Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

RecA4142 Causes SOS Constitutive Expression by Loading onto Reversed Replication Forks in Escherichia coli K-12

Jarukit Edward Long, Shawn C. Massoni, Steven J. Sandler
Jarukit Edward Long
Department of Microbiology, Morrill Science Center IV N203, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shawn C. Massoni
Department of Microbiology, Morrill Science Center IV N203, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven J. Sandler
Department of Microbiology, Morrill Science Center IV N203, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sandler@microbio.umass.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01623-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Distributions of cells with different levels of constitutive SOS expression (detected as GFP fluorescence) expressed as the percentage of cells in the population. The graphs truncate the percentage of cells at 16%. The strains are in order from top of the graph to the bottom, with the relevant part of the genotype in parentheses. All strains were grown in minimal medium at 37°C with aeration. All strains except SS996 have additionally the genotype recAo1403 recA4142. The other relevant genotypes are shown in parentheses, and full genotypes are shown in Table 1. The strains are SS996 (wild type, including recA+), SS4796 (wild type), SS7413 (sbcC), SS7162 (ruvC), SS7143 (recG), SS7174 (recQ), SS7160 (ruvAB), SS7161 (sbcB or xonA), SS4696 (recF), SS6023 (recBCD), SS5305 (recJ), SS5312 (recX), and SS7184 (recX recJ).

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    The three strains used in this figure have the same background: SS7160 (recAo1403 recA4142 ruvAB6203::tet) with the three different plasmids as indicated. Panel A is the same as Fig. 1. Panel B shows a UV survival curve of the three strains. Strains were grown in minimal media, UV irradiated at a rate of 0.5 J m2/s, and then serially diluted on to minimal plates. Plates were counted after 36 to 48 h of incubation at 37°C.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Same as Fig. 1. The strains are SS7404 (recBCD sbcBC), SS7423 (recBCD sbcBC ruvAB), SS7421 (recBCD sbcBC recF), SS7413 (sbcC), SS7198 (sbcC sbcB), SS7419 (sbcC recF), SS7420 (sbcC recJ), SS7417 (sbcC recBCD), and SS7418 (sbcC ruvAB). All strains also have the genotype recAo1403 recA4142.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Model for how RecA4142 can interact with a reversed replication fork with the help of RuvAB, RecJ, SbcB, and RecBCD. The red and blue strands of DNA show the nascent lagging and leading strands of DNA, respectively. The black strands are the parental DNA. The image suggests that RuvAB binds to a stopped fork and reverses it (annealing of the nascent leading and lagging strands [red and blue]). These ends are then processed by the exonuclease activities of RecJ (5′→3′) and SbcB (XonA) (3′→5′). RecBCD can then load onto the DNA, and, depending if there is a Chi site, it will either just degrade newly annealed strands, resetting the fork and allowing for the replication restart proteins to reload the fork, or it can the load RecA4142. Presumably once RecA4142 is loaded, it can start to interact with LexA and help accelerate its auto-cleavage. Since RecA4142 is recombination proficient, it could strand invade the homologous duplex, creating a structure that again is a substrate for the replication restart proteins. If so, RecA4142 may stably persist on the dsDNA and continue to accelerate LexA cleavage until removed.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Strains used in this work

    StrainrecArecBCDOther relevant genotypeSource or reference
    CAG18642++ zfj-3131::Tn10 41
    JC18923++ recJ284::Tn10 Lab stock
    JJC296++ ruvA60::tet B. Michel
    JJC754++ ruvABC::cat B. Michel
    JJC783++ ruvC::cat B. Michel
    KM78+ cat K. Murphy
    SMR839++ xonA::cat S. Rosenberg
    TP538++ recG6200::tet T. Poteete
    TP540++ ruvAB6203::tet T. Poteete
    TP640++ recQ6218::tet T. Poteete
    SS996a ++ 31
    SS4639 730 + recF4115 tnaA::miniTn5 cam 28
    SS4696 4142 b + recF4115 tnaA300::Tn10 28
    SS4976 4142 + 28
    SS5179++del(sbcC)100::kan 2
    SS5303 4142 + recX::cat g 28
    SS5305 4142 + recJ264::Tn10 JC18923→SS4976
    SS5312 4142 + recX::cat f 28
    SS6021 + cat KM78→SS996d
    SS6023 4142 cat 28
    SS6156 4142 + zfj-3131::Tn10 CAG18642→SS4976c
    SS7143 4142 + recG6200::tet TP538→SS4976c
    SS7144 4142 + ruvABC::cat JJC754→SS4976d
    SS7160 4142 + ruvAB6203::tet TP540→SS4976c
    SS7161 4142 + xonA::cat SMR839→SS4976d
    SS7162 4142 + ruvC::cat JJC783→SS4976d
    SS7165 + + ruvC::cat JJC783→SS996d
    SS7174 4142 + recQ6218::tet TP640→SS4976c
    SS7178 4142 +del(sbcC)100::kan SS5179→SS996a
    SS7184 4142 + recX::cat recJ284::Tn10 SS5303→SS5305d
    SS7186 + + xonA::cat SMR839→SS996d
    SS7187 4142 + ruvA60::tet JJC296→SS4976c
    SS7188 + + ruvA60::tet JJC296→SS996c
    SS7189 4142 + ruvAB6203::tet pRuvAB→SS7160
    SS7190 4142 + ruvAB6203::tet pGB2→SS7160
    SS7191 4142 + ruvAB6203::tet pRuvAB H198→SS7160
    SS7194 + + recJ284::Tn10 JC18923→SS996c
    SS7195 + + recQ6218::tet TP640→SS996c
    SS7196 + + ruvAB6203::tet TP540→SS996c
    SS7197 + +del(sbcB)200::frt del(sbcC)200::frt SS5162→SS7178e
    SS7198 4142 +del(sbcB)200::frt del(sbcC)200::frt SS4976→SS7197b
    SS7404 4142 cat del(sbcB)200::frt del(sbcC)200::frt KM78→SS7198d
    SS7411 + +del(sbcC)100::kan SS5179→SS996b
    SS7413 4142 +del(sbcC)200::frt SS4976→SS7411b
    SS7417 4142 cat del(sbcC)200::frt KM78→SS7413d
    SS7418 4142 cat ruvAB6203::tet del(sbcC)200::frt TP540→SS7413c
    SS7419 4142 +del(sbcC)200::frt recF4115 tnaA300::Tn10 SS5394→SS7413b
    SS7420 4142 + recJ284::Tn10 del(sbcC)200::frt JC18923→SS7413c
    SS7421 4142 cat recF4115 tnaA300::Tn10 SS5394→SS7404b
    SS7423 4142 cat ruvAB6203::tet TP540→SS7404c
    SS7424 + +del(sbcD)100::kan SS5180→SS996a
    SS7425 4142 +del(sbcD)100::kan zfj-3131::Tn10 SS6156→SS7424c
    SS7429 4142 + xonA::cat del(sbcD)100::kan zfj-3131::Tn10 SMR839→SS7425d
    SS7430 4142 cat del(sbcD)100::kan zfj-3131::Tn10 KM78→SS7425d
    SS7431 4142 +del(sbcD)100::kan zfj-3131::Tn10 recF4115 tnaA::miniTn5 cam SS4639→SS7425d
    SS7432 4142 + ruvABC::cat del(sbcD)100::kan zfj-3131::Tn10 JJC754→SS7425d
    SS7433 4142 +del(sbcD)100::kan zfj-3131::Tn10 recJ284::Tn10(cat) SS4907→SS7425d
    • ↵ a The genotype for this strain is sulB103Δattλ::sulApΩgfp-mut2 lacMS286 φ80dIIlacBK1 argE3 hi-4 thi-1 xyl-5 mtl-1 rpsL31 tsx. The lacMS286 φ80dIIlacBK1 genes code for two partial nonoverlapping deletions of the lac operon (21, 46), and Δattλ::sulApΩgfp-mut2 is the sulAp-gfp reporter gene inserted into the attλ site (31). All recA4142 strains used in this work also are ygaD1::kan recAo1403 (28).

    • ↵ b Select for Kanr and then screen for other marker phenotypically or by PCR.

    • ↵ c Select for Tetr and then screen for other marker phenotypically or by PCR.

    • ↵ d Select for Catr and then screen for other marker phenotypically or by PCR.

    • ↵ e This deletion allele was created by first transducing the Kanr allele from the Kieo collection into the strain as indicated in the reference column. pLH29, carrying the flp gene, was then introduced, and Kan-sensitive derivatives were screened (20).

    • ↵ f The Tn10 tetA::cat insertion deletion mutation was amplified with prSJS690,691 using pACYC184 as a template. The Tn10 tetA::cat insertion deletion mutation was transferred to the chromosome by the exo-bet method (13) into a strain containing recJ284::Tn10. This original combination of mutants was named and saved as the strain indicated as the donor in this cross.

    • ↵ g The full notation for the recX mutation is del(recX)4166::cat. The full notation for the recBCD mutation is del(recBCD)::cat. The full notation for the Ωgfp mutation is Δattλ::sulApΩgfp-mut2.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
RecA4142 Causes SOS Constitutive Expression by Loading onto Reversed Replication Forks in Escherichia coli K-12
Jarukit Edward Long, Shawn C. Massoni, Steven J. Sandler
Journal of Bacteriology Apr 2010, 192 (10) 2575-2582; DOI: 10.1128/JB.01623-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
RecA4142 Causes SOS Constitutive Expression by Loading onto Reversed Replication Forks in Escherichia coli K-12
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
RecA4142 Causes SOS Constitutive Expression by Loading onto Reversed Replication Forks in Escherichia coli K-12
Jarukit Edward Long, Shawn C. Massoni, Steven J. Sandler
Journal of Bacteriology Apr 2010, 192 (10) 2575-2582; DOI: 10.1128/JB.01623-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

DNA replication
Escherichia coli K12
Rec A Recombinases
SOS Response (Genetics)

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530