Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PATHOGENS

Detrimental Effects of Hypoxia-Specific Expression of Uracil DNA Glycosylase (Ung) in Mycobacterium smegmatis

Krishna Kurthkoti, Umesh Varshney
Krishna Kurthkoti
1Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Umesh Varshney
1Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
2Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: varshney@mcbl.iisc.ernet.in
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00679-10
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    (A) Uracil excision activity assay results for different stages of M. smegmatis growth. Cell extracts (1 μg each) from different stages of hypoxia and recovery phases were used for a time course analysis of uracil excision. The activity assays were performed for 0, 5, and 15 min at 37°C using a 32P-5′-end-labeled 30-mer DNA oligomer (PTU) containing uracil at the 12th position. In vitro mixing (lanes 12 to 14) refers to mixing of equal amounts of extracts from the 10-day hypoxia and recovery-phase cell extracts. M. smegmatis Ung (100 ng) was used as a positive control (lane 2). Following the reaction, the samples were further processed (see Materials and Methods) and analyzed on 8 M urea-15% polyacrylamide gels. S and P refer to substrate and product, respectively. (B) Immunoblot analysis of M. smegmatis cell extracts. (i) Equal amounts of cell extracts (∼30 μg) from different stages of hypoxia (3.5, 7.5, and 10 days) were separated on an SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel along with 200 ng of pure M. smegmatis Ung protein as marker (lane 1; M). The protein samples were transferred onto a PVDF membrane, probed with anti-M. smegmatis Ung antiserum, and developed using goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with HRP and using an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent. (ii) Equal amounts of cell extracts (∼30 μg) from 10-day hypoxia, 1-h recovery, and mid-log-phase cultures were separated on an SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel along with 200 ng of pure M. smegmatis Ung protein as marker (lane 1; M) and processed as described above. (C) Uracil excision activity assay results from different stages of M. tuberculosis growth. Cell extracts (1 μg each) from log-phase and 14-day hypoxia cultures were used for a time course analysis of uracil excision as described for panel A.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Expression analysis of the narK2 promoter. (A) Schematic representation of the pMVnarK2ung construct, depicting the promoter of narK2 from M. tuberculosis H37Rv cloned upstream of M. smegmatis Ung. (B) The mycobacterial vector pMVnarK2ung was introduced into M. smegmatis ung::kan by electroporation. The strain was grown to mid-log phase and subjected to 10 days of hypoxia. Cell extracts (1 μg each) from mid-log (lanes 3 to 5) and hypoxia (lanes 6 to 8) stages were used in a time course assay for uracil excision using 5′-32P-end labeled PTU. Purified M. smegmatis Ung (100 ng) was used as a positive control (lane 2). S and P refer to substrate and product, respectively.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Viable counts of M. smegmatis strains in mid-log and 10-day hypoxia cultures. M. smegmatis mc2155 harboring pMV361 alone or pMVnarK2ung, where ung is driven by the narK2 promoter (a hypoxia-specific promoter), and the ung::kan strain were grown to mid-log phase in triplicate in Dubos medium with ADC supplement and subjected to hypoxic culture (10-day hypoxia). Viabilities of the strains grown to mid-log phase (A) and after subjecting them to 10-day hypoxia (B) were determined by the serial dilution plating method. The differences in viable counts were analyzed for statistical significance by performing Student's t test using GraphPad Prism 4.03 software. *, P < 0.05.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Analyses of DNA repair gene mRNAs by quantitative real-time PCR. Total RNA were isolated in triplicate and processed to remove contaminating DNA. The cDNA was synthesized using gene-specific primers. The mRNA levels were determined using quantitative real-time PCR mix containing SYBR green dye. Amplification of 16S rRNA was used as an internal control. The expression level of each gene was determined by the comparative CT method after normalizing with a 16S rRNA control. The mean expression levels ± standard deviations for each gene under different conditions are plotted (using a log2 scale), and the differences in expression were analyzed for statistical significance by performing a paired Student's t test using GraphPad Prism 4.03 software. *, P < 0.05.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Model of detrimental effects of Ung deficiency and misexpression during hypoxia. Bacterial physiology during the log phase (extreme left) is characterized by high metabolism and efficient DNA synthesis and repair. Under hypoxic stress (step 1), bacterial metabolism declines and is characterized by low DNA synthesis (39) and repair (present study). The ability of hypoxia to inflict DNA damage may lead to persistence of bacteria with damage in the genome (depicted by the dotted line). Release of bacteria from hypoxia to normal oxygen conditions (step 2) leads to reactivation of DNA repair processes (present study), and repair of the accumulated damage (depicted by the bold line) allows bacterial multiplication. Misexpression of Ung (step 3) under hypoxia leads to untimely excision of uracil in DNA, committing the bacteria to the base excision repair pathway even when the downstream repair functions may be deficient. Inability to complete DNA repair leads to accumulation of AP sites and other damage, such as DNA breaks (depicted by the broken line), which are detrimental to bacterial survival. In such a model, Ung deficiency at step 2 would lead to deficient uracil repair, an increase in C-to-T mutations, and detrimental effects on survival. Misexpression of Ung at step 3 would result in excessive uracil release and accumulation of AP sites and other irreparable DNA damage, which too would be detrimental to the survival of the bacteria.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    DNA oligomers and plasmids

    Oligomer or plasmidSequence (5′ to 3′) or descriptionReference or source
    Oligomers
        Msm-hspXRT_FpCGGCGTGTTGACCATCAAGThis study
        Msm-hspXRT_RpGATCGTGAGGATGCCTTTGTC
        Msm-udgBRT_FpGGCACAGTGGACGGGTGT
        Msm-udgBRT_RpGAGATCATCGCGTCGAGGTC
        Msm-16SRT_FpAAGCGCAAGTGACGGTATGTG
        Msm-16SRT_RpAAGCTGTGAGTTTTCACGAACAAC
        Msm-ungRT_FpGCAGCCTGTCCAACATCTTCAC
        Msm-ungRT_RpCGGCCTCCCATCCTTTACC
        Msm-mutMRT_FpCACGTCGTTCGATTCGTTGTAC
        Msm-mutMRT_RpGCTGACATCTCGGGCAGTAGA
        Msm-uvrBRT_FpGATGGCGCCCAACAAGAC
        Msm-uvrBRT_RpCGTTGATCGAGCTGTCCTTCTC
        narK2_FpGATATCGTGATCCGACTGGTCGCC
        narK2_RpCCATGGCGAACTCCGCGCCCC
        PTUa 5′-A∼T∼ATACCGCGGUCGGCCGATCAAGCTTA∼T∼T-3′ 16
    Plasmids
        pJet1.2 E. coli vector for cloning PCR productsMBI Fermentas
        pRARE E. coli plasmid (p15a origin of replication, Cmr), encodes tRNA genes (proL, leuW, metT, argW, thrT, glyT, tyrU, thrU, argU, and ileX)Novagen
        pETMsmUngpET 11D E. coli expression construct harboring ung ORF from M. smegmatis SN2 between NcoI and EcoRI sites (renamed from pETMsmUDG) 2
        pRSETbMsmUngpRSET E. coli expression construct harboring M. smegmatis ung between NcoI and HindIII sites along with a 40-amino-acid N-terminal presequenceThis study
        pRSET-11-MsmUngDerivative of pRSETbMsmUng in which the N-terminal 40-amino-acid presequence has been reduced to 11 amino acids
        pTrcHisMsmUng E. coli expression construct with M. smegmatis ung along with 11-amino-acid N-terminal tag from pRSET-11-MsmUng cloned between NdeI and HindIII sites
        pTrcMsmUngpTrc99c harboring M. smegmatis ung ORF between NcoI and HindIII sites 1
        pJet1.2narK2 pJet vector containing ∼300 bp of narK2 promoter within EcoRV and NcoI sitesThis study
        pTrcnarK2ung pTrcMsmUng vector with narK2 promoter cloned upstream of ung ORF between EcoRV and NcoI sitesThis study
        pMV361 (Hygr)Integrative vector in mycobacteria containing L5 att region with E. coli origin of replication and Hygr marker 33
        pMV361Δhsp Derivative of pMV361 vector with hsp60 promoter truncated by BsrDI digestion, end filled, and ligatedThis study
        pMVnarK2ung pMV361Δhsp in which narK2ung from pTrcnarK2ung has been cloned between PvuII and HindIII sitesThis study
    • ↵ a The ∼ symbols indicate phosphorothioate modifications in the oligonucleotide.

  • TABLE 2.

    List of M. smegmatis strains used in the study

    M. smegmatis strainRelevant characteristic(s)Reference
    SN2Laboratory strain 23
    mc2155 or wild typeHigh-efficiency transformation strain 31
    WT(L5 att::pMV361)mc2155 harboring an integrative vector, pMV361 (Hygr), at the L5 att site of the chromosomeThis study
    ung::kan strainmc2155 with ung gene disrupted with kan cassette 36
    ung::kan(L5 att::narK2ung) strain ung::kan strain harboring the integrative vector, pMVnarK2ung (Hygr), at the L5 att site of the chromosomeThis study
    WT(L5 att::narK2ung)mc2155 strain harboring pMVnarK2ung at the L5 att site of the chromosome
  • TABLE 3.

    Spectrum of mutations in the RRDR locus of rifampin-resistant isolates of three M. smegmatis strains

    Mutations detected% of M. smegmatis isolates with indicated mutations (no. with mutations/total)a
    WT (hyg)bung::kancpMVnarK2ungd
    A→G, T→C43 (18/42)14 (4/28)72 (34/47)
    C→T, G→A45 (19/42)86 (24/28)21 (10/47)
    C→G, G→C5 (2/42)None2 (1/47)
    C→A, G→T5 (2/42)NoneNone
    A→C, T→G2 (1/42)None4 (2/47)
    • ↵ a Bacterial cultures (five replicates for each strain) were subjected to hypoxia and, at the end of the 10-day incubation, plated on medium containing rifampin. The RRDR loci from the rifampin-resistant colonies were sequenced. Values in parentheses are the number of isolates with the indicated mutations/the total number with mutations in the RRDR locus.

    • ↵ b A total of 50 samples were sequenced for mutations in the RRDR, of which 8 samples did not have mutations.

    • ↵ c A total of 45 samples were sequenced for mutations in the RRDR, of which 17 samples did not have mutations.

    • ↵ d A total of 63 samples were sequenced for mutations in the RRDR, of which 16 samples did not have mutations.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Detrimental Effects of Hypoxia-Specific Expression of Uracil DNA Glycosylase (Ung) in Mycobacterium smegmatis
Krishna Kurthkoti, Umesh Varshney
Journal of Bacteriology Nov 2010, 192 (24) 6439-6446; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00679-10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detrimental Effects of Hypoxia-Specific Expression of Uracil DNA Glycosylase (Ung) in Mycobacterium smegmatis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Detrimental Effects of Hypoxia-Specific Expression of Uracil DNA Glycosylase (Ung) in Mycobacterium smegmatis
Krishna Kurthkoti, Umesh Varshney
Journal of Bacteriology Nov 2010, 192 (24) 6439-6446; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00679-10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic
Mycobacterium smegmatis
Oxygen Consumption
Uracil-DNA Glycosidase

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530