Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Genetic Control of Osmoadaptive Glycine Betaine Synthesis in Bacillus subtilis through the Choline-Sensing and Glycine Betaine-Responsive GbsR Repressor

Gabriele Nau-Wagner, Daniela Opper, Anne Rolbetzki, Jens Boch, Bettina Kempf, Tamara Hoffmann, Erhard Bremer
Gabriele Nau-Wagner
Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Laboratory for Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Opper
Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Laboratory for Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Rolbetzki
Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Laboratory for Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Boch
Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Laboratory for Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bettina Kempf
Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Laboratory for Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tamara Hoffmann
Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Laboratory for Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erhard Bremer
Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Laboratory for Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.06642-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Fig 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1

    Systems for the uptake of compatible solutes by B. subtilis and the osmoadaptive choline-to-glycine betaine biosynthetic pathway. The substrate profiles of the OpuB and OpuC ABC transporters shown were compiled from the literature (9, 30), except those for proline betaine and DMSP, whose import systems are assigned based on unpublished data from our laboratory (T. Hoffmann, A. Bashir, C. Chen, and E. Bremer, unpublished data). The dots and arrows shown within the context of the opuB and gbsAB operons and the gbsR gene represent the experimentally mapped promoters (5, 36). The lollipops indicate predicted factor-independent transcriptional terminators.

  • Fig 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2

    Genetic control of gbsAB expression in response to the presence of external inducers, high salinity, and the GbsR regulator. Cells of the gbsA-treA reporter strains GNB45 (gbsR+) (A) or GNB48 (gbsR::neo) (B) were grown at 37°C either in SMM or in SMM with 0.4 M NaCl to an OD578 of 0.25; 1 mM choline (Cho), glycine betaine aldehyde (GBA), or glycine betaine (GB), respectively, was then added to some of the cultures, and the activity of the TreA reporter enzyme was determined after 90 min of further cultivation.

  • Fig 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3

    DNA sequence of the intergenic gbsR-gbsAB regulatory region. (A) The −10 and −35 sequences of the SigA-type promoters for the gbsR gene and the gbsAB operon are indicated, and the mapped transcriptional start sites for these genes are shown by bent arrows. The transcriptional start site for the gbsAB operon was mapped by Boch et al. (5) and that of the gbsR gene was determined in this study (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The putative GbsR binding site positioned downstream of the gbsAB transcription initiation site is indicated by a pair of inverted arrows. The beginning of the coding regions for the GbsR and GbsA proteins is marked. The two black triangles indicate the extent of the inferred minimal DNA fragment (Fig. 5) that permits GbsR-mediated induction of gbsAB transcription in response to choline. (B) Putative GbsR binding sites in the gbsAB and opuC regulatory regions. The −10 and −35 sequences of the SigA-type promoters for the opuB and opuC operons are indicated; the transcriptional start site for the opuB mRNA has been experimentally determined (36) (indicated by a bent arrow), and the promoter for the opuC operon was predicted by DNA sequence gazing. The putative GbsR binding sites are indicated by pairs of inverted arrows; the asterisks (*) mark differences in the DNA sequences of the putative GbsR binding site in the opuB and opuC regulatory regions.

  • Fig 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4

    Influence of GbsR on choline import via the OpuB and OpuC ABC transporters. Cells were cultivated at 37°C in SMM or in SMM containing 0.4 M NaCl until they had reached an OD578 of about 0.4. Subsequently, uptake of [14C]choline was assayed at a final substrate concentration of 10 μM. (A) Uptake of [14C]choline in the wild-type strain JH642 (opuB+ opuC+ gbsR+) (□, ■) and strain JBB8 (opuB+ opuC+ gbsR::neo) (○, ●) grown in SMM (□, ○) or SMM with 0.4 M NaCl (■, ●). (B) Uptake of [14C]choline in strain RMKB25 [opuB+ opuC::Tn10 (spc) gbsR+] (♦), GNB25 [opuB+ opuC::Tn10 (spc) gbsR::neo] (♢), strain RMKB26 [opuB::Tn10 (spc) opuC+ gbsR+] (▲) and GNB26 [opuB::Tn10 (spc) opuC+ gbsR::neo] (▵); cells were grown at 37°C in SMM containing 0.4 M NaCl.

  • Fig 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5

    Choline-responsive and GbsR-dependent regulation of gbsA-treA expression. Strains with either an intact gbsR gene (+) or a gbsR::neo mutation (−) carrying chromosomal gbsA-treA fusions of various lengths were pregrown in SMM to early log phase (OD578 of 0.25), and aliquots were assayed for TreA activity (noninduced condition). At this time point, 1 mM choline (final concentration) and 0.4 M NaCl (final concentration) were added to the cultures; after further growth for 90 min, the cells were harvested for assays of the TreA reporter enzyme (induced condition). NaCl was added to these cultures to elicit enhanced uptake of the inducer choline via the osmotically stimulated OpuB and OpuC transport systems (36). The symbol (Δ) indicates that the corresponding segment of the gbsR gene was deleted from the DNA fragment fused to the treA reporter gene. All fusion strains are derivatives of the B. subtilis strain JH642 (trp phe).

  • Fig 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6

    Binding of choline by the GbsR regulatory protein. (A) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified GbsR protein. (B) Fluorescence spectrum of the purified GbsR protein (5 μM) in the absence or the presence of 1 mM choline. (C) Binding kinetics of choline to the purified GbsR protein (5 μM) as assessed by intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy. (D) Intrinsic fluorescence spectrum of the purified GbsR protein (5 μM) in the absence or the presence of 1 mM glycine betaine.

  • Fig 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7

    Cells of the gbsA-treA fusion strain GNB46 (gbsAB::neo gbsR+) (A) and of strain GNB48 (gbsAB+ gbsR::neo) (B) were grown either in SMM without a compatible solute (−) or in SMM containing 1 mM choline (Cho) or 1 mM choline in combination with various compatible solutes: glycine betaine (GB), carnitine (Car), proline betaine (PB), dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP), choline-O-sulfate (COS), l-proline (Pro), or ectoine (Ect). Cells were harvested for TreA reporter assays when they reached an OD578 of 1 to 1.5.

  • Fig 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 8

    In silico model of the B. subtilis GbsR protein. (A) X-ray structure of the dimer of the M. jannaschii Mj223 protein (PDB code 1ku9) (50). The monomers are shown in either yellow or orange; the winged-helix DNA binding region is shown in green. (B) Monomer of the in silico-derived GbsR structure (red color). The predicted winged-helix DNA binding region is shown in green, and the four Phe residues predicted to form part of the choline-binding box are shown in blue. The insert enlarges a section of the GbsR in silico model and focuses on the spatial arrangement of the aromatic cage predicted to accommodate the trimethlyammonium head group of choline. (C) Overall crystal structure (PDB code 3r6u) (48) of the B. subtilis OpuBC solute binding protein in complex with its ligand choline. The insert enlarges a section of the OpuBC crystal structure and focuses on the spatial arrangement of the aromatic cage entrapping the choline ligand.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1

    B. subtilis strains used in this study

    StrainRelevant genotypeaReference/source
    JH642trpC2 pheA1J. Hoch; BGSC 1A96b
    JBB8(gbsR::neo)15
    RMKB25opuC-20::Tn10(spc)36
    RMKB26opuB-20::Tn10(spc)36
    BKB30(yvbF::tet)1This study
    BKB31(yvaV::spc)1This study
    GNB25(gbsR::neo)1 opuC-20::Tn10(spc)This study
    GNB26(gbsR::neo)1 opuB-20::Tn10(spc)This study
    GNB37Δ(treA::erm)2This study
    GNB40Δ(treA::erm)2 (gbsR::neo)1This study
    GNB45Δ(treA::erm)2 [amyE::(ΔgbsR)2-Φ(gbsA′-treA)1]This study
    GNB46Δ(treA::erm)2 Δ(gbsAB::neo)2 [amyE::(ΔgbsR)2- Φ(gbsA′-treA)1]This study
    GNB48Δ(treA::erm)2 (gbsR::neo)1 [amyE::(ΔgbsR)2-Φ(gbsA′-treA)1]This study
    GNB55Δ(treA::erm)2 (yvbF::tet)1 [amyE::(gbsA′-treA Δ(gbsR)2)1]This study
    GNB56Δ(treA::erm)2 (yvaV::spc)1 [amyE::(gbsA′-treA Δ(gbsR)2)1]This study
    GNB67Δ(treA::erm)2 [amyE::yvbF-Φ(opuCA′-treA)2]This study
    GNB69Δ(treA::erm)2 (gbsR::neo)1 [amyE::yvbF-Φ(opuCA′-treA)2]This study
    GNB74Δ(treA::erm)2 [amyE::yvaV-Φ(opuBA′-treA yvaV+)2]This study
    GNB76Δ(treA::erm)2 (gbsR::neo)1 [amyE::yvaV-Φ(opuBA′-treA)2]This study
    • ↵a The designation amyE::Φ(gbsA′-treA) indicates that the gbsA-treA operon fusion is stably integrated via a double-recombination event into the chromosomal amyE gene of B. subtilis as a single copy, thereby rendering the fusion strains defective in the extracellular AmyE α-amylase. The Φ(gbsA′-treA)1 reporter fusion is linked to a chloramphenicol resistance gene (cat), thereby conferring resistance to the antibiotic chloramphenicol to all strains carrying the amyE::Φ(gbsA′-treA) construct. This is true also for Φ(opuCA′-treA) and Φ(opuBA′-treA) reporter fusion strains. The designation (ΔgbsR)2-Φ(gbsA′-treA)1 indicates that the DNA fragment used for the construction of the Φ(gbsA′-treA) reporter fusion (Fig. 5) does not carry an intact gbsR gene.

    • ↵b Bacillus Genetic Stock Center, Columbus, Ohio.

  • Table 2

    Influence of GbsR on the transcriptional activity of the opuB and the opuC genesa

    Straintre fusiongbsRbTreA activity (U/mg protein)
    Without NaCl1.2 M NaCl
    GNB74opuB-treA+38 ± 5104 ± 2
    GNB76opuB-treA−308 ± 5724 ± 16
    GNB67opuC-treA+34 ± 3NDc
    GNB69opuC-treA−36 ± 5ND
    • ↵a Cells carrying chromosomal copies of the indicated opuB-treA and opuC-treA operon fusions were cultivated in SMM or SMM with 1.2 M NaCl to mid-log phase and were then harvested for TreA reporter enzyme activity.

    • ↵b Strains carrying a gbsR mutation (denoted with −) harbored the gbsR::neo allele.

    • ↵c ND, not determined.

  • Table 3

    Influence of choline and glycine betaine on the activity of the gbsA promotera

    StraingbsABbgbsRCompound presentTreA activity (U/mg protein)
    GNB45++−6 ± 1
    ++Choline106 ± 3
    ++Choline + glycine betaine5 ± 1
    GNB46−+−6 ± 1
    −+Choline534 ± 7
    −+Choline + glycine betaine5 ± 1
    GNB48+−−478 ± 16
    +−Choline569 ± 19
    +−Choline + glycine betaine515 ± 27
    • ↵a Cells of the various gbsA-treA reporter fusion strains were cultivated in SMM without (−) or with 1 mM choline or in the presence of 1 mM choline and 1 mM glycine betaine until the cultures had reached on OD578 of 1.5; samples were then assayed for TreA reporter enzyme activity.

    • ↵b The strains carrying mutations in the gbsAB operon [Δ(gbsAB::neo)] or in the gbsR gene [gbsR::neo] are indicated by −.

  • Table 4

    Role of the GbsR-related YvaV and YvbF B. subtilis proteins on gbsA promoter activitya

    StraingbsRbyvaVyvbFTreA activity (U/mg protein)
    GNB45+++10 ± 3
    GNB48−++568 ± 13
    GNB55+−+16 ± 2
    GNB56++−14 ± 2
    GNB57−−+574 ± 24
    GNB58−+−564 ± 33
    GNB59−−−565 ± 5
    GNB60+−−15 ± 4
    • ↵a Cells of the various gbsA-treA reporter fusion strains were cultivated in SMM until the cultures had reached on OD578 of 1.5; samples were then assayed for TreA reporter enzyme activity. The strains carry the same gbsA-treA reporter gene fusion and are present in a B. subtilis JH642 (trp phe) strain background.

    • ↵b The strains carrying mutations in the gbsR gene (gbsR::neo), the yvaV gene (yvaV::spc) or the yvbF gene (yvbF::tet) are indicated by −; the presence of wild-type alleles is indicated by +.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 1 - Supplemental methods
      Table S1, primers used for construction of gbsA-treA fusions
      Fig. S1, primer extension analysis of the gbsR gene
      Fig. S2, influence of glycine betaine on choline binding by the purified GbsR protein
      PDF file, 136K.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Genetic Control of Osmoadaptive Glycine Betaine Synthesis in Bacillus subtilis through the Choline-Sensing and Glycine Betaine-Responsive GbsR Repressor
Gabriele Nau-Wagner, Daniela Opper, Anne Rolbetzki, Jens Boch, Bettina Kempf, Tamara Hoffmann, Erhard Bremer
Journal of Bacteriology Apr 2012, 194 (10) 2703-2714; DOI: 10.1128/JB.06642-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic Control of Osmoadaptive Glycine Betaine Synthesis in Bacillus subtilis through the Choline-Sensing and Glycine Betaine-Responsive GbsR Repressor
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genetic Control of Osmoadaptive Glycine Betaine Synthesis in Bacillus subtilis through the Choline-Sensing and Glycine Betaine-Responsive GbsR Repressor
Gabriele Nau-Wagner, Daniela Opper, Anne Rolbetzki, Jens Boch, Bettina Kempf, Tamara Hoffmann, Erhard Bremer
Journal of Bacteriology Apr 2012, 194 (10) 2703-2714; DOI: 10.1128/JB.06642-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530