Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PATHOGENS

The BpsIR Quorum-Sensing System of Burkholderia pseudomallei

Yan Song, Chao Xie, Yong-Mei Ong, Yunn-Hwen Gan, Kim-Lee Chua
Yan Song
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chao Xie
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong-Mei Ong
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yunn-Hwen Gan
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim-Lee Chua
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bchckl@nus.edu.sg
DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.2.785-790.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

BpsIR, a LuxIR quorum-sensing homolog, is required for optimal expression of virulence and secretion of exoproducts in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Cell density-dependent expression of bpsI and bpsR, the positive regulation of bpsIR expression by BpsR, and the synthesis of N-octanoyl-homoserine lactone (C8HSL) by BpsI are described in this report.

Quorum sensing regulates many diverse biological functions in gram-negative bacteria, including conjugation (20, 32), antibiotic synthesis, extracellular enzyme and exopolysaccharide production (13, 21), expression of extracellular virulence factors, and biofilm formation (5, 18). In this study, we describe BpsIR, a LuxIR homolog in Burkholderia pseudomallei, a gram-negative soil bacillus and etiologic agent of human and animal melioidosis.

Autoinducer synthesis by BpsIR in B. pseudomallei KHW.

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. KHWbpsI::Km and KHWbpsR::Km insertion mutants were derived from a local virulent isolate, B. pseudomallei KHW, by gene replacement using the suicide vector pJQ200mp18 as described previously (2, 3). The bpsI and bpsR fragments were amplified from B. pseudomallei KHW genomic DNA using the primer pairs BpsIF (5′ATCTGCAGATGCGAACTTTCGTTCATGGC) and BpsIR (5′ATCTGCAGGAAATACCGTTGAATGGTCCA) and BpsRF (5′ATCTGCAGATGGAACTGCGCTGGCAAGA) and BpsRR (5′ATCTGCAGTTACGGCGCGTCGATGAGCC), respectively(Fig. 1). Located on chromosome 2 of B. pseudomallei, bpsIR is highly similar to pmlIR, which was recently described by Valade et al. (29), and the BpsI and BpsR proteins are 75 and 80% identical to B. cepacia CepI and CepR, respectively (29). bpsI and bpsR are divergently transcribed, and the intergenic 742-bp spacer region contained two lux box motifs composed of 20-bp palindromic sequences which matched the consensus lux box in 15 and 13 of 20 positions, respectively (Fig. 1, insert) (10).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Genetic organization of the bpsI-bpsR locus of B. pseudomallei KHW (GenBank accession no. AY373337 ). Gray box arrows denote the divergently transcribed bpsI and bpsR genes; short thin arrows denote the PCR primer positions, while short white box arrows denote putative bpsI and bpsR promoters (P). Triangles indicate the locations where kanamycin resistance cassettes were inserted in the null mutants, KHWbpsI::Km and KHWbpsR::Km. The insertion sites were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing, while the null phenotypes were confirmed by Northern blotting (data not shown). Black rectangles denote the lux boxes, and their similarities with the palindromic lux box consensus sequence are shown in the insert (10). Consensus sequence abbreviations are as follows: N is A, T, C, or G; R is A or G; S is C or G; Y is T or C; and X is N or a gap in the sequence. The length of the bar represents a distance of 200 bp.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

The promoterbpsI-lacZ fusion (pSYI) and the promoterbpsR-lacZ fusion (pSYR), obtained by ligating the putative bpsI and bpsR promoters, respectively, to lacZ on pCYY, were introduced into the wild type and bpsIR mutants to study transcriptional regulation of bpsI and bpsR. Exogenous addition of only 0.125 nM N-octanoyl-homoserine lactone (C8HSL) to KHWbpsI::Km (pSYI) restored the bpsI promoter activity to the wild-type level. The bpsI promoter was, in contrast, 10- and 1,600-fold less sensitive to C10HSL (N-decanoyl-l-homoserine lactone) and C6HSL (N-hexanoyl-l-homoserine lactone), respectively, and was insensitive to C4HSL (N-butyryl-l-homoserine lactone), 3OC6HSL [N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone], 3OC8HSL [N-(3-oxooctanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone], 3OC10HSL [N-(3-oxodecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone], and 3OC12HSL [N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone] tested at concentrations up to 1 μM (data not shown).

Acyl-HSLs, extracted from the spent culture supernatant of Escherichia coli DH5α(pGEM-T-bpsIR) expressing bpsI, were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a C18 reversed-phase column (Agilent Series 1100 Hypersil octyldecyl silane column; 200 by 4.6 mm; particle size, 5 μm). Upon elution at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with an isocratic profile of methanol-water (50:50, vol/vol) for 10 min, followed by a linear gradient of 50 to 90% methanol in water for 15 min, and an isocratic profile over 25 min, the amount of acyl-HSLs in each fraction was quantified by the β-galactosidase activity produced using KHWbpsI::Km (pSYI). BpsI synthesized mainly C8HSL (Fig. 2). The PmlIR system, in comparison, synthesized predominantly C10HSL, but this may be attributed to the different B. pseudomallei strains used (29).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Detection of acyl-HSLs produced by BpsI using HPLC. The culture extract (filled circles) contained acyl-HSL extracted from the supernatant of a stationary-phase culture of E. coli DH5α (pGEM-T-bpsIR) in AB medium (4) supplemented with 0.1 μg of thiamine/ml, 0.3% Casamino Acids, and 20 mM glycerol. Concentrated extract was chromatographed on a C18 reversed-phase HPLC column. Each 2-ml fraction collected was concentrated and assayed for β-galactosidase activity using KHWbpsI::Km (pSYI) as the reporter strain and according to the method described by Miller (15). For the profiles of the synthetic C8HSL (open squares) and C10HSL (open triangles) standards, only fractions 5 to 16 are represented, since the others did not yield any detectable activity.

Cell density-dependent expression and transcriptional regulation of bpsI and bpsR.

Cell density-dependent expression of bpsI was observed in the wild type, but not the bpsI or bpsR mutants, which is a characteristic of quorum-sensing genes (Fig. 3A and B). The addition of 0.125 nM C8HSL to the KHWbpsI::Km (pSYI) culture restored the cell density-dependent expression of bpsI previously absent in the bpsI mutant (Fig. 3A). The low-level expression of bpsI in KHWbpsI::Km suggests the possibility of residual autoinducers produced by other B. pseudomallei LuxIR homologs acting on the bpsI promoter (Fig. 3A and B). Like bpsI, transcription of bpsR was also cell density dependent (Fig. 3C) and was positively regulated by bpsI as well as its own gene product (Fig. 3C and D). Such findings are consistent with a model wherein the product of the BpsI synthase, an acyl-HSL, interacts with the BpsR, an acyl-HSL receptor protein, to activate the transcription of both bpsI and bpsR via interaction with the respective lux box motifs identified in the intergenic region between bpsI and bpsR (Fig. 1).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Cell density-dependent expressions of bpsI and bpsR. Open symbols represent cell densities, while filled symbols represent β-galactosidase activities. Cell densities and β-galactosidase activities of KHW(pSYI) and KHW(pSYR) are represented as open and filled triangles, respectively. Cell density-dependent expression of bpsI was abolished in KHWbpsI::Km(pSYI) (circles, A), and KHWbpsR::Km(pSYI) (circles, B). Addition of exogenous 0.125 nM C8HSL to KHWbpsR::Km(pSYI) did not affect the growth curve (open squares, A) but restored bpsI expression to almost wild-type levels (filled squares, A). KHW did not express any endogenous β-galactosidase activity (data not shown). Cell density-dependent expression of bpsR was also abolished in KHWbpsI::Km(pSYR) (circles, C) and KHWbpsR::Km(pSYR) (circles, D). β-Galactosidase activities were expressed in Miller units. The experiments were performed in triplicate. OD600, optical density at 600 nm.

bpsI and bpsR mutants are partially attenuated in virulence in the Caenorhabditis elegans model.

In the B. pseudomallei-C. elegans coculture assay using synchronized L2-stage worms, twice as many worms survived after 48 h of coculture with KHWbpsI::Km as with KHW and the complemented KHWbpsI::Km mutant (Fig. 4A) (8). Similarly, twice as many worms survived when fed on KHWbpsR::Km as when fed on KHW and the complemented KHWbpsR::Km mutant (Fig. 4B). The partial attenuation in C. elegans killing observed with the bpsI and bpsR mutants may be attributed to the presence of other luxIR homologs which may interact to control virulence in B. pseudomallei as in the cases of Vibrio cholera and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16, 19). Two other luxIR homologs have been identified in the recently sequenced B. pseudomallei K96243 genome. In P. aeruginosa, the quorum-sensing mutants were also not completely avirulent in both mammalian models of infection and pathogen-C. elegans coculture assay (25). The expression of B. pseudomallei virulence is probably multifactorial, and although quorum-sensing genes have significant effects on virulence, many other factors also play important roles in regulating pathogenesis.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Effects of bpsI and bpsR mutations on B. pseudomallei virulence. Both KHWbpsI::Km and KHWbspR::Km were attenuated in virulence in the B. pseudomallei-C. elegans coculture assays. After 48 h of coculture, 79% of the worms fed on KHWbpsI::Km survived, compared to 39 and 46% survival rates for those worms fed on KHW and the complemented KHWbpsI::Km strains, respectively (A). KHWbpsR::Km was also attenuated in virulence with 62% of the worms surviving after 48 h of coculture, compared to 31 and 37% survival rates in the wild-type KHW and complemented KHWbpsR::Km strains, respectively (B). E. coli OP50 was used as a negative control in this assay.

BpsIR is involved in the secretion of some exoproducts.

Previous studies have demonstrated that B. pseudomallei secreted protease, lipase, and phospholipase C (PLC) into the extracellular milieu, but the roles of these in pathogenesis have not been elucidated. Siderophore production in B. pseudomallei KHW was growth phase dependent, with maximal siderophore production occurring in the stationary-phase culture supernatants (data not shown). Both the bpsI and bpsR mutants yielded two- to threefold more siderophores than the wild type (Fig. 5A). Complementation of the mutants by use of the plasmids pUCP28T-bpsI and pUCP28T-bpsR restored the siderophores' levels to those of the wild type (Fig. 5A). Siderophores, which function in the sequestration of iron, are implicated in the virulence of several pathogenic bacteria, including B. cepacia, where the CepIR quorum-sensing system also negatively regulates ornibactin synthesis, but the significance of such a mechanism is also not established (14).

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

(A) Siderophore secretion in B. pseudomallei KHW was negatively regulated by the BpsIR quorum-sensing system. Siderophore activities were assayed in the 24-h-old culture supernatants of B. pseudomallei of KHW, KHWbpsI::Km, KHWbpsI::Km(pUCP28T-bpsI), KHWbpsR::Km, and KHWbpsR::Km(pUCP28T-bpsR) by measuring the differential in readings of optical density at 630 nm (OD630) between the test and the sample blank using the chrome azurol S assay as described in Yang et al. (31). The values shown have been normalized for cell density by expressing them as a ratio of ΔOD630/OD600. Each bar represents the average (± standard deviation) of readings from three independent experiments. (B) PLC secretion by B. pseudomallei KHW is positively regulated by the BpsIR quorum-sensing system. PLC activities were determined in the supernatants of 24-h cultures of B. pseudomallei KHW, KHWbpsI::Km, KHWbpsI::Km(pUCP28T-bpsI), KHWbpsR::Km, and KHWbpsR::Km(pUCP28T-bpsR) by the method described by Kurioka et al. (12). The data presented are the averages (± standard deviations) of the results from three independent experiments.

PLC production in the culture supernatants of B. pseudomallei was also dependent on the growth phase, with maximal production of PLC occurring at the late log phase (data not shown). Unlike siderophore production, PLC production in B. pseudomallei is positively regulated by the BpsIR quorum-sensing system, and the production of PLC in the supernatants of 24-h-old cultures was reduced to half in the bpsI and bpsR mutants compared to that in the wild type (Fig. 5B). The production of PLC was likewise restored to wild-type levels in the trans-complemented KHWbpsI::Km and KHWbpsR::Km mutants (Fig. 5B). The twofold difference between the wild type and the mutants suggests either that the PLC promoter may be indirectly controlled by the BpsIR quorum-sensing system or, alternatively, that the high basal level of PLC expression in the wild type and mutants might be attributable to a second acyl-HSL system which bears upon the PLC promoter. Since PLC is believed to be important for interaction with the phospholipids in eukaryotic cell membranes during infection, the former suggestion would explain how its production is positively regulated by quorum sensing (27, 28).

The secretion of lipase by B. pseudomallei KHW, which was also growth phase dependent, was unaffected in the bpsIR mutants (data not shown). Likewise, protease secretion in B. pseudomallei KHW, as detected by a zone of clearance around the colonies on dialyzed brain heart infusion agar supplemented with 1.5% skim milk (26), was also unaffected by the bpsIR mutations (data not shown). It is also unclear if protease is a virulence determinant in B. pseudomallei, since there was no correlation between virulence and the level of exoproteolytic activity when B. pseudomallei was injected into mice via the intraperitoneal route (9). Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms by which BpsIR regulates the production of siderophores and phospholipase C in B. pseudomallei.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 March 2004.
    • Accepted 29 September 2004.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Casadaban, M. J., J. Chou, and S. N. Cohen. 1980. In vitro gene fusions that join an enzymatically active beta-galactosidase segment to amino-terminal fragments of exogenous proteins: Escherichia coli plasmid vectors for the detection and cloning of translational initiation signals. J. Bacteriol.143:971-980.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Chan, Y. Y., T. M. Tan, Y. M. Ong, and K. L. Chua. 2004. BpeAB-OprB, a multidrug efflux pump in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48:1128-1135.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Chua, K. L., Y. Y. Chan, and Y. H. Gan. 2003. Flagella are virulence determinants of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infect. Immun.71:1622-1629.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Clark, D., and O. Maaloe. 1967. DNA replication and the division cycle in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol.23:99-112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Davies, D. G., M. R. Parsek, J. P. Pearson, B. H. Iglewski, J. W. Costerton, and E. P. Greenberg. 1998. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science280:295-298.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.
    de Lorenzo, V., M. Herrero, U. Jakubzik, and K. N. Timmis. 1990. Mini-Tn5 transposon derivatives for insertion mutagenesis, promoter probing, and chromosomal insertion of cloned DNA in gram-negative eubacteria. J. Bacteriol.172:6568-6572.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    de Lorenzo, V., and K. N. Timmis. 1994. Analysis and construction of stable phenotypes in gram-negative bacteria with Tn5- and Tn10-derived minitransposons. Methods Enzymol.235:386-405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Gan, Y. H., K. L. Chua, H. H. Chua, B. Liu, C. S. Hii, H. L. Chong, and P. Tan. 2002. Characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei infection and identification of novel virulence factors using a Caenorhabditis elegans host system. Mol. Microbiol.44:1185-1197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Gauthier, Y. P., F. M. Thibault, J. C. Paucod, and D. R. Vidal. 2000. Protease production by Burkholderia pseudomallei and virulence in mice. Acta Trop.74:215-220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Gray, K. M., L. Passador, B. H. Iglewski, and E. P. Greenberg. 1994. Interchangeability and specificity of components from the quorum-sensing regulatory systems of Vibrio fischeri and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol.176:3076-3080.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.
    Hoang, T. T., A. J. Kutchma, A. Becher, and H. P. Schweizer. 2000. Integration-proficient plasmids for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: site-specific integration and use for engineering of reporter and expression strains. Plasmid43:59-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Kurioka, S., and M. Matsuda. 1976. Phospholipase C assay using p-nitrophenylphosphoryl-choline together with sorbitol and its application to studying the metal and detergent requirement of the enzyme. Anal. Biochem.75:281-289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Lewenza, S., B. Conway, E. P. Greenberg, and P. A. Sokol. 1999. Quorum sensing in Burkholderia cepacia: identification of the LuxRI homologs CepRI. J. Bacteriol.181:748-756.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Lewenza, S., and P. A. Sokol. 2001. Regulation of ornibactin biosynthesis and N-acyl-l-homoserine lactone production by CepR in Burkholderia cepacia. J. Bacteriol.183:2212-2218.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  16. 16.↵
    Miller, M. B., K. Skorupski, D. H. Lenz, R. K. Taylor, and B. L. Bassler. 2002. Parallel quorum sensing systems converge to regulate virulence in Vibrio cholerae. Cell110:303-314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.
    Miller, V. L., and J. J. Mekalanos. 1988. A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae requires toxR. J. Bacteriol.170:2575-2583.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Passador, L., J. M. Cook, M. J. Gambello, L. Rust, and B. H. Iglewski. 1993. Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes requires cell-to-cell communication. Science260:1127-1130.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Pearson, J. P., M. Feldman, B. H. Iglewski, and A. Prince. 2000. Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell-to-cell signaling is required for virulence in a model of acute pulmonary infection. Infect. Immun.68:4331-4334.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Piper, K. R., S. Beck von Bodman, and S. K. Farrand. 1993. Conjugation factor of Agrobacterium tumefaciens regulates Ti plasmid transfer by autoinduction. Nature362:448-450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Pirhonen, M., D. Flego, R. Heikinheimo, and E. T. Palva. 1993. A small diffusible signal molecule is responsible for the global control of virulence and exoenzyme production in the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora. EMBO J.12:2467-2476.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.
    Quandt, J., and M. F. Hynes. 1993. Versatile suicide vectors which allow direct selection for gene replacement in gram-negative bacteria. Gene127:15-21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  24. 24.
    Simon, R., U. Priefer, and A. Puhler. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Bio/Technology1:784-791.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Smith, R. S., and B. H. Iglewski. 2003. P. aeruginosa quorum-sensing systems and virulence. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.6:56-60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Sokol, P. A., D. E. Ohman, and B. H. Iglewski. 1979. A more sensitive plate assay for detection of protease production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Microbiol.9:538-540.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Stonehouse, M. J., A. Cota-Gomez, S. K. Parker, W. E. Martin, J. A. Hankin, R. C. Murphy, W. Chen, K. B. Lim, M. Hackett, A. I. Vasil, and M. L. Vasil. 2002. A novel class of microbial phosphocholine-specific phospholipases C. Mol. Microbiol.46:661-676.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Titball, R. W. 1998. Bacterial phospholipases. Symp. Ser. Soc. Appl. Microbiol.27:127S-137S.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Valade, E., F. M. Thibault, Y. P. Gauthier, M. Palencia, M. Y. Popoff, and D. R. Vidal. 2004. The PmlI-PmlR quorum-sensing system in Burkholderia pseudomallei plays a key role in virulence and modulates production of the MprA protease. J. Bacteriol.186:2288-2294.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.
    West, S. E., H. P. Schweizer, C. Dall, A. K. Sample, and L. J. Runyen-Janecky. 1994. Construction of improved Escherichia-Pseudomonas shuttle vectors derived from pUC18/19 and sequence of the region required for their replication in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene148:81-86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Yang, H. M., W. Chaowagul, and P. A. Sokol. 1991. Siderophore production by Pseudomonas pseudomallei. Infect. Immun.59:776-780.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Zhang, L., P. J. Murphy, A. Kerr, and M. E. Tate. 1993. Agrobacterium conjugation and gene regulation by N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones. Nature362:446-448.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The BpsIR Quorum-Sensing System of Burkholderia pseudomallei
Yan Song, Chao Xie, Yong-Mei Ong, Yunn-Hwen Gan, Kim-Lee Chua
Journal of Bacteriology Jan 2005, 187 (2) 785-790; DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.2.785-790.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The BpsIR Quorum-Sensing System of Burkholderia pseudomallei
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The BpsIR Quorum-Sensing System of Burkholderia pseudomallei
Yan Song, Chao Xie, Yong-Mei Ong, Yunn-Hwen Gan, Kim-Lee Chua
Journal of Bacteriology Jan 2005, 187 (2) 785-790; DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.2.785-790.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Autoinducer synthesis by BpsIR in B. pseudomallei KHW.
    • Cell density-dependent expression and transcriptional regulation of bpsI and bpsR.
    • bpsI and bpsR mutants are partially attenuated in virulence in the Caenorhabditis elegans model.
    • BpsIR is involved in the secretion of some exoproducts.
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Burkholderia pseudomallei
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Homoserine
Repressor Proteins
signal transduction
Trans-Activators
transcription factors

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530