Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PATHOGENS

Role of Gne and GalE in the Virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila Serotype O34

Rocío Canals, Natalia Jiménez, Silvia Vilches, Miguel Regué, Susana Merino, Juan M. Tomás
Rocío Canals
Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08071 Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalia Jiménez
Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08071 Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Vilches
Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08071 Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miguel Regué
Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08071 Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susana Merino
Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08071 Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan M. Tomás
Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08071 Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jtomascommat;ub.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01260-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The mesophilic Aeromonas hydrophila AH-3 (serotype O34) strain shows two different UDP-hexose epimerases in its genome: GalE (EC 3.1.5.2) and Gne (EC 3.1.5.7). Similar homologues were detected in the different mesophilic Aeromonas strains tested. GalE shows only UDP-galactose 4-epimerase activity, while Gne is able to perform a dual activity (mainly UDP-N-acetyl galactosamine 4-epimerase and also UDP-galactose 4-epimerase). We studied the activities in vitro of both epimerases and also in vivo through the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) structure of A. hydrophila gne mutants, A. hydrophila galE mutants, A. hydrophila galE-gne double mutants, and independently complemented mutants with both genes. Furthermore, the enzymatic activity in vivo, which renders different LPS structures on the mentioned A. hydrophila mutant strains or the complemented mutants, allowed us to confirm a clear relationship between the virulence of these strains and the presence/absence of the O34 antigen LPS.

Mesophilic Aeromonas spp. are ubiquitous waterborne bacteria and pathogens of reptiles, amphibians, and fish (3). They can be isolated as a part of the fecal flora of a wide variety of other animals, including some used for human consumption, such a pigs, cows, sheep, and poultry. In humans, Aeromonas hydrophila isolates belonging to hybridization groups 1 and 3 (HG1 and HG3), Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria (HG8/HG10), and Aeromonas caviae (HG4) have been associated with gastrointestinal and extraintestinal diseases, such as wound infections of healthy humans, and less commonly with septicemias of immunocompromised patients (23). The pathogenicity of mesophilic aeromonads has been linked to a number of different determinants, such as toxins, proteases, outer membrane proteins (35), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (29), flagella (30, 37), and the type III secretion system (43).

Mesophilic Aeromonas sp. strains of serotype O34 typically express smooth LPS on the surface. We fully characterized chemically the O-antigen and the core LPS of A. hydrophila strain AH-3 (serotype O34) (Fig. 1) (24, 25). Mesophilic Aeromonas strains from this serotype are the most frequently isolated in clinical sources (28). A single mutation in a gene that codes for UDP N-acetylgalactosamine 4-epimerase (gne) renders a strain with the O− phenotype (LPS without O-antigen molecules) in serotype O34 (9). No changes were observed for the LPS core in a gne mutant from strain A. hydrophila AH-3 (serotype O34). O34 antigen LPS contains N-acetyl galactosamine (GalNAc), while no such sugar residue forms part of the LPS core from A. hydrophila AH-3. The A. hydrophila AH-3 gne mutants are drastically reduced in some pathogenic features (serum resistance or adhesion to Hep-2 cells) and less virulent for fish and mice than the wild-type strain. Strain AH-3, like other mesophilic Aeromonas strains, possesses two kinds of flagella (18), and the lack of the O34-antigen molecules by the gne mutation in this strain reduced the motility without any effect on the biogenesis of both polar and lateral flagella. gne is present in all the mesophilic Aeromonas strains tested and is able to fully complement all the phenotypes mentioned above (9).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Chemical structures of the O34 antigen LPS (A) and the LPS core (B) from A. hydrophila strain AH-3 (24, 25). The O34 antigen LPS is linked to the Gal residue (in italic letters) of the LPS core (25).

GalE (EC 3.1.5.2) is the enzyme able to epimerize UDP galactose, always present in all the bacteria studied, while Gne (EC 3.1.5.7.) is a UDP N-acetylgalactosamine 4-epimerase (9). However, in some cases a single protein could perform GalE and Gne activities (6), while two different proteins have been reported in other cases (5). We decided to investigate the presence of a galE gene in Aeromonas strains of serotype O34 and to fully characterize the role in vitro and in vivo of both enzymatic activities linked to bacterial virulence, especially through the role of these epimerases in LPS biogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, bacteriophages, plasmids, and growth conditions.Bacterial strains, bacteriophages, and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Aeromonas sp. strains were routinely grown on tryptic soy broth or tryptic soy agar at 30°C, while Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium strains were grown on Luria-Bertani (LB) Miller broth and LB Miller agar at 37°C. When required, the strains were cultured in Davis minimal medium with glucose or galactose as the unique carbon source. Bacteriophages Br2, Ffm, and P22 were grown and tested on S. enterica serotype Typhimurium strains as previously described (45). Kanamycin (50 μg ml−1), ampicillin (100 μg ml−1), tetracycline (20 μg ml−1), rifampin (100 μg ml−1), chloramphenicol (20 μg ml−1), or gentamicin (20 μg ml−1) was added to the different media.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains, bacteriophages, and plasmids used

General DNA methods.General DNA manipulations were done essentially as described elsewhere (40). DNA restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase, E. coli DNA polymerase (Klenow fragment), and alkaline phosphatase were used as recommended by the suppliers.

DNA sequencing and computer analysis of sequence data.Double-stranded DNA sequencing was performed by using the dideoxy chain termination method (41) with the ABI Prism dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Perkin-Elmer). Oligonucleotides used for genomic DNA amplifications experiments and for DNA sequencing were purchased from Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology. The DNA sequence was translated in all six frames, and all open reading frames (ORFs) were inspected. Deduced amino acid sequences were compared with those of DNA translated in all six frames from nonredundant GenBank and EMBL databases by using the BLAST (2, 4) network service at the National Center for Biotechnology Information and the European Biotechnology Information websites, respectively. Clustal W was used for multiple sequence alignments.

Dot blot hybridizations.For dot blot hybridizations, the DNA was denatured by boiling for 5 min, chilled on ice for another 5 min, and spotted onto Hybond N1 (Amersham) nylon membrane. Probe labeling, hybridization, and detection were carried out using the enhanced chemiluminescence labeling and detection system (Amersham) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Isolation of Aeromonas galE and double galE gne mutants.To obtain nonpolar galE mutants, the gene was amplified by PCR, ligated into the vector pGEMTeasy (Promega), and transformed into E. coli XL1-Blue. The Tn5-derived kanamycin resistance cartridge (nptll) from pUC4-KIXX was inserted into the gene. The cartridge contains an outward-reading promoter that ensures the expression of downstream genes when inserted in the correct orientation (8); however, such insertion will alter the regulation of such genes. The SmaI-digested cassette was inserted into a restriction site internal to each gene, and the presence of a single HindIII site in the SmaI-digested cassette allowed its orientation to be determined. The construct containing the mutated gene was ligated to suicide vector pDM4 (31), electroporated into E. coli MC1061 (λ pir), and plated on chloramphenicol plates at 30°C. Plasmid with the mutated gene (pDM4-GALE) was transferred into rifampin-resistant (Rifr) A. hydrophila AH-405 by triparental mating using E. coli MC1061 (λ pir) containing the insertion construct and the mobilizing strain HB101/pRK2073. Transconjugants were selected on plates containing chloramphenicol, kanamycin, and rifampin. PCR and Southern blot analysis confirmed that the vector had integrated correctly into the chromosomal DNA. To complete the allelic exchange, the integrated suicide plasmid was forced to recombine out of the chromosome by adding 5% sucrose to the agar plates. The pDM4 vector contains sacB, which produces an enzyme that converts sucrose into a product that is toxic to gram-negative bacteria. One of the rifampin-resistant kanamycin-resistant and chloramphenicol-sensitive (Cms) transconjugants surviving on plates with 5% sucrose was chosen and confirmed by PCR as a galE mutant (AH-2804).

To construct a galE gne double mutant, we used the suicide plasmid pGM-GNE (Table 1) to inactivate gne of AH-2804 (galE). To construct pGM-GNE, first the kanamycin resistance cassette in pFS100 was replaced with the gentamicin resistance cassette from pUCGm/ox (36) to get plasmid pGM100 (Table 1). Then, an internal fragment of gne was amplified by PCR, ligated into pGEM-Teasy (Promega), and transformed into E. coli XL1-Blue. The DNA insert was recovered by EcoRI restriction digestion and was ligated into EcoRI-digested and phosphatase-treated pGM100. The ligation was transformed into E. coli MC1061 (λ pir) and selected for gentamicin resistance, and one of the resulting recombinant plasmids was named pGM-GNE. Triparental mating with the mobilizing strain HB101/pRK2073 was used to transfer pGM-GNE into Rifr Kmr A. hydrophila AH-2804 to obtain a defined gne insertion mutant (AH-2806; galE gne double mutant), selecting for Rifr, Kmr, and Gmr.

Complementation studies.Complementation analysis of the different Aeromonas mutants was performed by conjugal transfer of wild-type galE or gne cloned in pACYC-GALE or pACYC-GNE. Recombinants were selected on LB agar containing tetracycline, and LPS was isolated and analyzed in gels.

Plasmid constructions for gene overexpression.For galE and gne overexpression, the pET-30 Xa/LIC vector (Novagen) and AccuPrime polymerase (high fidelity; Invitrogen) were used. The galE gene was amplified from plasmid DNA COS-GALE using primers AFw (5′- GGTATTGAGGGTCGC ATGAAAGTACTGGTCACC-3′) and ARv (5′- AGAGGAGAGTTAGAGCC TGTTCACGCCTCGTACCC-3′), while the gne gene was amplified with primers BFw (5′- GGTATTGAGGGTCGC ATGACAATATTGGTCACG GG-3′) and BRv (5′- AGAGGAGAGTTAGAGCC ATGAATAAATGAGGCTCCC-3′) from plasmid COS-GNE. The 1,017- and 1,065-nucleotide PCR products, respectively, were electrophoresed in agarose, and the DNA bands were recovered and purified. Purified amplicons were treated with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of 2.5 mM dGTP for 30 min at 22°C to generate single-stranded ends (underlined letters above) complementary to Xa/LIC single-stranded ends in pET-30 Xa/LIC. After inactivation of the T4 DNA polymerase, each amplicon was mixed with pET-30 Xa/LIC vector and electroporated into NovaBlue GigaSingles competent cells and plated on LB supplemented with kanamycin (30 μg/ml). Transformants were analyzed for proper construction of pET30-GalE and pET30-Gne by PCR amplification and sequencing. These plasmids express GalE and Gne with an in-frame His6 tag fused to their N terminus.

Preparation of cell-free extracts containing GalE and Gne.The His6-GalE and His6-Gne proteins were overexpressed from E. coli BL21(λDE3) containing pET30-GalE and pET30-Gne, respectively. Both strains were grown for 18 h at 37°C in LB medium supplemented with kanamycin. The culture was then diluted 1:100 in fresh medium, and incubation was continued until the culture reached an A 600 of 0.6. Expression of the fusion proteins was induced by adding isopropyl-1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside to the culture (1 mM final concentration) and an additional 3-h incubation. The cells were harvested, washed once with 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), and then frozen until needed. The cell pellet was resuspended in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) and sonicated on ice (for a total of 2 min using 10-s bursts followed by 10-s cooling periods). Unbroken cells, cell debris, and the membrane fraction were removed by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 60 min. For comparison, a soluble extract was prepared using the same protocol from E. coli BL21(λDE3) cells containing the pET30 vector. Protein expression was monitored by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and protein contents of the pET30 Xa/LIC, pET30-GalE, and pET30-Gne lysates were determined using the Bio-Rad Bradford assay as directed by the manufacturer.

Purification of His6-GalE and His6-Gne.Lysates containing the His6-GalE or His6-Gne proteins were prepared as described above, except that the pellet was washed and resuspended in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 500 mM NaCl (buffer A). His6-GalE and His6-Gne were purified on an ÁKTA Explorer 100 system (Amersham Biosciences) using a 1-ml HiTrap chelating HP column (Amersham Biosciences) previously loaded with nickel sulfate and equilibrated with buffer A as recommended by the manufacturer. The column was washed with 5 mM imidazole in buffer A for 10 column volumes, and a step gradient of 50 to 500 mM imidazole in buffer A was then applied. His6-GalE and His6-Gne were eluted from the column at an imidazole concentration of 300 mM. The buffer was exchanged into 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) with 50 mM NaCl using a HiPrep 26/10 desalting column (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The protein was concentrated using a Centriplus 10-ml YM-30 centrifugal filter device (Amicon Bioseparations), and typical protein preparations contained yields of 0.07 to 0.08 g/ml as determined by the Bio-Rad Bradford assay.

Cell surface isolation and analyses.Cell envelopes were prepared by lysis of whole cells in a French press at 16,000 lb/in2. Unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and the envelope fraction was collected by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 2 h. Cytoplasmic membranes were solubilized twice with sodium N-laurylsarcosinate (14), and the outer membrane (OM) fraction was collected as describe above. OM proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE by the Laemmli procedure (26). Protein gels were fixed and stained with Coomassie blue. Cultures for analysis of LPS were grown in TSB at 37°C. LPS was purified by the method of Galanos et al. (17), resulting in a 2.3% yield. For screening purposes, LPS was obtained after proteinase K digestion of whole cells (12). LPS samples were separated by SDS-PAGE or SDS-Tricine-PAGE and visualized by silver staining as previously described (12, 20).

Isolation of oligosaccharides.LPS (20 mg) was hydrolyzed with 1% AcOH (100°C for 1 h). The resulting precipitate was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant was analyzed by mass spectrometry. Another sample of LPS was deacylated and purified as already described (22), obtaining 6 mg of alditol oligosaccharides mixture.

LPS chemical analysis.For chemical analysis, either purified LPS or core LPS oligosaccharides samples were hydrolyzed with 1 N trifluoroacetic acid for 4 h at 100°C. Alditol acetates and methyl glycoside acetates were analyzed on an Agilent Technologies 5973N mass spectrometry instrument equipped with a 6850A gas chromatograph and an RTX-5 capillary column (Restek; 30 m by 0.25 inner diameter; flow rate, 1 ml min−1; He as carrier gas). Acetylated methyl glycoside analysis was performed with the following temperature program: 150°C for 5 min, 150° to 250°C at 3° min−1, and 250°C for 10 min. Acetylated methyl ester lipid analysis was performed as follows: 150° for 3 min, 150° to 280°C at 10°C min−1, and 280°C for 15 min. The alditol acetates mixture was analyzed with the following temperature program: 150°C for 5 min and 150°C to 300°C at 3°C min−1. For partially methylated alditol acetates, the temperature program was 90°C for 1 min, 90°C to 140°C at 25°C min−1, 140°C to 200°C at 5°C min−1, 200°C to 280°C at 10°C min−1, and 280°C for 10 min.

Mass spectrometry studies.Positive- and negative-ion reflectron, matrix-assisted time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectra were acquired on a Voyager DE-PRO instrument (Applied Biosystems) equipped with a delayed extraction ion source. Ion acceleration voltage was 25 kV, grid voltage was 17 kV, the mirror voltage ratio was 1.12, and delay time was 150 ns. Samples were irradiated at a frequency of 5 Hz by 337-nm photons from a pulsed nitrogen laser. Postsource decay was performed using an acceleration voltage of 20 kV. The reflectron voltage was decreased in 10 successive 25% steps. Mass calibration was obtained with a maltooligosaccharide mixture from corn syrup (Sigma). A solution of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in 20% CH3CN in water at a concentration of 25 mg/ml was used as the MALDI matrix. One μl of matrix solution was deposited on the target, followed by loading of 1 μl of the sample. The droplets were allowed to dry at room temperature. Spectra were calibrated and processed under computer control using the Applied Biosystems Data Explorer software.

Methylation analysis.A core oligosaccharide sample (1 mg) obtained from 1% AcOH hydrolysis was first reduced with NaBH4 and then methylated using the Ciucanu-Kerek procedure (10). Linkage analysis was performed as follows: the methylated sample was carboxymethyl reduced with lithium triethylborohydride (Super-Hydride; Aldrich), mildly hydrolyzed to cleave ketosidic linkage, reduced by means of NaBD4, and then totally hydrolyzed, reduced with NaBD4, and finally acetylated as described previously (16).

Cell extract production and enzymatic activity measurements in cell extracts or purified recombinant proteins (Gal and GalNAc 4-epimerase assays).Suspensions of bacteria (25%, wt/vol), washed in 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) containing 1 mM MgCl2, were disrupted in a Branson model 350 sonifier at 0°C. Disrupted bacteria were subjected to high-speed centrifugation (180,000 × g for 2 h) at 5°C to obtain cell extracts. Protein concentrations of extracts were determined by using the Bio-Rad Bradford assay as directed by the manufacturer with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

The assay for UDP-galactose 4-epimerase was performed as previously described (7) by adding 20 to 50 μl of cell extract (approximately 100 to 250 μg of protein) or 1 μl of purified recombinant proteins (approximately 7 to 8 μg of protein) to 1 ml of a solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM NAD+, and 0.03 U of NAD+-dependent uridine 5′-diphosphoglucose dehydrogenase (Sigma). The assay was begun by addition of 0.5 mM UDP-Gal, and the increase in A 340 was followed in a Beckman DU 640 spectrophotometer. Initial rates of NADH formation were determined by using the kinetics program installed in the instrument. A molar extinction (E 340) of 6,220 M−1 cm−1 was assumed in all calculations.

The assay for UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 4-epimerase was performed as previously described (11, 44). In this procedure, the conversion of UDP-GalNAc to UDP-GlcNAc is measured after acid hydrolysis by the 3.6-fold increase in the color (A 585) of free GlcNAc over GalNAc in the Morgan-Elson reaction. The reactions were carried out by adding 20 μl of cell extract or 1 μl of purified recombinant protein to a volume containing 0.5 ml of 10 mM glycine, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM UDP-GalNAc. Enzyme activity was halted after 5 and 10 min of incubation at 37°C by the addition of 0.8 μl of concentrated HCl. Following hydrolysis and completion of the Morgan-Elson reaction, color development was measured at 585 nm. Control assays with extract or purified recombinant protein alone and with substrate only were run simultaneously. All assays were performed in triplicate. Product formation (i.e., GlcNAc formed by hydrolysis of UDP-GlcNAc) was measured from standard plots prepared by subjecting UDPGlcNAc, UDP-GalNAc, GlcNAc, and GalNAc (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) to the same procedures.

Virulence for fish and mice.The virulence of the strains grown at 20°C was measured by monitoring their 50% lethal dose (LD50) by the method of Reed and Muench, as previously described (38).

(i) Fish.Rainbow trout (12 to 20 g) were maintained in 20-liter static tanks at 17 to 18°C. The fish were injected intraperitoneally with 0.05 ml of the test samples (approximately 109 viable cells). Mortality was recorded up to 2 weeks; all the deaths occurred within 2 to 8 days.

(ii) Mice.Albino Swiss female mice (5 to 7 weeks old) were injected intraperitoneally with 0.25 ml of the test sample (approximately 5 × 109 viable cells). Mortality was recorded for up to 1 week; all the deaths occurred within 2 to 5 days.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.The nucleotide sequence of the A. hydrophila AH-3 galE region described here has been assigned the following GenBank accession number: DQ860510.

RESULTS

Identification and cloning of the A. hydrophila AH-3 galE gene.Grown in the presence of galactose, Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium galE mutants accumulate intracellular Gal-1-P and UDP-Gal, leading to bacteriostasis and bacteriolysis (33, 34). On the basis of the sensitivity of galE mutants to galactose, an A. hydrophila AH-3 gene bank in pLA2917 previously obtained (35) was electroporated into S. enterica serotype Typhimurium SL1306. This strain is a galE mutant, and so growth on minimal medium containing galactose as the sole carbon source occurs only if a functional galE gene is present. Approximately 30 galactose-resistant colonies were obtained, and a representative recombinant plasmid was chosen for further study (COS-GALE). Rough LPS characteristic of the Rc chemotype is observed for S. enterica serotype Typhimurium SL1306 alone or carrying the plasmid vector. A ladder banding pattern consistent with smooth LPS is visualized when COS-GALE is present in strain SL1306 (Fig. 2A). Phage sensitivity assays with phages Br2, Ffm, and P22 were used to characterize LPSs on the outer membranes of S. enterica serotype Typhimurium L1306 and SL3770 with and without various plasmids. Phage Br2 is specific for the Rc chemotype, phage Ffm lyses only cells expressing rough LPS, and phage P22 specifically lyses cells with smooth LPS. The phage sensitivity pattern of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL1306 carrying COS-GALE is identical to that of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL3770 wild type (resistant to Br2 and Ffm and sensitive to P22), while the mutant, with or without plasmid vector, was sensitive to Br2 and Ffm and resistant to P22. Slide agglutination tests with Salmonella antiserum specific for group B factors showed that agglutination was observed only with S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL3770 or S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL1306 carrying COS-GALE. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of LPSs from S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL1306, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL3770, and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL1306 carrying COS-GALE showed that the relative sugar ratios for the latter two samples were essentially identical (data not shown). These data demonstrate that the galE mutation in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL1306 was complemented by a functional galE gene from A. hydrophila AH-3.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

A. LPS from S. enterica serotype Typhimurium SL3770 (wild type), mutant SL1306 (galE), and mutant SL1306 complemented with plasmids COS-GALE and pACYC-GALE, respectively (lanes 1, 2, 3, and 4). B. LPS from S. enterica serotype Typhimurium SL3770 (wild type), mutant SL1306 (galE), and mutant SL1306 complemented with plasmids pACYC-GNE and pGEMT-GNE, respectively (lanes 1, 2, 3, and 4). LPS was extracted and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (12%) according to the methods of Darveau and Hancock (12) and silver stained (12, 20).

DNA sequence of an A. hydrophila AH-3 genomic region coding for GalE (COS-GALE).The DNA sequence of COS-GALE showed the presence of five relevant ORFs (Fig. 3A). galE was followed downstream by three genes transcribed in the same direction with high homology with galT, -K, and -M; upstream, a gene with high homology with galR transcribed in the opposite direction to galE was found (Fig. 3B). A gene with high homology with several oxidoreductase genes from Yersinia sp. was found and named orf1. This genetic organization and the transcriptional direction for these genes are typical for the gal operon. Complementation studies of S. enterica serotype Typhimurium SL1306 by COS-GALE were confirmed, since reintroduction of the single galE gene (plasmid pACYC-GALE) rescues the complete wild-type phenotype in the mutant as the one obtained by COS-GALE (Fig. 2A, LPS) and by the phage sensitivity pattern and slide agglutination test.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

A. Genetic organization of the A. hydrophila AH-3 galE region from the COS-GALE plasmid. Transcription direction and stops (lollipops) are indicated. B. Main homologies of the ORFs as well as their sizes in nucleotides and amino acid (aa) residues are shown.

galE and gne are different in A. hydrophila AH-3.Comparison of nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences indicated that gne and galE are different genes in A. hydrophila AH-3. Using the plasmid pACYC-GNE, we tried to complement the S. enterica serotype Typhimurium SL1306 galE mutant. Figure 2B shows that the LPS from this strain was only partially complemented according to the O-antigen LPS expression by this plasmid, neither having a high copy number (pGEMT-GNE). However, strain SL1306 harboring plasmid pACYC-GNE or pGEMT-GNE was able to grow on minimal medium containing galactose as the single carbon source; besides that, an increase in the replication time could be observed with respect to the wild-type strain (SL3770). Furthermore, some changes in their sensitivity to bacteriophages Br2, Ffm, and P22 could be observed when A. hydrophila gne was expressed in this strain (some sensitivity to phages Br2 and Ffm and resistance to P22). Also, weak positive slide agglutination with antiserum specific for group B factors could be observed when A. hydrophila gne was expressed in SL1306. All the results obtained are in agreement with the presence of some O-antigen LPS molecules (not being the same number as for the wild-type strain SL3770) when SL1306 contains A. hydrophila gne. None of these results are obtained when the plasmid vectors alone are introduced in strain SL1306.

Distribution of galE and gne among mesophilic Aeromonas sp.We studied the presence of galE in different mesophilic Aeromonas strains (n = 50) where previously gne was identified (9). PCR fragment DNA amplification used genomic DNAs from these strains and oligonucleotides (AFw and ARv; see Materials and Methods) binding to regions flanking galE. In all the strains tested, except one, a single 1,017-bp band was amplified. To confirm that galE was indeed present, the nucleotide sequence of the DNA-amplified fragments from several Aeromonas strains was determined. The negative strain by PCR was positive in a dot blot using the 1,017-bp band as a DNA probe. Thus, either galE or gne was found in all the mesophilic Aeromonas strains tested.

Aeromonas galE mutants.The previously obtained results prompted us to generate a galE nonpolar mutant in A. hydrophila AH-3 (AH-2804) with plasmid pDM4-GALE. This mutant showed an identical LPS profile to the wild-type strain (Fig. 4A); it was able to cross-react with anti-O34 serum and also was able to grow in minimal medium with galactose as a single carbon source. However, this growth was delayed in comparison to wild-type strain AH-3 growth or that of the rifampin-resistant mutant (AH-405) under the same conditions. Similar results were obtained when galE mutants were isolated in several (n = 5) mesophilic Aeromonas strains with galE and gne (data not shown). The introduction of the A. hydrophila AH-3 galE gene (plasmid pACYC-GALE) in the A. hydrophila AH-3 gne mutant (AH-2767) did not rescue the presence of O34-antigen LPS, as when plasmid pACYC-GNE was introduced (9).

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

A. LPS in SDS-PAGE gels from mesophilic Aeromonas strains. Lane 1, A. hydrophila AH-3 (wild type); lane 2, A. hydrophila AH-3 galE mutant (AH-2804); lane 3, A. hydrophila AH-3 gne mutant (AH-2767); lane 4, A. hydrophila AH-3 galE gne double mutant (AH-2806); lane 5, AH-2806 mutant complemented with pACYC-GNE (A. hydrophila AH-3 gne); lane 6, AH-2806 mutant complemented with pACYC-GALE (A. hydrophila AH-3 galE). B. SDS-Tricine-PAGE gels from LPS cores of mesophilic Aeromonas strains. Lane 1, A. hydrophila AH-3 (wild type); lane 2, A. hydrophila AH-3 galE mutant (AH-2804); lane 3, A. hydrophila AH-3 galE gne double mutant (AH-2806); lane 4, AH-2806 mutant complemented with pACYC-GALE (A. hydrophila AH-3 galE).

Aeromonas galE gne double mutant and complementation studies.The fact that no changes in the A. hydrophila AH-3 galE mutant LPS could be observed and also that the LPS core from the A. hydrophila AH-3 gne mutant (AH-2767) does not lack galactose (9) prompted us to obtain a double A. hydrophila AH-3 galE gne mutant. From the galE mutant (AH-2804; Kmr) we derived a gne mutant using the same technique previously described (9) but with plasmid pGM100 in order to use gentamicin resistance for the selection. The galE gne double mutant (AH-2806) shows an LPS profile devoid of the O34 antigen LPS and also a slightly faster migration of the LPS core in gels (Fig. 4). Mutant AH-2806 was completely unable to grow in minimal medium with galactose as the single carbon source.

LPS obtained from mutant AH-2806 (galE gne) was subjected to mild acid hydrolysis (1% acetic acid) to cleave the acid-labile ketosidic linkage between Kdo (3-deoxy-d-manno-octulosonic acid) and lipid A. The lipid A fraction was removed by high-speed centrifugation, and the core oligosaccharides were recovered by Sephadex G-50 chromatography. Chemical composition analysis of the core oligosaccharide fraction by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of acetylated methyl glycosides revealed the absence of d-galactose and the presence of the remaining residues found in the wild-type core LPS (l-glycero-d-manno-heptose, d-glycero-d-manno-heptose, d-glucose, d-glucosamine, and Kdo), suggesting that in this mutant the core LPS is truncated at the d-galactose level. To further prove this point, the oligosaccharide fractions from AH-2806 were analyzed by negative-ion reflectron MALDI-TOF. This experiment revealed the presence of a major signal at 1,712.7 m/z (Fig. 5). This signal is in agreement with a structure similar to the wild-type strain (Kdo-Hep6-GlcN-Glc-Gal) but deficient in d-galactose (Kdo-Hep6-GlcN-Glc; 1,714.5 Da) (25). The signal at 1,695.0 m/z (Fig. 5) could correspond to the oligosaccharide anhydro form, as previously described for LPS samples hydrolyzed with acetic acid (25). In addition, the signal at 1,735.55 m/z probably corresponds to a sodium adduct. Furthermore, the oligosaccharide sequence was determined using the MALDI-postsource decay technique (unpublished data) and confirmed that the galE gne double mutation results in a d-galactose-deficient core oligosaccharide. This result was also confirmed by a methylation analysis experiment of the N-acetylated oligosaccharide alditols mixture obtained from the AH-2806 mutant. This experiment showed the presence of 3,4,6-linked Hep, terminal Hep, and GlcN but did not detect a terminal Gal residue.

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

Negative-ion MALDI-TOF spectrum of acid-released core LPS oligosaccharide from A. hydrophila AH-2806 (galE gne double mutant).

Introduction of the galE gene from the wild-type strain (plasmid pACYC-GALE) into double mutant AH-2806 resulted in a core LPS essentially identical to that of the wild-type strain (Fig. 6; major signal at m/z 1,874.41 corresponding to Kdo-Hep6-GlcN-Glc-Gal) but lacking the O34 antigen (Fig. 4A), with the same electrophoretic moiety (Fig. 4B) and able to grow in minimal medium with galactose as a single carbon source. The result about the LPS core structure was also confirmed by determining the core oligosaccharide sequence from the galE-complemented AH-2806 mutant (unpublished data). A methylation analysis experiment with the N-acetylated oligosaccharide alditols mixture confirmed the presence of a terminal Gal residue as the complete LPS core from the wild-type strain.

FIG. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 6.

Negative-ion MALDI-TOF spectrum of acid-released core LPS oligosaccharide from A. hydrophila AH-2806 (galE gne double mutant) complemented with A. hydrophila galE (pACYC-GALE).

Introduction of the gne gene from the wild-type strain (plasmid pACYC-GNE) into double mutant AH-2806 resulted in a complete LPS with O34 antigen (Fig. 4A) and the ability to grow with some delay in minimal medium with galactose as a unique carbon source.

Gal and GalNAc 4-epimerase enzymatic activities in cell extracts and purified recombinant proteins (GalE and Gne).The genetic analysis as well as the LPS chemical structure of the mutants prompted us to study the enzymatic activities that allow the production of UDPGal from UDPGlc (Gal 4-epimerase) and the production of UDPGalNAc from UDPGlcNAc (GalNAc 4-epimerase). A. hydrophila AH-3 (wild-type strain) as previously indicated (9) showed high Gal and GalNAc 4-epimerase activities, grown in glucose or galactose, when measured as described in Materials and Methods (Table 2). However, mutant strain AH-2804 (galE) with or without the plasmid vector (pACYC184) showed a four- to fivefold decrease in its Gal 4-epimerase activity but not a complete lack, while no differences could be observed in the GalNAc 4-epimerase activity with respect to the wild type. This decrease in Gal 4-epimerase activity in strain AH-2804 can be rescued by the reintroduction of the single gene using plasmid pACYC-GALE. Furthermore, strain AH-2806 (galE gne double mutant) with or without plasmid vector showed a complete lack of both enzymatic activities (Gal 4- and GalNAc 4-epimerases) when grown in glucose and was unable to grow in galactose as a single carbon source (Table 2). The introduction of pACYC-GALE (galE) in strain AH-2806 restored the Gal 4-epimerase activity but not the GalNAc 4-epimerase activity, while the introduction of plasmid pACYC-GNE (gne) in strain AH-2806 fully restored the GalNAc 4-epimerase activity and partially the Gal 4-epimerase activity (similar levels obtained for strain AH-2804 galE mutant) (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Gal and GalNAc 4-epimerase activities in cell extracts of wild-type A. hydrophila AH-3 and mutant strains

The recombinant Gne and GalE proteins obtained as described in Materials and Methods, instead of cell extracts, were assayed for Gal and GalNAc 4-epimerase enzymatic activities. The recombinant Aeromonas GalE shows a clear UDPGal 4-epimerase activity, while no UDPGalNAc 4-epimerase activity was observed. The recombinant Aeromonas Gne shows a clear UDPGalNAc 4-epimerase activity and also a UDPGal 4-epimerase activity in these assays. The recombinant Aeromonas GalE UDPGal 4-epimerase activity was at least five times higher than the same enzymatic activity to the same protein concentration produced by the recombinant Aeromonas Gne.

Virulence studies.We tested the virulence of the wild-type strain and mutants (LD50), as described in Materials and Methods. No differences were found in mortality between the wild-type strain and the A. hydrophila AH-3 galE mutant (AH-2804) (105.3 and 107.4 LD50 in fish and mice for the wild-type strain, respectively). However, the galE gne double mutant AH-2806 showed a higher LD50 (an increase of 1 to 2 log units) in both fish and mice than the wild-type strain did. This result is similar to the virulence previously observed for an A. hydrophila AH-3 gne mutant (9). Complementation of this double mutant with pACYC-GNE (carrying the single gne) completely restored the virulence for fish or mice (LD50 similar to the wild-type strain), while no changes were observed with the plasmid vector alone or with the plasmid carrying the A. hydrophila galE. These results suggested that O34 antigen LPS is an important virulence factor for mesophilic Aeromonas serogroup O34 pathogenesis.

DISCUSSION

Mesophilic Aeromonas sp. strains like strain AH-3 (serotype O34) showed at least two different UDP-sugar epimerases: GalE, with the unique enzymatic activity of UPD-Gal epimerase responsible for the conversion of UPDGlc to UDPGal, and Gne, with two enzymatic activities, UDP-Gal and UDPGalNAc 4-epimerase, responsible for the conversion of UDPGlcNAc to UDPGalNAc. It is clear that these epimerases are critical for the biosynthesis of the different surface carbohydrates, like capsular polysaccharide, O-antigen, and core LPS. While in several enterobacteria like E. coli or S. enterica serovar Typhimurium GalE is the unique UDP-Gal epimerase, and their mutations correlate with changes in the LPS chemical structure (in many cases with the lack of the O-antigen LPS), no changes were observed in A. hydrophila AH-3 when this mutation occurred. The reason is that Gne (an enzyme not found in many enteric bacteria) is able to perform UPD-Gal epimerization as well as UDPGalNAc 4-epimerization. As we demonstrated, A. hydrophila Gne is able to show both enzymatic activities either in vitro or in vivo, but with a UDP-Gal epimerization in vitro it is at least five times less effective than A. hydrophila GalE. The reasons that allow us to conclude that A. hydrophila Gne shows UDP-Gal epimerization activity in vivo are the following.

(i) A. hydrophila galE mutants showed no changes in LPS and also are able to grow in minimal medium with galactose as a single energy and carbon source.

(ii) The A. hydrophila galE gne double mutant shows an LPS devoid of the O34 antigen LPS and also lacks the Gal residue of the LPS core (Fig. 1). This Gal residue is the one where O34-antigen LPS is linked to the LPS core and is present in the LPS core of the A. hydrophila gne single mutant (9).

(iii) When the A. hydrophila galE gne double mutant is complemented by A. hydrophila galE alone, the Gal residue of the LPS core is rescued; in addition, no O34 antigen is found (as we previously demonstrated, O34 antigen requires the UDPGalNAc 4-epimerization to form UDP-GalNAc [9]). When the A. hydrophila galE gne double mutant is complemented by A. hydrophila gne alone, the complete LPS with O34 antigen is rescued. This is because both enzymatic activities are performed by A. hydrophila Gne in vivo.

(iv) A. hydrophila Gne is able to partially complement (not fully) the S. enterica serotype Typhimurium galE mutant, as can be judged by LPS gels, phage sensitivity, and growth in minimal medium with galactose.

In recent reports, a single and unique protein was able to perform both enzymatic activities (UDP-Gal and UDPGalNAc 4-epimerase) in vitro and in vivo, as in Bacillus subtilis (42) and Campylobacter jejuni (6). In other bacteria, such as many enteric bacteria, including S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, only GalE exists with a unique UDP-Gal epimerase activity and no gne could be detected or identified in sequenced genomes. However, other UDP-hexose epimerases, like Yersinia enterocolitica Gne (5) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa WbpP (15), a protein with mainly UDPGalNAc 4-epimerase activity and some UPD-Gal epimerase activity in vitro, could be detected as described. In both cases, because their genomes or similar have been sequenced, galE seems to be present. It is tempting to speculate, according to the results obtained in A. hydrophila, that bacteria with two proteins like GalE and Gne have two possibilities for UDP-Gal epimerization in vivo: a major one based on GalE and a second one depending on the dual performance of Gne. This suggestion is in agreement that in some bacteria galE mutants showed, at least for the phenotypes studied, identical characteristics as the wild-type strain, like in Vibrio cholerae (32). The presence of GalE and Gne homologues in the same genome can be deduced from the Vibrio genomes already completely sequenced.

Both A. hydrophila GalE and Gne are members of the UDP-hexose 4-epimerase family of enzymes (Fig. 7). It has been recently proposed that the substrate specificity of these enzymes for UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal or UDP-GlcNAc/UDP-GalNAc lies in six key amino acid residues in the saccharide binding pocket (21). Amino acid residues L/K-S-Y-N-H/N-L/Y were proposed to be involved in recognizing UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal. Amino acid residues G-S-Y-N-a-s are present in WbpP from P. aeruginosa and would be involved in recognizing UDP-GlcNAc/UDP-GalNAc. Residues K-S-Y-N-N-c are present in the bifunctional human GalE using as substrate both UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal and UDP-GlcNAc/UDP-GalNAc (lowercase letters indicate similar amino acid residues). Nevertheless, it should be noted that the bifunctional enzyme from C. jejuni key residues (I-T-Y-N-L-L) (6) (Fig. 7) differs from those of other bifunctional 4-epimerases. By contrast, A. hydrophila GalE and Gne contain the same six key amino acid residues in their putative saccharide binding pocket, K-S-Y-N-N-C (Fig. 7), and according to mentioned work (21) they should be bifunctional enzymes recognizing both UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal and UDP-GlcNAc/UDP-GalNAc. The bifunctionality of the A. hydrophila Gne enzyme was demonstrated by us, but this is not the case for the A. hydrophila GalE enzyme, which seems to be able to use only UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal as substrates. Our results indicate that the saccharide binding pocket is not the only determinant allowing the recognition of UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal, UDP-GlcNAc/UDP-GalNAc, or both.

FIG. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 7.

Multiple sequence alignments of UDP-hexose 4-epimerases. GalE proteins are from Trypanosome brucei (Tb-CAD23117-GalE), T. cruzi (Tc-CAE17296-GalE), Escherichia coli (Ec-AAC73846-GalE), Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (Se-Typhi-GalE), A. hydrophila (Ah-GalE), Campylobacter jejuni (Cj-GalE-Bif); Homo sapiens (Hs-Q14376-GalE), and Bacillus subtilis (Bs-NP_391765-GalE); Gne proteins are from A. hydrophila (Ah-Gne) and Yersinia enterocolitica (Ye-AAC60777-Gne); WbpP is from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (AAM27817WbpP-Pa); WbgU is from Plesiomonas shigelloides (AAG17409WbgU-Psh). Biochemically confirmed UDPGal 4-epimerase activity enzymes (bold letters), UDPGalNAc 4-epimerase enzymes (italic letters), and bifunctional enzymes (underlined) are shown. Residue conservation shading in more than 50% of the sequence: black, identical; dark gray, similar; light gray, conserved. Box 1, GXXGXXG motif; boxes 2 to 7, predicted substrate binding pocket residues.

The results obtained in the performed virulence studies are in agreement with the presence or absence of O34 antigen LPS. As previously indicated (9), the O34 antigen LPS is essential in Aeromonas serotype O34 pathogenesis. Then, an A. hydrophila galE mutant was as virulent as the wild-type strain (presence of O34 antigen LPS), and furthermore, the same result was obtained when the A. hydrophila galE gne double mutant was complemented with Aeromonas gne alone (presence of O34 antigen LPS). All of the other A. hydrophila mutants (gne or galE gne) and the complemented double mutant with Aeromonas galE alone showed a reduction in virulence (absence of O34 antigen LPS).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Plan Nacional de I + D, FIS grants (Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Deporte, and Ministerio de Sanidad, Spain), and Generalitat de Catalunya. R.C., N.J., and S.V. are predoctoral fellows from Universidad de Barcelona and Generalitat de Catalunya.

We thank Maite Polo for her technical assistance.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 10 August 2006.
    • Accepted 31 October 2006.
  • Copyright © 2007 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Allen, L. N., and R. S. Hanson. 1985. Construction of broad-host-range cosmid cloning vector: identification of genes necessary for growth of Methylobacterium organophilum on methanol. J. Bacteriol. 161 : 955-962.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25 : 3389-3402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Austin, B., and C. Adams. 1996. Fish pathogens, p. 197-243. In B. Austin, M. Altwegg, P. J. Gosling, and S. W. Joseph (ed.), The genus Aeromonas. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
  4. 4.↵
    Bateman, A., E. Birney, L. Cerruti, R. Durbin, L. Etwiller, S. R. Eddy, S. Griffiths-Jones, K. L. Howe, M. Marshall, and E. L. Sonnhammer. 2002. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 : 276-280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Bengoechea, J. A., E. Pinta, T. Salminen, C. Oertelt, O. Holst, J. Radziejewska-Lebrecht, Z. Piotrowska-Seget, R. Venho, and M. Skurnik. 2002. Functional characterization of Gne (UDP-N-acetylglucosamine-4-epimerase), Wzz (chain length determinant), and Wzy (O-antigen polymerase) of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:8. J. Bacteriol. 184 : 4277-4287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Bernatchez, S., C. M. Szymanski, N. Ishiyama, J. Li, H. C. Jarrell, P. C. Lau, A. M. Berghuis, N. M. Young, and W. W. Wakarchuk. 2005. A single bifunctional UDP-GlcNAc/Glc-4 epimerase supports the synthesis of three cell surface glycoconjugates in Campylobacter jejuni. J. Biol. Chem. 280 : 4792-4802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Boels, I. C., A. Ramos, M. Kleerebezem, and W. M. de Vos. 2001. Functional analysis of the Lactococcus lactis galU and galE genes and their impact on sugar nucleotide and exopolysaccharide biosynthesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67 : 3033-3040.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Bott, M., M. Meyer, and P. Dimroth. 1995. Regulation of anaerobic citrate metabolism in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. 18 : 533-546.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Canals, R., N. Jiménez, S. Vilches, M. Regué, S. Merino, and J. M. Tomás. 2006. A gene (uridine diphosphate N-acetylgalactosamine 4-epimerase) is essential for mesophilic Aeromonas serotype O34 virulence. Infect. Immun. 74 : 537-548.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Ciucanu, I., and F. Kerek. 1984. A simple and rapid method for the permethylation of carbohydrates. Carbohydr. Res. 131 : 209-217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Creuzenet, C., M. Belanger, W. W. Wakarchuk, and J. S. Lam. 2000. Expression, purification, and biochemical characterization of WbpP, a newUDP-GlcNAc C4 epimerase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O6. J. Biol. Chem. 275 : 19060-19067.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Darveau, R. P., and R. E. Hancock. 1983. Procedure for isolation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides from both smooth and rough Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium strains. J. Bacteriol. 155 : 831-838.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.
    De Lorenzo, V., M. Herrero, U. Jakubzik, and K. N. Timmis. 1990. Mini-Tn5 transposon derivatives for insertion mutagenesis, promoter probing, and chromosomal insertion of cloned DNA in gram-negative eubacteria. J. Bacteriol. 172 : 6568-6572.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Filip, C., G. Fletcher, J. L. Wulff, and C. F. Earhart. 1973. Solubilization of the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli by the ionic detergent sodium lauryl sarcosinate. J. Bacteriol. 115 : 717-722.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Filling, C., K. D. Berndt, J. Benach, S. Knapp, T. Prozorovski, E. Nordling, R. Ladenstein, H. Jornvall, and U. Oppermann. 2002. Critical residues for structure and catalysis in short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases. J. Biol. Chem. 277 : 25677-25684.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Forsberg, L. S., U. Ramadas Bhat, and R. W. Carlson. 2000. Structural characterization of the O-antigenic polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide from Rhizobium etli strain CE3. J. Biol. Chem. 275 : 18551-18863.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Galanos, C., O. Lüderitz, and O. Westphal. 1969. A new method for the extraction of R lipopolysaccharides. Eur. J. Biochem. 9 : 245-249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Gavín, R., A. A. Rabaan, S. Merino, J. M. Tomás, I. Gryllos, and J. G. Shaw. 2002. Lateral flagella of Aeromonas species are essential for epitelial cell adherence and biofilm formation. Mol. Microbiol. 42 : 383-397.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.
    Hanahan, D. 1983. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J. Mol. Biol. 166 : 557-580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Hitchcock, P. J., and T. M. Brown. 1983. Morphological heterogeneity among Salmonella lipopolysaccharide chemotypes in silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. J. Bacteriol. 154 : 269-277.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Ishiyama, N., C. Creuzenet, J. S. Lam, and A. M. Berghuis. 2004. Crystal structure of WbpP, a genuine UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 4-epimerase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem. 279 : 22635-22642.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Izquierdo, L., N. Coderch, N. Piqué, E. Bedini, M. Corsaro, S. Merino, S. Fresno, J. M. Tomas, and M. Regué. 2003. The Klebsiella pneumoniae wabG gene: its role in the biosynthesis of the core lipopolysaccharide and virulence. J. Bacteriol. 185 : 7213-7221.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Janda, J. M., and S. L. Abbott. 1998. Evolving concepts regarding the genus Aeromonas: an expanding panorama of species, disease presentations, and unanswered questions. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27 : 332-344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Knirel, Y. A., A. S. Shaskov, S. N. Senchenkova, S. Merino, and J. M. Tomás. 2002. Structure of the O-polysaccharide of Aeromonas hydrophila O34: a case of random O-acetylation of 6-deoxy-L-talose. Carbohydr. Res. 337 : 1381-1386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Knirel, Y. A., E. Vinogradov, N. Jimenez, S. Merino, and J. M. Tomás. 2004. Structural studies on the R-type lipopolysaccharide of Aeromonas hydrophila. Carbohydr. Res. 339 : 787-793.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 227 : 680-685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.
    MacLachlan, P. R., and K. E. Sanderson. 1985. Transformation of Salmonella typhimurium with plasmid DNA: differences between rough and smooth strains. J. Bacteriol. 161 : 442-445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    Merino, S., S. Camprubí, and J. M. Tomás. 1993. Incidence of Aeromonas spp. serotypes O34 and O:11 among clinical isolates. Med. Microbiol. Lett. 2 : 48-55.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Merino, S., X. Rubires, A. Aguillar, J. F. Guillot, and J. M. Tomas. 1996. The role of the O-antigen lipopolysaccharide on the colonization in vivo of the germfree chicken gut by Aeromonas hydrophila serogroup O34. Microb. Pathog. 20 : 325-333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Merino, S., X. Rubirés, A. Aguilar, and J. M. Tomás. 1997. The role of flagella and motility in the adherence and invasion to fish cell lines by Aeromonas hydrophila serogroup O34 strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 151 : 213-217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Milton, D. L., R. O'Toole, P. Horstedt, and H. Wolf-Watz. 1996. Flagellin A is essential for the virulence of Vibrio anguillarum. J. Bacteriol. 178 : 1310-1319.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Nesper, J., M. C. Lauriano, K. E. Klose, D. Kapfhammer, A. Kraiβ, and J. Reidl. 2001. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor galU and galE mutants: influence on lipopolysaccharide structure, colonization and biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 69 : 435-445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Nikaido, H. 1961. Galactose sensitive mutants of Salmonella. I. Metabolism of galactose. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 48 : 460-469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Nikaido, H. 1961. Galactose sensitive mutants of Salmonella. II. Bacteriolysis induced by galactose. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 48 : 470-479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Nogueras, M. M., S. Merino, A. Aguilar, V. J. Benedí, and J. M. Tomás. 2000. Cloning, sequencing and role in serum susceptibility of porin II from mesophilic Aeromonas sp. Infect. Immun. 68 : 1849-1854.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Quénée, L., D. Lamotte, and B. Polack. 2005. Combined sacB-based negative selection and cre-lox antibiotic marker recycling for efficient gene deletion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BioTechniques 38 : 63-67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Rabaan, A. A., I. Gryllos, J. M. Tomás, and J. G. Shaw. 2001. Motility and the polar flagellum are required for Aeromonas caviae adherence to Hep-2 cells. Infect. Immun. 69 : 4257-4267.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Reed, L. J., and H. Muench. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty percent end points. Am. J. Hyg. 27 : 493-497.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.
    Rubirés, X., F. Saigí, N. Piqué, N. Climent, S. Merino, S. Albertí, J. M. Tomás, and M. Regué. 1997. A gene (wbbL) from Serratia marcescens N28b (O4) complements the rfb-50 mutation of Escherichia coli K-12 derivatives. J. Bacteriol. 179 : 7581-7586.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  41. 41.↵
    Sanger, F., S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74 : 5463-5467.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Soldo, B., C. Scotti, D. Karamata, and V. Lazarevic. 2003. The Bacillus subtilis Gne (GneA, GalE) protein can catalyse UDP-glucose as well as UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 4-epimerisation. Gene 319 : 65-69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Vilches, S., C. Urgell, S. Merino, M. R. Chacón, L. Soler, G. Castro-Escarpulli, M. J. Figueras, and J. M. Tomás. 2004. Complete type III secretion system of a mesophilic Aeromonas hydrophila strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70 : 6914-6919.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    Wang, L., S. Huskic, A. Cisterne, D. Rothemund, and P. R. Reeves. 2002. The O-antigen gene cluster of Escherichia coli O55:H7 and identification of a new UDP-GlcNAc C4 epimerase gene. J. Bacteriol. 184 : 2620-2625.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Wilkinson, R. G., P. Gemski, and B. A. D. Stocker. 1972. Non-smooth mutants of Salmonella typhimurium: differentiation by phage sensitivity and genetic mapping. J. Gen. Microbiol. 70 : 527-554.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Role of Gne and GalE in the Virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila Serotype O34
Rocío Canals, Natalia Jiménez, Silvia Vilches, Miguel Regué, Susana Merino, Juan M. Tomás
Journal of Bacteriology Dec 2006, 189 (2) 540-550; DOI: 10.1128/JB.01260-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of Gne and GalE in the Virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila Serotype O34
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Role of Gne and GalE in the Virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila Serotype O34
Rocío Canals, Natalia Jiménez, Silvia Vilches, Miguel Regué, Susana Merino, Juan M. Tomás
Journal of Bacteriology Dec 2006, 189 (2) 540-550; DOI: 10.1128/JB.01260-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Aeromonas hydrophila
Carbohydrate Epimerases
UDPglucose 4-Epimerase

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530