Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Cell Biology

FpvA-Mediated Ferric Pyoverdine Uptake in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Identification of Aromatic Residues in FpvA Implicated in Ferric Pyoverdine Binding and Transport

Jiang-Sheng Shen, Valérie Geoffroy, Shadi Neshat, Zongchao Jia, Allison Meldrum, Jean-Marie Meyer, Keith Poole
Jiang-Sheng Shen
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valérie Geoffroy
2Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Génétique, Université Louis-Pasteur, CNRS FRE 2326, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shadi Neshat
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zongchao Jia
3Department of Biochemistry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allison Meldrum
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Marie Meyer
2Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Génétique, Université Louis-Pasteur, CNRS FRE 2326, Strasbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith Poole
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: poolek@post.queensu.ca
DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.24.8511-8515.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A number of aromatic residues were seen to cluster in the upper portion of the three-dimensional structure of the FpvA ferric pyoverdine receptor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, reminiscent of the aromatic binding pocket for ferrichrome in the FhuA receptor of Escherichia coli. Alanine substitutions in three of these, W362, W391, and F795, markedly compromised ferric pyoverdine binding and transport, consistent with a role of FpvA in ferric pyoverdine recognition.

Iron acquisition by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is often facilitated by high-affinity iron chelating molecules, termed siderophores, that, together with cell surface receptors specific for the iron-siderophore complexes, serve to provide the organism with iron under nutritionally dilute conditions (20). A major siderophore produced by P. aeruginosa and, indeed, all fluorescent pseudomonads is pyoverdine, a mixed catecholate-hydroxamate siderophore characterized by a conserved dihydroxyquinoline chromophore to which is attached a peptide chain of variable length and composition (3, 18). This variation likely explains the noted specificity vis-à-vis pyoverdine utilization by Pseudomonas spp., where, for example, a given strain will often use only its own pyoverdine but not that of other Pseudomonas strains (4, 13), and suggests that the peptide moiety is involved in receptor recognition and binding. Some P. aeruginosa strains can also use so-called heterologous pyoverdines (i.e., those produced by other pseudomonads) of different chemical structure, though these often exhibit some peptide feature or partial amino acid sequence in common with the endogenous siderophore (1, 19, 28), again highlighting the importance of the peptide for receptor recognition. Three major, structurally distinct pyoverdines have been described for P. aeruginosa, dubbed types I, II, and III (17). Outer membrane receptors for all three have been described (FpvA [or FpvAI], FpvAII, and FpvAIII), and their genes have been cloned (7, 21). A second receptor for type I pyoverdine, FpvB, has also recently been reported for P. aeruginosa (10). The FpvA receptor, like other ferric siderophore receptors (12), has been shown to bind both iron-free and iron-bound siderophores (25-27), although there appear to be differences in the ways that iron-free and iron-bound pyoverdines interact with FpvA (5, 9). Still, both compete with a common or at least overlapping site on FpvA (5), and iron-bound pyoverdine effectively displaces iron-free pyoverdine on the receptor during transport (24, 25). Recently, the FpvA crystal structure with bound pyoverdine was solved at 3.6 Å (6), revealing a cluster of aromatic residues reminiscent of the FhuA ferrichrome receptor of Escherichia coli, where such residues were implicated in ferrichrome binding (8). We report here a study that confirms the importance of three residues in this cluster (W362, W391, and F795) in ferric pyoverdine binding and transport by FpvA.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. A pyoverdine-deficient ΔpvdD derivative of K1120 (an aminoglycoside-susceptible, aphA derivative of wild-type P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain K767) was constructed using plasmid pSUP202::Δpvd. Briefly, pSUP202::Δpvd was mobilized from E. coli S17-1 (29) into K1120 via conjugal transfer as described previously (30), and K1120 transconjugants carrying the plasmid in the chromosome were selected on 50 μg/ml tetracycline and 0.5 μg/ml imipenem (the latter to counterselect E. coli S17-1). To select for spontaneous loss of pSUP202 sequences, as a first step in selecting for strains in which the wild-type pvdD gene has been replaced by the deletion, three tetracycline- and imipenem-resistant colonies were individually inoculated into 5 ml Luria broth (L broth; Difco) and cultured overnight. These cultures were diluted 1:999 into fresh L broth (5 ml) and again cultured overnight. This was repeated daily over 8 days, after which dilutions of the cultures (10−5 to 10−7) were plated onto L agar and colonies appearing after overnight incubation (800 were tested) were screened for loss of tetracycline resistance (on L agar supplemented with 100 μg/ml tetracycline). These tetracycline-sensitive, pSUP202-free isolates were then screened for an absence of fluorescence on iron-deficient succinate minimal agar plates, and one of these, K1203, was retained for further study. Iron-deficient succinate minimal medium has been described previously (16) and was supplemented with 0.05 % (wt/vol) Casamino Acids (CA). Cell envelopes were prepared as described previously (31) from P. aeruginosa strains cultured overnight in CA-supplemented iron-deficient succinate minimal medium and subjected to sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10% [wt/vol] acrylamide) (31) and Western immunoblotting (32) with an FpvA-specific rabbit polyclonal antiserum (21). To assess 59Fe-pyoverdine binding and transport, P. aeruginosa cells were cultured for 24 h at 30°C in CA-supplemented iron-deficient succinate minimal medium, harvested by centrifugation (5 min at 13,000 rpm) in a microfuge, and washed with an equal volume of the same medium before being resuspended in one-half volume of this medium. One milliliter of washed cells was incubated on ice (binding assay) or with shaking at 37°C (transport assay) for 20 min with 50 μl 59Fe-pyoverdine (14.5 nmol 59FeCl3 [specific activity, 536 MBq/mg Fe; Amersham] diluted in 50 μl distilled H2O containing 1 mM pyoverdine, incubated for 5 min at room temperature, and made up to 1 ml in CA-supplemented iron-deficient minimal medium) and subsequently harvested by centrifugation, washed twice with an equal volume of CA-supplemented iron-deficient succinate minimal medium, and resuspended in 1 ml of the same medium. 59Fe bound to or transported by bacterial cells was measured with a scintillation counter.

Both a three-dimensional model (not shown) of FpvA based on the crystal structure of ferrichrome-bound FhuA (8) and the recently published FpvA crystal structure (6) reveal a cluster of aromatic residues (i.e., W362, F366, F369, W391, Y790, F795, Y796, and Y801) in the upper portion of the β-barrel region of FpvA, above the plane of the outer membrane (Fig. 1A). This is reminiscent of FhuA, where aromatic residues in the β-barrel of this receptor contribute to a high-affinity ferrichrome-binding site and an external aromatic pocket implicated in extracting ferrichrome from the external medium (8). However, only one of these, Y796, was implicated in pyoverdine binding in the FpvA crystal structure (6). Still, given possible differences in pyoverdine and ferric pyoverdine binding to FpvA (5, 9), these aromatic residues may be involved in binding ferric pyoverdine and not pyoverdine. Consistent with this, the above-highlighted aromatic cluster in FpvA was identified based on similarities to a cluster in FhuA implicated in binding that receptor's ferrated ligand, ferrichrome. To assess the involvement of these aromatic residues in FpvA function, then, alanine (and, in one instance, tyrosine) substitutions were engineered at each site and the impact on FpvA production and ferric pyoverdine binding and transport by P. aeruginosa expressing the mutant FpvA proteins was assessed. To engineer these substitutions, site-directed mutagenesis of fpvA on plasmid mini-CTX1 derivative pCBS2 was carried out using PCR with mutagenic primers, generally as described previously (23) (primer sequences and PCR parameters are available on request). Plasmid mini-CTX1 derivatives carrying wild-type or mutated fpvA were mobilized from E. coli DH5α (2) into the ΔfpvA ΔpvdD P. aeruginosa strain K2333 by using a previously described triparental mating procedure (32), with transconjugants carrying these plasmids in the chromosome (at the phage D113 attB site) selected on 70 μg/ml tetracycline and 25 μg/ml chloramphenicol, the latter to counterselect E. coli. The mini-CTX1 backbone was then excised from the chromosome, leaving behind the wild-type or mutant fpvA genes (i.e., producing FpvA with W362A, F366Y, F369A, W391A, Y790A, F795A, Y796A, or Y801A substitutions), by using the pFLP2-encoded Flp recombinase as described previously (11).

None of the substitutions adversely impacted FpvA production (Fig. 1C), although substitutions at W362 in particular and W391 and F795 to a substantial degree compromised ferric pyoverdine binding and transport (Table 2) (the Y790A substitution was not obtained). In a previous mutagenesis study, a peptide (18-mer) insertion at residue Y394 in FpvA (Y350 in that study, where residue numbering was based on the mature protein) also compromised FpvA-mediated ferric pyoverdine binding and transport (15), confirming the significance of this region (i.e., near W391) of the receptor in ferric pyoverdine recognition. Similarly, a peptide (8-mer) insertion at the G361 residue (G318 in the mature protein) adjacent to W362 was recently shown to obviate pyoverdine-mediated iron uptake (14). Interestingly, while residues W362, W391, and F795 were somewhat near the FpvA-bound pyoverdine in the crystal structure (W362, 3.07 Å; W391, 6.65, Å; F795, 3.97 Å) (Fig. 1B), they were not deemed sufficiently close to be implicated in pyoverdine binding (6). Still, it is interesting to note that W362 and W391, identified here as important for ferric pyoverdine binding, were implicated (6) as two of three tryptophan residues of FpvA responsible for fluorescence energy transfer (FRET) with the pyoverdine chromophore in earlier studies of FpvA-pyoverdine binding (25, 27). Moreover, these tryptophans also appear (6) to contribute to FRET in in vitro-reconstituted FpvA complexed with metal (i.e. gallium)-substituted pyoverdine (iron-bound pyoverdine is not fluorescent and, so, cannot be used in FRET assays) (9). Clearly, then, and in contrast to predictions based on the pyoverdine-FpvA crystal structure, W362 and W391 are important for ferric pyoverdine binding (and transport), suggesting that while pyoverdine and ferric pyoverdine may well bind to similar regions of the FpvA receptor (5), the specific details of binding differ and some differences exist with respect to residues involved in pyoverdine versus ferric pyoverdine binding. In further agreement with this, Y796 but not F795 was deemed sufficiently close to pyoverdine in the pyoverdine-bound FpvA structure to be a candidate residue for siderophore binding (6) and yet alanine substitutions at F795 but not Y796 compromised ferric pyoverdine binding and transport (Table 2). Thus, the pyoverdine-bound FpvA structure may not be particularly instructive with regard to the structural details of ferric pyoverdine binding or the identity of residues important for this binding.

Given the expected involvement of aromatic residues of FpvA in binding of the pyoverdine chromophore, it would be reasonable to assume that W362, W391, and F795 function in recognition of the dihydroxyquinoline moiety of iron-bound pyoverdine. Consistent with this, W391 is highly conserved in receptors for other pyoverdines (tryptophan in FpvAIII and FpvB and tyrosine in FpvAII) which, while differing in their peptide tails, share a conserved chromophore structure (3). Similarly, the conservation of an aromatic residue at positions equivalent to F795 in most of these other ferric pyoverdine receptors (phenylalanine in FpvB and tyrosine in FpvAIII) is also consistent with F795 of FpvA contributing to the recognition of the chromophore moiety of the bound ferric pyoverdine. Intriguingly, however, W362 (or any aromatic residue) is absent in receptors for type II and type III pyoverdines but is conserved in a second type I pyoverdine receptor broadly distributed in P. aeruginosa, FpvB (10). As such, this residue may be important for type I specificity in FpvA and explain, in part, the ability of FpvB to accommodate type I pyoverdine.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Identification of aromatic residues in FpvA implicated in ferric pyoverdine binding and transport (A and B) and expression of FpvA proteins mutated in these residues (C). (A) Crystal structure of FpvA at 3.6 Å, taken from reference 6 (PDB code 1XKH), highlighting (in spacefill to assist visualization) the aromatic residues assessed for roles in ferric pyoverdine binding and transport. Top panel, side view; bottom panel, top view. (B) Crystal structure of FpvA, highlighting the aromatic residues confirmed to be involved in ferric pyoverdine binding and transport. The position of bound pyoverdine (Pvd) in the structure is also highlighted. Residues and pyoverdine are shown in spacefill to assist visualization. (C) Expression of FpvA proteins mutated at aromatic residues implicated in ferric pyoverdine binding and transport. Strains were cultured overnight in iron-deficient succinate minimal medium, and cell envelopes were prepared and immunoblotted using an FpvA-specific antiserum. Lane 1, K1203 (wild-type FpvA). Lanes 2 through 10, P. aeruginosa K2333 (K1203 ΔfpvA) expressing no FpvA (lane 2), wild-type FpvA (lane 3), FpvAW362A (lane 4), FpvAF366Y (lane 5), FpvAF369A (lane 6), FpvAW391A (lane 7), FpvAF795A (lane 8), FpvAY796A (lane 9), and FpvAY801A (lane 10).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Pyoverdine-mediated iron binding and transport by P. aeruginosa expressing wild-type and mutant FpvA receptorsa

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by operating grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to K.P. and Z.J.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 27 July 2005.
    • Accepted 19 September 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Amann, C., K. Taraz, H. Budzikiewicz, and J. M. Meyer. 2000. The siderophores of Pseudomonas fluorescens 18.1 and the importance of cyclopeptidic substructures for the recognition at the cell surface. Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C55:671-680.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1992. Short protocols in molecular biology, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
  3. 3.↵
    Budzikiewicz, H. 1997. Siderophores of fluorescent pseudomonads. Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C52:713-720.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Buyer, J. S., and J. Leong. 1986. Iron transport-mediated antagonism between plant growth-promoting and plant-deleterious Pseudomonas strains. J. Biol. Chem.261:791-794.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Clément, E., P. J. Mesini, F. Pattus, and I. J. Schalk. 2004. The binding mechanism of pyoverdin with the outer membrane receptor FpvA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is dependent on its iron-loaded status. Biochemistry43:7954-7965.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Cobessi, D., H. Celia, N. Folschweiller, I. J. Schalk, M. A. Abdallah, and F. Pattus. 2005. The crystal structure of the pyoverdine outer membrane receptor FpvA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 3.6 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol.347:121-134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    De Chial, M., B. Ghysels, S. A. Beatson, V. Geoffroy, J. M. Meyer, T. Pattery, C. Baysse, P. Chablain, Y. N. Parsons, C. Winstanley, S. J. Cordwell, and P. Cornelis. 2003. Identification of type II and type III pyoverdine receptors from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology149:821-831.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Ferguson, A. D., E. Hofmann, J. W. Coulton, K. Deiderichs, and W. Welte. 1998. Siderophore-mediated iron transport: crystal structure of FhuA with bound lipopolysaccharide. Science282:2215-2220.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Folschweiller, N., J. Gallay, M. Vincent, M. A. Abdallah, F. Pattus, and I. J. Schalk. 2002. The interaction between pyoverdin and its outer membrane receptor in Pseudomonas aeruginosa leads to different conformers: a time-resolved fluorescence study. Biochemistry41:14591-14601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Ghysels, B., B. T. Dieu, S. A. Beatson, J. P. Pirnay, U. A. Ochsner, M. L. Vasil, and P. Cornelis. 2004. FpvB, an alternative type I ferripyoverdine receptor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology150:1671-1680.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Hoang, T. T., A. J. Kutchma, A. Becher, and H. P. Schweizer. 2000. Integration- proficient plasmids for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: site-specific integration and use for engineering of reporter and expression strains. Plasmid43:59-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Hoegy, F., H. Celia, G. L. Mislin, M. Vincent, J. Gallay, and I. J. Schalk. 2005. Binding of iron-free siderophore, a common feature of siderophore outer membrane transporters of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem.280:20222-20230.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Hohnadel, D. and J.-M. Meyer. 1988. Specificity of pyoverdine-mediated iron uptake among fluorescent Pseudomonas strains. J. Bacteriol.170:4865-4873.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    James, H. E., P. A. Beare, L. W. Martin, and I. L. Lamont. 2005. Mutational analysis of a bifunctional ferrisiderophore receptor and signal-transducing protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol.187:4514-4520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.
    Kilburn, L., K. Poole, J.-M. Meyer, and S. Neshat. 1998. Insertion mutagenesis of the ferric pyoverdine receptor FpvA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: identification of permissive sites and a region important for ligand binding. J. Bacteriol.180:6753-6756.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Meyer, J.-M., and M. A. Abdallah. 1978. The fluorescent pigment of Pseudomonas fluorescens: biosynthesis, purification and physiochemical properties. J. Gen. Microbiol.107:319-328.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Meyer, J.-M., A. Stintzi, D. De Vos, P. Cornelis, R. Tappe, K. Taraz, and H. Budzikiewicz. 1997. Use of siderophores to type pseudomonads: the three Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyoverdine systems. Microbiology143:35-43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Meyer, J. M. 2000. Pyoverdines: pigments, siderophores and potential taxonomic markers of fluorescent Pseudomonas species. Arch. Microbiol.174:135-142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Meyer, J. M., A. Stintzi, and K. Poole. 1999. The ferripyoverdine receptor FpvA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 recognizes the ferripyoverdines ofPseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC 13525. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.170:145-150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Poole, K. and G. A. McKay. 2003. Iron acquisition and its control in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: many roads lead to Rome. Front. Biosci.8:d661-d686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Poole, K., S. Neshat, K. Krebes, and D. E. Heinrichs. 1993. Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of the ferripyoverdine receptor gene fpvA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol.175:4597-4604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.
    Rédly, A., and K. Poole. 2003. Pyoverdine-mediated regulation of FpvA synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: involvement of a probable extracytoplasmic-function sigma factor, FpvI. J. Bacteriol.185:1261-1265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Rédly, G. A., and K. Poole. 2005. FpvIR control of fpvA ferric pyoverdine receptor gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: demonstration of an interaction between FpvI and FpvR and the identification of mutations in each compromising this interaction. J. Bacteriol.187:5648-5657.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Schalk, I. J., M. A. Abdallah, and F. Pattus. 2002. Recycling of pyoverdin on the FpvA receptor after ferric pyoverdin uptake and dissociation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochemistry41:1663-1671.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Schalk, I. J., C. Hennard, C. Dugave, K. Poole, M. A. Abdallah, and F. Pattus. 2001. Iron-free pyoverdin binds to its outer membrane receptor FpvA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a new mechanism for membrane iron transport. Mol. Microbiol.39:351-361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.
    Schalk, I. J., M. A. Abdallah, and F. Pattus. 2002. A new mechanism for membrane iron transport in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochem. Soc. Trans.30:702-705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Schalk, I. J., P. Kyslik, D. Prome, A. van Dorsselaer, K. Poole, M. A. Abdallah, and F. Pattus. 1999. Copurification of the FpvA ferric pyoverdin receptor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with its iron-free ligand: implications for siderophore- mediated iron transport. Biochemistry38:9357-9365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Schlegel, K., R. Fuchs, M. Schafer, K. Taraz, H. Budzikiewicz, V. Geoffroy, and J. M. Meyer. 2001. The pyoverdins of Pseudomonas sp. 96-312 and 96-318. Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C56:680-686.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Simon, R., U. Priefer, and A. Puehler. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram-negative bacteria. Biotechnology1:784-791.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    Sobel, M. L., G. A. McKay, and K. Poole. 2003. Contribution of the MexXY multidrug transporter to aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:3202-3207.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Srikumar, R., T. Kon, N. Gotoh, and K. Poole. 1998. Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa multidrug efflux pumps MexA-MexB-OprM and MexC- MexD-OprJ in a multidrug-sensitive Escherichia coli strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:65-71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Zhao, Q., X.-Z. Li, A. Mistry, R. Srikumar, L. Zhang, O. Lomovskaya, and K. Poole. 1998. Influence of the TonB energy-coupling protein on efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:2225-2231.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
FpvA-Mediated Ferric Pyoverdine Uptake in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Identification of Aromatic Residues in FpvA Implicated in Ferric Pyoverdine Binding and Transport
Jiang-Sheng Shen, Valérie Geoffroy, Shadi Neshat, Zongchao Jia, Allison Meldrum, Jean-Marie Meyer, Keith Poole
Journal of Bacteriology Nov 2005, 187 (24) 8511-8515; DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.24.8511-8515.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FpvA-Mediated Ferric Pyoverdine Uptake in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Identification of Aromatic Residues in FpvA Implicated in Ferric Pyoverdine Binding and Transport
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
FpvA-Mediated Ferric Pyoverdine Uptake in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Identification of Aromatic Residues in FpvA Implicated in Ferric Pyoverdine Binding and Transport
Jiang-Sheng Shen, Valérie Geoffroy, Shadi Neshat, Zongchao Jia, Allison Meldrum, Jean-Marie Meyer, Keith Poole
Journal of Bacteriology Nov 2005, 187 (24) 8511-8515; DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.24.8511-8515.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins
DNA Mutational Analysis
Oligopeptides
Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530