Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
ENZYMES AND PROTEINS

Role of the Campylobacter jejuni Cj1461 DNA Methyltransferase in Regulating Virulence Characteristics

Joo-Sung Kim, Jiaqi Li, If H. A. Barnes, David A. Baltzegar, Mohanasundari Pajaniappan, Thomas W. Cullen, M. Stephen Trent, Christopher M. Burns, Stuart A. Thompson
Joo-Sung Kim
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiaqi Li
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
If H. A. Barnes
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Baltzegar
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohanasundari Pajaniappan
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas W. Cullen
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Stephen Trent
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher M. Burns
2College of Biomedical Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida 33431
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart A. Thompson
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: stthomps@mcg.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00765-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Mutation of the cj1461 predicted methyltransferase gene reduced the motility of Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. Electron microscopy revealed that the mutant strain had flagella but with aberrant structure. The Δcj1461 mutant was sevenfold more adherent to but 50-fold less invasive of INT-407 human epithelial cells than the wild type.

Campylobacter jejuni is a gram-negative bacterium and one of the most common bacterial causes of gastroenteritis worldwide (38). Major symptoms of Campylobacter infection include diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and fever, although most infections are self-limiting (27). Sources of infection include undercooked poultry meat, raw milk, and environmental water (9).

In bacteria, the N6 position of adenine and C5 or N4 position of cytosine can be methylated by DNA methyltransferases (MTases) (35). While DNA MTases are often involved in restriction-modification (R-M) systems (4), certain MTases, such as DNA adenine methylase (Dam), affect bacterial housekeeping functions, such as DNA replication and mismatch repair (23). Furthermore, Dam can also positively or negatively regulate the expression of numerous genes, including those involved in virulence phenotypes, such as motility, adherence to and invasion of host cells, M-cell cytotoxicity, and host colonization (1, 8, 11, 15, 19, 20, 22, 23). Dam affects gene expression by methylating GATC sites in promoter and operator regions, thus modifying interactions with the transcription apparatus and regulatory proteins (23).

In C. jejuni, elucidation of the mechanisms of gene regulation and virulence remains incomplete. In particular, a role for gene regulation by a DNA MTase (epigenetic regulation) has not been demonstrated. In this study, we report that mutation of the predicted MTase Cj1461 affects several phenotypes related to virulence, suggesting that epigenetic regulation may play a role in C. jejuni pathogenesis.

Cj1461 is a DNA MTase but is not a Dam ortholog.

The cj1461 gene is annotated as encoding a “possible DNA methylase” in the genome of C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (32), and orthologs are found in all sequenced Campylobacter genomes. Cj1461 has the conserved domain FGG (S-adenosyl methionine [SAM] binding site) and the DNA MTase active-site motif LYLDPPF (Prosite motif PS00092), which are signatures of N6-adenine-specific DNA methylases. No endonuclease-encoding gene is found adjacent to the cj1461 gene, suggesting that it is not part of an R-M system (24).

Because Cj1461 is predicted to be an N 6-adenine-specific DNA MTase, we assayed Cj1461 for DNA MTase activity. In E. coli, we first overproduced Cj1461 containing an N-terminal His6 tag and affinity purified Cj1461-His6 on a nickel column. Purified Cj1461-His6 was used in an MTase assay (6) using chromosomal DNA from the Δcj1461 mutant (Table 1; also, see below) as a nonmethylated substrate (Fig. 1). Commercially purchased Dam (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) was used as a positive control, with JM110 (dam mutant) chromosomal DNA as the substrate. This assay measures the ability of an enzyme to transfer the radiolabeled [3H]methyl group from SAM to substrate DNA. Both Dam and Cj1461 showed MTase activity, confirming sequence predictions that Cj1461 is a DNA MTase (Fig. 1). Control reactions (data not shown) using purified recombinant Cj1253 or Cj0355 failed to detect such activity, indicating that the observed activity was specific for Cj1461. The amount of Cj1461 MTase activity was somewhat lower than that of commercially purchased Dam. This could be due to a variety of factors, including a smaller number of target DNA sequences in the C. jejuni chromosome (Dam has >15,000 GATC targets per Escherichia coli chromosome), nonoptimized in vitro reaction conditions for Cj1461 activity, or partial Cj1461 enzymatic activity due to the His6 tag.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

DNA-MTase activity of 1 U Dam (New England Biolabs) or 1 μM Cj1461-His6 was measured using in vitro reaction mixtures containing 100 μM SAM, with a substrate of 500 ng of chromosomal DNA (from E. coli JM110 dam or C. jejuni Δcj1461 cells, respectively). Both DAM and Cj1461 showed MTase activity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Strains and plasmids used in this study

Because Cj1461 shares very limited homology with Dam, wild-type C. jejuni 81-176 (Table 1) was tested for Dam activity using the GATC-recognizing restriction endonucleases Sau3AI (insensitive to Dam methylation), DpnI (requires Dam methylation), and MboI (inhibited by Dam methylation). 81-176 chromosomal DNA was completely digested with Sau3AI and MboI but was resistant to DpnI digestion (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), showing that Dam methylation does not exist in 81-176 and that the sequence specificity of Cj1461 is different from that of Dam.

Generation of cj1461 mutant and complemented strains.

To generate a cj1461 mutant, the cj1461 gene was amplified from C. jejuni 81-176 genomic DNA using PCR with the primers cj1461-F1 and cj1461-R1 (Table 2), and cloned into pBluescript SKII(−) to yield pBS-cj1461. In vitro transposition was performed to inactivate the cj1461 gene using a kanamycin-resistant (Kmr) EZ::TN transposon (Epicentre, Madison, WI) as previously described (31). A plasmid (pBS-cj1461K) containing a transposon insertion after nucleotide 370 of the cj1461 gene was introduced into C. jejuni 81-176 via natural transformation-mediated allelic replacement. Numerous transformants were selected on kanamycin (60 μg/ml) and confirmed to have the cj1461 mutation. The ease with which cj1461 mutants were recovered further suggested that Cj1461 is not part of an R-M system, since mutation of the MTase component of an R-M system is expected to be lethal.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

PCR primers used in this study

To complement the cj1461 mutation, we inserted a second copy of cj1461 (under the control of its native promoter) into the cj0046 pseudogene (Fig. 2). The cj0046 pseudogene was amplified from C. jejuni 81-176 using the primers If313-F and If314-R (Table 2) and was subcloned into pBluescript SKII(−) to yield pBS-cj0046. Inverse PCR with primers If320-IV-F and If319-IV-R (Table 2) was used to introduce an NsiI site in cj0046. A chloramphenicol resistance (Cmr) gene, cat, was PCR amplified from pRY111 (36) using the primers If317-F and If318-R (Table 2) and ligated with the pBS-cj0046 inverse PCR product to yield pSAT1000.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Organization of cj1461, its surrounding genes, and complementation constructs in the cj0046 pseudogene. Gene designations are based on the C. jejuni NCTC 11168 genome (32); however, the organization of these genes is similar in C. jejuni 81-176. Arrows represent open reading frames and the direction of transcription. Arrows representing genes are not to scale for clarity of the figure. The solid arrow represents the cj1461 gene, and the dashed arrow indicates the cj0046 pseudogene. Triangles indicate the points of insertion of a kanamycin resistance transposon (aphA) in cj1461 and complementation constructs in cj0046. DNA included in the two complementation constructs is indicated by thick black lines below the gene map. Bent arrows represent promoters. The shaded box indicates the location of a putative σ54 enhancer for flgI. flgI encodes a flagellar structural component, the P ring. cj1459, cj1460, and cj1463 encode hypothetical proteins.

The cj1461 gene, including its ribosome-binding site, was amplified from C. jejuni 81-176; this product was cloned into pSAT1000 to yield pSAT1001. A 172-bp fragment containing the cj1461 promoter (upstream of cj1459) (Fig. 2 and data not shown) was inserted upstream of cj1461 to direct its expression at native levels. Because the σ54-regulated and motility-related cj1462 (flgI) and cj1463 genes were 59 bp downstream of cj1461, to determine any indirect effects of the cj1461 mutation on flgI and cj1463 expression, we also expressed a second copy of flgI and cj1463 in the Δcj1461 mutant, along with 739 bp upstream of cj1462 containing the promoter and putative σ54 enhancer of these genes. This region was amplified using the primers JL15 and JL16 (Table 2) and inserted in the cj0046 pseudogene of the Δcj1461 mutant by using the methods described above.

Mutation of cj1461 causes a motility defect.

Motility is a common bacterial virulence factor involved in colonization and invasion of host cells (30), including C. jejuni (3, 12, 17, 26, 28, 34, 37). Furthermore, Dam affects motility in several bacteria, including E. coli (29), Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (1), Aeromonas hydrophila (5), and Yersinia enterocolitica (7). To investigate a role for cj1461 in C. jejuni motility, the Δcj1461 mutant was tested in a Mueller-Hinton soft-agar assay (Mueller-Hinton medium with 0.4% agar) (14), and the diameter of the area of motility was measured after 48 h incubation at 37°C. The cj1461 mutation caused a significant reduction in motility compared to the wild type (Fig. 3), and the motility defect was not related to a growth defect of the Δcj1461 mutant (data not shown). Complementation of the Δcj1461 mutant with the native cj1461 gene (Fig. 2) partially but significantly restored motility, confirming that cj1461 specifically affects the motility of 81-176 (Fig. 3). Wet-mount microscopy confirmed differences in motility and suggested that cj1461 mutation affected motility rather than chemotaxis, although a chemotactic defect cannot be excluded.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Relative motility (percent of the value for the wild type) at 37°C of the complemented and uncomplemented Δcj1461 mutant cells. The cj1461 mutant showed impaired motility (*, P < 0.01), and complementation with cj1461 significantly restored motility (*, P < 0.01). In contrast, complementation with flgI and cj1463 did not restore motility. Data are the averages from at least three independent experiments. Bars represent standard deviation.

We considered the possibility that insertion of the Kmr transposon in cj1461 may have somehow disrupted the putative σ54 enhancer for the downstream flgI gene and that this could have indirectly affected the expression of flgI and motility of the mutant. To address this, we made a complementation construct containing nearly the entirety of cj1461 (but without its 5′ end to prevent cj1461 expression) and all of flgI and cj1463 (Fig. 2); this should contain all flgI and cj1463 transcriptional and translational initiation signals. Complementation of the Δcj1461 mutant with flgI and cj1463 together did not restore motility to the Δcj1461 mutant (Fig. 3). Together, these data suggest that the motility defect of the Δcj1461 mutant was not due to any indirect effect of the cj1461 mutation on flgI expression and that cj1461 is directly involved in the motility of 81-176.

Mutation of cj1461 causes a defect in flagellar appearance.

Transmission electron microscopy was used to visualize flagella as previously described (33). Fifty cells each of the C. jejuni wild-type, the Δcj1461 mutant, and the cj1461-complemented mutant strains were randomly selected, and the length of flagella at both poles was measured for individual cells. There was no significant difference between any of the strains in flagellar length (Fig. 4A and data not shown). However, further investigation revealed a difference in flagellar morphology among the strains. The flagella in nearly all wild-type and cj1461-complemented cells had the appearance typical of normal Campylobacter flagella (Fig. 4B) (P. Guerry, personal communication) (10, 13, 14, 16, 18, 39). In contrast, while half of the Δcj1461 mutant cells had a wild-type morphology, half exhibited an aberrant phenotype, having a more dense appearance with poorly defined edges (Fig. 4B). The difference in flagellar appearance between the wild type and the Δcj1461 mutant suggests structural differences that may be related to the observed motility difference. We do not know the molecular basis for the change in flagellar appearance, but it could be related to Cj1461-regulated epigenetic changes in some aspect of flagellar biosynthesis. For example, glycosylation of flagellar subunits is important for their proper assembly (13). If Cj1461 is involved in regulating some aspect of flagellar glycosylation, it could yield an improperly assembled and partially defective flagellum. Alternatively, it is possible that expression of cellular FlaA subunits could be decreased (but not absent) in the cj1461 mutant such that flagellum assembly kinetics are affected, resulting in flagella of normal length but aberrant structure. It is also possible that there are uncharacterized flagellar modifications (such as alternative covalent monomer modifications or variation in minor flagellar components) that could be changed in the cj1461 mutant. Elucidation of the molecular basis underlying the flagellar changes in the Δcj1461 mutant will be an interesting area of future research.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Transmission electron micrographs reveal that the Δcj1461 mutant has normal flagellar length (A), but a large number of cells show altered flagellar structure (B). Fifty Campylobacter cells from two independent samples of each strain were analyzed. wt, wild type.

cj1461 mutation causes hyperadherence to but decreased invasion of INT-407 cells.

Adherence and invasion assays were conducted as previously described (2, 25, 34). Briefly, C. jejuni cells were centrifuged onto semiconfluent INT-407 cells at a multiplicity of infection of about 20, and the number of adherent bacteria was quantified after 3 h. Gentamicin (250 μg/ml) was added to kill extracellular bacteria, and invasive bacteria were quantified after an additional 2 h incubation. Adherence was calculated as the number of adherent bacteria divided by the number of input bacteria. Invasion efficiency was calculated as the number of invasive bacteria divided by the number of adherent bacteria, to normalize for differences in adherence.

The Δcj1461 mutant was sevenfold more adherent to INT-407 cells than wild-type cells were (Fig. 5). Complementation with the cj1461 gene restored wild-type adherence, confirming that the absence of Cj1461 caused hyperadherence to INT-407 cells. No change in the mobility of lipooligosaccharide of the Δcj1461 mutant was found compared to the wild type on silver-stained gels (data not shown), indicating that gross changes in lipooligosaccharide did not account for the hyperadherence. The molecular basis for the hyperadherence of the Δcj1461 mutant is currently unknown but warrants further investigation.

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

Adherence to (A) and invasion of (B) INT-407 cells by wild-type (WT), Δcj1461 mutant, and complemented mutant strains. Mutation of cj1461 resulted in sevenfold increased adherence compared to the wild type (A). In contrast, the Δcj1461 mutant was 50-fold less invasive than the wild type (B). For both adherence and invasion, complementation with cj1461 restored wild-type phenotypes. Data are the averages from two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Bars represent standard deviations.

In contrast to its hyperadherence, the Δcj1461 mutant had a severe defect (50-fold) in invasion of INT-407 cells compared to the wild type, and complementation with the cj1461 gene restored wild-type invasion efficiency (Fig. 5). All three strains had identical gentamicin MICs (data not shown), indicating that the invasion phenotypes of the strains were not due to differences in gentamicin susceptibilities. Alteration of the invasion efficiency in the Δcj1461 mutant indicates that cj1461 is involved in invasion of host cells by C. jejuni 81-176. Because motility is a prerequisite for invasion into eukaryotic cells, the motility defect of the mutant may be a significant contributor to the invasion deficiency of the mutant into INT-407 cells, although we cannot rule out possible contribution by other proteins that may be altered in the Δcj1461 mutant. The involvement of DNA MTases in host cell invasion was also demonstrated in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium and Y. enterocolitica expressing aberrant levels of Dam (15).

Conclusion.

It has become evident that epigenetic regulation by DNA MTases can play a significant role in the virulence of pathogenic bacteria (15). This study shows that loss of the predicted C. jejuni Cj1461 DNA MTase affects virulence characteristics such as motility, adherence, and invasion in C. jejuni 81-176. These results suggest that epigenetic regulation by Cj1461 may control the expression of proteins involved in these processes and therefore could play a significant role in the pathogenesis of C. jejuni.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Richard J. Roberts (New England Biolabs) for helpful discussions and Bob Smith (Medical College of Georgia) for assistance with transmission electron microscopy.

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AI055715, AI058284, and AI061026 (to S.A.T.) and R01AI064184 and R01AI076322 (to M.S.T.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 29 May 2008.
    • Accepted 21 July 2008.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Balbontin, R., G. Rowley, M. G. Pucciarelli, J. Lopez-Garrido, Y. Wormstone, S. Lucchini, F. Garcia-Del Portillo, J. C. Hinton, and J. Casadesús. 2006. DNA adenine methylation regulates virulence gene expression in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 188 : 8160-8168.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Barnes, I. H., M. C. Bagnall, D. D. Browning, S. A. Thompson, G. Manning, and D. G. Newell. 2007. γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase has a role in the persistent colonization of the avian gut by Campylobacter jejuni. Microb. Pathog. 43 : 198-207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Chang, C., and J. F. Miller. 2006. Campylobacter jejuni colonization of mice with limited enteric flora. Infect. Immun. 74 : 5261-5271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Dale, J. W., and S. F. Park. 2004. Molecular genetics of bacteria, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England.
  5. 5.↵
    Erova, T. E., L. Pillai, A. A. Fadl, J. Sha, S. Wang, C. L. Galindo, and A. K. Chopra. 2006. DNA adenine methyltransferase influences the virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila. Infect. Immun. 74 : 410-424.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Evdokimov, A. A., V. V. Zinoviev, E. G. Malygin, S. L. Schlagman, and S. Hattman. 2002. Bacteriophage T4 Dam DNA-[N6-adenine] methyltransferase—kinetic evidence for a catalytically essential conformational change in the ternary complex. J. Biol. Chem. 277 : 279-286.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Fälker, S., J. Schilling, M. A. Schmidt, and G. Heusipp. 2007. Overproduction of DNA adenine methyltransferase alters motility, invasion, and the lipopolysaccharide O-antigen composition of Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect. Immun. 75 : 4990-4997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Fälker, S., M. A. Schmidt, and G. Heusipp. 2005. DNA methylation in Yersinia enterocolitica: role of the DNA adenine methyltransferase in mismatch repair and regulation of virulence factors. Microbiology 151 : 2291-2299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Friedman, C. R., J. Neimann, H. C. Wegener, and R. V. Tauxe. 2000. Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialized nations, p. 121-138. In I. Nachamkin and M. J. Blaser (ed.), Campylobacter , 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  10. 10.↵
    Galkin, V. E., X. Yu, J. Bielnicki, J. Heuser, C. P. Ewing, P. Guerry, and E. H. Egelman. 2008. Divergence of quaternary structures among bacterial flagellar filaments. Science 320 : 382-385.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    García-Del Portillo, F., M. Graciella Pucciarelli, and J. Casadesús. 1999. DNA adenine methylase mutants of Salmonella typhimurium show defects in protein secretion, cell invasion and M cell cytotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 : 11578-11583.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Grant, C. C., M. E. Konkel, W. Cieplak, Jr., and L. S. Tompkins. 1993. Role of flagella in adherence, internalization, and translocation of Campylobacter jejuni in nonpolarized and polarized epithelial cell cultures. Infect. Immun. 61 : 1764-1771.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Guerry, P. 2007. Campylobacter flagella: not just for motility. Trends Microbiol. 15 : 456-461.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Guerry, P., R. A. Alm, M. E. Power, S. M. Logan, and T. J. Trust. 1991. Role of two flagellin genes in Campylobacter motility. J. Bacteriol. 173 : 4757-4764.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Heusipp, G., S. Fälker, and M. A. Schmidt. 2007. DNA adenine methylation and bacterial pathogenesis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 297 : 1-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Jagannathan, A., C. Constantinidou, and C. W. Penn. 2001. Roles of rpoN, fliA, and flgR in expression of flagella in Campylobacter jejuni. J. Bacteriol. 183 : 2937-2942.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Jagannathan, A., and C. W. Penn. 2005. Motility, p. 331-347. In J. M. Ketley and M. E. Konkel (ed.), Campylobacter: cellular and molecular biology. Horizon Bioscience, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
  18. 18.↵
    Jeon, B., K. Itoh, N. Misawa, and S. Ryu. 2003. Effects of quorum sensing on flaA transcription and autoagglutination in Campylobacter jejuni. Microbiol. Immunol. 47 : 833-839.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Julio, S. M., D. M. Heithoff, D. Provenzano, K. E. Klose, R. L. Sinsheimer, D. A. Low, and M. J. Mahan. 2001. DNA adenine methylase is essential for viability and plays a role in the pathogenesis of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun. 69 : 7610-7615.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Julio, S. M., D. M. Heithoff, R. L. Sinsheimer, D. A. Low, and M. J. Mahan. 2002. DNA adenine methylase overproduction in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis alters YopE expression and secretion and host immune responses to infection. Infect. Immun. 70 : 1006-1009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.
    Korlath, J. A., M. T. Osterholm, L. A. Judy, J. C. Forfang, and R. A. Robinson. 1985. A point-source outbreak of campylobacteriosis associated with consumption of raw milk. J. Infect. Dis. 152 : 592-596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Lobner-Olesen, A., O. Skovgaard, and M. G. Marinus. 2005. Dam methylation: coordinating cellular processes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8 : 154-160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Low, D. A., N. J. Weyand, and M. J. Mahan. 2001. Roles of DNA adenine methylation in regulating bacterial gene expression and virulence. Infect. Immun. 69 : 7197-7204.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Miller, W. G., B. M. Pearson, J. M. Wells, C. T. Parker, V. V. Kapitonov, and R. E. Mandrell. 2005. Diversity within the Campylobacter jejuni type I restriction-modification loci. Microbiology 151 : 337-351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Monteville, M. R., J. E. Yoon, and M. E. Konkel. 2003. Maximal adherence and invasion of INT 407 cells by Campylobacter jejuni requires the CadF outer-membrane protein and microfilament reorganization. Microbiology 149 : 153-165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Morooka, T., A. Umeda, and K. Amako. 1985. Motility as an intestinal colonization factor for Campylobacter jejuni. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131 : 1973-1980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Nachamkin, I., J. Engberg, and F. M. Aarestrup. 2000. Diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter species, p. 45-66. In I. Nachamkin and M. J. Blaser (ed.), Campylobacter , 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  28. 28.↵
    Nachamkin, I., X. H. Yang, and N. J. Stern. 1993. Role of Campylobacter jejuni flagella as colonization factors for three-day-old chicks: analysis with flagellar mutants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 : 1269-1273.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Oshima, T., C. Wada, Y. Kawagoe, T. Ara, M. Maeda, Y. Masuda, S. Hiraga, and H. Mori. 2002. Genome-wide analysis of deoxyadenosine methyltransferase-mediated control of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 45 : 673-695.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Ottemann, K. M., and J. F. Miller. 1997. Roles for motility in bacterial-host interactions. Mol. Microbiol. 24 : 1109-1117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Pajaniappan, M., J. E. Hall, S. A. Cawthraw, D. G. Newell, E. C. Gaynor, J. A. Fields, K. M. Rathbun, W. A. Agee, C. M. Burns, S. J. Hall, D. J. Kelly, and S. A. Thompson. 2008. A temperature-regulated Campylobacter jejuni gluconate dehydrogenase is involved in respiration-dependent energy conservation and chicken colonization. Mol. Microbiol. 68 : 474-491.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Parkhill, J., B. W. Wren, K. Mungall, J. M. Ketley, C. Churcher, D. Basham, T. Chillingworth, R. M. Davies, T. Feltwell, S. Holroyd, K. Jagels, A. V. Karlyshev, S. Moule, M. J. Pallen, C. W. Penn, M. A. Quail, M. A. Rajandream, K. M. Rutherford, A. H. van Vliet, S. Whitehead, and B. G. Barrell. 2000. The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature 403 : 665-668.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Sommerlad, S. M., and D. R. Hendrixson. 2007. Analysis of the roles of FlgP and FlgQ in flagellar motility of Campylobacter jejuni. J. Bacteriol. 189 : 179-186.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Wassenaar, T. M., N. M. Bleumink-Pluym, and B. A. van der Zeijst. 1991. Inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni flagellin genes by homologous recombination demonstrates that flaA but not flaB is required for invasion. EMBO J. 10 : 2055-2061.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Wion, D., and J. Casadesús. 2006. N6-methyl-adenine: an epigenetic signal for DNA-protein interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4 : 183-192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Yao, R., R. A. Alm, T. J. Trust, and P. Guerry. 1993. Construction of new Campylobacter cloning vectors and a new mutational cat cassette. Gene 130 : 127-130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Yao, R., D. H. Burr, P. Doig, T. J. Trust, H. Niu, and P. Guerry. 1994. Isolation of motile and non-motile insertional mutants of Campylobacter jejuni: the role of motility in adherence and invasion of eukaryotic cells. Mol. Microbiol. 14 : 883-893.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Young, V. B., and L. S. Mansfield. 2005. Campylobacter infection—clinical context, p. 1-12. In J. M. Ketley and M. E. Konkel (ed.), Campylobacter: cellular and molecular biology. Horizon Bioscience, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
  39. 39.↵
    Zhilenkov, E. L., V. M. Popova, D. V. Popov, L. Y. Zavalsky, E. A. Svetoch, N. J. Stern, and B. S. Seal. 2006. The ability of flagellum-specific Proteus vulgaris bacteriophage PV22 to interact with Campylobacter jejuni flagella in culture. Virol. J. 3 : 50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Role of the Campylobacter jejuni Cj1461 DNA Methyltransferase in Regulating Virulence Characteristics
Joo-Sung Kim, Jiaqi Li, If H. A. Barnes, David A. Baltzegar, Mohanasundari Pajaniappan, Thomas W. Cullen, M. Stephen Trent, Christopher M. Burns, Stuart A. Thompson
Journal of Bacteriology Sep 2008, 190 (19) 6524-6529; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00765-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of the Campylobacter jejuni Cj1461 DNA Methyltransferase in Regulating Virulence Characteristics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Role of the Campylobacter jejuni Cj1461 DNA Methyltransferase in Regulating Virulence Characteristics
Joo-Sung Kim, Jiaqi Li, If H. A. Barnes, David A. Baltzegar, Mohanasundari Pajaniappan, Thomas W. Cullen, M. Stephen Trent, Christopher M. Burns, Stuart A. Thompson
Journal of Bacteriology Sep 2008, 190 (19) 6524-6529; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00765-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Cj1461 is a DNA MTase but is not a Dam ortholog.
    • Generation of cj1461 mutant and complemented strains.
    • Mutation of cj1461 causes a motility defect.
    • Mutation of cj1461 causes a defect in flagellar appearance.
    • cj1461 mutation causes hyperadherence to but decreased invasion of INT-407 cells.
    • Conclusion.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Campylobacter jejuni
DNA Modification Methylases

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530