Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

The Integron Integrase Efficiently Prevents the Melting Effect of Escherichia coli Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein on Folded attC Sites

Céline Loot, Vincent Parissi, José Antonio Escudero, Jihane Amarir-Bouhram, David Bikard, Didier Mazel
Céline Loot
aInstitut Pasteur, Unité Plasticité du Génome Bactérien, Paris, France
bCNRS UMR3525, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Parissi
cLaboratoire MCMP, UMR 5234 CNRS-Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José Antonio Escudero
aInstitut Pasteur, Unité Plasticité du Génome Bactérien, Paris, France
bCNRS UMR3525, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jihane Amarir-Bouhram
aInstitut Pasteur, Unité Plasticité du Génome Bactérien, Paris, France
bCNRS UMR3525, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Bikard
aInstitut Pasteur, Unité Plasticité du Génome Bactérien, Paris, France
bCNRS UMR3525, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Didier Mazel
aInstitut Pasteur, Unité Plasticité du Génome Bactérien, Paris, France
bCNRS UMR3525, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01109-13
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Integrons play a major role in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria. Rearrangement of gene cassettes occurs by recombination between attI and attC sites, catalyzed by the integron integrase. Integron recombination uses an unconventional mechanism involving a folded single-stranded attC site. This site could be a target for several host factors and more precisely for proteins able to bind single-stranded DNA. One of these, Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB), regulates many DNA processes. We studied the influence of this protein on integron recombination. Our results show the ability of SSB to strongly bind folded attC sites and to destabilize them. This effect was observed only in the absence of the integrase. Indeed, we provided evidence that the integrase is able to counterbalance the observed effect of SSB on attC site folding. We showed that IntI1 possesses an intrinsic property to capture attC sites at the moment of their extrusion, stabilizing them and recombining them efficiently. The stability of DNA secondary structures in the chromosome must be restrained to avoid genetic instability (mutations or deletions) and/or toxicity (replication arrest). SSB, which hampers attC site folding in the absence of the integrase, likely plays an important role in maintaining the integrity and thus the recombinogenic functionality of the integron attC sites. We also tested the RecA host factor and excluded any role of this protein in integron recombination.

INTRODUCTION

Integrons have been isolated on mobile elements responsible for the capture and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes among Gram-negative bacteria (1). More recently, their importance has been highlighted by the discovery of integrons in the chromosomes (chromosomal integrons) of environmental strains of bacteria (2). This has led to the extension of their role from acquisition of resistance genes to a wider role in the adaptation of bacteria to different environments (3). The discovery that integron recombination was controlled by the SOS response has further connected these elements to bacterial adaptive responses (4). Integrons are composed of three key elements: an integrase gene (intI), which encodes a tyrosine (Y) recombinase performing the site-specific recombination (SSR) reaction; a primary recombination site (attI), where the incorporation of gene cassettes occurs; and a strong resident promoter (Pc) (5). Gene cassettes are devoid of promoters and correspond mostly to genes associated with an attC recombination site. The attC × attI recombination event catalyzed by IntI leads to cassette integration at the attI site, downstream of the Pc promoter, allowing gene cassette expression (6). IntI can also catalyze recombination between two consecutive attC sites, leading to cassette excision.

The structures of attI and attC sites differ significantly from that of the canonical Y-recombinase core sites (for a review, see reference 7), and integron site-specific recombination is described as an atypical mechanism, in comparison to the classical SSR largely used in bacteria for movement of mobile genetic elements such as prophages or genomic islands (8).

The major distinctive characteristic of integron SSR comes from the properties of the attC sites. Indeed, it was previously shown that the attC site recombines as a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) folded structure, in contrast to the attI site, which is recombined in a double-stranded form (9). The length of natural attC sites varies from 57 to 141 bp. These sites include two regions of inverted homology, R″-L″ and L′-R′, separated by a central region that is highly variable in length and sequence (Fig. 1A) (10). In contrast to the heterogeneity of their sequences, attC sites display a strikingly conserved palindromic organization (11) that can form secondary structures through DNA strand self-pairing (Fig. 1B). Upon folding, single-stranded attC sites show a structure resembling a canonical core site consisting of R and L boxes separated by an unpaired central segment (UCS), two or three extrahelical bases (EHBs), and a variable terminal structure (VTS), (12). The VTS varies in length among various attC sites, from 3 predicted unpaired nucleotides, such as for attCaadA7, to a complex branched secondary structure in larger sites such as VCR (Vibrio cholerae repeat) sites (Fig. 1B).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

attC recombination sites and a model for attC folding. (A) Schematic representation of a double-stranded (ds) attC site. Inverted repeats R″, L″, L′, and R′ are indicated by gray boxes. The dotted line represents the variable central part. Conserved nucleotides are indicated. The asterisk shows the conserved G nucleotide, which corresponds to the extrahelical base (EHB) in the folded attC site bottom strand. The black arrow shows the cleavage point. (B) Secondary structures of VCR2/1 and attCaadA7 site bottom strands (bs). Structures were determined by the UNAFOLD online interface at the Pasteur Institute. The four structural features of attC sites, namely, the UCS (unpaired central segment), the EHB, the stem, and the VTS (variable terminal structure), are indicated. The black arrow shows the cleavage points, and the asterisk shows the extrahelical G bases. Primary sequences of the attC sites are shown (except for the VTS of the VCR2/1 site). (C) Representation of both ssDNA and dsDNA pathways for attC site folding. In the ssDNA pathway (1) (red), horizontal gene transfer (conjugation, transformation, and phage infection) and replication (template of lagging strand) lead to the production of ssDNA favoring attC hairpin formation. In the dsDNA pathway (2) (green), an increase of supercoiling ensures cruciform extrusion. Origins of replication are shown as blue ovals, and replication complexes are shown as yellow ovals.

It has been shown using a DNA-binding assay that IntI1 binds strongly and specifically to the bottom strand of attC ssDNA (13). In vivo, it has also been shown that only the bottom strand of the attC site is used as a substrate during gene cassette integration (9), thereby creating an atypical Holliday junction (aHJ) between the single-stranded attC and the double-stranded attI sites. We recently proved the implication of replication in the resolution of the aHJ and definitively ruled out the involvement of a second strand exchange of any kind in the attC × attI reaction (14).

We have previously shown that cellular bacterial processes delivering ssDNA, such as conjugation and replication, favor the proper folding of attC sites (“ssDNA pathway”) (Fig. 1C) (14, 15). By developing a very sensitive in vivo assay, we also provided evidence that attC sites can recombine as cruciform structures by extrusion from double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) (“dsDNA pathway”) (Fig. 1C) (14). Moreover, we showed an influence of DNA superhelicity on attC site extrusion and recombination in vitro and in vivo (14). We demonstrated that the proper folding of attC sites depends on both the propensity to form nonrecombinogenic structures and the length of their VTS.

Since integron recombination uses attC sites in a single-stranded form, the host cell factors that have affinity toward single-stranded DNA can potentially regulate integron recombination by acting on attC sites, impairing their folding and/or impeding the integrase activity.

In this paper, we examine the effects of several of these specific host factors on attC site folding. Among them, we chose to investigate the effect of single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) and RecA.

Escherichia coli SSB is essential for cell viability (16). During replication, SSB binds tightly and cooperatively to ssDNA to prevent premature annealing. Indeed, single-stranded DNA has a natural tendency to revert to the double-stranded form, but SSB binds to the single strands, keeping them separate and allowing the DNA replication machinery to proceed (for a review, see reference 17). In addition, SSB is implicated in several other cellular processes, such as homologous recombination, mismatch repair, and excision repair (for a review, see reference 16). Moreover, recent studies found that SSB is not static when bound to DNA but could migrate randomly on single-stranded DNA. Indeed, SSB diffusion can melt short DNA hairpins and, as a consequence, remove these secondary structures spontaneously formed by DNA (18). This function is biologically important because RecA, which is necessary for recombinational DNA repair, does not bind well to secondary structures formed in ssDNA. SSB, through its ability to destabilize the intramolecular DNA base pairing within ssDNA, allows RecA to form a contiguous filament on the DNA (19).

RecA, a multifunctional DNA-binding protein with a ubiquitous distribution in nature, plays a central role in both homologous recombination and postreplicative DNA repair mechanisms (see above). In bacteria, it also plays a role in the SOS response as a coprotease for the autocatalytic cleavage of the LexA repressor, leading to derepression of the SOS regulon genes (20). The RecA protein binds strongly, and in long clusters, to ssDNA to form a nucleoprotein filament.

Since integron recombination uses a folded single-stranded attC site, we hypothesized that SSB could potentially act on the folded attC site and ultimately on integron recombination. SSB could bind parts of the folded attC site that remain as single-stranded DNA (i.e., the UCS and/or VTS) (Fig. 1B), thus destabilizing/unpairing recombinogenic attC structures and impeding integrase activity. We also studied the role of RecA in integron recombination.

By using a gel retardation assay, we showed that SSB can bind folded attC sites. Moreover, a replication slippage assay allowed us to conclude that this binding induces the destabilization of attC site folding in vivo. Interestingly, this effect of SSB was not observed in the presence of the integron integrase (IntI1). We also provide evidence that, contrary to SSB, IntI1 possesses an intrinsic property to capture attC sites at the moment of their extrusion, stabilizing and recombining them efficiently.

The stability of secondary structures in the cell must be limited to avoid genetic instability (mutations or deletions) and/or toxicity (replication arrest). SSB is able to restrain the formation of attC secondary structures in the absence of the integrase, ensuring the integrity of integron attC sites when recombination is not happening. We also demonstrated that, when expressed, the integrase is able to counterbalance this effect of SSB even when SSB is overexpressed.

By using a set of similar experiments, we demonstrated that RecA does not regulate integron recombination. We conclude that the interplay between SSB and the attC sites represents another example of host regulation of attC site folding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, oligonucleotides, and media.Bacterial strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotide primer sequences are described in Tables S1, S2, and S3 in the supplemental material, respectively. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) at 37°C. The following antibiotics were used: ampicillin (Ap) at 100 μg/ml, chloramphenicol (Cm) at 25 μg/ml, kanamycin (Km) at 25 μg/ml, spectinomycin (Sp) at 50 μg/ml, and tetracycline (Tc) at 15 μg/ml. 2,6-Diaminopimelic acid (DAP) was supplemented when necessary to a final concentration of 0.3 mM. Glucose and l-arabinose were added at final concentrations of 10 and 2 mg/ml, respectively. Chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (France).

Integron cassette excision assay. (i) SSB overexpression assay.The two plasmids pBAD::intI1 (p7383) (Km resistant [Kmr]) and pHYD620 (p7305) (Spr) (which carries the ssb gene on a pSC101 vector; approximately 5 copies/cell) were introduced by transformation into an MG1655 ΔdapA derivative strain, which contains an insertion (in the attB lambda site) of a plasmid carrying a dapA gene interrupted by the two specific attI1 and attCaadA7 sites (pB117 [strains ωB768 and ωC021]) (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material), attCaadA7 and attCereA2 sites (pB647 [ωB661 and ωB726]), and attI1 and attI1 sites (pB119 [ωB662 and ωB735]). These strains are unable to synthesize DAP, and as a result, they are not viable without DAP supplemented in the medium. Recombination between att sites causes excision of the synthetic cassette, restoring a functional dapA gene and allowing the strain to grow on DAP-free medium. As controls, we also transformed this MG1655 ΔdapA strain with the previously used pBAD::intI1 plasmid and with the control vector pCL1920 devoid of the ssb gene (p8008 [Spr] [ωC020, ωB725, and ωB734]). We also transformed MG1655 ΔdapA strains by pCL1920 or pHYD620 but without pBAD::intI (ωC018, ωC019, ωB723, ωB724, ωB732, and ωB733).

After overnight growth in the presence of appropriate antibiotics (Sp, Cm, and Km), DAP, and 1% glucose, strains were cultivated for 6 h in the presence of 0.2% arabinose to allow intI1 expression and plated onto agar containing either LB or LB plus DAP. Recombination activity was calculated as the ratio of the number of cells growing in the absence of DAP over the total number of cells.

(ii) RecA overexpression assay.In order to test RecA overexpression in the integron cassette excision assay, we proceeded exactly as described above for the SSB overexpression assay, but we transformed pGB2-ara-RecAEco (pB981 [Spr], which carries the recA gene on a pSC101 vector) in place of pHYD620 (ωC071, ωC069, ωB720, ωB722, ωB729, and ωB731) and the control vector pGB2 (pB495) in place of pCL1920 (ωC070, ωC068, ωB719, ωB721, ωB728, and ωB730).

(iii) ssb-200 and recA269::Tn10 assays.In order to test the effects of SSB and RecA inactivation in the integron cassette excision assay, we proceeded exactly described above for the SSB and RecA overexpression assays. pBAD::intI1 (p7383) (Kmr) was introduced by transformation into MG1655 ΔdapA, MG1655 ΔdapA ssb-200, and recA269::Tn10 derivative strains, which contain an insertion (in the attB lambda site) of a plasmid carrying a dapA gene interrupted by the two specific attI1 and attCaadA7 sites (pB117 [ωB768, ωB769, ωB149, ωB848, ωB849, and ωB645]) (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material), attCaadA7 and attCereA2 sites (pB647 [ωB661, ωB771, ωB660, ωB718, ωB851, and ωB717]), and attI1 and attI1 sites (pB119 [ωB662, ωB770, ωB150, ωB727, ωB850, and ωB646]).

Replication slippage assay.To determine reversion frequencies, 100 ml of E. coli strains GJ1885 and GJ1890 (GJ1885 ssb-200) (ω6737 and ω6738), transformed by the pBR derivative plasmids (p5087, p5088, p6671, p6672, p8558, and p8559), was grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.8 in LB medium containing ampicillin from 4 ml of a culture grown overnight. Reversion frequencies were calculated as the number of Cmr cells in the population, which was determined by plating the equivalent of 90 ml of cells onto medium containing ampicillin and chloramphenicol. Total viable cells were determined by plating onto medium containing ampicillin. The frequency represents the mean of 4 independent experiments. The partial or complete deletion of the attC site was confirmed for several Cmr reversion events by sequencing. To study the effect of the integrase on reversion frequency, we performed the same experiment by employing the previously used GJ1885 and GJ1890 strains. We transformed them with the pBAD::intI1Y312F plasmid (p8741) (Spr). To determine reversion frequencies, 100 ml of these strains (ω8749, ω8752, and ω8755) was grown to an OD600 of 0.8 in LB medium containing ampicillin and kanamycin with 1% glucose (integrase gene repression) or 0.2% arabinose (integrase gene expression) from 4 ml of a culture grown overnight.

Protein purification.Bacterial strain BL21(DE3)/pLysS (21) was transformed with pET-derived plasmids expressing the His-IntI integrase (p4634 [ωC004]). Protein purification was carried out as described previously by Johansson and collaborators (22) and with the minor modifications described previously by Demarre and collaborators (23). E. coli SSB was provided by Sigma (product code S3917).

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay.SSB was incubated with 0.6 pmol of 32P-labeled DNA oligonucleotides corresponding to the bottom strands of the wild-type (wt) (o32) or the synthetic paired (o42) or the synthetic unpaired (o36) VCR2/1 site derivative (see Tables S2 and S3 in the supplemental material). The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was carried out as described previously by Frumerie and collaborators (24). Quantifications were made by using Image Gauge version 4.0.0 (Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd.), manually defining the lanes and using the automatic peak search function. All other functions were at default values.

attC site folding assay.The 100-bp double-stranded attI1-containing fragment was generated by annealing oligonucleotide attI1-F with the complementary oligonucleotide attI1-R. The 120-bp double-stranded aadA7 fragment was obtained by PCR amplification using the p4136 vector as the template and primers aadA7-F and aadA7-R. The 131-bp double-stranded VCR fragment was obtained by PCR amplification using the p1880 vector and primers VCR-F and VCR-R. The 119-bp double-stranded aadA7 mutant fragment was obtained by PCR amplification using the p4250 vector as the template and primers aadA7-F and aadA7-R.

Under standard conditions, the melting temperature of a 50-μg/ml solution of each fragment was measured as the OD260 in a thermostatic spectrophotometer at 37°C. Fragments were prechilled to 4°C and preheated to 95°C. To analyze the effect of IntI1, proteins were added to the fragment solution 30 min after the beginning of the measurement. The OD260 measurement of the proteins alone was previously performed and subtracted from the measurement obtained with the mixture in order to determine accurate values of the fragment solution.

RESULTS

SSB binds folded attC sites.It was shown previously that single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) destabilizes secondary structures in ssDNA during major cellular processes such as DNA replication, repair, and homologous recombination (19, 25, 26). We therefore hypothesized that SSB can bind folded attC sites and destabilize them. To determine if this was the case, we investigated the binding capacity of SSB on folded attC sites using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). In order to mimic the attC site's bottom strand, we used a VCR derivative bottom-strand (VCRdbs) substrate, a single-stranded oligonucleotide of ∼90 bases containing a shorter version of the VCR2/1bs site (23). In this substrate, the central part of the site (VTS) was removed and replaced with GAA (Fig. 2A), a modification previously described and shown to be fully recombinogenic (23).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Comparison of SSB binding to several VCR2/1 site derivatives. (A) Nucleotide sequences and secondary structures of the bottom strands (bs) of VCR2/1 site derivatives. Structures were determined by the UNAFOLD online interface at the Pasteur Institute. VCRdbs is a VCR derivative used in EMSA in which the variable terminal structure (VTS) was replaced by GAA. The black arrow shows the cleavage point in the R box, and the asterisk shows the extrahelical G nucleotide. We introduced mutations (boldface type) into this VCRdbs site in order to generate, after folding, paired (pd) and unpaired (unpd) VCRdbs site derivatives. The ΔG (free energy) values of VCRdbs, paired VCRdbs, and unpaired VCRdbs folding are −21.7, −37.2, and −5.3 kcal mol−1, respectively. (B) EMSA of the binding of SSB to VCR2/1 site derivatives. Equal quantities of radiolabeled VCR site derivative DNA fragments (0.6 pmol) were incubated with increasing amounts (0, 13, 26, 52, and 104 nM) of SSB. Complexes I and II probably represent several degrees of SSB multimerization. (C) Densitometry analysis of EMSA. Binding of SSB was measured by monitoring the fraction (×100) of the labeled DNA substrate bound by SSB in complexes I and II to labeled (bound and free) DNA, detected by an automatic peak search of Image Gauge.

As controls, we constructed two other synthetic attC sites, namely, the unpaired and paired VCRdbs site derivatives. To obtain a fully paired VCRdbs site derivative, we introduced specific mutations in the unpaired-strand parts of the folded VCRdbs site in order to introduce complementarity and pair them. Finally, to obtain the unpaired VCRdbs derivative, we introduced specific mutations in the double-stranded parts of the folded VCRdbs site in order to unpair them (Fig. 2A).

The results from EMSA are presented in Fig. 2B. In the presence of SSB, distinct shifted bands (bands I and II), corresponding to SSB-DNA complexes, can be seen for both VCRdbs and unpaired VCRdbs site derivatives. Bands I and II probably correspond to different SSB-binding modes and/or different types of intertetramer cooperativity (see Discussion). As expected, for the paired VCRdbs derivative, we failed to observe distinct and significantly shifted bands. The band intensities on the gels were quantified, confirming the ability of SSB to bind single-stranded parts of attC sites very efficiently (Fig. 2C). We observed, among free DNA, higher electrophoretic migration bands in the VCRdbs and paired VCRdbs derivative lanes. Note that these supplementary bands probably correspond to DNA dimer formation favored by the presence of inverted repeats. The presence of these DNA dimers does not alter the interpretation of the results.

SSB destabilizes folded attC sites.We hypothesized that the consequence of SSB binding on the folded attC sites could be a destabilization effect. Indeed, Reddy and collaborators have previously shown the ability of SSB to efficiently and rapidly bind stem-loops, melting these secondary structures and facilitating the binding of RecA (26). To study this, we developed a replication slippage assay. Indeed, a direct correlation between the stability of secondary structures and the frequency of replication slippage was demonstrated previously (27). The model proposed is that the formation of a stem-loop structure between a pair of flanking direct sites during replication permits a slippage event. This results in precise or nearly precise loss of the structured region. As SSB is essential in E. coli, the slippage assays were performed in the wild-type SSB context or with an ssb-200 mutant. The ssb-200 mutation corresponds to a G→A substitution at nucleotide 41, resulting in an amino acid substitution at position 4 (G4D). This mutation induces a tex (transposon excision) phenotype, leading to an increase in the precise excision frequency of a Tn10 derivative (Tn10dKan) (28). Interestingly, Reddy and collaborators showed that tex of the ssb-200 mutant was not affected in any other functions mediated by SSB, such as replication, recombination, or repair. This suggests that the observed tex phenotype of this mutant is probably due only to an incapability of the SSB-200 protein to destabilize stem-loop structures formed by the inverted repeats of Tn10dKan. Thus, if the previously observed binding of SSB on the attC folded sites induces their melting, it is very likely that such an effect would not be observed with SSB-200.

We constructed a pBR325 derivative plasmid carrying an attCaadA7 site inserted into the cat resistance gene in such way that the loss of this attC site by “replication slippage” would lead to the reconstitution of a functional cat gene (p5087) (see Materials and Methods) (Fig. 3A). This plasmid was transformed into an ssb-200 mutant strain (ω6738 [28]) and into its ssb wt parental strain, GJ1885 (ω6737 [28]). The Cmr reversion frequency obtained for the parental strain was 5.5 × 10−11. Interestingly, the frequency of reversion for the ssb-200 strain was approximately 14-fold higher (7.6 × 10−10) (Fig. 3B). Note that several of the Cmr clones were sequenced in order to confirm deletion of the attC sites (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that SSB reduces the attC site loss mediated by replication slippage events, probably by binding and destabilizing the single-stranded folded attC site. To confirm that the obtained frequency of replication slippage is not influenced by the local context (transcription, replication, and nucleotide sequences), we performed a set of experimental controls. attC sites were cloned into further pBR derivatives in both orientations within the cat resistance gene. Moreover, the cat gene was cloned in both orientations on the plasmid (see Materials and Methods). In all cases, we obtained the same order of Cmr reversion frequencies for the four tested constructions in the wt context and in the ssb-200 context (data not shown, and see Materials and Methods; see also Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). As an additional control, we constructed a synthetic derivative of the attCaadA7 site presenting a lower free energy of single-stranded attC site folding (ΔG = −5.1 kcal mol−1) than the natural attCaadA7 site (ΔG = −19.1 kcal mol−1). For this, we introduced specific mutations into the double-stranded parts of the natural attCaadA7 site in order to unpair them. We called this synthetic attC site an unpaired attCaadA7 site derivative (Fig. 4A). As with the attCaadA7 site, we also observed a decrease in attC deletion frequencies in the ssb-200 context (∼13-fold) (ω8609) compared to the wt context (ω8605) (Fig. 4B). This result shows that the probable destabilization effect of SSB is not only on the attC sites but also more generally on single-stranded folded secondary structures. We also cloned the unpaired attCaadA7 site derivative in the opposite orientation within the cat resistance gene, and we obtained the same order of Cmr reversion and attC deletion frequencies for this construct in both the wt context (ω8604) and the ssb-200 context (ω8608) (data not shown).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

In vivo effects of SSB and IntI1 on attC site folding. (A) Experimental setup of the replication slippage assay. The model proposed is that folding of the attC site between the pair of flanking direct repeats (EcoRI restriction sites) (black rectangles) permits a replication slippage event. This results in precise or nearly precise attC deletion, thus reconstituting a functional cat resistance gene (Cmr reversion frequencies). The precise attC deletion was measured by sequencing (attC deletion frequencies). (B) Effects of SSB and IntI1 on Cmr reversion and attC deletion frequencies (see Materials and Methods). The replication slippage assay was used to study the effects of IntI1Y312F and SSB on attCaadA7 site folding. The Cmr reversion frequencies and attC deletion frequencies are represented in the absence (−) and in the presence (+) of IntI1 for the GJ1885 wild-type strain and the GJ1885 ssb-200 strain (GJ1890). The results represent means of four independent experiments (see Materials and Methods). Error bars show the standard deviations.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Specificity of the in vivo effects of SSB and IntI1 on attC site folding. (A) Secondary structures of the attCaadA7 site bottom strand (bs) and the unpaired attCaadA7 bottom-strand (bs) site derivative. Structures were determined by the UNAFOLD online interface at the Pasteur Institute. The black arrow shows the cleavage point. Primary sequences of the attC sites are shown. The ΔG (free energy) values of attCaadA7 bs and unpaired attCaadA7 bs folding are −19.1 and −5.1 kcal mol−1, respectively. (B) The replication slippage assay was used to study the effect of SSB on folding of the attCaadA7 site (black bar) and the unpaired attCaadA7 site derivative (gray bar). The relative deletion rates obtained for the ssb-200 strain versus GJ1885 (ssb-WT) are indicated. The results represent means of four independent experiments. (C) The replication slippage assay was used to study the effect of IntI1Y312F on folding of the attCaadA7 site (black bar) and the unpaired attCaadA7 site derivative (gray bar). The relative deletion rates obtained in the presence of integrase versus in its absence (intI1+/intI1−) are indicated. The results represent means of four independent experiments.

Altogether, these assays confirmed that SSB can destabilize folded attC sites in a nonspecific manner.

The integrase stabilizes attC site folding.We showed a destabilizing effect of SSB on folded attC sites, in the absence of integrase. As the integrase likely stabilizes the folded attC structure, we could expect this effect to be counterbalanced in the presence of this protein. In order to test this hypothesis, we assessed the effect of IntI1 expression on the slippage frequency in the assay described above. In strain GJ1885 (ω6791), we introduced plasmid p8741 carrying the intI1 gene under the control of the inducible Pbad promoter (ω8749). We chose to use an intI1 gene mutated for the catalytic tyrosine (Y312F) in order to observe the effect of IntI1 binding without an influence of potential recombination events that could occur between copies of the plasmid. It was previously shown that when replacing the reactive nucleophilic tyrosine with the inert phenylalanine (IntI1Y312F), the ability of the integrase to attack the DNA was lost, but the attC site binding capability was preserved (22). The results showed that in the IntI1Y312F expression context (arabinose induction), the Cmr reversion and attC deletion frequencies were 25-fold higher than those in the absence of the integrase (glucose repression) (Fig. 3B and 4C). This suggests that IntI1, contrary to SSB, increases the attC site loss mediated by replication slippage events, probably by stabilizing folded attC sites. To confirm that this observed stabilizing effect of IntI1 on attC folding is specific to attC sites, we performed the same experiment by using the previously used unpaired attCaadA7 derivative (Fig. 4A), which theoretically lost its IntI1-binding boxes (ω8752). As expected in this case, we obtained a very low and probably nonsignificant stabilizing effect of IntI1 (6-fold higher) compared to that of the wild-type attCaadA7 site (25-fold higher) (Fig. 4C). We demonstrated here that the integron integrase stabilizes the folding of attC sites in a specific manner.

In vitro study of effects of IntI1 and SSB on attC site folding.In order to specify the effect of the integrase on attC site folding, we performed additional in vitro experiments. Indeed, it has been shown that IntI1 possesses the intrinsic property to efficiently catalyze strand transfer in vitro between attC fragments in the absence of other bacterial proteins, suggesting the ability of the integrase to favor attC site folding or to stabilize it (29, 30). To confirm this observation, we set up an in vitro folding assay to allow us to easily monitor the single-stranded or double-stranded folding of short DNA fragments containing attC sites. The variations in optical density measured at 260 nm (OD260) directly reflect the DNA hybridization modifications. Indeed, the OD260 was comparatively lower when the DNA fragment was in the double-stranded form rather than in the single-stranded form. The preheated attCaadA7 fragment led to an OD260 close to 1.2, corresponding to the fully ssDNA form of the fragment (Fig. 5A, red), and the prechilled attCaadA7 fragment led to an OD260 close to 0.6, corresponding to the fully dsDNA form (Fig. 5A, blue). By stabilizing the temperature to 37°C, the OD260 of the preheated fragment decreased to 0.9, corresponding to the partially dsDNA form of the fragment. We also obtained the same partially dsDNA structure from the prechilled fragment. These results were also reproduced by using VCR2/1-containing fragments (Fig. 5B) but not for attI1 sites (sites not forming a hairpin structure) (Fig. 5C). This confirms that attC sites share a partially dsDNA form, in contrast to attI1, which remains fully double stranded. Addition of IntI1 to both prechilled and preheated attCaadA7 (Fig. 5A) and VCR2/1 (Fig. 5B) fragments led to an OD260 close to 1.2, suggesting that the enzyme favors the formation of the fully single-stranded folded attC site and stabilizes this structure. In contrast, no such effect was found by using the att1I site, suggesting that this activity of IntI1 is highly specific to attC sites. As a supplementary control, we tested a mutated attCaadA7 site (attCaadA7m) (Fig. 5D) where the extrahelical G base has been deleted in order to prevent the specific binding of IntI1 on the L box (Fig. 1B) (22). As expected, by using this mutated site, we failed to observe any influence of IntI1 on attC site folding, highlighting the specificity of the IntI1 properties for the attC sites.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

In vitro effect of IntI1 on attCaadA7 (A), VCR2/1 (B), attI1 (C), and attCaadA7m (D) site folding. The OD260 of each fragment (50 μg/ml) was measured at 37°C either after prechilling (prechilled attCaadA7, VCR2/1, attI1, and attCaadA7m) or after preheating for 3 min at 95°C (preheated attCaadA7, VCR2/1, attI1, and attCaadA7m) in the absence of IntI1 as well as after the addition of IntI1 (2 pmol) 30 min after the beginning of the measurement with prechilling (prechilled attCaadA7 + IntI1, VCR2/1 + IntI1, attI1 + IntI1, and attCaadA7m + IntI1) or after preheating at 95°C (preheated attCaadA7 + IntI1, VCR2/1 + IntI1, attI1 + IntI1, and attCaadA7m + IntI1). The OD260 measurement of the proteins alone was previously performed and subtracted from the measurements obtained with the mixture in order to determine accurate values for the fragment solution. Results represent means of three independent experiments. Error bars show the standard deviations.

Interestingly, when SSB was used instead of IntI1, perturbation of the fragments' folding was observed only for preheated DNA. This suggests that the protein binds the single-stranded fragments, keeps them in a single-stranded form (Fig. 6A and B), and does not intervene in the attC folding property, as observed with IntI1. This also highlights the specificity of the effect observed with IntI1, confirming that the folding effect was due to an intrinsic property of the enzyme to favor and stabilize the folding of DNA strands and not to an unspecific DNA avidity.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

In vitro effect of SSB on attCaadA7 (A) and VCR2/1 (B) site folding. The OD260 of each fragment (50 μg/ml) was measured at 37°C either after prechilling (prechilled attCaadA7 and VCR2/1) or after preheating for 3 min at 95°C (preheated attCaadA7 and VCR2/1) in the absence of SSB as well as after addition of SSB (2 pmol) 30 min after the beginning of the measurement with prechilling (prechilled attCaadA7 + SSB and VCR2/1 + SSB) or after preheating at 95°C (preheated attCaadA7 + SSB and VCR2/1 + SSB). The OD260 measurement of the proteins alone was previously performed and subtracted from the measurements obtained with the mixture in order to determine accurate values for the fragment solution. Results represent means of three independent experiments. Error bars show the standard deviations.

In conclusion, while both SSB and IntI1 bind the folded attC site, the consequences of their binding would be antagonistic, since SSB seems to destabilize the folded attC site, while IntI1 assists with attC site folding.

SSB does not modulate integron recombination.We tested the recombination of attC sites under conditions of SSB overexpression and in an ssb-200 mutant context. We used an excision assay described previously (31). This assay allowed us to directly measure attC recombination through restoration of the dapA reading frame. In an MG1655 ΔdapA strain, we inserted a plasmid containing a dapA gene interrupted by two specific recombination sites, attI1 and attCaadA7 (ωB768) (Fig. 7A), attCaadA7 and attCereA2 (ωB661), or attI1 and attI1 (ωB662) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Integrase expression causes site-specific recombination and excision of the synthetic cassette, restoring a functional dapA gene and allowing these strains to grow on DAP-free medium (Fig. 7A). We transformed these strains with the pBAD::intI1 multicopy plasmid carrying the intI1 gene under the control of the Pbad promoter (p7383) and a second plasmid, p7305 (pHYD620 from reference 28), containing the ssb gene, ensuring the overexpression of the SSB protein. pCL1920, the pHYD620 progenitor plasmid (p8008) (devoid of the ssb gene), was used as a control. Integrase-driven recombination frequencies were calculated as the ratio of the number of cells growing in the absence of DAP over the total number of cells. Results are presented in Fig. 7B.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

In vivo effect of SSB on cassette excision. (A) Experimental setup of the cassette excision assay. The dapA gene is interrupted by a synthetic cassette (black line) encountered by the attI1 (black triangle) and attCaadA7 (white triangle) sites. Recombination leads to the excision of the integron cassette and restores a functional dapA gene. (B) Excision frequencies of the attI1 × attI1, attCaadA7 × attCereA2, and attI1 × attCaadA7 cassettes in the WT or ssb-200 strain (bottom) and in the presence of the pCL1920 control vector (vector) or the pHYD620 plasmid (ssb+), which overexpresses the SSB protein (bottom). Black bars represent the results obtained in the presence of IntI1, and gray bars represent those obtained in the absence of IntI1. “nd” indicates “nondetected” recombination events. Results represent means of three independent experiments. Error bars show the standard deviations.

The frequencies of excision in the absence (vector) and presence (ssb+) of SSB overexpression were significantly similar for each tested att combination. These results show that SSB overexpression does not affect integron recombination.

We also tested the recombination of these three att combinations in the above-described ssb-200 context (ωB769, ωB771, and ωB770). For this, we constructed an MG1655 ΔdapA ssb-200 strain (ωB704) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Results are presented in Fig. 7B. Once more, excision frequencies in the wt and ssb-200 strains were similar for each tested att combination. These results show that SSB did not affect integron recombination.

As a control, we also performed both assays described above in the absence of integrase expression (Fig. 7B). We observed a few recombination events only for the attI1 × attI1 reaction, probably due to slippage events and/or homologous recombination between both identical 58-bp-long attI1 sites.

Effect of RecA on integron recombination.We tested the recombination of att sites under conditions of RecA overexpression (recA+) and in a recA-deleted mutant. Tests were performed by using the above-described in vivo excision assay. We also tested the recombination of the three previously used att combinations (see Materials and Methods; see also Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). The frequencies of excision in the RecA overexpression conditions and recA-deleted strains are significantly similar for each tested att combination (Fig. 8). These results show that RecA does not affect integron recombination.

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

In vivo effect of RecA on cassette excision. Shown are excision frequencies of the attI1 × attI1, attCaadA7 × attCereA2, and attI1 × attCaadA7 cassettes in the WT or recA-deleted strain (bottom) and in the presence of the pGB2 control vector (vector) or the pGB2-recA plasmid (recA+), which overexpresses the RecA protein (top). Black bars represent the results obtained in the presence of IntI1, and gray bars represent the results obtained in the absence of IntI1. “nd” indicates “nondetected” recombination events. Results represent means of three independent experiments. Error bars show the standard deviations.

We also performed these assays in the absence of integrase expression (Fig. 8). As in the SSB studies, we observed recombination events only for the attI1 × attI1 combination, probably due to slippage events and/or homologous recombination (only in the recA+ strains) between both attI1 sites.

DISCUSSION

Biological functions of secondary structures.It is now obvious that DNA is not always present in its canonical double-stranded form but can also form secondary structures through intrastrand base pairing. These structures are strongly favored in single-stranded DNA and can also be extruded from dsDNA at a lower rate. These structures have been found to be involved in biological functions (15). Indeed, hairpins play an essential role in initiation of replication and transcription and are present in a majority of origins of transfer (oriT), ensuring conjugation (15). Moreover, to date, there are three examples of recombination systems using secondary structures as the substrates: attC integron recombination (9), CTX-phage integration (32), and IS608 transposition (33). In all of the examples described above, secondary structures could represent a supplementary way to expand information storage in DNA, in addition to the primary base sequence.

It is also known that palindromes that are too long and too stable pose a threat to genome stability. Indeed, they cannot be maintained in vivo (for a review, see reference 15), either because they are inviable, i.e., intrinsically toxic to the cell, or because they are genetically unstable, i.e., partially mutated or deleted (34). It is assumed that inviability is caused by an arrest of the replication fork, as it is unable to process these secondary structures, and that instability is caused by the presence of proteins, such as SbcCD, destroying these structures. This leads to constraints on the size and perfection of the inverted repeats that can be maintained in vivo.

Single-strand DNA-binding proteins.Hairpin formation in the cell is most likely to occur in the presence of ssDNA in the cell. The presence of ssDNA is not merely an intermediate state between its functional double-stranded forms. Indeed, ssDNA can be found in the cell during many of its physiological processes, such as lagging-strand synthesis during replication and DNA repair, but ssDNA is also tightly connected to horizontal gene exchange in bacteria, i.e., in bacterial conjugation, natural transformation, or viral infections. When produced, cellular ssDNA is not left naked; several proteins, such as RecA and SSB, bind it without sequence specificity. The best-characterized SSB is the one from the bacterium E. coli. SSB prevents premature annealing, stabilizes and protects the single-stranded DNA, and also removes the secondary structures (16, 17). It acts as a homotetramer that can migrate via random walk-along ssDNA, providing a mechanism by which it can be repositioned along ssDNA while remaining tightly bound (18). SSB can form different complexes and bind ssDNA with several binding modes, depending on the number of nucleotides bound per tetramer [(SSB)n; n = 35, 56, or 65]. ssDNA interacts with only two SSB subunits in the (SSB)35 complex and with all four subunits in the (SSB)65 complex, resulting in different extents of ssDNA compaction. The binding mode defines several intertetramer cooperativities: in the (SSB)35-binding mode, cooperativity is “unlimited,” and tetramers can form long protein clusters, while in the (SSB)65-binding mode, only dimers of tetramers (octamers) can be formed (“limited” cooperativity) (17). Moreover, SSB directs RecA binding to ssDNA and ensures the directionality of RecA polymerization across stem-loop structures in ssDNA (19), (26). Indeed, the RecA protein also binds ssDNA, forming a nucleoproteic filament. Recent single-molecule studies have shown how SSB can spontaneously migrate along ssDNA, melting unstable hairpins while stimulating RecA filament elongation (18).

In this paper, we were interested in examining the role of these ssDNA-binding proteins, SSB and RecA, in integron recombination and, more specifically, the role of SSB in attC site folding. Whereas SSB and RecA are not involved in integron recombination, we demonstrate here the involvement of SSB in the modulation of attC site folding in the absence of recombination.

The RecA protein does not regulate integron recombination.In order to test the effect of RecA on integron recombination, in vivo tests were performed by using the integron cassette excision assay where the recombination sites are carried by the chromosome. Note that we also performed supplementary tests by using our suicide conjugation and replicative assays (data not shown). While the conjugation assay permits the delivery of attC sites as ssDNA, the test performed under replicative conditions supplies attC sites that have to be extruded as cruciforms from double-strand molecules. Our results show that whatever the delivery mode of attC sites, RecA does not influence integron recombination. Interestingly, even RecA overexpression did not affect integron recombination. This is relevant since we know that expression of integron integrases depends on the induction of the SOS response, which in turn produces a large excess of RecA. Note that this result does not exclude any regulatory role of RecA in attC site folding outside recombination. Nevertheless, it seems unlikely, since previous observations showed that the RecA protein does not, by itself, bind well to ssDNA secondary structures and needs SSB to remove such structures (19).

SSB modulates attC site folding.It was thought that SSB could have a role in integron recombination, as it plays extensive cellular roles in DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA homologous recombination, where it destabilizes secondary structures in ssDNA (19, 25, 26). Since SSB is essential for cell viability, new experimental setups were developed to study its role in integron recombination and attC folding. Especially, we developed a replication slippage assay using a strain with a mutated form of SSB, SSB-200, which does not hamper cell viability but confers a transposon excision (tex) phenotype (28). This tex phenotype is probably directly linked to SSB-200 not destabilizing the stem-loop structures formed by the pair of inverted repeats of the transposon. In the ssb-200 mutant strain, the frequency of reconstitution of a chloramphenicol resistance gene induced by an excision of the folded attC site by replication slippage was increased only in the absence of the integrase. This in vivo test confirmed that SSB can modify attC-mediated replication slippage, probably by destabilizing the folded attC sites. A DNA-binding assay allowed us to confirm the ability of SSB to strongly bind these sites. Note that even if the unpaired single-stranded parts contained in the folded attC site (and also the unpaired derivative site) are smaller than the SSB tetramer binding site (n = 35) (see above), SSB is able to bind to these sites. Indeed, the folded attC sites are probably not fixed structures and could “breathe,” inducing a transient, more unpaired state allowing SSB binding.

In conclusion, we demonstrated here that SSB, by “flattening” the folded attC sites, permits the maintenance of their integrity in the cell, avoiding their deletion or mutation and also ensuring cell viability.

Stabilization constraints and recombination of hairpins.Although ssDNA is present in many contexts within the cell, hairpin formation is strongly constrained by SSB binding. Proteins that function through hairpin binding are thus in competition with SSB for substrate availability. It could be the case for the integrase, since during recombination, folded attC sites need to be stable enough to resist SSB melting and coating. Therefore, we proposed that the integrase could capture attC sites at the moment of their extrusion, efficiently stabilizing and recombining them. Here, we confirmed this hypothesis and demonstrated that, when expressed, the integrase is able to counterbalance the effect of SSB even when SSB is overexpressed.

Finally, integron recombination efficiency is directed by a precise regulation of the stability of the folded attC sites. Bacteria have to find a subtle balance between the benefit provided by biological functions of secondary structures in DNA and the avoidance of such structures that could be detrimental. Here, this balance seems to have been reached through the production of SSB and integrase, even though other host factors may have a role in attC site folding. Both proteins are capable of recognizing and acting upon these secondary structures, mediating an antagonistic effect.

We previously demonstrated the influence of cellular processes such as replication and/or horizontal gene transfer events (such as conjugation) on attC site folding and also the implication of superhelicity in cruciform extrusion. The multiple means of regulating attC site folding by the host show once again the network of cell processes that regulate integron recombination.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Institut Pasteur, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS-UMR3525), the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-HEALTH-2011-single-stage), and the Evolution and Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance (EvoTAR).

We acknowledge Jason Bland, Zeynep Baharoglu, Alfonso Soler, and Aleksandra Nivina for critical reading of the manuscript; Clara Frumerie for performing the EMSA quantification; and Bénédicte Michel, Ivan Matic, and Robert Lloyd for providing bacterial strains.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 19 September 2013.
    • Accepted 25 November 2013.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 2 December 2013.
  • Address correspondence to Didier Mazel, mazel{at}pasteur.fr.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.01109-13.

  • This work is dedicated to the memory of Guy Duval-Valentin.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hall RM,
    2. Collis CM
    . 1998. Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria: the role of gene cassettes and integrons. Drug Resist. Updat. 1:109–119. doi:10.1016/S1368-7646(98)80026-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Rowe-Magnus DA,
    2. Guerout A-M,
    3. Ploncard P,
    4. Dychinco B,
    5. Davies J,
    6. Mazel D
    . 2001. The evolutionary history of chromosomal super-integrons provides an ancestry for multiresistant integrons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:652–657. doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.652.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rowe-Magnus DA,
    2. Mazel D
    . 2002. The role of integrons in antibiotic resistance gene capture. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 292:115–125. doi:10.1078/1438-4221-00197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Guerin E,
    2. Cambray G,
    3. Sanchez-Alberola N,
    4. Campoy S,
    5. Erill I,
    6. Da Re S,
    7. Gonzalez-Zorn B,
    8. Barbe J,
    9. Ploy MC,
    10. Mazel D
    . 2009. The SOS response controls integron recombination. Science 324:1034. doi:10.1126/science.1172914.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mazel D
    . 2006. Integrons: agents of bacterial evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:608–620. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jove T,
    2. Da Re S,
    3. Denis F,
    4. Mazel D,
    5. Ploy MC
    . 2010. Inverse correlation between promoter strength and excision activity in class 1 integrons. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000793. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000793.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Grindley ND,
    2. Whiteson KL,
    3. Rice PA
    . 2006. Mechanisms of site-specific recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75:567–605. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073908.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hallet B,
    2. Sherratt DJ
    . 1997. Transposition and site-specific recombination: adapting DNA cut-and-paste mechanisms to a variety of genetic rearrangements. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 21:157–178. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00349.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bouvier M,
    2. Demarre G,
    3. Mazel D
    . 2005. Integron cassette insertion: a recombination process involving a folded single strand substrate. EMBO J. 24:4356–4367. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600898.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  10. 10.↵
    1. Stokes HW,
    2. O'Gorman DB,
    3. Recchia GD,
    4. Parsekhian M,
    5. Hall RM
    . 1997. Structure and function of 59-base element recombination sites associated with mobile gene cassettes. Mol. Microbiol. 26:731–745. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6091980.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hall RM,
    2. Brookes DE,
    3. Stokes HW
    . 1991. Site-specific insertion of genes into integrons: role of the 59-base element and determination of the recombination cross-over point. Mol. Microbiol. 5:1941–1959. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00817.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bouvier M,
    2. Ducos-Galand M,
    3. Loot C,
    4. Bikard D,
    5. Mazel D
    . 2009. Structural features of single-stranded integron cassette attC sites and their role in strand selection. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000632. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000632.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Francia MV,
    2. Zabala JC,
    3. de la Cruz F,
    4. Garcia-Lobo JM
    . 1999. The IntI1 integron integrase preferentially binds single-stranded DNA of the attC site. J. Bacteriol. 181:6844–6849.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Loot C,
    2. Bikard D,
    3. Rachlin A,
    4. Mazel D
    . 2010. Cellular pathways controlling integron cassette site folding. EMBO J. 29:2623–2634. doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Bikard D,
    2. Loot C,
    3. Baharoglu Z,
    4. Mazel D
    . 2010. Folded DNA in action: hairpin formation and biological functions in prokaryotes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74:570–588. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00026-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Meyer RR,
    2. Laine PS
    . 1990. The single-stranded DNA-binding protein of Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 54:342–380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lohman TM,
    2. Ferrari ME
    . 1994. Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein: multiple DNA-binding modes and cooperativities. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:527–570. doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.002523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Roy R,
    2. Kozlov AG,
    3. Lohman TM,
    4. Ha T
    . 2009. SSB protein diffusion on single-stranded DNA stimulates RecA filament formation. Nature 461:1092–1097. doi:10.1038/nature08442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kowalczykowski SC,
    2. Krupp RA
    . 1987. Effects of Escherichia coli SSB protein on the single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase activity of Escherichia coli RecA protein. Evidence that SSB protein facilitates the binding of RecA protein to regions of secondary structure within single-stranded DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 193:97–113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Walker GC
    . 1996. The SOS response of Escherichia coli, p 1400–1416. In Neidhardt FC, Curtiss R III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE (ed), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed, vol 1. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Studier FW,
    2. Rosenberg AH,
    3. Dunn JJ,
    4. Dubendorff JW
    . 1990. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 185:60–89. doi:10.1016/0076-6879(90)85008-C.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Johansson C,
    2. Kamali-Moghaddam M,
    3. Sundstrom L
    . 2004. Integron integrase binds to bulged hairpin DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:4033–4043. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh730.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Demarre G,
    2. Frumerie C,
    3. Gopaul DN,
    4. Mazel D
    . 2007. Identification of key structural determinants of the IntI1 integron integrase that influence attC x attI1 recombination efficiency. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:6475–6489. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm709.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Frumerie C,
    2. Ducos-Galand M,
    3. Gopaul DN,
    4. Mazel D
    . 2010. The relaxed requirements of the integron cleavage site allow predictable changes in integron target specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:559–569. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Muniyappa K,
    2. Shaner SL,
    3. Tsang SS,
    4. Radding CM
    . 1984. Mechanism of the concerted action of recA protein and helix-destabilizing proteins in homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81:2757–2761. doi:10.1073/pnas.81.9.2757.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Reddy MS,
    2. Vaze MB,
    3. Madhusudan K,
    4. Muniyappa K
    . 2000. Binding of SSB and RecA protein to DNA-containing stem loop structures: SSB ensures the polarity of RecA polymerization on single-stranded DNA. Biochemistry 39:14250–14262. doi:10.1021/bi001187+.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Sinden RR,
    2. Zheng GX,
    3. Brankamp RG,
    4. Allen KN
    . 1991. On the deletion of inverted repeated DNA in Escherichia coli: effects of length, thermal stability, and cruciform formation in vivo. Genetics 129:991–1005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Reddy M,
    2. Gowrishankar J
    . 1997. Identification and characterization of ssb and uup mutants with increased frequency of precise excision of transposon Tn10 derivatives: nucleotide sequence of uup in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179:2892–2899.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Dubois V,
    2. Debreyer C,
    3. Litvak S,
    4. Quentin C,
    5. Parissi V
    . 2007. A new in vitro strand transfer assay for monitoring bacterial class 1 integron recombinase IntI1 activity. PLoS One 2:e1315. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Dubois V,
    2. Debreyer C,
    3. Quentin C,
    4. Parissi V
    . 2009. In vitro recombination catalyzed by bacterial class 1 integron integrase IntI1 involves cooperative binding and specific oligomeric intermediates. PLoS One 4:e5228. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Baharoglu Z,
    2. Bikard D,
    3. Mazel D
    . 2010. Conjugative DNA transfer induces the bacterial SOS response and promotes antibiotic resistance development through integron activation. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001165. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Val ME,
    2. Bouvier M,
    3. Campos J,
    4. Sherratt D,
    5. Cornet F,
    6. Mazel D,
    7. Barre FX
    . 2005. The single-stranded genome of phage CTX is the form used for integration into the genome of Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Cell 19:559–566. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Guynet C,
    2. Hickman AB,
    3. Barabas O,
    4. Dyda F,
    5. Chandler M,
    6. Ton-Hoang B
    . 2008. In vitro reconstitution of a single-stranded transposition mechanism of IS608. Mol. Cell 29:302–312. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Collins J,
    2. Volckaert G,
    3. Nevers P
    . 1982. Precise and nearly-precise excision of the symmetrical inverted repeats of Tn5; common features of recA-independent deletion events in Escherichia coli. Gene 19:139–146. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(82)90198-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  • Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Integron Integrase Efficiently Prevents the Melting Effect of Escherichia coli Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein on Folded attC Sites
Céline Loot, Vincent Parissi, José Antonio Escudero, Jihane Amarir-Bouhram, David Bikard, Didier Mazel
Journal of Bacteriology Jan 2014, 196 (4) 762-771; DOI: 10.1128/JB.01109-13

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Integron Integrase Efficiently Prevents the Melting Effect of Escherichia coli Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein on Folded attC Sites
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Integron Integrase Efficiently Prevents the Melting Effect of Escherichia coli Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein on Folded attC Sites
Céline Loot, Vincent Parissi, José Antonio Escudero, Jihane Amarir-Bouhram, David Bikard, Didier Mazel
Journal of Bacteriology Jan 2014, 196 (4) 762-771; DOI: 10.1128/JB.01109-13
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530