Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Computational Biology

Allelic Diversity among Helicobacter pylori Outer Membrane Protein Genes homB and homA Generated by Recombination

Mónica Oleastro, Rita Cordeiro, Armelle Ménard, João Paulo Gomes
Mónica Oleastro
1Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Lisbon, Portugal
2INSERM U853, 33076 Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: monica.oleastro@insa.min-saude.pt
Rita Cordeiro
1Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Armelle Ménard
2INSERM U853, 33076 Bordeaux, France
3Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
João Paulo Gomes
1Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00395-10
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Recombination is one of the main mechanisms contributing to Helicobacter pylori genomic variability. homB and homA are paralogous genes coding for H. pylori outer membrane proteins (OMPs). Both genes display allelic variation yielded by polymorphisms of the genes' middle regions, with six different alleles. This study used bioinformatic and statistical analyses to evaluate whether the allelic diversity of homB and homA is generated by recombination. A detailed molecular analysis of the most prevalent homB allelic variant was also performed to establish its molecular profile. The two most prevalent homB and homA allelic variants resulted from interallelic homologous recombination between the rarest allelic variants of each gene, with a crossover point localized in the middle of the genes, containing the allelic region. Molecular analysis of the most prevalent homB allele revealed a geographic partition among Western and East Asian strains, more noticeable for the 5′ and 3′ homB regions than for the middle allelic regions. In conclusion, the diversity of the 5′ and 3′ homB regions reflect the strains' geographical origin, and variants likely occur via the accumulation of single nucleotide polymorphisms. On the other hand, homologous recombination seems to play an important role in the diversification of the highly polymorphic homB and homA allele-defining regions, where the most prevalent alleles worldwide result from genomic exchange between the rarest variants of each gene, suggesting that the resulting combinations confer biological advantages to H. pylori. This phenomenon illustrates an evolutionary scenario in which recombination appears to be associated with ecological success.

The Gram-negative bacterium Helicobacter pylori colonizes the stomachs of more than half of the world's population, and this infection is associated with diverse gastroduodenal diseases (6, 16, 27). The risk of developing severe gastric diseases is influenced by H. pylori strain-dependent factors, among which are several outer membrane proteins (OMPs) that have been identified as virulence factors such as the babA/babB, hopZ, hopQ, sabA, oipA, and homB proteins (8, 17, 24, 28, 31, 48).

The homB gene and its highly similar (90% similarity at the nucleotide level) paralogous gene, homA, are members of the H. pylori OMP gene family (2). Both genes can be present in the H. pylori genome at two conserved loci, as a single copy or as two copies (homA/homA, homB/homB, homA/homB, or homB/homA) (28, 29). The homB gene has been proposed as a H. pylori virulence candidate, since its presence was correlated with severe gastroduodenal disease (19, 30) and with corpus inflammation and atrophy, as demonstrated by pathological analyses (19). Moreover, a putative role as an adhesin was suggested for the corresponding protein HomB, since homB knockout mutant strains showed significantly reduced binding (28). HomB was also shown to be antigenic and implicated in the in vitro activation of interleukin-8 secretion (28).

In contrast, the homA gene has been correlated with nonulcer gastritis (28, 30), and histological analyses did not show any association between the presence of the homA gene and inflammation or atrophy (19). The corresponding protein was also shown to be antigenic in humans (29).

Similar to other H. pylori OMP-encoding genes, such as babA/babB, hopM/hopN and hopQ (8, 20, 32), homB and homA genes display allelic variation which, in this case, was shown to occur in 300-bp regions localized in the middle of these genes, with homB displaying greater allelic diversity than homA (29). This highly polymorphic region, spanning from approximately 750 to 1,050 bp in homB (≈2,007 bp) and from 720 to 980 bp in homA (≈1,980 bp), was identified by the analysis of the similarity plot of each gene (29). Based on these plots, three segments were thus defined for those genes, where segments 1, 2, and 3 correspond to the regions preceding, matching, and following the allelic zone, respectively (see Fig. 2C) (29). Moreover, detailed sequence analyses, at nucleotide and amino acid levels, of homB and homA segment 2 were also performed, revealing the existence of six distinct and well-conserved allelic variants denominated AI to AVI. Five distinct alleles were observed for homB (AI, AII, AIII, AV, and AVI), while three allelic variants were observed for the homA gene (AII, AIII, and AIV). The variants AI, AV, and AVI were exclusively observed in homB, whereas AIV was present only in homA. Each gene displayed a predominant worldwide allelic variant (AI and AII for homB and homA, respectively), which was present in up to 80% of the clinical strains (29).

H. pylori displays one of the highest levels of genomic variability known among bacteria, and the high frequency of recombination is one of the main mechanisms contributing to that diversity (11, 39-41). Intragenomic recombination involving some of the OMP paralogous genes was also known to take place during infection, probably reflecting the selective pressure for adhesion, which may differ across different hosts as well as within an individual over time (5, 20, 38).

Accordingly, the present study aimed to identify recombination phenomena that may have occurred within and between homB and homA allelic variants, which may underlie the genetic diversity and generation of alleles. Furthermore, considering that homB presents a worldwide dispersion (homA is rarely found among East Asian strains) and that the AI allele is the predominant homB variant worldwide (29), a detailed molecular analysis of this allele was performed in order to establish its molecular profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

homB and homA sequences.The 107 homB sequences and 30 homA sequences used in the present study belong to 92 H. pylori strains isolated from patients from seven Western countries (Brazil, Colombia, France, Germany, Portugal, Sweden, and the United States) and from two East Asian countries (Japan and Korea), as previously reported (28, 29). These sequences are available under the GenBank accession numbers EF648320 to EF648325, EF648331 to EF648354, EF648374 to EF648379, EU363366 to EU363460, and EU910189 to EU910194 (28, 29).

Analyses of recombination events.A search for potential mosaic structures within the homA and homB genes was performed using the bioinformatic application SimPlot 3.5.1 (http://sray.med.som.jhmi.edu/SCRoftware ) to study the similarity of one putative recombinant sequence (query) to the other sequences. This software calculates and plots the nucleotide similarity of a query sequence against a panel of sequences under study, in a sliding window fashion, along the alignment. A sliding window size of 200 bp moved across the alignment using a step size of 20 bp. Nucleotide pairwise distances were calculated using the Jukes-Cantor parameter method (18). SimPlot analysis was performed for the 20 possible combinations involving the 6 homB/homA allelic variants (alleles AI to AVI). Whenever a putative recombination event was detected, a bootscan analysis (36) was also performed in which the likely recombinant sequence was compared with sequences from the probable parental strain(s) and a known outgroup sequence, generating four-member trees. The bootscan analysis is also a sliding window-based analysis that combines phylogeny and bootstrapping. At each nucleotide window range, a phylogenetic analysis was performed using neighbor-joining topology on the basis of pairwise genetic distances (Jukes-Cantor parameter method). For more accurate phylogenies, the software pairwise deletion option was chosen in order to remove all sites containing alignment gaps for each pair of sequences under comparison and not on an overall basis. Bootstrap confidence levels were determined by 100 replicates. Significant changes in phylogenetic relationships from window to window resulted in changes in bootscan values that were indicative of probable recombination events. SimPlot was also used to identify informative sites (34) where two sequences share one specific nucleotide but the other two share a different nucleotide. Each informative site supports one of the three possible phylogenetic relationships generated by bootscanning among the four taxa. The likelihood that the observed distribution of sites favoring specific phylogenetic groupings might occur randomly was assessed using the maximum χ2 test. The most likely crossover region occurred where the observed distribution is less likely to occur randomly (maximum χ2 value). The null hypothesis for recombination was that informative sites are drawn from a single distribution.

A P value for any specified crossover was determined by Fisher's exact test, using contingency tables. These included the number of the informative sites shared by the recombinant allele and each of the two putative parental strains, upstream and downstream of the crossovers, and also the lengths of these two regions.

To support the recombination regions detected by SimPlot and to accurately infer the phylogenetic relationships of the putative recombinant strains, the defined crossover regions were used to create two separate alignments, each corresponding to the left or right region of the crossover, and phylogenetic trees were inferred by neighbor-joining (Kimura two-parameter) analysis (22).

Ten different pairs of parental strains and recombinant sequences were tested for homB and homA, in order to confirm the crossover regions.

Molecular analysis of the homB AI allele.A total of 90 homB AI allele sequences, 70 from Western H. pylori strains and 20 from East Asian H. pylori strains, were used for molecular analysis of the homB AI allele. The nucleotide variability within homB allelic variants and within the homB AI allele was inferred by the determination of the variable sites (a site that contains at least two types of nucleotides or amino acids), nonsynonymous (Ka ) sites (a nucleotide site in which one or more changes are nonsynonymous), and parsimony-informative sites (a variable site occurring in at least two sequences), using MEGA 4.0.2 (http://www.megasoftware.net ). By analyzing parsimony-informative sites rather than variable sites, a conservative approach was used in order to avoid biased bioinformatic analyses, because some sequences presented a high number of nucleotide changes that were specific to a single strain (likely due to the limited number of sequences analyzed in the present study, mainly from the East Asian group).

To study the nucleotide variability within homB allelic variants, a consensus sequence for each of the five variants was constructed, based on 10 homB AI, 10 AII, 3 AIII, 1 AV, and 3 AVI allele sequences. The number of sequences is proportional to the prevalence of each allele (29), in order to create consensus sequences that could accurately represent the frequency of each allele and, thus, its variability.

In order to evaluate the differences within the East Asian and Western strains, dispersion plots were constructed based on the estimated pairwise distances of the 90 homB AI allele sequences (70 from Western strains and 20 from East Asian strains) against homB AI East Asian consensus and homB AI Western consensus sequences. All of the consensus sequences, based on the five allelic homB variants and on both the homB AI East Asian and Western groups, were generated by sequence alignment using MegAlign software (Lasergene; DNAStar, Madison, WI) (7).

Evolutionary parameters were determined using MEGA 4.0.2 for all of the homB AI allele sequences and for homB AI East Asian and Western consensus sequences. Molecular distances were estimated using the Kimura two-parameter method (22), while the overall mean values of synonymous (Ks ) and nonsynonymous (Ka ) substitution rates were determined using the Nei-Gojobori method (25). The type of selection operating at the amino acid level can be detected by comparing the synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates. Positive selection refers to selection in favor of nonsynonymous substitutions at the DNA level, where the evolutionary distance based on nonsynonymous substitutions is expected to be greater than that based on synonymous substitutions (Ka > Ks ); purifying selection refers to selection against nonsynonymous substitutions, where the evolutionary distance based on synonymous substitutions is expected to be greater than the distance based on nonsynonymous substitutions (Ka < Ks ). The codon-based one-tailed Z-test of selection (26) was used to evaluate the probability of rejection of the null hypothesis of evolution (Ka = Ks ) in favor of the positive or the purifying selection. The level of significance was set at 5%.

Considering that the percentage of G+C is a good indicator of genetic exchange among species (1, 3), the G+C percentage was also determined using EditSeq software (Lasergene; DNAStar) (7).

RESULTS

Analyses of recombination events.The potential existence of recombination events underlying homB and homA allelic diversity was evaluated with recombination analysis tools which have been successfully applied to analysis of this type of recombination in several other pathogens (13-15, 36). In a window-based analysis, the putative recombination crossover lies in the position where the plots of similarity values cross each other (35), as can be observed in the similarity plots between each homB and homA recombinant sequence (query sequence) and the respective parental strains (Fig. 1A1 and B1, respectively). Upstream and downstream of this position, the query sequence shows similarity to distinct sequences, evidencing a mosaic structure. Thus, the potential mosaic structures for the 20 possible combinations of the six homB/homA allelic variants were evaluated by the SimPlot analysis, suggesting the existence of homologous recombination in the following two cases: (i) the predominant homB allele AI (78.9%) seems to result from recombination between homB allelic variants AV and AVI (Fig. 1A1), the two less frequent variants (1.4% and 4.2%, respectively), and (ii) the predominant homA AII allele (84.9%) seems to result from recombination between the less frequent homA allelic variants AIV and AIII (3.8% and 11.3%, respectively) (Fig. 1B1) (29).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

SimPlot and bootscan analyses of the recombination events generating the two most prevalent Helicobacter pylori homB AI (A) and homA AII (B) allelic variants. (A) The homB AV allele parental strain and the homB AVI allele generate the recombinant (query) homB AI allele, and the homA AII allele was used as the outgroup. (B) The homA IV allele parental strain and the homA III allele generate the recombinant (query) homA II allele, and the homB AI allele was used as the outgroup. (A1, B1) Similarity plots between each recombinant sequence and the respective parental strains (window size, 200 bp; step size, 20 bp). (A2 and B2) Four-member trees representing the number of informative sites shared by the recombinant sequence and the parental strains. The dark boxes show the number of informative sites shared by the recombinant allele and the first parental strain (left), and the white boxes show the number of informative sites shared by the recombinant allele and the second parental strain (right). (A3, B3) Bootscan analyses (window size, 200 bp; step size, 20 bp) showing the phylogenetic relatedness (percentage of permuted trees) between the recombinant and the parental sequences. (A1 and 3, B1 and 3) The crossover regions are located between the vertical lines (represented in Fig. 2), and the nucleotide (nt) positions at the bottom of each plot correspond to alignment positions of the genomic regions. (A4, B4) Phylogenetic reconstructions for each specific region bounded by the crossover region supporting each putative crossover. The sequences used to represent the homB AI, AV, and AVI alleles and the homA AII, AIII, and AIV alleles are available under GenBank accession numbers EF648377, EU363409, EF648345, EU363372, EF648340, EU363449, EF648321, and EF648336.

The bootscan analysis was used to statistically confirm the results obtained using the SimPlot analysis. In this analysis, “four-member” trees are generated, based on the similarity of the query (recombinant) sequence to the two probable parental strains, and a tree permutation is expected to occur whenever a recombination phenomenon takes place (35). A more detailed analysis using bootscan analysis confirmed the above-described recombination events (Fig. 1A3 and B3). In fact, for the homB AI allele, a putative crossover region was found, for which 30 informative sites upstream of that region support the similarity with the parental AV allele, whereas 29 informative sites downstream of that region support the similarity with the parental AVI allele (Fig. 1A2). Similarly, for the homA AII allele, 20 informative sites upstream of the crossover region support the similarity with the parental AIV allele, and 24 informative sites downstream of that region support the similarity with the parental AIII allele (Fig. 1B2). These results were confirmed by the two incongruent phylogenetic reconstructions presented in Fig. 1A4 and B4, which show that the clustering of the homB and homA recombinant alleles alternates between the two putative parental alleles, respectively. The crossover regions of these putative homologous recombination events involve gene segments of 16 and 36 bp for homB and homA, respectively (Fig. 2A and B) and are located in the middle of the genes within their 300-bp allelic regions (Fig. 2C). Within the crossover regions, no specific similarity was observed between the query and any parental strain (i.e., no informative sites were found). On the other hand, the difference between the numbers of informative sites shared by the recombinant allele and one parental strain with regard to the other, upstream and downstream of the crossover, was statistically significant, validating the two putative crossovers (Table 1).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

(A, B) Nucleotide sequences of crossovers for Helicobacter pylori homB (A) and homA (B) genes. Numbers represent positions relative to the start codon of homB or homA, dots represent positions where nucleotides match between the recombinant and the parental sequences, and hyphens represent deletions. Crossover regions are highlighted in gray, bordered by two informative sites (in boldface), obtained from SimPlot/bootscan analyses. Between the informative sites, the recombinant allele displays no specific similarity with any of the parental alleles. (C) Localization of the crossover regions within the allelic regions for homB and homA.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Statistical significance of the crossover regions in H. pylori homB AI and homA AII alleles

Molecular analysis of the homB AI allele.About 40% of the nucleotide changes for the Western strains and 60% of those for the East Asian strains occur in a single strain (data not shown), which could lead to a biased analysis, since nucleotide changes spread among the population would be overestimated due to changes that are likely deleterious. Thus, a conservative approach employing parsimony informative sites was used to estimate the number of genetic polymorphisms within homB (Fig. 3). When comparing the consensus sequences of each of the five alleles, it is interesting to note that 41.5% (88/212) of the polymorphisms are located in segment 2 of the gene. Furthermore, almost half (44.3%; 94/212) of all the polymorphisms observed are nonsynonymous. As expected, 48.9% (46/94) of these nonsynonymous polymorphisms are also concentrated in segment 2 of the homB gene (Fig. 3A). Contrary to the nucleotide interallelic variability, the nucleotide distribution within the homB AI allele seems to be random for both Western strains (Fig. 3B) and East Asian strains (Fig. 3C). Although the former presented a higher degree of polymorphism than the latter, this is likely due to the higher number of Western strains analyzed in the present study. The same pattern of random distribution occurs at the protein level, as shown by the location of the nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. This distribution pattern was confirmed by the molecular distance analysis of 90 homB AI allele sequences, presented in Table 2, where similar values for the whole gene and for the three gene segments were found. Furthermore, the evolutionary analysis of the homB AI allele revealed no significant differences among the three segments studied, neither with the rate of synonymous or nonsynonymous polymorphisms nor with the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (Table 2). These results contrast with those obtained when analyzing homB sequences, including all five homB alleles, for which the molecular distance, the rate of nonsynonymous polymorphisms, and the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions were higher for segment 2 than for the entire gene or segments 1 and 3 (29). The G+C content revealed no differences for the entire gene (38.03% [standard error {SE, 0.34}]) or for segments 1, 2, and 3 (35.8% [SE, 0.494], 35.6% [SE, 1.283], and 40.3% [SE, 0.538], respectively), presenting values similar to that of the H. pylori J99 strain genome content (≈38%) (3).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Genetic polymorphisms within Helicobacter pylori homB. The polymorphism distribution was determined by comparing the consensus sequences of each of the five allelic variants at nucleotide (variable site) and protein (nonsynonymous site) levels (A), the homB AI allele in Western strains (n = 70) at nucleotide (parsimony-informative site) and protein (nonsynonymous parsimony-informative site) levels (B), and the homB AI allele in East Asian strains (n = 20) at nucleotide (parsimony-informative site) and protein (nonsynonymous parsimony-informative site) levels (C). Given that some sequences presented a high number of nucleotide changes that were exclusive of a single strain, parsimony-informative sites rather than variable sites were used. Ns, nonsynonymous; Pi, parsimony informative.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Evolutionary parameters of the H. pylori homB AI allelec

Interestingly, the evolutionary parameters calculated for two consensus sequences, homB AI allele sequences from East Asian and Western strains, showed that the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions was approximately 8- to 14-fold lower for segment 2, the allele-defining region, than for segments 3 and 1, respectively (Table 2). The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions was 1.84 for homB segment 1 (Table 2), suggesting a positive selection, i.e., a selection toward amino acid change (45), but this hypothesis was not statistically supported by the codon-based Z-test of selection (P Z-test = 0.081), thus a neutral evolution for this segment cannot be excluded. On the other hand, the null hypothesis (Ka = Ks ) was rejected, with statistical support in favor of the purifying selection (Ka < Ks ) for segment 2 (P Z-test < 0.001). With regard to segment 3, the value obtained for the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (1.02 ± 0.317) does not suggest any kind of pressure in this gene region.

The evaluation of the dispersion of the individual homB AI sequences against the East Asian and Western consensus sequences showed a clear separation between the East Asian and Western strains (Fig. 4A), which is consistent with the previously described phylogenetic reconstruction of homB, showing the existence of two predominant clusters corresponding to East Asian and Western countries (29). This dispersion was also noted for each gene segment, 1, 2, and 3 (Fig. 4B to D), although an intersection of the two clusters of strains was observed for segment 2, most likely reflecting a smaller influence of the geographic background of the strains in the evolution of this gene segment (Fig. 4C).

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Dispersion plots of the Helicobacter pylori homB AI allele individual sequences against the Western and East Asian AI allele consensus sequences. Dispersion plots were determined using the AI allele consensus sequences, based on the pairwise distances calculated for 70 homB sequences from H. pylori Western strains and 20 homB sequences from East Asian strains, considering the entire gene (A) and each of the gene segments, i.e., segments 1 (B), 2 (C), and 3 (D). (A) The arrow refers to an H. pylori clinical strain isolated from a U.S. citizen of Asian origin. (C) The geographical separation (East Asia versus West) was less noticeable for segment 2, most likely reflecting a smaller influence of the geographic background of the strains in the evolution of this gene segment.

DISCUSSION

Homologous recombination is crucial for the long-term survival of bacterial cells being implicated in the evolution of genomes (14, 37, 43, 44) and, more specifically, in the evolution of paralogous genes such as OMP-encoding genes (2). Indeed, intragenomic recombination between members of the OMPs may represent a means of regulating protein expression for adaptation to host selective pressures. This mechanism was shown to occur in H. pylori in vivo for several OMPs, such as BabA/BabB and HopM/HopN (20, 38), allowing H. pylori to dynamically change the adherence and antigenic properties of OMPs in response to host immune and inflammatory pressures, as was previously demonstrated for BabA/BabB (38). The genes homB and homA, analyzed in the present study, seem to somehow mirror babA and babB at the genomic level, as they also code for OMPs and they are present in both a single- or two-copy fashion, exchanging positions between themselves in conserved loci (28, 29). Furthermore, as described for babA/babB and for other H. pylori OMP genes (hopQ and hopM/hopN) (8, 20, 33), allelic variation has been reported for homB and homA (29). It has been suggested that intragenomic recombination is the likely mechanism underlying the generation of allelic groups (20, 28, 29, 33).

In the present study, the analysis of the homB/homA interallelic recombination events showed that the rarest circulating alleles constitute the parental sequences of the most prevalent circulating alleles, a phenomenon observed for both homB (the AI allele results from recombination between AV and AVI) and homA (AV and AVI yield the AII allele). Assuming that there is no DNA sequence affecting homologous recombination frequency in this area, it is reasonable to speculate that the events promoting the recombination between the two rarest alleles, yielding the most prevalent one, confer a biological advantage to the H. pylori strain. This is supported by the fact that this phenomenon occurs in H. pylori strains from both East Asian and Western countries. In this context, if a role as an adhesin is hypothesized for HomB (28), then one can speculate that the protein coded by the homB AI allele is the best adapted to adhere to human gastric mucosa. On the other hand, and considering the antigenicity of HomB (28), it is likely that the HomB AI protein would be a better fit to mediate the host-bacteria interaction.

Considering that (i) both homA and homB can be present in one H. pylori genome and/or mixed infections can occur and that (ii) some alleles are gene specific, whereas some alleles are common to both genes, consequently a common allele may also be involved in the phenomenon of homologous recombination, although the exact parental origin of the allele cannot be determined (homA or homB). As an example, the predominant AII variant of the homA gene could also arise by recombination between the specific AIV allele of homA and the common AIII allele of homB. Therefore, and although the results point to recombination involving alleles present in the same gene (homB or homA), alleles located in different genes (homB and homA), whether belonging to the same strain or not, are also most likely involved in these recombination events, unless it can be demonstrated otherwise.

The molecular analysis of the homB AI allele showed that the polymorphic sites were randomly distributed throughout the gene for both East Asian and Western strains (Fig. 3B and C), while the interallelic variability, previously determined for all five homB allelic variants, was observed mostly in the middle region (segment 2) of the gene (Fig. 3A), which corresponds to the allele-defining region (29). Indeed, when sequences of all five homB allelic variants where analyzed, segment 2 of this gene displayed both the largest molecular distance and the highest nonsynonymous substitution rate, even compared to those of the entire gene; a sliding window analysis also showed that the nonsynonymous substitution rate in that region was about 5-fold higher than that in the rest of the gene (29). This is not the case for the homB AI allele, showing that within each allele, segment 2 is the most conserved segment (Table 2). Considering that all five “allelic” HomB proteins were shown to be antigenic, these results suggest that segment 2 is the segment most implicated in promoting antigenic variability (29). Thus, it would be interesting to evaluate the antigenicity of each of the three HomB segments, in order to clarify each one's role.

The geographical segregation observed for the homB AI variant has also been described for several H. pylori gene categories, such as housekeeping and virulence genes (1, 21, 23, 46). Moreover, as described for the two paralogous genes babA/babB (33), phylogenetic analysis of homB revealed that strains are grouped first by their geographic origin, with two main clusters being observed, the Western cluster and the East Asian cluster. Then, within each main cluster, a separation according to the allelic variant could also be detected (29).

Though the factors that lie beneath the geographic partitioning of H. pylori genes are not known, one can speculate that genetic factors underlying human population heterogeneity will select for divergence among H. pylori strains. This heterogeneity can include specificity and strength of immune and inflammatory responses, as well as availability and distribution of receptors to which H. pylori can adhere (10, 38). Previous results indicate the role of HomB in H. pylori adhesion (28); therefore, by analogy with the BabA adhesin for which functional adaptation to geographically predominant blood groups was reported (4), HomB likely is subject to that kind of pressure. Furthermore, several studies suggest that H. pylori polymorphisms reflect human phylogeography and historical migrations, constituting a reliable biological marker of host-pathogen coevolution (9, 12, 23, 42, 47) which is facilitated by the long-term contact between the infecting strain and the host. Thus, it is likely that the strains infecting humans from different geographical regions display unique characteristics that reflect distinctive human population traits on behalf of the never-ending coevolutionary process that takes place during infection.

However, it is interesting to observe that, when solely analyzing the homB AI allele, the geographical separation is less noticeable for segment 2 than for segments 1 and 3 (Fig. 4). Consequently, the existence of an allelic region less dependent on the geographic origin of the strain, flanked by regions that show strong evidence of geographic segregation, indicates that segments 1 and 3 are more likely to be influenced by the host selective pressure. This is clearly supported by evolutionary parameters, as the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions obtained by comparing the East Asian and Western homB AI consensus sequences (Table 2) reveals 8- to 14-fold-higher values for segments 3 and 1, respectively, than for segment 2. Moreover, the evidence that the latter segment is the most polymorphic among all of the homB allelic variants (Fig. 3A) (29) but the most conserved within homB AI allele sequences, regardless of the strain's geographic origin (Table 2 and Fig. 4C), strongly supports its choice as the definition of the allelic variants. Lastly, the predominance of the homB AI allele among East Asian and Western strains (29) suggests that this allele may confer some biological advantages to H. pylori strains. To clarify this issue, further experiments are necessary to evaluate the binding ability and antigenicity strength of H. pylori strains according to their homB allelic variants.

In summary, by using bioinformatic analysis on sequences taken from human biopsy samples, this study presents statistically supported evidence that the allelic variability among the H. pylori OMP-encoding genes homB and homA is generated by homologous recombination events, in addition to the accumulation of point mutations. Finally, the fact that the most prevalent alleles worldwide seem to be chimeras of the rarest alleles suggests that the resulting genetic combinations are critical for the ecological success of H. pylori strains.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia and the Programme de Cooperation Scientifique et Technique Franco-Portugais, offered by the French Embassy in Portugal, for supporting this project. We thank the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, project PPCDT/SAL-IMI/57297/2004, for financial support.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 7 April 2010.
    • Accepted 22 May 2010.
  • Copyright © 2010 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Achtman, M., T. Azuma, D. E. Berg, Y. Ito, G. Morelli, Z. J. Pan, S. Suerbaum, S. A. Thompson, A. van der Ende, and L. J. van Doorn. 1999. Recombination and clonal groupings within Helicobacter pylori from different geographical regions. Mol. Microbiol. 32 : 459-470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Alm, R. A., J. Bina, B. M. Andrews, P. Doig, R. E. W. Hancock, and T. J. Trust. 2000. Comparative genomics of Helicobacter pylori: analysis of the outer membrane protein families. Infect. Immun. 68 : 4155-4168.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Alm, R. A., L. S. L. Ling, D. T. Moir, B. L. King, E. D. Brown, P. C. Doig, D. R. Smith, B. Noonan, B. C. Guild, B. L. deJonge, G. Carmel, P. J. Tummino, A. Caruso, M. UriaNickelsen, D. M. Mills, C. Ives, R. Gibson, D. Merberg, S. D. Mills, Q. Jiang, D. E. Taylor, G. F. Vovis, and T. J. Trust. 1999. Genomic-sequence comparison of two unrelated isolates of the human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Nature 397 : 176-180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Aspholm-Hurtig, M., G. Dailide, M. Lahmann, A. Kalia, D. Ilver, N. Roche, S. Vikstrom, R. Sjostrom, S. Linden, A. Backstrom, C. Lundberg, A. Arnqvist, J. Mahdavi, U. J. Nilsson, B. Velapatino, R. H. Gilman, M. Gerhard, T. Alarcon, M. Lopez Brea, T. Nakazawa, J. G. Fox, P. Correa, M. G. Dominguez Bello, G. I. Perez Perez, M. J. Blaser, S. Normark, I. Carlstedt, S. Oscarson, S. Teneberg, D. E. Berg, and T. Boren. 2004. Functional adaptation of BabA, the H. pylori ABO blood group antigen binding adhesin. Science 305 : 519-522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Backstrom, A., C. Lundberg, D. Kersulyte, D. E. Berg, T. Boren, and A. Arnqvist. 2004. Metastability of Helicobacter pylori bab adhesin genes and dynamics in Lewis b antigen binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 : 16923-16928.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Blaser, M. J. 1992. Hypotheses on the pathogenesis and natural history of Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation. Gastroenterology 102 : 720-727.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Burland, T. G. 2000. DNASTAR's Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol. Biol. 132 : 71-91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Cao, P., and T. L. Cover. 2002. Two different families of hopQ alleles in Helicobacter pylori. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40 : 4504-4511.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Disotell, T. 2003. Discovering human history from stomach bacteria. Genome Biol. 4 : 213.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Dubois, A., D. E. Berg, E. T. Incecik, N. Fiala, L. M. Heman-Ackah, J. Del Valle, M. Yang, H.-P. Wirth, G. I. Perez-Perez, and M. J. Blaser. 1999. Host specificity of Helicobacter pylori strains and host responses in experimentally challenged nonhuman primates. Gastroenterology 116 : 90-96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Falush, D., C. Kraft, N. S. Taylor, P. Correa, J. G. Fox, M. Achtman, and S. Suerbaum. 2001. Recombination and mutation during long-term gastric colonization by Helicobacter pylori: estimates of clock rates, recombination size, and minimal age. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 : 15056-15061.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Falush, D., T. Wirth, B. Linz, J. K. Pritchard, M. Stephens, M. Kidd, M. J. Blaser, D. Y. Graham, S. Vacher, G. I. Perez Perez, Y. Yamaoka, F. Megraud, K. Otto, U. Reichard, E. Katzowitsch, X. Y. Wang, M. Achtman, and S. Suerbaum. 2003. Traces of human migrations in Helicobacter pylori populations. Science 299 : 1582-1585.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Fang, G., B. Weiser, C. Kuiken, S. M. Philpott, S. Rowland-Jones, F. Plummer, J. Kimani, B. Shi, R. Kaul, J. Bwayo, O. Anzala, and H. Burger. 2004. Recombination following superinfection by HIV-1. AIDS 18 : 153-159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Gomes, J. P., W. J. Bruno, A. Nunes, N. Santos, C. Florindo, M. J. Borrego, and D. Dean. 2007. Evolution of Chlamydia trachomatis diversity occurs by widespread interstrain recombination involving hotspots. Genome Res. 17 : 50-60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    He, C. Q., N. Z. Ding, J. G. Chen, and Y. L. Li. 2007. Evidence of natural recombination in classical swine fever virus. Virus Res. 126 : 176-185.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    IARC. 1994. Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 7-14 June 1994. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum. 61 : 1-241.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Ilver, D., A. Arnqvist, J. Ögren, I.-M. Frick, D. Kersulyte, E. T. Incecik, D. E. Berg, A. Covacci, L. Engstrand, and T. Boren. 1998. Helicobacter pylori adhesin binding fucosylated histo-blood group antigens revealed by retagging. Science 279 : 373-377.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules, p. 21-132. In H. N. Munro (ed.), Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, NY.
  19. 19.↵
    Jung, S., M. Sugimoto, D. Graham, and Y. Yamaoka. 2009. homB status of Helicobacter pylori as a novel marker to distinguish gastric cancer from duodenal ulcer. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47 : 3241-3245.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Kersulyte, D., H. Chalkauskas, and D. E. Berg. 1999. Emergence of recombinant strains of Helicobacter pylori during human infection. Mol. Microbiol. 31 : 31-43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Kersulyte, D., A. K. Mukhopadhyay, B. Velapatino, W. W. Su, Z. J. Pan, C. Garcia, V. Hernandez, Y. Valdez, R. S. Mistry, R. H. Gilman, Y. Yuan, H. Gao, T. Alarcon, M. Lopez Brea, G. B. Nair, A. Chowdhury, S. Datta, M. Shirai, T. Nakazawa, R. Ally, I. Segal, B. C. Y. Wong, S. K. Lam, F. O. Olfat, T. Boren, L. Engstrand, O. Torres, R. Schneider, J. E. Thomas, S. Czinn, and D. E. Berg. 2000. Differences in genotypes of Helicobacter pylori from different human populations. J. Bacteriol. 182 : 3210-3218.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16 : 111-120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Linz, B., F. Balloux, Y. Moodley, A. Manica, H. Liu, P. Roumagnac, D. Falush, C. Stamer, F. Prugnolle, S. W. van der Merwe, Y. Yamaoka, D. Y. Graham, E. Perez-Trallero, T. Wadstrom, S. Suerbaum, and M. Achtman. 2007. An African origin for the intimate association between humans and Helicobacter pylori. Nature 445 : 915-918.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Mahdavi, J., B. Sonden, M. Hurtig, F. O. Olfat, L. Forsberg, N. Roche, J. Angstrom, T. Larsson, S. Teneberg, K. A. Karlsson, S. Altraia, T. Wadström, D. Kersulyte, D. E. Berg, A. Dubois, C. Petersson, K. E. Magnusson, T. Norberg, F. Lindh, B. B. Lundskog, A. Arnqvist, L. Hammarstrom, and T. Boren. 2002. Helicobacter pylori SabA adhesin in persistent infection and chronic inflammation. Science 297 : 573-578.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Nei, M., and T. Gojobori. 1986. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3 : 418-426.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Nei, M., and S. Kumar. 2000. Synonymous substitutions and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions, p. 52-61. In M. Nei (ed.), Molecular evolution and phylogenetics, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    NIH Consensus Development Panel on Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcer Disease. 1994. NIH Consensus Conference. Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease. JAMA 272 : 65-69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Oleastro, M., R. Cordeiro, J. Ferrand, B. Nunes, P. Lehours, I. Carvalho-Oliveira, A. I. Mendes, D. Penque, L. Monteiro, F. Mégraud, and A. Ménard. 2008. Evaluation of the clinical significance of homB, a novel candidate marker of Helicobacter pylori strains associated with peptic ulcer disease. J. Infect. Dis. 198 : 1379-1387.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Oleastro, M., R. Cordeiro, A. Ménard, D. Queiroz, F. Mégraud, and L. Monteiro. 2009. Allelic diversity and phylogeny of homB, a novel co-virulence marker of Helicobacter pylori. BMC Microbiol. 9 : 248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Oleastro, M., R. Cordeiro, Y. Yamaoka, D. Queiroz, F. Mégraud, L. Monteiro, and A. Ménard. 2009. Disease association with two Helicobacter pylori duplicate outer membrane protein genes, homB and homA. Gut Pathog. 1 : 12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Peck, B., M. Ortkamp, K. D. Diehl, E. Hundt, and B. Knapp. 1999. Conservation, localization and expression of HopZ, a protein involved in adhesion of Helicobacter pylori. Nucleic Acids Res. 27 : 3325-3333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Pride, D. T., and M. J. Blaser. 2002. Concerted evolution between duplicated genetic elements in Helicobacter pylori. J. Mol. Biol. 316 : 629-642.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Pride, D. T., R. J. Meinersmann, and M. J. Blaser. 2001. Allelic variation within Helicobacter pylori babA and babB. Infect. Immun. 69 : 1160-1171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Robertson, D. L., B. H. Hahn, and P. M. Sharp. 1995. Recombination in AIDS viruses. J. Mol. Evol. 40 : 249-259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Salminen, M. 2003. Detecting recombination in viral sequences: theory, p. 348-361. In M. Salemi and A.-M. Vandamme (ed.), The phylogenic handbook: a practical approach to DNA and protein phylogeny. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  36. 36.↵
    Salminen, M. O., J. K. Carr, D. S. Burke, and F. E. McCutchan. 1995. Identification of breakpoints in intergenotypic recombinants of HIV type 1 by bootscanning. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 11 : 1423-1425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Santoyo, G., and D. Romero. 2005. Gene conversion and concerted evolution in bacterial genomes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29 : 169-183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Solnick, J. V., L. M. Hansen, N. R. Salama, J. K. Boonjakuakul, and M. Syvanen. 2004. Modification of Helicobacter pylori outer membrane protein expression during experimental infection of rhesus macaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 : 2106-2111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Suerbaum, S. 2000. Genetic variability within Helicobacter pylori. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 290 : 175-181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.
    Suerbaum, S., and M. Achtman. 1999. Evolution of Helicobacter pylori: the role of recombination. Trends Microbiol. 7 : 182-184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    Suerbaum, S., J. M. Smith, K. Bapumia, G. Morelli, N. H. Smith, E. Kunstmann, I. Dyrek, and M. Achtman. 1998. Free recombination within Helicobacter pylori. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95 : 12619-12624.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Templeton, A. R. 2007. Shared history of humans and gut bacteria: evolutionary togetherness: coupled evolution of humans and a pathogen. Heredity 98 : 337-338.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Tsuru, T., M. Kawai, Y. Mizutani-Ui, I. Uchiyama, and I. Kobayashi. 2006. Evolution of paralogous genes: reconstruction of genome rearrangements through comparison of multiple genomes within Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 : 1269-1285.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Tsuru, T., and I. Kobayashi. 2008. Multiple genome comparison within a bacterial species reveals a unit of evolution spanning two adjacent genes in a tandem paralog cluster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25 : 2457-2473.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Vandamme, A.-M. 2003. Basic concepts of molecular evolution, p. 1-23. In M. Salemi and A.-M. Vandamme (ed.), The phylogenic handbook: a practical approach to DNA and protein phylogeny. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  46. 46.↵
    Van Doorn, L.-J., C. Figueiredo, F. Mégraud, S. Pena, P. Midolo, D. M. Queiroz, F. Carneiro, B. Vanderborght, M. D. Pegado, R. Sanna, W. De Boer, P. M. Schneeberger, P. Correa, E. K. Ng, J. Atherton, M. J. Blaser, and W. G. V. Quint. 1999. Geographic distribution of vacA allelic types of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 116 : 823-830.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    Wirth, T., A. Meyer, and M. Achtman. 2005. Deciphering host migrations and origins by means of their microbes. Mol. Ecol. 14 : 3289-3306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    Yamaoka, Y., S. Kikuchi, H. M. T. El-Zimaity, O. Gutierrez, M. S. Osato, and D. Y. Graham. 2002. Importance of Helicobacter pylori oipA in clinical presentation, gastric inflammation, and mucosal interleukin 8 production. Gastroenterology 123 : 414-424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Allelic Diversity among Helicobacter pylori Outer Membrane Protein Genes homB and homA Generated by Recombination
Mónica Oleastro, Rita Cordeiro, Armelle Ménard, João Paulo Gomes
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2010, 192 (15) 3961-3968; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00395-10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Allelic Diversity among Helicobacter pylori Outer Membrane Protein Genes homB and homA Generated by Recombination
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Allelic Diversity among Helicobacter pylori Outer Membrane Protein Genes homB and homA Generated by Recombination
Mónica Oleastro, Rita Cordeiro, Armelle Ménard, João Paulo Gomes
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2010, 192 (15) 3961-3968; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00395-10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Genetic Variation
Helicobacter pylori
Recombination, Genetic

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530