Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PATHOGENS

CcpC-Dependent Regulation of Citrate Synthase Gene Expression in Listeria monocytogenes

Meghna Mittal, Silvia Picossi, Abraham L. Sonenshein
Meghna Mittal
1Program in Molecular Microbiology, Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Picossi
2Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts 02111
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abraham L. Sonenshein
1Program in Molecular Microbiology, Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences
2Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts 02111
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: linc.sonenshein@tufts.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01384-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Organization of the citZ locus in L. monocytogenes and genetic content of lacZ fusions used in B. subtilis. L. monocytogenes genes are indicated by designations used at the ListiList database site (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/ListiList/ ). The arrows indicate genes and their orientations, and the balloons indicate the locations of putative transcription termination sites. A putative CcpC-binding site is indicated by a box in the region upstream of lmo1568. The regions fused to lacZ and used for assays of gene expression in B. subtilis are indicated. The arrowheads indicate the putative positions of transcription start sites. The figure is not drawn to scale.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Genetic content of lacZ fusions integrated at the L. monocytogenes int′-′comK locus. The regions fused to lacZ and used for assays of gene expression in L. monocytogenes are indicated below the gene map. The arrows above the gene map indicate the annealing sites and orientations of primers used for RT-PCR experiments. See the legend to Fig. 1 for additional details.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    RT-PCR analysis of the effect of ccpA mutation on citZ expression. RNA was extracted from wild-type, ccpC mutant, ccpA mutant, or ccpC ccpA double-mutant cells growing exponentially in BHI medium. Primer OMM88 was used for RT, and OMM88 and OMM87 were the primers used in PCR with the cDNA. The upper panels show the results for the citZ transcript (two different amounts of RNA and two different numbers of PCR cycles). The lower panels show the results for two different amounts of rRNA used as a control. The intensities of the bands were quantified using ImageQuant software. In two independent experiments, the average values for the citZ transcript relative to the wild type, normalized to rRNA, were 0.9 ± 0.1 for the ccpA mutant, 10 ± 2 for the ccpC mutant, and 9 ± 3 for the ccpA ccpC mutant.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Primer extension analysis to map the tsp for the lmo1568 gene. Three oligonucleotide primers that were labeled with 32P at the 5′ end and were complementary to lacZ mRNA (see Materials and Methods) were annealed to total cellular RNA that was extracted from wild-type strain EGD-e and ccpC null mutant cells carrying a lmo1568-lacZ fusion and growing exponentially in BHI medium and were extended by using deoxynucleoside triphosphates and reverse transcriptase. The DNA products were separated by electrophoresis on a 6% polyacrylamide-7 M urea gel, and their mobilities were compared with the mobilities of dideoxynucleotide sequencing ladders (lanes A, C, G, and T) generated using two of the same primers used for primer extension and the relevant cloned DNA as the template. (The length of the third reverse transcript was extrapolated from its mobility relative to the mobilities of DNA sequences having known lengths generated with the other primers.) The left and right lanes in each set show products obtained with RNA from the wild-type (WT) and ccpC mutant strains, respectively. The following primers were used: for the left panel, OMM070; for the middle panel, OMM071; and for the right panel, OBB102. The arrows indicate the positions of the primer extension products. The sequence of the lmo1568 promoter region is shown below the gels. The consensus recognition sequences for CcpC are indicated by uppercase letters. The putative −35 and −10 regions and transcription start site (+1) of the deduced P2 promoter are also indicated. The start codon (ATG) is italicized.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    RT-PCR analysis of read-through transcription from the P1 promoter into lmo1568. RNA was extracted from cells growing exponentially in BHI medium. Lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 contained RT-PCR products from the wild-type strain, and lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 contained RT-PCR products from the ccpC null strain. For analysis of read-through transcription from P1, the primer used for RT was OMM64; the PCR was primed with OMM50 and OMM64 (Fig. 2). One microgram of RNA was used for RT, and 10% of the product was used as a template for the PCR. To assay for rRNA as a normalization factor, 50 ng of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis and 10% of the product was used as a template for a PCR. The numbers of PCR cycles are indicated below the gels. The band intensities for the ccpC mutant strain RNA normalized to rRNA and relative to the wild-type intensities (wt) for the experiment shown were determined by using densitometry and ImageQuant software and are also indicated below the gels. In three independent experiments, the average value for the read-through transcript normalized to rRNA and relative to the wild-type value was 3.5 ± 0.5 for the ccpC mutant.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    RT-PCR analysis of read-through transcription from citZ into the citC gene and regulation of citC by CcpC. RNA was extracted from wild-type and ccpC mutant cells growing exponentially in BHI medium. To assay for citZ-citC read-through transcription or for citC transcription, 500 ng of RNA was used for RT and 10% of the product was used as a template for a PCR. To assay for rRNA as a normalization factor, 50 ng of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis and 10% of the product was used as a template for PCR. Data from two independent experiments (experiments 1 and 2) are shown. Each pair of lanes shows the results obtained with RNA from wild-type cells (lanes a) and from ccpC mutant cells (lanes b). The numbers of PCR cycles are indicated below the gels. Band intensities were quantified by using densitometry and ImageQuant software. (A) Read-through transcription from citZ into the downstream citC gene. The primers used were OMM140 and OMM98 (Fig. 2). In two independent experiments, the average amount of read-through transcript (normalized to the amount of rRNA) was 2.5- ± 0.5-fold larger in the ccpC mutant than in the wild-type strain. (B) Transcripts of the citC gene. The primers used were OMM97 and OMM98 (Fig. 2). In two independent experiments, the amount of citC transcript (normalized to the amount of rRNA) was 3- ± 0.2-fold larger in the ccpC mutant than in the wild-type strain.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    Gel mobility shift assay of the interaction of L. monocytogenes CcpC with the P1 and P2 promoters. CcpC-His6 was incubated with 32P-labeled DNA fragments containing either the lmo1568 (left panel) or lmo1569 (right panel) promoter region. The concentrations of CcpC-His6 used in the reactions were as follows: for lmo1568, 0, 3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125, 250, 500, and 1,000 nM (lanes 1 to 10, respectively); and for lmo1569, 0, 7.8, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125, 250, 500, and 1,000 nM (lanes 1 to 9, respectively). See Materials and Methods for details.

  • FIG. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 8.

    DNase I footprinting assay of the interaction between CcpC-His6 and the P2 promoter region. A 32P-labeled DNA fragment corresponding to the lmo1568 promoter region was incubated with various amounts of CcpC-His6 prior to DNase I digestion. The concentrations of CcpC-His6 (in nM) used in the reactions are indicated above the lanes. The vertical bar indicates the region protected from DNase I digestion by CcpC-His6. In the sequence of the lmo1568 promoter region shown on the right, the region protected by CcpC-His6 from DNase I digestion (positions −9 to −61 with respect to the transcription start site, as deduced from other experiments in which a DNA sequence ladder was generated) is indicated by bold type. The consensus recognition sequences for CcpC are indicated by uppercase letters. The transcription start site is indicated by a single uppercase T, and the −10 and −35 regions are also indicated. The start codon of lmo1568 is indicated by italics.

  • FIG. 9.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 9.

    Effect of medium composition on expression of a lacZ fusion in L. monocytogenes. Strains LMM16 (ccpC +) (gray bars) and LMM21 (ΔccpC::spc) (black bars), both of which carried an lmo1568-lacZ fusion, were grown at 37°C in BHI medium supplemented with 0.5% glucose, 1.6 mg glutamine per ml, or 0.5% citrate or with combinations of these supplements. β-Galactosidase activity was measured using samples taken at various points during the exponential phase of growth. The values are the averages of two experiments.

  • FIG. 10.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 10.

    Synteny of the citZ loci in L. monocytogenes and B. subtilis. The designations of the L. monocytogenes and B. subtilis genes are the designations used in the ListiList (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/ListiList/ ) and SubtiList (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/SubtiList/ ) databases. The arrows indicate genes and their orientations, and the balloons indicate the locations of putative transcription termination sites. Dotted lines connect genes whose products share sequence similarity.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Bacterial strains used

    StrainGenotype and/or other characteristicsSource or reference
    B. subtilis strains
        SMYWild typeP. Schaeffer
        LS1002ΔamyE::Φ(citBp21-lacZ cat) ccpC::spc ccpA::Tn917(ble) 23
        SG82 trpC2 lacA::tet 5
        HKB5 ccpA::Tn917(ble)SMY × LS1002 DNA
        BB1888 lacA::tet SMY × SG82 DNA
        BMM1ΔamyE::Φ(lmo1569-lmo1568-citZ-lacZ) ΔccpC::spc BMM6 × LS1002 DNA
        BMM3ΔamyE::Φ(lmo1568-citZ-lacZ) ΔccpC::spc BMM7 × LS1002 DNA
        BMM4ΔamyE::Φ(citZ-lacZ) ΔccpC::spc BMM8 × LS1002 DNA
        BMM6ΔamyE::Φ(lmo1569-lmo1568-citZ-lacZ)BB1888 × pEMM10
        BMM7ΔamyE::Φ(lmo1568-citZ-lacZ)BB1888 × pEMM11
        BMM8ΔamyE::Φ(citZ-lacZ)BB1888 × pEMM13
        BMM12ΔamyE::Φ(lmo1569-lmo1568-citZ-lacZ) ΔccpA::ble BMM6 × HKB5 DNA
        BMM13ΔamyE::Φ(lmo1568-citZ-lacZ) ΔccpA::ble BMM7 × HKB5 DNA
    L. monocytogenes strains
        EGD-eAnimal isolate, genome sequencing strain 14
        HKB214Δint::Φ(citB-lacZ neo) 24
        LMM16Δint::Φ(lmo1568-lacZ neo), contains 143 bp upstream of lmo1568 fused to the lacZ geneThis study
        LMM17Δint::Φ(lmo1569-lacZ neo), contains 155 bp upstream of lmo1569 and 36 bp of lmo1569 coding region fused to lacZ This study
        LMM18Δint::Φ(lmo1568-citZ-lacZ neo), contains 203 bp upstream of lmo1568, the entire lmo1568 coding sequence, and the region between lmo1568 and citZ fused to lacZ This study
        LMM19Δint::Φ(citZ-lacZ neo), contains 484 bp upstream of citZ fused to lacZ This study
        LMM21Δint::Φ(lmo1568-lacZ neo) ΔccpC::spc LMM16 × pHK95
        LMM22Δint::Φ(lmo1569-lacZ neo) ΔccpC::spc LMM17 × pHK95
        LMM23Δint::Φ(lmo1568-citZ-lacZ neo) ΔccpC::spc LMM18 × pHK95
        LMM24Δint::Φ(citZ-lacZ neo) ΔccpC::spc LMM19 × pHK95
        LMM33Δint::Φ(citB-lacZ neo) ΔcitZ HKB214 × pEMM47
        SP121Δint::Φ(lmo1568-citZ-lacZ neo) ΔccpA::tet LMM18 × pSP65
        SP122Δint::Φ(citZ-lacZ neo) ΔccpA::tet LMM19 × pSP65
        SP124Δint::Φ(citZ-lacZ neo) ΔccpC::spc ΔccpA::tet LMM24 × pSP65
  • TABLE 2.

    Oligonucleotides used in this work

    OligonucleotideSequence (5′ to 3′)aRestriction site(s)
    OBB102CGGAAAGTATGTTGTTTTTACTTC
    OMM014GACTGAGAATTCGTATATAACGGCAAAACAGCEcoRI
    OMM015ACGTACGAATTCGGAAATCAAAA GAAACATACGCEcoRI
    OMM016TCGTCGGAATTCATGTTTACGGAAAGTATGTTGEcoRI
    OMM017CATGCAAAGCTTGGTACCTTCATTTCCTCCTTTTATCCHindIII, KpnI
    OMM041CCATTACTTTGCCGTCGAC
    OMM042GCTACAG CAATGATAAGCG
    OMM046CCCCAATTTATCCCTTTTGC
    OMM047GGGGCCAAAAGCCGATTAC
    OMM048ACTGCAGAATTCCAAGGTGTTGTATATAACGGCEcoRI
    OMM049TGACTGGGTACCGCCATATAAAGCCCAATAAAGKpnI
    OMM050GTACGAGAATTCCTATGGGAAAAACTTTCTATAGAGGEcoRI
    OMM051ACTGCAGGTACCGAAGTAAAAACAACATACTTTCCGKpnI
    OMM064CGACAGCTACAGCAATGATAAGCG
    OMM070AAGGCGATTAAGTTGG GTAAC
    OMM071GCGCAACTGTTGGGAAG
    OMM074GGTGTTATAACAACTATCCTTGGACTGCTC
    OMM085GAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTC
    OMM086CCTACCAACTAGCTAATGCAC
    OMM087GTTGCTGAAACGTCCATTAGC
    OMM088CTGTATCAAATACACCGAGCTTGG
    OMM092CAACGGCCATATAGCCTACAC
    OMM097GACGGAACTGGTCCAGACATC
    OMM098GACCATATCTGTGTCTTCTGGACG
    OMM099ACTGACGGATCCAATTCGCTTATCATTGCTGTAGCTGTCBamHI
    OMM100GGCCCGATTTAAGCACACTTATTCAAGCCCTATTCTC
    OMM101GCTGAGTCTGGCTTTCGGAGAAAATCATTCAGTTTGC
    OMM102GTCACTCCATGGTGGTGAAGGAACACCTTTGAAATAACGNcoI
    OMM140ATTTATGTTGGACCTGAAAATAG
    OSP157AGCGAAAGATCTAAAACTTATTCGTGGTGGBglII
    OSP158GTAAGTCTTCTCGCAATATCTGGATCCCCACGAGCAAGTTCAGCBamHI
    OSP159CCAGATATTGCGAGAAGACTTAGTCGACATGACAAGCAACAATACGSalI
    OSP160AAATTCCCATGGGTGATTAAAGTCCATCGCNcoI
    OSP172TCCAGACCCGGGAGTTGCATTATCGSmaI
    OSP174TGCGTACCCGGGCTTCATCTGTTTGCTGGSmaI
    • ↵ a Some of the oligonucleotides contained recognition sites for restriction enzymes, which are indicated by underlining.

  • TABLE 3.

    Effects of ccpC or ccpA mutations on expression of L. monocytogenes citZ in B. subtilis

    Fusionβ-Galactosidase activity (Miller units)a
    Wild typeccpC null mutantccpA null mutant
    Long [(lmo1569-lmo1568-citZ)-lacZ]11 ± 0.862 ± 0.810 ± 2.5
    Medium [(lmo1568-citZ)-lacZ]0.9 ± 0.238 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.03
    Short (citZ-lacZ)0.7 ± 0.10.38 ± 0.01ND
    • ↵ a β-Galactosidase activity was determined for B. subtilis wild-type, ccpC null mutant, and ccpA null mutant strains carrying fusions to lacZ of segments of the citZ locus (Fig. 1). The organisms were grown at 37°C in TSS medium supplemented with 0.5% glucose and 1.6 mg glutamine per ml, and cells were harvested at several times during exponential growth phase and used for analysis. No growth phase-related regulation was seen. The β-galactosidase activities shown are the averages ± standard deviations of three independent experiments, in each of which samples were removed at multiple time points. ND, not determined.

  • TABLE 4.

    Effects of ccpC, ccpA, and ccpA ccpC mutations on citZ expression in L. monocytogenes

    Fusionβ-Galactosidase activity (Miller units)
    Wild typeccpC mutantccpA mutantccpC ccpA mutant
    lmo1569-lacZ (A)24 ± 2.027 ± 2.4NDND
    lmo1568-lacZ (B)5.0 ± 1.524 ± 3.2NDND
    (lmo1568-citZ)-lacZ (C)3.2 ± 1.524 ± 53.9 ± 0.4ND
    citZ-lacZ (D)0.5 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.050.6 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.4
    • a β-Galactosidase activity was determined for wild-type, ccpC null mutant, ccpA null mutant, and ccpC ccpA mutant strains of L. monocytogenes carrying various lacZ fusions. The organisms were grown at 37°C in BHI medium. The results shown are the averages ± standard deviations of three independent experiments. ND, not determined.

  • TABLE 5.

    Effects of different carbon sources on citZ expression in L. monocytogenes

    StrainFusionβ-Galactosidase activity (Miller units) with the following carbon sources:
    GlucoseMannoseGlycerolCitrate
    LMM18(lmo1568-citZ)-lacZ (C)4.64.1 ± 0.25.2 ± 1.24.1 ± 0.2
    LMM19 citZ-lacZ (D)0.6 ± 0.020.7 ± 0.30.7 ± 0.30.8 ± 0.3
    LMM23(lmo1568-citZ)-lacZ (C) in ccpC null mutant28 ± 1.931 ± 2.229 ± 2.226 ± 2.2
    LMM24 citZ-lacZ (D) in ccpC null mutant0.9 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.30.9 ± 0.2
    • a β-Galactosidase activity was determined for wild-type and ccpC null mutant strains of L. monocytogenes carrying various lacZ fusions (Fig. 2). The organisms were grown at 30°C in IMM medium. Samples were collected in mid-exponential phase (OD600, 0.5) for all of the sugars tested except citrate. Samples were collected at an OD600 of 0.1 or 0.2 when citrate was used as the sole carbon source. The results are the averages ± standard deviations of two independent experiments (except for the strain with fusion C in glucose medium). In all experiments, multiple samples were taken during the exponential growth phase.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
CcpC-Dependent Regulation of Citrate Synthase Gene Expression in Listeria monocytogenes
Meghna Mittal, Silvia Picossi, Abraham L. Sonenshein
Journal of Bacteriology Jan 2009, 191 (3) 862-872; DOI: 10.1128/JB.01384-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CcpC-Dependent Regulation of Citrate Synthase Gene Expression in Listeria monocytogenes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
CcpC-Dependent Regulation of Citrate Synthase Gene Expression in Listeria monocytogenes
Meghna Mittal, Silvia Picossi, Abraham L. Sonenshein
Journal of Bacteriology Jan 2009, 191 (3) 862-872; DOI: 10.1128/JB.01384-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Citrate (si)-Synthase
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic
Listeria monocytogenes

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530