Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Genomics and Proteomics

Genome-Wide Transcriptional Analysis of the Cold Shock Response in Wild-Type and Cold-Sensitive, Quadruple-csp-Deletion Strains of Escherichia coli

Sangita Phadtare, Masayori Inouye
Sangita Phadtare
Department of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: phadtasa@umdnj.edu
Masayori Inouye
Department of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.20.7007-7014.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A DNA microarray-based global transcript profiling of Escherichia coli in response to cold shock showed that in addition to the known cold shock-inducible genes, new genes such as the flagellar operon, those encoding proteins involved in sugar transport and metabolism, and remarkably, genes encoding certain heat shock proteins are induced by cold shock. In the light of strong reduction in metabolic activity of the cell after temperature downshift, the induction of sugar metabolism machinery is unexpected. The deletion of four csps (cspA, cspB, cspG, and cspE) affected cold shock induction of mostly those genes that are transiently induced in the acclimation phase, emphasizing that CspA homologues are essential in the acclimation phase. Relevance of these findings with respect to the known RNA chaperone function of CspA homologues is discussed.

The cold shock response is a physiological response of living cells to temperature downshift (12) and has been studied in detail using Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis as model systems (for a review, see references 5, 21, 26, and 32). When an exponentially growing culture of E. coli is shifted from 37 to 15°C, an acclimation phase (lag period of cell growth) characterized by transient dramatic induction of cold shock proteins against a severe inhibition of general protein synthesis precedes the resumption of growth. Out of the nine CspA homologues of E. coli, only CspA, CspB, CspG, and CspI are cold shock inducible (6, 17, 20, 31). Interestingly, double or triple deletions of genes encoding cold shock-inducible CspA homologues do not result in cold sensitivity. In a triple-deletion strain, the ΔcspA ΔcspB ΔcspG strain, CspE that is normally produced at 37°C is overproduced at low temperatures (33). This observation suggests that the functions of the CspA family members may overlap and they are able to substitute for each other during cold acclimation. Indeed a quadruple-deletion strain (the ΔcspA ΔcspB ΔcspG ΔcspE strain) of E. coli exhibits cold sensitivity at 15°C, which can be complemented by overproduction of any one of the CspA homologues except CspD (33).

In spite of a wealth of knowledge accumulated in recent years, the cold shock response is not fully elucidated. The proteomic approaches that so far have been extremely useful in identification of many cold shock-induced proteins do have certain limitations: (i) not all the proteins can be resolved well on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and (ii) identification of proteins from the gel may sometimes be cumbersome. To overcome these shortcomings, in the present study, we carried out analysis of global cold shock gene expression profiles of an E. coli wild-type and cold-sensitive quadruple-deletion strain. Our main objectives were (i) to identify the E. coli open reading frames that exhibit significant increase or decrease in mRNA abundance caused by the temperature downshift and (ii) to explore the effect of deletion of four csp genes that leads to cold sensitivity. In brief, the E. coli JM83 strain [F−araΔ(lac-proAB) rpsL(Strr)] (35) (considered the wild-type strain in this study) was grown in Luria broth (LB). The cells grown overnight in LB medium at 37°C were diluted into fresh LB medium. Cells were grown at 37°C to exponential phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] of 0.8), and part of the cell culture was harvested and used as a control. Aliquots of the cells were transferred to a prechilled LB medium at 15°C, and the cells were harvested after 1 and 5 h of cold shock. The OD600 did not increase after 1 h of cold shock, while after 5 h of cold shock, it was 1.2. The 37°C controls were of corresponding OD600 values. For studies involving the quadruple-deletion strain, the wild-type and the deletion strain were grown at 37°C and subsequently cold shocked for 1 h as described above. Note that in the studies involving the quadruple-deletion strain, both the wild-type and the deletion cells are cold shocked at 15°C for 1 h and compared with each other. This enables us to directly single out the genes that were differentially expressed as a result of csp deletion upon cold shock. The RNA extraction and hybridization and DNA array analysis were carried out as described previously (24). The cell density of all samples used was the same; thus, the changes seen in the microarray were not substantially influenced by the difference in cell densities. Genes whose expression levels differed by a ratio of at least 4 after cold shock were considered. From replicates, we estimate that the chance random fluctuations giving rise to a fourfold up- or down-modulation is less than 0.14%, corresponding to a confidence interval of 99.86%. Thus, the chosen fourfold cutoff value is rather stringent and the modulation of expression beyond the cutoff is highly statistically significant. In some cases, genes belonging to the same operon or category were considered even if the ratios did not adhere to these specified values. Ratios above 1 indicate induction and below 1 indicate repression. Ratios averaged from three independent of sets of experiments are shown with standard deviation values.

The result of the microarray analysis was confirmed by Northern blot analysis. The genes chosen for these experiments represent the important groups changed by the cold shock treatment, such as cspA and those encoding proteins involved in sugar metabolism, molecular chaperones, and iron metabolism. The deoxyoligonucleotides used for detection of cspA and dps were described previously (22, 24, 34). The deoxyoligonucleotides used for detection of malT (4) (accession number M13585 ), mopB (19), rbsD (3), and fecA (29) correspond to the region from codons 13 to 6 of malT and mopB, 21 to 14 of rbsD, and 13 to 8 of fecA. The Northern blot analysis was carried out as described previously (30). The results are shown in Fig. 1. These results are consistent with the microarray data.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Effect of cold shock on the levels of mRNAs. Total RNA was extracted by the hot phenol method as described in the text, and Northern blot analysis was carried out with deoxyoligonucleotides corresponding to cspA, malT, dps, mopB, rbsD, and fecA. Lanes 1 and 2 in each case except fecA represent mRNAs isolated from control (37°C) and cold-shocked (1 h) wild-type cells, respectively. In the case of fecA, lanes 1 and 2 represent mRNAs isolated from cold-shocked (1 h) wild-type and quadruple-deletion cells, respectively. The positions of the transcripts were determined using as reference ribosomal RNAs. Bands corresponding to 23S and 16S rRNAs were visualized by ethidium bromide staining of the gel.

The reliability of the present data was confirmed by (i) reproducible values obtained in multiple, independent experiments, (ii) induction of many known cold shock-inducible genes, and (iii) confirmation of levels of some of the significantly affected genes by Northern blot analysis. Our data did not show mRNA abundance of certain genes known to be cold shock-inducible, for example, genes belonging to the nusA-pnp operon, such as nusA, infB, rbfA, and pnp. The reason for this is not known at present; however, this observation is similar to that from a recent report by Polissi et al. (27), in which the discrepancy was attributed to differential stability of the 3′ end and the entire mRNA transcripts.

The genes affected by cold shock are grouped as those that (i) are transiently induced immediately following the cold shock in the acclimation phase (Table 1), (ii) show transient repression upon cold shock (Table 2), (iii) show prolonged induction beyond the acclimation phase (Table 3), and (iv) show prolonged repression upon cold shock.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Genes transiently induced upon cold shock

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Genes showing transient repression upon cold shock in the wild-type strain

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Genes showing prolonged induction upon cold shock

Genes transiently induced and repressed in the acclimation phase upon cold shock.

The present analysis showed transient induction of a number of known cold shock-inducible genes, for example, cspA, cspB, cspG, cspI, otsA, otsB, and ppiA (Table 1). Other known genes such as gyrA (twofold), infA (twofold), infC (2.8-fold), and recA (threefold) were also induced. New genes shown by the present analysis to be cold shock-inducible in the acclimation phase include the following: (i) transport or metabolism of sugars (fructose, glucose, glycerol, maltose, mannose, ribose, and xylose) and (ii) molecular chaperones (mopA and mopB, encoding GroEL and GroES, respectively, htpG, and ppiA). Deletion of four csp genes led to repression of cold shock induction of all these genes (Table 1). Although cold shock response is characterized by strong repression of the major metabolic activity of the cell, the present study showed induction of several new genes after the temperature downshift. Transport and metabolism systems for sugars deserve special mention in this aspect. Cold shock caused induction of otsA (trehalose-6-phosphate synthase) and otsB (trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase) (Table 1), consistent with the previously reported possible protective effect of this sugar upon cold shock (14). However, such a protective effect is not known for sugars such as ribose or mannose that were induced in the present system, and this induction could simply be a manifestation of the cell gearing up for the low-temperature-adapted metabolism. It should be noted that recently, cold stress accumulation and protective effect of maltose in plants was reported (16). It is interesting that cold shock induction of mannose and maltose transport systems was prominently repressed in the quadruple deletion that has significantly prolonged (4 h) lag period as opposed to the 1-h lag period of the wild-type strain (33) after the temperature downshift. This suggests that cold shock induction of these genes is indeed relevant for the cold acclimation of the cells.

As the cold shock response of the quadruple-deletion strain was severely affected, many genes repressed in the wild type upon cold shock were further repressed in the deletion strain. In addition to the genes listed in Table 1, the genes repressed in the quadruple-deletion strain included those involved in transport (ATP synthase, DctA protein, DsdX permease, fatty acid transport protein, maltoporin precursor, OmpF, OmpX, thiamine-binding protein precursor, and tryptophan permease) and a number of genes involved in cellular metabolism (especially amino acids and sugars).

On the other hand, a few genes were transiently induced in the quadruple-deletion strain compared with the wild-type strain, and these prominently constitute the genes encoding proteins involved in transport of iron, such as exbD, fecA to fecD, fepC, and fhuA and fhuF (Table 4). It is not clear why deletion of csp genes should result in induction of iron transport. It is noteworthy that these genes were repressed in the wild-type cells upon temperature downshift. In fact, judging from Table 4, a very divergent group of genes was induced by deletion of the four csp genes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Genes induced by cold shock in the quadruple-deletion strain

In addition to the genes listed in Table 2, most of the genes encoding ribosomal L proteins showed transient reduced levels during acclimation phase in the wild-type strain, although in the latter the effect was not severe (approximately two- to threefold) and their synthesis recovered after continued growth at 15°C for 5 h. This result is consistent with cold shock two-dimensional gel electrophoresis data published for E. coli (26).

In addition, the products of a number of genes, such as ybdQ, ycfP, ydaA, ydhO, yeaA, yedU, yeeX, yefI, yfbU, yfiA, yfjL, yggG, ygjR, yhbT, yhjH, yieP, yqeB, yqhD, and yzzQ, increased significantly, although the products have not been assigned any functions. On the other hand, priB, yaeG, yafK, ybiR, ybiT, ycaJ, ycaO, yccA, yceD, yceP, ycfC, ycfV, ycfX, ycgE, ydgR, ydiU, yedA, yedl, yfcA, yfK, yfgL, yfgM, yfiH, yfiR, ygdE, yggN, yhaD, yhaE, yhaF, yhaU, yhbM, yheQ, yhiN, yjgP, yqgE, yqgF, and yrbE were repressed.

Genes showing prolonged induction and repression upon cold shock.

Genes encoding flagellar proteins were induced and maintained at high levels even after 5 h at 15°C in the wild-type strain and were down-regulated in the quadruple-deletion strain. Spermidine acetyltransferase encoded by speG is required to prevent spermidine toxicity at low temperatures in E. coli (18). Our DNA microarray analysis showed a steady increase in speG levels from three- to fivefold at 1 to 5 h after temperature downshift (Table 3). On the other hand, genes such as tas (Tas protein), artP (ArtP protein), those mainly involved in amino acid and nucleotide biosynthesis, such as trpB, and leu, pur, and pyr operon genes were repressed even 5 h after cold shock. All of these showed further down-regulation in the quadruple-deletion strain.

Cold shock induction of genes encoding heat shock proteins.

Protein misfolding was previously not considered a major problem upon cold shock. But increasing numbers of recent reports of a heat shock protein being induced by cold shock even in higher systems suggest that proper folding of proteins as well as refolding of cold-damaged proteins is important after cold shock. However, in most of these cases the heat shock induction of proteins is after prolonged incubation at low temperature (10, 28). On the other hand, in the present study, a number of genes encoding heat shock-inducible proteins and molecular chaperones such as htpG, mopA, mopB, and ppiA (encoding HtpG, GroEL, GroES, and peptidyl-prolyl-cis-trans-isomerase, respectively) showed transient induction immediately following cold shock. ClpB, which is both heat and cold shock-inducible in Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942 (28) was induced 10-fold and maintained at this level even at 5 h after temperature downshift (Table 3). ppiA, encoding peptidyl-prolyl-cis-trans-isomerase, is also reported from Bacillus, is involved in accelerating proline-limited steps in protein folding, and is important in helping protein folding at low temperatures (7, 8). Trigger factor encoded by tig is another interesting chaperone, which is moderately induced 2 to 3 h after cold shock (15). It is not included in Table 1, as it does not fulfill the criteria of the required n-fold increase; however, we did find moderate (1.7-fold) induction of this gene. Previously, it was also shown that when E. coli is grown at 16°C, GroEL expression is reduced (15); however, in that study the cells were grown to an OD600 of 0.5, and then the protein expression was checked by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In the present study, the immediate effect of cold shock is being analyzed (1 h). Both mopA and mopB were induced 9.3- and 8-fold after 1 h and then reduced to a basal level of 1.3- and 0.9-fold, respectively, after 5 h. Thus, our data are consistent with the low level of GroEL observed by these authors after cells reached the OD600 of 0.5 at 16°C. Note that the OD600 increased by 0.4 at 5 h after cold shock in the present study. This suggests that the GroELS system is transiently induced immediately after the temperature downshift, along with the induction of CspA homologues, and is then reduced to a basal level. It should be mentioned that GroEL is induced in E. coli at 37°C by the overexpression of CspC and CspE, although this induction is lesser than its heat shock induction (22). On the same note, the present study showed that deletion of four CspA homologues leads to repression of cold shock induction of mopA and mopB (Table 1). This suggests a possibility that cold shock induction of GroEL may be linked to the higher levels of CspA homologues.

Comparison of cold shock response of E. coli and B. subtilis.

DNA microarray analysis of the cold shock response of B. subtilis has been carried out by two groups (2, 13). Our study showed that there are a number of common genes such as leuBCD (amino acid biosynthesis) and purBCDEFHKLMN (purine biosynthesis) that are affected by cold shock in E. coli and Bacillus spp. Other such examples include topA (DNA topoisomerase I), gltB, arg, and aro genes (amino acid biosynthesis) (Table 2). There are certain genes that are not included in the tables, as their ratios do not fulfill the criteria of the required n-fold difference; however, these are worth mentioning as they are affected by cold shock in Bacillus spp. The genes and the respective n-fold differences are as follows: (i) amino acid biosynthesis, aroF and aroH (0.5 and 0.6, respectively), metC (0.7), and serC (0.6); (ii) tRNA synthetases, aspS (0.6), hisS (0.5), and thrS (0.75); (iii) NAD biosynthesis, nifS (0.7) and nadC (0.7); (iv) ATP synthase, atpA, atpB, atpE, atpF, atpH, and atpI (approximately 0.5); (vi) pyrimidine biosynthesis, pyrC (0.75); (vii) citric acid cycle, sdhC (0.8); and (viii) metabolism, bioA and bioD (0.5 to 0.6) and ptb (2). However, there were also differences between E. coli and Bacillus cold shock response. For example, in the case of Bacillus spp., the ribosomal proteins were induced by cold shock, while in E. coli, these were either repressed or showed no significant change. One of these two analyses in Bacillus showed repression of GroEL 70 min after cold shock (2), while the present study shows induction of the GroELS system in E. coli 1 h after cold shock. This suggests that in spite of common basic principles in the cold shock response of E. coli and Bacillus spp., there are certain distinct differences.

CspA homologues are needed at acclimation phase.

At low temperature, the secondary structures of RNA stabilize, which should slow down (i) transcription elongation and (ii) ribosomal movement on RNA and thus translation. The Csps are transiently and dramatically induced in the acclimation phase upon cold shock. These presumably act as RNA chaperones (1, 9, 11, 23, 25) by destabilizing the secondary structures in RNA and thus facilitating transcription and translation. Increased levels of CspA homologues after cold shock may be important for compensating for higher stability of secondary structures in RNA at low temperatures (11). The RNA chaperone effect of CspA homologues is apparent in the present microarray analysis, as cold shock induction of a number of diverse genes was repressed by deletion of four csp genes. These may be the genes that need help to transcribe and translate efficiently at low temperature, possibly due to stabilization of secondary structures in their mRNAs, and the high level of Csps ensures their effective production. It is noteworthy that, except for the flagellar operon, deletion of four csp genes mainly affected genes that are transiently induced during acclimation phase. This emphasizes the need for the RNA chaperones immediately upon cold shock, and once the cells are acclimated to cold, their presence is no longer required. This is supported by the observations that cold shock induction of Csps is transient and the quadruple-deletion strain shows a prolonged lag period after cold shock. Further studies on the effect of Csps on the transcription and translation of genes, especially those encoding GroELS, maltose, the ribose operon, and flagellar proteins, should prove to be useful in this aspect.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM 19043) to M.I.

We thank Takara Bio Inc. Japan for DNA array chips and help in analysis of the array scans. We also thank Anirvan Sengupta and Ruadhan O'Flanagan for their help in statistical analysis of the data and K. V. Chin for his useful suggestions in the scanning of the DNA arrays.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 February 2004.
    • Accepted 22 July 2004.
  • Copyright © 2004 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bae, W., B. Xia, M. Inouye, and K. Severinov. 2000. Escherichia coli CspA-family RNA chaperones are transcription antiterminators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:7784-7789.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Beckering, C. L., L. Steil, M. H. Weber, U. Volker, and M. A. Marahiel. 2002. Genomewide transcriptional analysis of the cold shock response in Bacillus subtilis.J. Bacteriol.184:6395-6402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Bell, A. W., S. D. Buckel, J. M. Groarke, J. N. Hope, D. H. Kingsley, and M. A. Hermodson. 1986. The nucleotide sequences of the rbsD, rbsA, and rbsC genes of Escherichia coli K12. J. Biol. Chem.261:7652-7658.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Boos, W., and H. Shuman. 1998. Maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.62:204-229.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Ermolenko, D. N., and G. I. Makhatadze. 2002. Bacterial cold-shock proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.59:1902-1913.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Goldstein, J., N. S. Pollitt, and M. Inouye. 1990. Major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87:283-287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Graumann, P., K. Schroder, R. Schmid, and M. A. Marahiel. 1996. Cold shock stress-induced proteins in Bacillus subtilis.J. Bacteriol.178:4611-4619.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Graumann, P. L., and M. A. Marahiel. 1999. Cold shock response in Bacillus subtilis.J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1:203-209.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Graumann, P. L., and M. A. Marahiel. 1998. A superfamily of proteins that contain the cold-shock domain. Trends Biochem. Sci.23:286-290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Hossain, M. M., and H. Nakamoto. 2002. HtpG plays a role in cold acclimation in cyanobacteria. Curr. Microbiol.44:291-296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Jiang, W., Y. Hou, and M. Inouye. 1997. CspA, the major cold-shock protein of Escherichia coli, is an RNA chaperone. J. Biol. Chem.272:196-202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Jones, P. G., R. A. VanBogelen, and F. C. Neidhardt. 1987. Induction of proteins in response to low temperature in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.169:2092-2095.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Kaan, T., G. Homuth, U. Mader, J. Bandow, and T. Schweder. 2002. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the Bacillus subtilis cold-shock response. Microbiology148:3441-3455.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Kandror, O., A. DeLeon, and A. L. Goldberg. 2002. Trehalose synthesis is induced upon exposure of Escherichia coli to cold and is essential for viability at low temperatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99:9727-9732.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Kandror, O., and A. L. Goldberg. 1997. Trigger factor is induced upon cold shock and enhances viability of Escherichia coli at low temperatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94:4978-4981.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Kaplan, F., and C. L. Guy. 2004. Beta-amylase induction and the protective role of maltose during temperature shock. Plant Physiol.135:1674-1684. (First published 9 July 2004; 10.1104/pp.104.040808.)
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Lee, S. J., A. Xie, W. Jiang, J. P. Etchegaray, P. G. Jones, and M. Inouye. 1994. Family of the major cold-shock protein, CspA (CS7.4), of Escherichia coli, whose members show a high sequence similarity with the eukaryotic Y-box binding proteins. Mol. Microbiol.11:833-839.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Limsuwun, K., and P. G. Jones. 2000. Spermidine acetyltransferase is required to prevent spermidine toxicity at low temperatures in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.182:5373-5380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Lindler, L. E. 1994. Nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli groE promoter. Gene146:129-130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Nakashima, K., K. Kanamaru, T. Mizuno, and K. Horikoshi. 1996. A novel member of the cspA family of genes that is induced by cold shock in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.178:2994-2997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Phadtare, S. 2004. Recent developments in bacterial cold-shock response. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol.6:125-136.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Phadtare, S., and M. Inouye. 2001. Role of CspC and CspE in regulation of expression of RpoS and UspA, the stress response proteins in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.183:1205-1214.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Phadtare, S., M. Inouye, and K. Severinov. 2002. The nucleic acid melting activity of Escherichia coli CspE is critical for transcription antitermination and cold acclimation of cells. J. Biol. Chem.277:7239-7245.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Phadtare, S., I. Kato, and M. Inouye. 2002. DNA microarray analysis of the expression profile of Escherichia coli in response to treatment with 4,5-dihydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-one. J. Bacteriol.184:6725-6729.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Phadtare, S., S. Tyagi, M. Inouye, and K. Severinov. 2002. Three amino acids in Escherichia coli CspE surface-exposed aromatic patch are critical for nucleic acid melting activity leading to transcription antitermination and cold acclimation of cells. J. Biol. Chem.277:46706-46711.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Phadtare, S., Yamanaka, K., and M. Inouye. 2000. The cold shock response, p. 33-45. In G. Storz and R. Hengge-Aronis (ed.), Bacterial stress responses. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  27. 27.↵
    Polissi, A., W. De Laurentis, S. Zangrossi, F. Briani, V. Longhi, G. Pesole, and G. Deho. 2003. Changes in Escherichia coli transcriptome during acclimatization at low temperature. Res. Microbiol.154:573-580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Porankiewicz, J., and A. K. Clarke. 1997. Induction of the heat shock protein ClpB affects cold acclimation in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. J. Bacteriol.179:5111-5117.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Pressler, U., H. Staudenmaier, L. Zimmermann, and V. Braun. 1988. Genetics of the iron dicitrate transport system of Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.170:2716-2724.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, vol. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
  31. 31.↵
    Wang, N., K. Yamanaka, and M. Inouye. 1999. CspI, the ninth member of the CspA family of Escherichia coli, is induced upon cold shock. J. Bacteriol.181:1603-1609.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Weber, M. H., and M. A. Marahiel. 2003. Bacterial cold shock responses. Sci. Prog.86:9-75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Xia, B., H. Ke, and M. Inouye. 2001. Acquirement of cold sensitivity by quadruple deletion of the cspA family and its suppression by PNPase S1 domain in Escherichia coli.Mol. Microbiol.40:179-188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Xia, B., H. Ke, W. Jiang, and M. Inouye. 2001. The Cold Box stem-loop proximal to the 5′-end of the Escherichia coli cspA gene stabilizes its mRNA at low temperature. J. Biol. Chem.277:6005-6011.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene33:103-119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Genome-Wide Transcriptional Analysis of the Cold Shock Response in Wild-Type and Cold-Sensitive, Quadruple-csp-Deletion Strains of Escherichia coli
Sangita Phadtare, Masayori Inouye
Journal of Bacteriology Oct 2004, 186 (20) 7007-7014; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.20.7007-7014.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genome-Wide Transcriptional Analysis of the Cold Shock Response in Wild-Type and Cold-Sensitive, Quadruple-csp-Deletion Strains of Escherichia coli
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genome-Wide Transcriptional Analysis of the Cold Shock Response in Wild-Type and Cold-Sensitive, Quadruple-csp-Deletion Strains of Escherichia coli
Sangita Phadtare, Masayori Inouye
Journal of Bacteriology Oct 2004, 186 (20) 7007-7014; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.20.7007-7014.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Genes transiently induced and repressed in the acclimation phase upon cold shock.
    • Genes showing prolonged induction and repression upon cold shock.
    • Cold shock induction of genes encoding heat shock proteins.
    • Comparison of cold shock response of E. coli and B. subtilis.
    • CspA homologues are needed at acclimation phase.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Cold Temperature
Escherichia coli
Genome, Bacterial
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530