Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
PHYSIOLOGY AND METABOLISM

Preferential Reduction of Fe(III) over Fumarate by Geobacter sulfurreducens

Abraham Esteve-Núñez, Cinthia Núñez, Derek R. Lovley
Abraham Esteve-Núñez
1Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: aesteve@microbio.umass.edu
Cinthia Núñez
1Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
2Departamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62251, México
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Derek R. Lovley
1Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2897-2899.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The presence of Fe(III), but not that of Fe(II), resulted in ca. 20-fold-lower levels of mRNA for fumarate reductase, inhibiting fumarate reduction and favoring utilization of fumarate as an electron donor in chemostat cultures of Geobacter sulfurreducens, despite the fact that growth yield with fumarate was 3-fold higher than with Fe(III).

The study of Fe(III) reduction has been greatly facilitated by the finding that microorganisms in the family Geobacteraceae are the predominant Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms in a diversity of subsurface environments (1, 3, 6, 11) and the fact that Geobacteraceae similar to those that predominate in these environments can be recovered in pure culture. Geobacter sulfurreducens, which commonly serves as the model organism for the Geobacteraceae in subsurface environments, can use both Fe(III) and fumarate as an electron acceptor (2). Understanding the relative utilization of Fe(III) and fumarate as electron acceptors could aid in developing strategies to best promote the growth of Geobacter species for bioremediation applications, such as the reductive precipitation of uranium from contaminated groundwater (1). In previously studied microorganisms, the regulation of electron acceptor utilization favors the reduction of the electron acceptor that can yield the most energy to support cell growth (5, 7, 8, 12). However, it is not clear whether the same trend applies to microorganisms in subsurface environments.

Inhibition of fumarate respiration in the presence of Fe(III).

In order to evaluate potential controls on fumarate and Fe(III) respiration, G. sulfurreducens was grown in continuous culture (A. Esteve-Núñez, M. Rothermich, M. Sharma, and D. R. Lovley, submitted for publication) with the electron donor, acetate (5.5 mM), which limited growth at a dilution rate of 0.05 h−1. This culture condition was designed to simulate the most prevalent conditions in anoxic soils and subsurface environments, in which acetate is the key electron donor for Fe(III) reduction (10). When fumarate (30 mM) was provided as the electron acceptor, there was a steady-state accumulation of succinate resulting from fumarate reduction (Fig. 1). The steady-state biomass was 45.5 ± 5 (mean ± standard deviation of results from three replicate experiments) mg of protein per liter. When cultures were grown with the same acetate input, but with 60 mM Fe(III) citrate as the electron acceptor, the culture density was 15.5 ± 3 mg of protein per liter. Thus, fumarate reduction provided significantly more energy to support growth than Fe(III) reduction.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

A steady-state culture of G. sulfurreducens growing at a dilution rate of 0.05 h−1 with fumarate as the terminal electron acceptor was pulsed with 10 mM Fe(III) citrate (arrow). The response of the cell to the pulse was monitored by analyzing the respective respiration products, succinate (filled circles) and Fe(II) (open circles). All the Fe(II) produced was finally washed out of the chemostat as expected in a continuous culture system. Cells were harvested before the Fe(III) pulse, after the Fe(III) pulse (6 h), and when all the Fe(III) was fully reduced to Fe(II) (14 h). RNA was isolated from those cells, and Northern blot hybridization was performed with a specific oligoprobe for frdC (fumarate reductase). The detected transcript corresponds with the 3.3 kb of the frdCAB operon. As a control, parallel cultures were pulsed with the chelating agent citrate, and Northern analysis was performed as described for the Fe(III) citrate pulse.

In order to examine the interaction between fumarate and Fe(III) reduction, Fe(III) citrate (10 mM) was added to steady-state cultures of cells growing with fumarate as the electron acceptor (Fig. 1). There was an immediate decrease in succinate concentration concurrent with an accumulation of Fe(II) resulting from Fe(III) reduction. The inhibition of fumarate reduction was associated with a dramatic decline in levels of mRNA for the fumarate reductase operon, frdCAB (Fig. 1), measured by Northern analysis (the probe was generated with PCR using the primers frdCfor [5′-GTTCGGTATCCAGCTGAG-3′] and frdCrev [5′-CTTTCAGAATGCCGGTGACG-3′]). Six hours after the addition of Fe(III), the mRNA levels for frdCAB were 17-fold lower than in cells not exposed to Fe(III) (Fig. 1). Furthermore, at this time fumarate reductase-specific activity in the membrane fraction of Fe(III)-amended cultures was fourfold lower than in unamended cultures (13 ± 1 versus 52 ± 4 nmol min−1 mg of protein−1). Once the Fe(III) was completely reduced to Fe(II), the level of mRNA for the fumarate reductase genes returned to the level detected prior to the addition of Fe(III), even though there was still a significant quantity of Fe(II) in the culture (Fig. 1). The finding that the expression of the fumarate reductase was down-regulated in the presence of Fe(III), but not Fe(II), represents a novel instance in which discrimination between iron redox states seems essential for regulating processes that might have an impact on the pathway for electron transfer.

In order to determine whether Fe(III) had a similar effect on fumarate respiration over longer periods of time in which G. sulfurreducens would have time to adapt to the simultaneous presence of high quantities of Fe(III) and fumarate, G. sulfurreducens was grown in continuous culture with acetate as the electron donor and the limiting growth substrate, with both fumarate (35 mM) and Fe(III) (70 mM) as potential electron acceptors (Fig. 2). As was observed in the short-term studies, fumarate reduction was inhibited and levels of fumarate reductase mRNA were lower in the presence of Fe(III) and fumarate than in control cultures growing on fumarate alone. The steady-state biomass concentration in the presence of both fumarate and Fe(III) was slightly higher than that with Fe(III) alone but significantly lower than when fumarate was the sole electron acceptor.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

(A) Effect of terminal electron acceptors on the growth yield. Cells of G. sulfurreducens were cultured in chemostats in the presence of fumarate, fumarate and Fe(III), or just Fe(III) as the terminal electron acceptor. The results shown are the means of results from triplicate cultures for each treatment. (B) Effect of the terminal electron acceptor on fumarate reductase (frdCAB) expression. Northern blot hybridizations on isolated RNA were performed with a specific oligoprobe for frdC. fum, fumarate.

During bacterial growth on fumarate, the succinate that is produced from fumarate reduction is not oxidized in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (4), but it is possible that in the presence of Fe(III), small amounts of fumarate were used as an electron donor or carbon source in a pathway in which fumarate was converted to acetyl coenzyme A via malate and pyruvate with the formation of formate (Fig. 3A). In the presence of Fe(III), high concentrations of malate accumulated, and there was an increased rate of formate production (Fig. 3B). The high levels of malate indicated that conversion of malate to pyruvate might be the limiting step in fumarate utilization. Once Fe(III) was depleted and fumarate reduction resumed, malate accumulation and formate production stopped (Fig. 3B).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

(A) Scheme of fumarate transformation by G. sulfurreducens in the presence of Fe(III). Fumarate is transformed into malate when fumarate respiration is inhibited. Malate is subsequently converted to acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) via pyruvate with the release of formate. TCA, tricarboxylic acid; e−, electron. (B) Malate (filled circles) and formate (open triangles) formation after a pulse of 10 mM Fe(III) citrate. The reduction of Fe(III) is plotted as Fe(II) production (open circles).

Implications.

The respiration in G. sulfurreducens is clearly not optimized for maximal growth when high concentrations of fumarate as well as Fe(III) are available. However, the down-regulation of fumarate respiration in the presence of Fe(III) may represent an effective adaptation to conditions found in most subsurface environments. Generally, the scarcity of readily metabolizable organic matter severely limits microbial growth in the subsurface. In contrast, Fe(III) is often the most abundant electron acceptor available for microbial respiration (9). Therefore, in typical anoxic subsurface environments in which Geobacter species predominate, if any fumarate becomes available it may be more beneficial to funnel it toward catabolic reactions rather than to use it as an electron acceptor. Thus, although the regulation of respiration in G. sulfurreducens does not fit the paradigm that the most energetically favorable electron acceptors are reduced first, this finding may represent the most adaptive response to the environmental conditions that Geobacter species typically encounter.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded by the Genomes to Life Program, U.S. Department of Energy (grant DE-FC02-02ER63446). A.E.-N. was the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Secretaría de Estado de Educación y Universidades (Madrid, Spain), cofunded by the European Social Fund. In addition, C.N. was the recipient of a DGAPA/UNAM postdoctoral fellowship.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 23 October 2003.
    • Accepted 16 January 2004.
  • Copyright © 2004 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Anderson, R. T., H. A. Vrionis, I. Ortiz-Bernad, C. T. Resch, P. E. Long, R. Dayvault, K. Karp, S. Marutzky, D. R. Metzler, A. Peacock, D. C. White, M. Lowe, and D. R. Lovley. 2003. Stimulating the in situ activity of Geobacter species to remove uranium from the groundwater of a uranium-contaminated aquifer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69 : 5884-5891.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Caccavo, F., Jr., D. J. Lonergan, D. R. Lovley, M. Davis, J. F. Stolz, and M. J. McInerney. 1994. Geobacter sulfurreducens sp. nov., a hydrogen- and acetate-oxidizing dissimilatory metal-reducing microorganism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60 : 3752-3759.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Coates, J. D., E. J. P. Phillips, D. J. Lonergan, H. Jenter, and D. R. Lovley. 1996. Isolation of Geobacter species from diverse sedimentary environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 : 1531-1536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Galushko, A. S., and B. Schink. 2000. Oxidation of acetate through reactions of the citric acid cycle by Geobacter sulfurreducens in pure culture and in syntrophic coculture Arch. Microbiol. 174 : 314-321.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Gunsalus, R. P. 1992. Control of electron flow in Escherichia coli: coordinated transcription of respiratory pathway genes. J. Bacteriol. 174 : 7069-7074.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Holmes, D. E., K. T. Finneran, R. A., O'Neil, and D. R. Lovley. 2002. Enrichment of members of the family Geobacteraceae associated with stimulation of dissimilatory metal reduction in uranium-contaminated aquifer sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 : 2300-2306.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Jones, H. M., and R. P. Gunsalus. 1987. Regulation of Escherichia coli fumarate reductase (frdABCD) operon expression by respiratory electron acceptors and the fnr gene product. J. Bacteriol. 169 : 3340-3349.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Liu, P. H., S. A. Svoronos, and B. Koopman. 1998. Experimental and modeling study of diauxic lag of Pseudomonas denitrificans switching from oxic to anoxic conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 60 : 649-655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Lovley, D. R. 1991. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. Microbiol. Rev. 55 : 259-287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Lovley, D. R., and F. H. Chapelle. 1995. Deep subsurface microbial processes. Rev. Geophys. 33 : 365-382.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Snoeyenbos-West, O. L., K. P. Nevin, R. T. Anderson, and D. R. Lovley. 2000. Enrichment of Geobacter species in response to simulation of Fe(III) reduction in sandy aquifer sediments. Microb. Ecol. 39 : 153-167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Unden, G. 1998. Transcriptional regulation and energetics of alternative respiratory pathways in facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerget. 1365 : 220-224.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Preferential Reduction of Fe(III) over Fumarate by Geobacter sulfurreducens
Abraham Esteve-Núñez, Cinthia Núñez, Derek R. Lovley
Journal of Bacteriology Apr 2004, 186 (9) 2897-2899; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2897-2899.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preferential Reduction of Fe(III) over Fumarate by Geobacter sulfurreducens
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Preferential Reduction of Fe(III) over Fumarate by Geobacter sulfurreducens
Abraham Esteve-Núñez, Cinthia Núñez, Derek R. Lovley
Journal of Bacteriology Apr 2004, 186 (9) 2897-2899; DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2897-2899.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Inhibition of fumarate respiration in the presence of Fe(III).
    • Implications.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Fumarates
Geobacter
iron

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530