their alkaline regions uppermost and with isoform positions indicated on the right. For both panels A (RsbS) and B (RsbRA), lanes 1 to 3 show extracts from the wild type (strain PB2), lanes 4 to 6 show extracts from the rsbT deletion mutant (PB421), lanes 7 to 9 show extracts from the rsbRAT171A substitution mutant (PB829), and lane 10 shows an additional extract from unstressed wild-type cells.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    New model for environmental stress signaling. The phosphorylation states of the RsbR coantagonist and RsbS antagonist proteins are controlled by the opposing activities of the RsbT kinase and the RsbX feedback phosphatase. In unstressed cells RsbRA is already partially phosphorylated on T171, and from the genetic analysis reported elsewhere (18) we propose that this phosphorylation is required for signaling. Following an environmental stress, RsbS becomes phosphorylated on S59, triggering the release of RsbT and the activation of the RsbU phosphatase. Phosphorylation of RsbRB, RsbRC, and RsbRD is not shown but is presumed to resemble that of RsbRA.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    B. subtilis strains

    StrainGenotypeReference or construction
    PB2 trpC2 168 Marburg strain
    PB198 amyE::ctc-lacZ trpC2 8
    PB421 rsbTΔ1 trpC2pCK1(16) → PB2a
    PB422 rsbSΔ1 trpC2 16
    PB427 rsbRAΔ1 trpC2 2
    PB465 rsbSS59A trpC2 16
    PB477 rsbSS59D Pspac(rsbV+rsbW+sigB+rsbX+) trpC2 16
    PB502 rsbRAT205D trpC2 2
    PB505 rsbRAT205A trpC2 2
    PB556 rsbRAT171A-T205A trpC2 18
    PB557 rsbRAT171D trpC2 12
    PB558 rsbRAT171D-T205D trpC2 12
    PB829 rsbRAT171A trpC2 18
    • ↵ a Arrow indicates transformation of donor plasmid into recipient.

  • TABLE 2.

    Adjacent RsbRA and RsbS ortholog genes in diverse prokaryotic genomes

    OrganismRsbRA orthologaE valuebRsbS orthologaE valueb
    Bacillus subtilis RsbRA1e-149RsbS6e-52
    Listeria monocytogenes NP_4644157e-68NP_4644161e-36
    Nostoc punctiforme ZP_001078521e-32ZP_001078512e-20
    Burkholderia fungorum ZP_000345962e-32ZP_000345972e-19
    Chloroflexus aurantiacus ZP_000180034e-32Nonec
    Pseudomonas fluorescens ZP_000843392e-31ZP_000843384e-16
    Cytophaga hutchinsonii ZP_001171398e-30ZP_001171384e-20
    Xanthomonas campestris NP_6365452e-29NP_6365461e-18
    Streptomyces coelicolor NP_6313781e-27NP_6313772e-16
    Vibrio vulnificus NP_7620592e-26NP_7620601e-09
    Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis NP_6226931e-24NP_6226945e-17
    Chromobacterium violaceum NP_9005482e-23NP_9005491e-07
    • ↵ a For organisms other than B. subtilis, each ortholog is indicated by its accession number in the NCBI Protein Database. Organisms are listed by similarity of their RsbRA orthologs to B. subtilis RsbRA.

    • ↵ b E value for the alignment resulting from a BLASTP search (5) of proteins available in the NCBI Microbial Genomes Database, using the default parameters of the on-site program. Only the most similar ortholog for a given bacterium is shown.

    • ↵ c Gene encoding the most similar C. aurantiacus RsbRA ortholog (ZP_00018003) is flanked by genes for additional RsbRA paralogs, from a total of 18 such genes in the organism. The gene for an RsbS ortholog (ZP_00018452; 5e-17) is not adjacent to any of these RsbRA-like genes.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
In Vivo Phosphorylation of Partner Switching Regulators Correlates with Stress Transmission in the Environmental Signaling Pathway of Bacillus subtilis
Tae-Jong Kim, Tatiana A. Gaidenko, Chester W. Price
Journal of Bacteriology Sep 2004, 186 (18) 6124-6132; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.18.6124-6132.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vivo Phosphorylation of Partner Switching Regulators Correlates with Stress Transmission in the Environmental Signaling Pathway of Bacillus subtilis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
In Vivo Phosphorylation of Partner Switching Regulators Correlates with Stress Transmission in the Environmental Signaling Pathway of Bacillus subtilis
Tae-Jong Kim, Tatiana A. Gaidenko, Chester W. Price
Journal of Bacteriology Sep 2004, 186 (18) 6124-6132; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.18.6124-6132.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacillus subtilis
Bacterial Proteins
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Phosphoproteins
signal transduction

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530