Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Regulation of Carbon and Nitrogen Utilization by CbrAB and NtrBC Two-Component Systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Wei Li, Chung-Dar Lu
Wei Li
Department of Biology, Georgia State University, 24 Peachtree Center Ave., Atlanta, Georgia 30303
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chung-Dar Lu
Department of Biology, Georgia State University, 24 Peachtree Center Ave., Atlanta, Georgia 30303
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: biocdl@panther.gsu.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00432-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The global effect of the CbrAB and NtrBC two-component systems on the control of carbon and nitrogen utilization in Pseudomonas aeruginosa was characterized by phenotype microarray analyses with single and double mutants and the isogenic parent strain. The tested compounds were clustered based on the growth phenotypes of these strains, and the results clearly demonstrated the pivotal roles of CbrAB and NtrBC in carbon and nitrogen utilization, respectively. Growth of the cbrAB deletion mutant on arginine, histidine, and polyamines used as the sole carbon source was abolished, while growth on the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates was sustained. In this study, suppressors of the cbr mutant were selected from minimal medium containing l-arginine as the sole carbon and nitrogen source. These mutants fell into two groups according to the ability to utilize histidine. The genomic library of a histidine-positive suppressor mutant was constructed, and the corresponding suppressor gene was identified by complementation as an ntrB allele. Similar results were obtained from four additional suppressor mutants, and point mutations of these ntrB alleles resulting in the following changes in residues were identified, with implications for reduced phosphatase activities: L126W, D227A, P228L, and S229I. The Ntr systems of these ntrB mutants became constitutively active, as revealed by the activity profiles of glutamate dehydrogenase, glutamate synthase, and glutamine synthetase. As a result, these mutants not only regain the substrate-specific induction on catabolic arginine and histidine operons but are also expressed to higher levels than the wild type. While the ΔcbrAB ntrB(Con) mutant restored growth on many N-containing compounds used as the carbon sources, its capability to grow on TCA cycle intermediates and glucose was compromised when ammonium served as the sole nitrogen source, mostly due to an extreme imbalance of carbon and nitrogen regulatory systems. In summary, this study supports the notion that CbrAB and NtrBC form a network to control the C/N balance in P. aeruginosa. Possible molecular mechanisms of these two regulatory elements in the control of arginine and histidine operons used as the model systems are discussed.

Pseudomonads are known for their metabolic versatility, being able to utilize a wide range of organic compounds as carbon and/or nitrogen sources. Expression of catabolic enzymes for the assimilation of these compounds is subjected to carbon catabolite repression (CCR) of unknown mechanisms in these organisms. In contrast to what occurs in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, glucose does not play the central role in CCR in pseudomonads in many aspects. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the presence of succinate was reported to repress enzymes of hexose catabolism (35). In this organism, glucose uptake is not carried out by a phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (21). Besides, the levels of cyclic AMP (cAMP) do not change in response to the presence or absence of glucose, and the cAMP-cAMP receptor protein complex plays no role in CCR in P. aeruginosa (18, 27, 35, 37, 38).

The Crc protein was first reported as a player in CCR of catabolic genes for sugars and aromatic compounds in P. aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida (7, 12, 13, 19, 39). Crc exhibits sequence similarity to endo- and exonucleases, but the proposed nuclease or DNA-binding activity has not been demonstrated, despite extensive efforts (18). Recent reports suggested that Crc may regulate the expression of the affected genes posttranscriptionally as a component of a hypothetical signal transduction pathway in CCR (13, 40).

The CbrAB two-component system was discovered in P. aeruginosa as important regulatory elements for the expression of several catabolic pathways (23), and utilization of a variety of organic compounds as the sole carbon source was abolished or severely retarded in the mutant strains of cbrAB (23). Sequence comparison revealed that CbrAB belong to the NtrBC family. While the signal of the CbrAB system remained unknown, this system was suggested to function coordinately with NtrBC to maintain the carbon-nitrogen balance (23).

Similar to that in enteric bacteria (28), ammonia assimilation in P. aeruginosa is mediated by an NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) when ammonia supply is high and by a combined action of glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) when ammonia supply is limited (5, 11, 16, 28). Except glnB and nac, all genes in the nitrogen regulatory cascade of E. coli have their functional homologues annotated in the finished genomic project of P. aeruginosa; however, none of them have been characterized to confirm the proposed physiological function.

Arginine serves as a good carbon and nitrogen source for P. aeruginosa, as reflected by the existence of four catabolic arginine pathways (9, 15). Under aerobic conditions, arginine is transported into cells via an ABC transporter system encoded by the aotJQMP genes (24) and is converted into glutamate via the arginine succinyltransferase pathway encoded by the aruCFGDBE operon (15). Both the aot and the aru operons are induced by the presence of exogenous arginine. ArgR, the arginine-specific regulatory protein belonging to the AraC/XylS family of transcriptional regulators, is essential for the activation of the aot-argR and aru operons by arginine (24, 25).

Histidine is another good source of carbon and nitrogen of P. aeruginosa. The σ54-dependent hutUHIG operon encodes enzymes for degrading histidine into glutamate and formamide (32). In P. aeruginosa and P. putida, the hut operon is repressed by HutC through its interactions with an operator proximal to the hut promoter, and binding of urocanate produced from histidine catabolism to HutC removes this repression effect (14).

To further understand the molecular mechanism of CbrAB in CCR, in this study spontaneous suppressors of the cbrAB mutant were isolated and analyzed to identify additional players that may interact with CbrAB in the control of nutrient utilization. Using catabolism of arginine and histidine as two models, here we present evidences to support that CbrAB and NtrBC two-component systems work coordinately to control the carbon and nitrogen metabolic flows in P. aeruginosa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, media, and growth conditions.The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Luria-Bertani (LB) and 2× tryptone-yeast extract media (33) were used for strain construction with the following supplements as indicated: ampicillin at 100 μg/ml, carbenicillin at 200 μg/ml, gentamicin at 50 μg/ml, tetracycline at 10 μg/ml for E. coli or 100 μg/ml for P. aeruginosa, and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactoside at 0.03% (wt/vol). Minimal medium P (MMP) supplemented with indicated carbon sources at 20 mM and nitrogen sources at 5 mM was used for the growth of P. aeruginosa (10).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Strains and plasmids used in this study

Growth phenotype analysis.Phenotype microarray (PM; Biolog Co.) plates were used to analyze utilization of carbon, nitrogen, sulfate, or phosphate sources. Ammonium was provided as the sole nitrogen source when carbon sources were tested, and succinate was provided as the sole carbon source when nitrogen sources were tested. PM experiments were conducted according to the manufacturer's instruction. In short, fresh overnight cells from an agar plate were suspended in the inoculating fluid and the turbidity was adjusted to 85%. The cells were inoculated into PM plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h for carbon plates and 48 h for nitrogen plates. Cell growth was reflected by the development of purple coloration as monitored and recorded by OmniLog PM Station and PM Kinetic (Biolog). Further information on the compounds tested with the PM kit can be found at the Biolog website.

Isolation of the suppressor mutants.Cells were grown in the LB medium overnight and harvested by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 10 min. The cell pellet was washed twice, suspended, and spread onto MMP plates supplemented with 20 mM arginine or histidine as the sole source of carbon and nitrogen. The suppressor mutants that showed visible colony sizes after incubation at 37°C for 48 h were isolated.

Genomic library construction and screening.Genomic DNA of P. aeruginosa Arg18 was subjected to partial digestion with Sau3AI, and the DNA fragments of 4 to 20 kb were size fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis and subjected to cloning into the dephosphorylated BamHI site of pUCP18 (34). After transformation into E. coli DH5α, the genomic library was further enriched by agarose gel electrophoresis to separate recombinant plasmids from the vector. The library was then introduced into PAO5100 by transformation (6), and the transformants were screened onto MMP plates supplemented with nutrients as indicated.

Construction of lacZ fusions.DNA fragments containing the glnA and hutU promoter regions were PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of PAO1 with the following synthetic oligonucleotide primers: 5′-ACGAT AAGCTT CAT GCG AGG GAC GCGAA-3′ and 5′-CTT GTA CGA CAT GCT GTC CTC CAG GAGG-3′ for glnA; 5′-GAC TAC AAGCTT CAG GCG CAG GGC TGG-3′ and 5′-CGG GGT GGT CAC GGC AGG CTC CTG GGC-3′ for hutU. The PCR products were purified from a 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel, digested by restriction endonuclease HindIII, and ligated to the HindIII and SmaI sites of the translational fusion vector pQF52 (26). The resulting plasmids, pSA500 and pSU500, contain the entire upstream intergenic sequence of glnA and hutU and the 5′ end of the coding sequence fused in-frame to the eighth codon of the lacZ gene in the vector. The nucleotide sequences of the resulting constructs were verified by nucleotide sequence determination.

Construction of mutant strains and plasmids.To make the ntrBC mutant, the DNA fragment containing the N-terminal part of ntrB was amplified by PCR from the genomic DNA of PAO5122 (Fig. 1) with a transposon-specific flanking primer containing synthetic oligonucleotides designed to generate the HindIII or BamHI restriction site (underlined): 5′-AGGG AAGCTT CGC GCT TGG TGA ACG GATGT-3′. The C-terminal DNA fragment of ntrC was PCR amplified from the PAO1 genomic DNA with the following two primers: 5′-TGGA AAGCTT GGT GCG CGA CGG CAA GTTC-3′ and 5′-GTC GGATCC ATC GAC GTT CAT CCC CAG CTC-3′. The PCR products were purified from a 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel, digested by appropriate restriction endonucleases, and assembled onto the EcoRI and BamHI sites of pRTP1-M (36). The Tetr cassette of EZ::TN<TET-1> was gel purified after HindIII digestion of a transposon-inserted plasmid and ligated to the HindIII fusion site of the NtrB-NtrC hybrid as described above. For gene replacement, the resulting transposon insertion plasmid in E. coli SM10 was mobilized into the recipient strains by biparental mating (8). Following incubation at 37°C overnight, transconjugants were selected on LB plates supplemented with tetracycline (100 μg/ml) and streptomycin (500 μg/ml). The correct gene replacements were confirmed by PCR with the following two primers flanking the ntrBC locus: 5′-GGT CAG CGC GAT AGA GCC AAG CGA-3′ and 5′-GTT GGG TCG CTC ATG GGA GCA GTG GCG CTT-3′.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

glnA-ntrC loci of PAO strains and plasmids. The PA gene numbers are based on annotations of the Pseudomonas Genome Project (http://www.pseudomonas.com/ ). Drawings for genes and transposon cassettes (Tn) are symbolic and not scaled. Dashed lines denote regions of deletion. Thick arrows represent genes and open reading frames with orientations. Strain PAO5122 carries a tetracycline resistance Tn inserted in PA5122 that was used as the source of PCR to make the ntrBC deletion mutant PAO5125. Strain PAO5125 has an antibiotic resistance (Tetr) cassette in place of the deleted ntrBC region. Plasmids pHIS, pHIS1, and pNTR18 carry an ntrB(Con) allele from Arg18 (Table 1); the asterisks depict the relative locations of the point mutations carried on the ntrB genes of these constructs. Only relevant restriction sites are indicated: B, BamHI; C, ClaI; K, KpnI; S, Sau3AI.

To analyze the nucleotide sequences of the histidine suppressor mutants, the ntrB and ntrC alleles were PCR amplified by Pfu polymerase from genomic DNA of the suppressor mutants and PAO5100 with the following synthetic oligonucleotides: for ntrB, 5′-GGT CAG CGC GAT AGA GCC AAG CGA-3′ and 5′-GAC GAT CCA GAC GGT CTC TGA TCG-3′; for ntrC, 5′-CCT GCC CCT GGA ACA AGG AGT GCA TTG ACC-3′ and 5′-GTT GGG TCG CTC ATG GGA GCA GTG GCG CTT-3′. The amplified fragments were purified from a 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel and ligated into the SmaI site of pUCP18 (34). To make the pCBR plasmid, the 7-kb EcoRI fragment covering the cbrAB operon was purified from a cosmid clone, which was identified from colony screening of a genomic library constructed in this laboratory, and subcloned into pUCP18 (34). The DNA sequences of the insert on the plasmid were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing.

Enzyme assays.GS was assayed as γ-glutamyltransferase activity in cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide-treated cells (16). The GOGAT and anabolic GDH activities were assayed as described previously (11). β-Galactosidase activities were determined by the methods of Miller (22). Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (4) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

RESULTS

Growth phenotype analysis of cbrAB and ntrBC mutants.The CbrAB two-component system was reported by Nishijyo et al. (23) to control the utilization of carbon/nitrogen sources in P. aeruginosa, and it was anticipated that the NtrBC system controls nitrogen utilization in this organism. To further understand the physiological function of CbrAB and NtrBC in carbon and nitrogen catabolism, we conducted extensive growth phenotype analyses by PMs with the wild-type strain PAO1, the cbrAB mutant PAO5100, the ntrBC mutant PAO5125, and the cbrAB ntrBC double mutant PAO5126.

In comparison to the growth pattern of PAO1, that of the ntrBC mutant PAO5125 showed an expected deficiency on the utilization of N-only compounds (e.g., nitrite, nitrate, and urea) and specific C/N compounds (e.g., uridine and cytidine) as the sole nitrogen source (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), as has been reported for E. coli and many other enteric bacteria (20, 29). In contrast, the cbrAB mutant was defective in carbon utilization of a variety of compounds (24 out of 49), including C-only compounds (e.g., sugars, acetate, pyruvate, and lactate) as well as C/N compounds (e.g., arginine, histidine, and proline) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). While the cbr mutant lost the capability to utilize many C/N compounds as the sole carbon source, almost all of these compounds could still serve as the sole nitrogen source in this mutant as well as in the cbr ntr double mutant, with few exceptions (e.g., l-histidine and l-serine). These results clearly delineate the pivotal role of CbrAB and NtrBC in regulation of carbon and nitrogen utilization, respectively; however, it was also intriguing to note that a cbrAB ntrBC double mutant retained the capability to utilize most C/N compounds as the sole nitrogen source.

Suppressors of the ΔcbrAB mutant.The spontaneous suppressors of PAO5100 (ΔcbrAB) were isolated from plates that restored growth on arginine used as the sole source of carbon and nitrogen. Among over 100 suppressors obtained, 90 of these mutants were randomly picked for further growth phenotype analyses of histidine and glucose, which can be utilized by PAO1 but not PAO5100. It was found that these suppressors can be divided into two groups: 5 mutants showing a histidine-positive, glucose-negative phenotype, as represented by Arg18, and 85 mutants exhibiting a histidine-negative, glucose-positive phenotype, as represented by Arg34.

To further explore the differences in catabolic capability, Arg18 and Arg34 were subjected to more extensive analyses by PMs. For carbon source utilization, Arg34 exhibited a pattern almost identical to that of the wild-type strain PAO1, except showing no growth on histidine, ornithine, and hydroxy-l-proline (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Arg18 regained the ability to utilize most of the N-containing compounds but meanwhile lost the capability to utilize tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates (e.g., succinate) and most carbon sources containing no nitrogen moiety (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). For nitrogen source analysis, Arg34 had the same pattern as the wild-type strain PAO1. Arg18 was found surprisingly to show no growth on ammonium but grew normally on nitrate, urea, and other compounds (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Since ammonium was used as the supplement in carbon source analysis and succinate was added as the carbon supplement in nitrogen source analysis, these results suggest that Arg18 might be deficient in the uptake or assimilation of ammonium per se.

Arg18 possesses a mutation of nitrogen regulation in the ntrB gene.In order to uncover the suppressor mutation of Arg18, a genomic library of Arg18 was constructed and employed to conduct genetic complementation of PAO5100 on histidine utilization. By this approach, the recombinant plasmid pHIS was recovered from one clone. To substantiate the physiological function of pHIS, this plasmid was introduced into PAO5100, and the resulting recombinant strain of PAO5100 harboring pHIS exhibited the same growth phenotypes as Arg18.

The results of sequence analysis revealed that pHIS carries a 6.5-kb chromosomal fragment with five complete (PA5120 through ntrB) and two truncated (glnA and ntrC) open reading frames (Fig. 1). The glnA, ntrB, and ntrC genes encoding GS and the NtrBC sensor/response regulator of nitrogen regulation were annotated based on sequence analysis. PA5120 to PA5123, the four genes between glnA and ntrB, encoded hypothetical proteins with unknown functions. When the subclone pHIS1 (Fig. 1), carrying an intact ntrB and devoid of four upstream genes, was introduced into PAO5100, it exerted the same complementation effect as pHIS.

To define the nature of the mutation responsible for the Arg18 phenotype, the nucleotide sequence of the DNA fragment carried by pHIS was determined and subjected to sequence comparison to the finished genomic sequence of P. aeruginosa PAO1. Only a single T680G mutation, which led to the Asp227Ala substitution, was detected on the ntrB allele of pHIS. To confirm the authenticity of this identified mutation, the ntrB genes of PAO5100 and Arg18 were cloned after PCR and sequenced. Sequence analyses confirmed the same point mutation in ntrB of Arg18 as in pHIS. Furthermore, a complementation experiment demonstrated that only the plasmid containing the ntrB allele of Arg18 (pNTR18) (Fig. 1), but not the wild-type ntrB gene, was able to convert the growth phenotype of PAO5100 on carbon utilization to that of Arg18.

Analysis of four other histidine-positive suppressors of PAO5100.Like Arg18, four other suppressors of PAO5100 (Arg8, Arg9, Arg10, and Arg24) isolated from arginine plates that restored the ability to utilize histidine as the sole carbon and nitrogen source were subjected to genetic analysis. Based on the results of allele analysis of Arg18, we predicted that the suppressor genes of these four mutants might be either ntrB or ntrC. Accordingly, the ntrB and ntrC genes of these mutants were PCR amplified and cloned into pUCP18. The resulting constructs were subjected to DNA sequence analysis and complementation analysis. Each of these four mutants carried a point mutation in the ntrB gene which led to the following amino acid substitutions: L126W in Arg8, P228L in Arg9, and S229I in Arg10 and Arg24. Complementation of PAO5100 with these ntrB mutant clones also resulted in a growth phenotype identical to that of the suppressor mutants. These results were consistent to what was observed in Arg18 as described above.

Effect of CbrAB and NtrBC on histidine and arginine catabolism.To understand the molecular mechanism responsible for the growth phenotype of PAO5100 and Arg18, we selected histidine and arginine utilization as two model systems for further analysis. A hutU::lacZ translational fusion, pSU500, was constructed to investigate expression of the hut operon with histidine utilization in different strains (Table 2). The cells were grown in glutamate minimal medium in the presence and absence of histidine. In the wild-type strain PAO1, exogenous histidine induced the expression of the hutU promoter, and this induction effect was abolished in PAO5100 devoid of cbrAB. In Arg18, the hutU promoter exhibited a higher basal level of activity than in PAO1, and exogenous histidine could further induce this promoter over threefold higher than that of PAO1 (Table 2). A similar pattern of promoter activities was also observed when pST500, an aotJ::lacZ translational fusion (24), was used to investigate expression of the aot operon for arginine transport in the same set of strains in response to the presence and absence of exogenous arginine (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Effects of Cbr and Ntr on expression of β-galactosidase activities from the PhutU::lacZ and PaotJ::lacZ fusions

Since NtrC and CbrB are enhancers of σ54 promoters, we also conducted measurements of aotJ and hutU promoter fusions in the rpoN mutant. As shown in Table 2, these two promoters were no longer subjected to the substrate-specific induction, and only low basal levels of expression can be observed in the rpoN mutant. These results strongly support the hypothesis that the CbrAB and NtrBC systems participate in regulation of genes for uptake or catabolism of histidine and arginine and possibly other C/N sources, as revealed by PM analysis.

The Ntr system in Arg18 is constitutively active.The ntrB mutation in Arg18 was anticipated to exert an effect on nitrogen regulation. To characterize the nature of this effect, the specific activities of GDH, GOGAT, and GS, three major enzymes in ammonium assimilation under the control of Ntr, were measured in PAO1 (wild type), PAO5100 (ΔcbrAB), PAO5125 (ΔntrBC), and Arg18. The cells were grown in succinate minimal medium with ammonium or nitrate as the sole nitrogen source. For PAO5125 growing on nitrate and Arg18 on ammonium, limiting amounts of glutamine (0.4 mM) and glutamate (1 mM), respectively, were added to enable cell growth until the optical density at 600 nm reached 0.5.

In the wild-type strain PAO1, GDH and GOGAT of glutamate biosynthesis were induced by ammonium and repressed when nitrate was the nitrogen source (Table 3). As expected, the expression profile of GS in PAO1 was reciprocal to that of GDH and GOGAT, i.e., repression by ammonium and induction by nitrate. A similar expression pattern of these three enzymes was also observed in PAO5100, except that the level of GS in PAO5100 was about 50% of that in PAO1 when nitrate was provided as the nitrogen source (Table 3). These results suggested that CbrAB per se may not be essential for nitrogen regulation, consistent with the results of PM analyses.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Effects of Ntr and Cbr on expression of enzymes in ammonium assimilation

In contrast, significant changes were observed when the Ntr system was disturbed. In PAO5125 devoid of ntrBC, both GDH and GOGAT activities were constitutively high regardless of the nitrogen sources while the levels of GS remained constitutively low (Table 3). These results strongly suggest that the Ntr system exerts a repression effect on expression of GDH and GOGAT and an activation effect on GS expression. In comparison, a completely reversed pattern of expression was observed in Arg18.

We also conducted experiments with pSA500, a glnA::lacZ fusion, to investigate the expression of the glnA gene at the transcriptional level in the same set of strains under the same growth conditions as those described above. As shown in Table 3, the resulting pattern of glnA promoter expression was basically identical to what was observed at the GS enzyme levels. Based on these results, we hypothesized that the ntrB allele of Arg18 makes the Ntr system constitutively active in this mutant.

An imbalanced act by cbrAB deletion and ntrBC activation in Arg18.As revealed by growth phenotype analyses, regaining the ability to utilize most of the N-containing carbon sources in Arg18 was compromised by losing the capability to utilize TCA cycle intermediates and most carbon-only sources when ammonium was the sole nitrogen source. To further dissect the possible contribution from Cbr deletion and Ntr activation in Arg18, PM analysis was conducted with Arg18 harboring pCBR, which contains and expresses functional CbrAB from the plasmid. The result showed that the pattern of carbon utilization by Arg18/pCBR was not different from that of PAO1, which strongly suggests that a constitutive Ntr system in Arg18/pCBR does not affect carbon utilization and that the unique growth phenotype of Arg18 might be the consequence of an extremely imbalanced act by Cbr deletion and Ntr activation.

DISCUSSION

The pleiotropic effect of CbrAB on carbon and/or nitrogen utilization was first reported by the work of Nishijyo et al. (23). In our current study, an extensive analysis of nutrient utilization in cbrAB and/or ntrBC mutants clearly established the physiological function of these regulatory systems in the control of carbon and nitrogen utilization in a coordinated manner. As shown in Table S1 in the supplemental material, all tested compounds used as the carbon and/or nitrogen sources can be categorized into different groups based on the effect of Cbr and/or Ntr. While utilization of many compounds as the carbon source was affected by CbrAB, it was noted that a specific group of compounds, including succinate, l-aspartate, glycerol, l-glutamate, l-asparagine, fumarate, α-ketoglutarate, and l-glutamine, was exempted from this regulation. One interesting common feature among these exempted compounds was their relationship to the TCA cycle. They are either TCA cycle intermediates or one or two catabolic steps away from the TCA cycle. It is intriguing to propose that perhaps these are the preferred carbon sources of P. aeruginosa, in accordance with the long-reported phenomenon of reversed CCR. Unlike in E. coli or B. subtilis, glucose is not the preferred carbon source in pseudomonads (39), and there are only two complete phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems for fructose and N-acetylglucosamine uptake and utilization in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (31). Instead, P. aeruginosa preferentially utilizes succinate and other dicarboxylates of the TCA cycle (7, 39) over other compounds. While the molecular mechanism of CCR in pseudomonads is still unknown, it is not likely that CbrAB serves as the master regulator of CCR, but rather, it could be a direct target of CCR.

The results of PM analyses indicated that the cbr ntr double mutant retains the ability to grow on most C/N compounds used as the sole nitrogen source. At first sight, it seemed contradictory to the proposed pivotal role of CbrAB and NtrBC in the control of carbon and nitrogen utilization. We proposed the following explanation based on a simple concept, supply and demand. It was well known that to support bacterial growth, the demand of nitrogen flow is much lower than that of carbon flow. Therefore, it might be that in the cases of most C/N compounds (e.g., arginine), the substrate-specific regulator per se can maintain levels of uptake and catabolism sufficient for sustaining growth as the nitrogen source, and the CbrAB system coordinates with the substrate-specific regulators to ensure a maximal supply when the demand as the carbon source is high. Depending on the regulatory circuit, the NtrBC system could play a significant role only in few cases (e.g., histidine).

The CbrB response regulator belongs to the NtrC family of transcriptional enhancers for the σ54-dependent promoters (23). As in the Ntr system, it is conceivable that CbrB could activate the affected σ54 promoters of catabolic operons through the CbrA-CbrB phosphorelay in response to a signal(s) yet to be identified. This can be best demonstrated by the hut operon of histidine utilization. As shown in Fig. 2a, the hutU regulatory region of P. aeruginosa PAO1 contains one σ54 promoter (Y. Itoh, presented at the 9th International Congress on Pseudomonas, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, 2003) which overlaps with a putative operator site of the HutC repressor (HutCPa). The helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain sequence of the HutCPa protein exhibits 85% identity to its counterpart in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 (HutCPp), and the nucleotide sequence of this HutCPa operator site is 94% identical to that of the reported HutCPp site (14). In the wild-type strain PAO1, formation of the HutC-urocanate complex was proposed to release HutC from its operator, and expression of the hutU::lacZ fusion from a σ54 promoter was activated by either CbrB or NtrC, depending on the C/N status. As shown in Table 2, this histidine-dependent induction effect was abolished in the cbr mutant but was restored when a constitutive Ntr system was introduced. These data support the proposed model of Cbr/Ntr-dependent activation of σ54 promoters for catabolism of C/N compounds.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Nucleotide sequences of the regulatory regions for the aotJQMOP-argR operon (a) and the hutUHIG operon (b). The −10 and −35 regions of each σ70 promoter and the −12 and −24 regions of a potential σ54 promoter are indicated accordingly. The reported transcriptional initiation sites of aotJ are marked by arrows above the nucleotides and labeled P1 and P2. The putative NtrC binding sites as identified by sequence similarities to the consensus sequence (30), TGCACCA-N3-TGGTGCA, are underlined. The reported ArgR binding site and the putative HutC binding site are double underlined.

The model described above for the σ54-dependent hutU promoter might not work properly for σ70 promoters, because structure-wide, σ54-dependent transcriptional enhancers of the NtrC family do not activate directly on σ70 promoters, and no such case has been reported so far. For example, induction of the aotJ P2 promoter by exogenous arginine (Table 2) depends on the presence of ArgR, a transcriptional regulator of the AraC/XylS family. As shown in Fig. 2b, the reported aotJ promoters are presumably σ70 dependent, and it is unlikely that ArgR can serve as a transcriptional enhancer of σ54-dependent promoters; however, ΔcbrAB and ntrB(Con) mutations were found to exert effects on the expression profile of the aotJ::lacZ fusion similar to those for the hutU::lacZ fusion (Table 2). It is possible that an additional regulatory protein that functions similarly to Nac in the Ntr system of Klebsiella and other enteric bacteria (1-3) could serve as a mediator of the Cbr/Ntr systems to extend the scopes of their control to σ70 promoters. On the other hand, a higher basal level of aotJ::lacZ expression in the ntrBc mutant implies the presence of a σ54 promoter yet to be identified in the aotJ regulatory region. Interestingly, a putative σ54 promoter (Fig. 2b) was predicted by computation analysis (http://www.promscan.uklinux.net/ ). More study is needed to verify this prediction and its possible contribution to Cbr/Ntr-dependent regulation of the aotJQMOP-argR operon.

With arginine utilization as the model system, two types of suppressors arose from the cbr mutant, as represented by Arg18 and Arg34. The genetic determinants were identified as ntrB alleles for suppression in Arg18 and several other strains in the same group. We proposed that mutations in these ntrB alleles resulted in a constitutively active Ntr system as supported by the expression profiles of GS, GOGAT, and GDH in Arg18 (Table 3). Mutations of the four ntrB alleles identified in this study are located in two regions of NtrB. Based on the reported characterization of E. coli NtrB, L126W is located in the central domain for the phosphotransferase/phosphatase activities whereas D227A, P228L, and S229I are clustered in a region at which the PII protein interacts. The corresponding NtrB mutant forms of E coli exhibit impaired phosphatase activities, and thus, the NtrC protein remains phosphorylated and active.

In Arg18, although turning on the Ntr system enabled this mutant to regain growth on some C/N sources, including arginine and histidine, the trade-off was a compromised capability to grow on the “preferred” carbon sources (see description above) in the presence of ammonium. This unique growth phenotype of Arg18 was due to a combination of ΔcbrAB and ntrB(Con); complementation of the cbrAB deletion in Arg18 by a recombinant plasmid pCBR exhibited a pattern of C/N utilization not different from that of the wild type. Although currently we have no explanation of these observations at the molecular level, these data support the notion that CbrAB and NtrBC need to function in a balanced and coordinated manner in order to regulate the carbon and nitrogen metabolic flow in P. aeruginosa. One clue for solving this puzzle was buried in Arg34. It was intriguing that the growth phenotype of Arg34 was very much like that of the wild type except on a few compounds. The same approach of complementation was attempted but failed to identify the genetic determinant of Arg34, which suggest that Arg34 might carry a recessive suppressor mutation. Identification of the genetic determinant of Arg34 is currently in progress.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grant MCB-0415603 from the National Science Foundation and by the Molecular Basis of Diseases Program at Georgia State University.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 23 March 2007.
    • Accepted 21 May 2007.
  • Copyright © 2007 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bender, R. A. 1991. The role of the NAC protein in the nitrogen regulation of Klebsiella aerogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 5 : 2575-2580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.
    Bender, R. A., P. M. Snyder, R. Bueno, M. Quinto, and B. Magasanik. 1983. Nitrogen regulation system of Klebsiella aerogenes: the nac gene. J. Bacteriol. 156 : 444-446.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Blauwkamp, T. A., and A. J. Ninfa. 2002. Nac-mediated repression of the serA promoter of Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 45 : 351-363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Bradford, M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72 : 248-254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Brown, P. R., and R. Tata. 1981. Growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants lacking glutamate synthase activity. J. Bacteriol. 147 : 193-197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Chung, C. T., S. L. Niemela, and R. H. Miller. 1989. One-step preparation of competent Escherichia coli: transformation and storage of bacterial cells in the same solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 : 2172-2175.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Collier, D. N., P. W. Hager, and P. V. Phibbs. 1996. Catabolite repression control in the Pseudomonads. Res. Microbiol. 147 : 551-561.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Gambello, M. J., and B. H. Iglewski. 1991. Cloning and characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR gene, a transcriptional activator of elastase expression. J. Bacteriol. 173 : 3000-3009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Haas, D., M. Galimands, M. Gamper, and A. Zimmermann. 1990. Arginine network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: specific and global controls, p. 303-316. In S. Silver, A. M. Chakrabarty, B. Iglewski, and S. E. Kaplan (ed.), Pseudomonas: biotransformations, pathogenesis, and evolving biotechnology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  10. 10.↵
    Haas, D., B. W. Holloway, A. Schamböck, and T. Leisinger. 1977. The genetic organization of arginine biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Gen. Genet. 154 : 7-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Hashim, S., D. H. Kwon, A. Abdelal, and C. D. Lu. 2004. The arginine regulatory protein mediates repression by arginine of the operons encoding glutamate synthase and anabolic glutamate dehydrogenase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 186 : 3848-3854.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Hester, K. L., J. Lehman, F. Najar, L. Song, B. A. Roe, C. H. MacGregor, P. W. Hager, P. V. Phibbs, Jr., and J. R. Sokatch. 2000. Crc is involved in catabolite repression control of the bkd operons of Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 182 : 1144-1149.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Hester, K. L., K. T. Madhusudhan, and J. R. Sokatch. 2000. Catabolite repression control by crc in 2xYT medium is mediated by posttranscriptional regulation of bkdR expression in Pseudomonas putida. J. Bacteriol. 182 : 1150-1153.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Hu, L., and A. T. Phillips. 1988. Organization and multiple regulation of histidine utilization genes in Pseudomonas putida. J. Bacteriol. 170 : 4272-4279.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Itoh, Y. 1997. Cloning and characterization of the aru genes encoding enzymes of the catabolic arginine succinyltransferase pathway in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 179 : 7280-7290.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Janssen, D. B., H. J. op den Camp, P. J. Leenen, and C. van der Drift. 1980. The enzymes of the ammonia assimilation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch. Microbiol. 124 : 197-203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    Lu, C.-D., Y. Itoh, Y. Nakada, and Y. Jiang. 2002. Functional analysis and regulation of the divergent spuABCDEFGH-spuI operons for polyamine uptake and utilization in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Bacteriol. 184 : 3765-3773.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    MacGregor, C. H., S. K. Arora, P. W. Hager, M. B. Dail, and P. V. Phibbs, Jr. 1996. The nucleotide sequence of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyrE-crc-rph region and the purification of the crc gene product. J. Bacteriol. 178 : 5627-5635.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    MacGregor, C. H., J. A. Wolff, S. K. Arora, and P. V. Phibbs, Jr. 1991. Cloning of a catabolite repression control (crc) gene from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, expression of the gene in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 173 : 7204-7212.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Magasanik, B. 1996. Regulation of nitrogen utilization, p. 1344-1356. In R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Midgley, M., and E. A. Dawes. 1973. The regulation of transport of glucose and methyl alpha-glucoside in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochem. J. 132 : 141-154.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  23. 23.↵
    Nishijyo, T., D. Haas, and Y. Itoh. 2001. The CbrA-CbrB two-component regulatory system controls the utilization of multiple carbon and nitrogen sources in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 40 : 917-931.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Nishijyo, T., S.-M. Park, C.-D. Lu, Y. Itoh, and A. T. Abdelal. 1998. Molecular characterization and regulation of an operon encoding a system for transport of arginine and ornithine and the ArgR regulatory protein in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 180 : 5559-5566.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Park, S. M., C. D. Lu, and A. T. Abdelal. 1997. Cloning and characterization of argR, a gene that participates in regulation of arginine biosynthesis and catabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Bacteriol. 179 : 5300-5308.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Park, S. M., C. D. Lu, and A. T. Abdelal. 1997. Purification and characterization of an arginine regulatory protein, ArgR, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its interactions with the control regions for the car, argF, and aru operons. J. Bacteriol. 179 : 5309-5317.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Phillips, A. T., and L. M. Mulfinger. 1981. Cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate levels in Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas aeruginosa during induction and carbon catabolite repression of histidase synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 145 : 1286-1292.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    Reitzer, L. J. 1996. Ammonia assimilation and the biosynthesis of glutamine, glutamate, aspartate, asparagine, l-alanine, and d-alanine, p. 391-407. In R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  29. 29.↵
    Reitzer, L. J. 1996. Sources of nitrogen and their utilization, p. 380-390. In R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Reitzer, L. J., and B. Magasanik. 1986. Transcription of glnA in E. coli is stimulated by activator bound to sites far from the promoter. Cell 45 : 785-792.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Reizer, J., A. Reizer, M. J. Lagrou, K. R. Folger, C. K. Stover, and M. H. Saier, Jr. 1999. Novel phosphotransferase systems revealed by bacterial genome analysis: the complete repertoire of pts genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1 : 289-293.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Rietsch, A., M. C. Wolfgang, and J. J. Mekalanos. 2004. Effect of metabolic imbalance on expression of type III secretion genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 72 : 1383-1390.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  34. 34.↵
    Schweizer, H. P. 1991. Escherichia-Pseudomonas shuttle vectors derived from pUC18/19. Gene 97 : 109-121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Siegel, L. S., P. B. Hylemon, and P. V. Phibbs, Jr. 1977. Cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate levels and activities of adenylate cyclase and cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate phosphodiesterase in Pseudomonas and Bacteroides. J. Bacteriol. 129 : 87-96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Stibitz, S., W. Black, and S. Falkow. 1986. The construction of a cloning vector designed for gene replacement in Bordetella pertussis. Gene 50 : 133-140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Suh, S. J., L. J. Runyen-Janecky, T. C. Maleniak, P. Hager, C. H. MacGregor, N. A. Zielinski-Mozny, P. V. Phibbs, Jr., and S. E. West. 2002. Effect of vfr mutation on global gene expression and catabolite repression control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 148 : 1561-1569.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    West, S. E., A. K. Sample, and L. J. Runyen-Janecky. 1994. The vfr gene product, required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A and protease production, belongs to the cyclic AMP receptor protein family. J. Bacteriol. 176 : 7532-7542.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Wolff, J. A., C. H. MacGregor, R. C. Eisenberg, and P. V. Phibbs, Jr. 1991. Isolation and characterization of catabolite repression control mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO. J. Bacteriol. 173 : 4700-4706.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Yuste, L., and F. Rojo. 2001. Role of the crc gene in catabolic repression of the Pseudomonas putida GPo1 alkane degradation pathway. J. Bacteriol. 183 : 6197-6206.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Regulation of Carbon and Nitrogen Utilization by CbrAB and NtrBC Two-Component Systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Wei Li, Chung-Dar Lu
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2007, 189 (15) 5413-5420; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00432-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulation of Carbon and Nitrogen Utilization by CbrAB and NtrBC Two-Component Systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Regulation of Carbon and Nitrogen Utilization by CbrAB and NtrBC Two-Component Systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Wei Li, Chung-Dar Lu
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2007, 189 (15) 5413-5420; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00432-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Carbon
Nitrogen
PII Nitrogen Regulatory Proteins
Phosphoprotein Phosphatases
Protein Kinases
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
transcription factors

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530