Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
ENZYMES AND PROTEINS

Site-Directed Mutagenesis Reveals Putative Substrate Binding Residues in the Escherichia coli RND Efflux Pump AcrB

Jürgen A. Bohnert, Sabine Schuster, Markus A. Seeger, Eva Fähnrich, Klaas M. Pos, Winfried V. Kern
Jürgen A. Bohnert
Center for Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, University Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: juergen@bohnert.name
Sabine Schuster
Center for Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, University Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus A. Seeger
Institute of Physiology and Zürich Centre for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva Fähnrich
Center for Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, University Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaas M. Pos
Institute of Physiology and Zürich Centre for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Winfried V. Kern
Center for Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, University Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00912-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The Escherichia coli multidrug efflux pump protein AcrB has recently been cocrystallized with various substrates, suggesting that there is a phenylalanine-rich binding site around F178 and F615. We found that F610A was the point mutation that had the most significant impact on substrate MICs, while other targeted mutations, including conversion of phenylalanines 136, 178, 615, 617, and 628 to alanine, had smaller and more variable effects.

The Escherichia coli AcrB multidrug efflux pump is a member of the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family and recognizes many chemically unrelated compounds, including various dyes and antibiotics (10, 11). AcrB cooperates with the membrane fusion protein AcrA and the TolC outer membrane protein.

While previous crystallographic studies with crystals grown in trigonal space group R32 described a symmetric AcrB trimer, recent studies of structures derived from monoclinic crystals described an asymmetric trimer in which each protomer was suggested to correspond to a distinct functional state of a proposed three-step transport cycle reminiscent of a peristaltic pump (9, 12, 13). In this model, the protomer in its binding or tight-state conformation forms a hydrophobic pocket defined by phenylalanines 136, 178, 610, 615, 617, and 628.

Analysis of doxorubicin- and minocycline-complexed AcrB crystals suggested that these two compounds interact with different residues of the binding protomer. Minocycline seemed to interact with F178, N274, and F615, while doxorubicin seemed to interact with Q176, F615 and F617 (9). Thus, it was proposed that the extremely broad substrate spectrum of AcrB could be explained by the flexible interaction of various ligands mostly with hydrophobic phenylalanines and to a minor degree with polar residues in the binding pocket.

Support for this model also came from several mutational studies which found that substrate specificity in RND efflux pumps is determined by residues in the periplasmic domain (2-4, 7, 8). A recent study found that the V610F mutation in the E. coli RND efflux pump YhiV, which is homologous to the V612F mutation in AcrB, leads to a 16-fold increase in the linezolid MIC compared to the MIC of the YhiUV-overproducing wild-type strain (2).

However, no systematic site-directed mutagenesis study of the phenylalanine residues that form the proposed hydrophobic binding pocket in AcrB has been described previously.

In the present study we constructed and tested such phenylalanine mutants to examine the functional role of hydrophobic residues in the proposed AcrB multidrug binding site. We used as the parental strain the previously described multidrug-resistant (gyrA marR) acrB-overexpressing E. coli K-12 strain 3-AG100 that was obtained after repeated exposure to a fluoroquinolone (5).

For site-directed mutagenesis the phage λ-based homologous recombination system (Red/ET counterselection Bac modification kit; GeneBridges, Heidelberg, Germany) was used to introduce an rpsL-neo cassette into the acrB gene of strain 3-AG100 (grown in Luria-Bertani broth) and to subsequently replace the cassette with an appropriate oligonucleotide (the sequences of the PCR primers and oligonucleotides that were obtained from Thermo Electron [Ulm, Germany] are shown in Table 1). Recombination events were confirmed by PCR and nucleotide sequencing of the acrB gene using standard techniques.

To confirm production of the mutant AcrB protein, we performed Western blotting using standard techniques. Most of the mutants exhibited a strong immunogenic response; the only exception was an F615A/F617A/F628A triple mutant which was excluded from further study due to insufficient AcrB expression (Fig. 1).

We used as a positive control strain F628F, which is a pseudomutant with MICs and ethidium bromide (EtBr) and phenylalanine-arginine β-naphthylamide (PAβN) accumulation properties corresponding to those of wild-type strain 3-AG100. F628A is characterized by a silent mutation from TTC to TTT (sequence shown in Table 1) that demonstrates that the site-directed mutagenesis technique has no inherent effect.

The susceptibilities of the different mutants to various antimicrobials and dyes and to the putative efflux pump inhibitors 1-naphthylmethylpiperazine (NMP) and PAβN were characterized by determining MICs in 96-well microtiter plates as described previously (1, 2, 6) and are shown in Table 2. EtBr (external concentration, 2.5 μM) and PAβN (external concentration, 200 μM) fluorescence accumulation assays were carried out at least in duplicate for 30 min using our previously described protocol (2). Both EtBr and PAβN are excellent substrates of AcrAB-TolC and were chosen since they are structurally diverse; thus, the recognition by the AcrB binding pocket was assumed to be mediated by different residues. EtBr is a nonspecific DNA intercalator which, upon binding to its target structure, causes enhancement of fluorescence, while the intrinsically low-fluorescence compound PAβN is cleaved by esterases, yielding the highly fluorescent compound β-naphthylamine as described previously in a study using the related substrate Ala-Nap (naphthylamide) (6). The results obtained are shown in Fig. 2a and 2b. We also used an EtBr concentration of 25 μM and a PAβN concentration of 20 μM and obtained similar results (data not shown).

The complete disruption of acrB by the rpsL-neo cassette led to a highly drug-susceptible phenotype and dramatic increases in EtBr and PAβN accumulation. The positive control pseudomutant F628F displayed no changes in the MIC assays or in the dye accumulation assays. Novobiocin was the only drug whose MIC was consistently markedly reduced for every single mutant. The F136A, F178A, F615A, F617A, and F628A mutations had very variable effects on substrate MICs. In addition to the susceptibility of the mutants to novobiocin, the MICs of oxacillin and the macrolides tested were also reduced in all but the F617A mutant. F178A markedly increased the susceptibility to linezolid, and the F628A mutation was found to reduce the MICs of Hoechst 33342, pyronine Y, and minocycline more than 4-fold and to increase EtBr and PAβN accumulation ∼2-fold after 30 min.

The crystallographic structure of the asymmetric AcrB trimer suggests that the main interactions between substrates and protein are due to an ensemble of phenylalanines mediating hydrophobic interactions, which might explain the extremely broad substrate specificity (Fig. 3). Surprisingly, although the AcrB cocrystallization with doxorubicin and minocycline suggested that there is a strong interaction of these substrates with F178 and F615, the F615A and F178A mutations had no measurable impact on the MICs of these two substrates. Deletion of amino acids 615 to 617 was associated with minor changes in the susceptibility to minocycline and some changes in the MICs of macrolides and oxacillin.

The lack of correlation between the changes in susceptibility to doxorubicin and minocycline and the model derived from cocrystallization might have been due to redundancy of phenylalanines in the binding pocket. Mutating or deleting only one or even two phenylalanines might only lead to a (slight) reorientation of the substrate and use of other phenylalanines as hydrophobic interaction partners without generally compromising substrate capture. However, bulkier substrates, like the macrolides or novobiocin, might be unable to adapt properly in the altered environment of the pocket and might be affected more by a single mutation.

To test this hypothesis, we generated the F615A/F617A/F628A triple phenylalanine mutant; however, since we obtained only a weak Western blot band (Fig. 1), suggesting that the level of expression of the mutant AcrB protein was low, we did not include this mutant in further analyses.

The F610A mutant, however, displayed dramatically enhanced susceptibility to almost all AcrB substrates tested (but not to aminoglycosides and NMP, which are not AcrB substrates), although the absolute changes varied considerably for different substrates. In contrast, the F610A mutation increased EtBr accumulation only moderately and did not affect PAβN accumulation. This difference might have been due to the different time windows between the MIC and fluorescence experiments. The dramatic impact on substrate MICs indicates that the F610 residue has a special role in the substrate extrusion process, although the exact mechanism remains unclear. The other targeted mutations, including conversion of phenylalanines 136, 178, 615, 617, and 628 to alanine, generally had smaller effects on substrate susceptibility and presumably efflux function and binding, and the effects were variable depending on the substrate.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Western blot analysis of mutant AcrB production. Total protein extracts of E. coli 3-AG100 mutants (14 μg protein) were separated by NuPAGE Novex bis-Tris (Invitrogen, California) gel electrophoresis and probed with polyclonal anti-AcrB antibodies. Lanes MW contained molecular weight markers.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Increases in EtBr (a) and PAβN (b) fluorescence in AcrB phenylalanine mutants compared to pseudomutant AcrB strain F628F. Fluorescence was recorded for 30 min after addition of 2.5 μM EtBr or 200 μM PAβN. The values are means of at least duplicate experiments. RFU, relative fluorescence units.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

AcrB binding pocket based on the “tight” monomer 2GIF structure coordinates (12). Phenylalanines are indicated by sticks. The image was generated using the molecular visualization software PyMol (http://pymol.sourceforge.net).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Oligonucleotides and primers used for Red/ET-recombinationa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

MICs of different pump substrates for AcrB mutants of E. coli 3-AG100a

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by BMBF grant 01KI9951.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 2 July 2008.
    • Accepted 1 October 2008.
  • ↵▿ Published ahead of print on 10 October 2008.

  • American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Bohnert, J. A., and W. V. Kern. 2005. Selected arylpiperazines are capable of reversing multidrug resistance in Escherichia coli overexpressing RND efflux pumps. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:849-852.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Bohnert, J. A., S. Schuster, E. Fähnrich, R. Trittler, and W. V. Kern. 2007. Altered spectrum of multidrug resistance associated with a single point mutation in the Escherichia coli RND-type MDR efflux pump YhiV (MdtF). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59:1216-1222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. Elkins, C. A., and H. Nikaido. 2002. Substrate specificity of the RND-type multidrug efflux pumps AcrB and AcrD of Escherichia coli is determined predominantly by two large periplasmic loops. J. Bacteriol. 184:6490-6498.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Hearn, E. M., M. R. Gray, and J. M. Foght. 2006. Mutations in the central cavity and periplasmic domain affect efflux activity of the resistance-nodulation-division pump EmhB from Pseudomonas fluorescens cLP6a. J. Bacteriol. 188:115-123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Jellen-Ritter, A. S., and W. V. Kern. 2001. Enhanced expression of the multidrug efflux pumps AcrAB and AcrEF associated with insertion element transposition in Escherichia coli mutants selected with a fluoroquinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1467-1472.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Lomovskaya, O., M. S. Warren, A. Lee, J. Galazzo, R. Fronko, M. Lee, J. Blais, D. Cho, S. Chamberland, T. Renau, R. Leger, S. Hecker, W. Watkins, K. Hoshino, H. Ishida, and V. J. Lee. 2001. Identification and characterization of inhibitors of multidrug resistance efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel agents for combination therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:105-116.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Mao, W., M. S. Warren, D. S. Black, T. Satou, T. Murata, T. Nishino, N. Gotoh, and O. Lomovskaya. 2002. On the mechanism of substrate specificity by resistance nodulation division (RND)-type multidrug resistance pumps: the large periplasmic loops of MexD from Pseudomonas aeruginosa are involved in substrate recognition. Mol. Microbiol. 46:889-901.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Middlemiss, J. K., and K. Poole. 2004. Differential impact of MexB mutations on substrate selectivity of the MexAB-OprM multidrug efflux pump of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 186:1258-1269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Murakami, S., R. Nakashima, E. Yamashita, T. Matsumoto, and A. Yamaguchi. 2006. Crystal structures of a multidrug transporter reveal a functionally rotating mechanism. Nature 443:173-179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Nikaido, H. 1998. Antibiotic resistance caused by gram-negative multidrug efflux pumps. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27(Suppl. 1):S32-S41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Piddock, L. J. 2006. Clinically relevant chromosomally encoded multidrug resistance efflux pumps in bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19:382-402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Seeger, M. A., A. Schiefner, T. Eicher, F. Verrey, K. Diederichs, and K. M. Pos. 2006. Structural asymmetry of AcrB trimer suggests a peristaltic pump mechanism. Science 313:1295-1298.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Sennhauser, G., P. Amstutz, C. Briand, O. Storchenegger, and M. G. Grutter. 2007. Drug export pathway of multidrug exporter AcrB revealed by DARPin inhibitors. PLoS Biol. 5:e7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Site-Directed Mutagenesis Reveals Putative Substrate Binding Residues in the Escherichia coli RND Efflux Pump AcrB
Jürgen A. Bohnert, Sabine Schuster, Markus A. Seeger, Eva Fähnrich, Klaas M. Pos, Winfried V. Kern
Journal of Bacteriology Nov 2008, 190 (24) 8225-8229; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00912-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Site-Directed Mutagenesis Reveals Putative Substrate Binding Residues in the Escherichia coli RND Efflux Pump AcrB
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
Share
Site-Directed Mutagenesis Reveals Putative Substrate Binding Residues in the Escherichia coli RND Efflux Pump AcrB
Jürgen A. Bohnert, Sabine Schuster, Markus A. Seeger, Eva Fähnrich, Klaas M. Pos, Winfried V. Kern
Journal of Bacteriology Nov 2008, 190 (24) 8225-8229; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00912-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530