Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Structure and Expression of Propanediol Utilization Microcompartments in Acetonema longum

Elitza I. Tocheva, Eric G. Matson, Sarah N. Cheng, Wesley G. Chen, Jared R. Leadbetter, Grant J. Jensen
Elitza I. Tocheva
aDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric G. Matson
cRonald and Maxine Linde Center for Global Environmental Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah N. Cheng
aDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wesley G. Chen
aDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jared R. Leadbetter
cRonald and Maxine Linde Center for Global Environmental Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grant J. Jensen
aDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
bHoward Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00049-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Numerous bacteria assemble proteinaceous microcompartments to isolate certain biochemical reactions within the cytoplasm. The assembly, structure, contents, and functions of these microcompartments are active areas of research. Here we show that the Gram-negative sporulating bacterium Acetonema longum synthesizes propanediol utilization (PDU) microcompartments when starved or grown on 1,2-propanediol (1,2-PD) or rhamnose. Electron cryotomography of intact cells revealed that PDU microcompartments are highly irregular in shape and size, similar to purified PDU microcompartments from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 that were imaged previously. Homology searches identified a 20-gene operon in A. longum that contains most of the structural, enzymatic, and regulatory genes thought to be involved in PDU microcompartment assembly and function. Transcriptional data on PduU and PduC, which are major structural and enzymatic proteins, respectively, as well as imaging, indicate that PDU microcompartment synthesis is induced within 24 h of growth on 1,2-PD and after 48 h of growth on rhamnose.

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial microcompartments are small, cytoplasmic, organelle-like bodies consisting of a thin, selectively permeable proteinaceous shell that surrounds a cluster of enzymes. Together, these isolate certain metabolic pathways away from the rest of the cytoplasm. Microcompartments may increase metabolic efficiency by concentrating enzymes and substrates, inhibiting nonproductive side reactions, or sequestering toxic by-products (1, 2). The best-studied microcompartments are the “carboxysomes” that sequester ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) and facilitate carbon fixation (3, 4). After early electron microscopy images of carboxysomes revealed their general size and shape (5), crystal structures of the shell proteins led to pseudoatomic models of carboxysomes as irregular polyhedra with hexagonally packed faces joined at the vertices by pentagonal disclinations (6, 7). In the case of carboxysomes, it was also recently shown that the RubisCO enzymes destined to be internalized cluster together and then nucleate the assembly of the shell (8). Electron cryotomography (ECT) (9) of purified carboxysomes (10) and then of intact cells producing carboxysomes (11) has shown that while purification enriches for more-nearly-icosahedral shapes, carboxysomes inside cells are more heterogeneous, exhibit ordered layers of enzymes packed against the shell, and harbor small internal storage granules as well as elaborate connections to larger, external storage granules (11).

In addition to carboxysomes, there are several other types of bacterial microcompartments, including propanediol utilization (PDU) and ethanolamine microcompartments (12, 13). Whether or not all microcompartments share similar assembly and structural features remains unclear. Projection images of plastic-embedded sections of PDU and ethanolamine microcompartments from Salmonella enterica and Lactobacillus reuteri have shown that these are also irregular polyhedra with thin shells (12, 14).

We recently discovered microcompartments in another organism, Acetonema longum, which is a strictly anaerobic, acetogenic bacterium found in the gut of the phylogenetically lower wood-feeding termite Pterotermes occidentis (15). In addition to using H2 plus CO2 as a source of energy and carbon, this bacterium can use a variety of organic carbon sources to support its growth. A. longum is unusual in that while it affiliates phylogenetically with Clostridia, within the phylum Firmicutes, and can sporulate, it is a bona fide Gram-negative species with both an inner and an outer membrane (15, 16). In our previous study, aimed at characterizing sporulation in A. longum, we observed microcompartments in some but not all sporulating cells (16). Here we identify the microcompartments in A. longum as PDU microcompartments, identify the operon responsible for their synthesis, structurally characterize them three-dimensionally (3-D) in their native state within intact cells by ECT, and explore the timing of their assembly when A. longum is grown on different carbon sources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Identification of PDU-associated genes.Sequences for the genes of structural proteins and enzymes associated with PDU microcompartments were obtained from the complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. These S. enterica genes were used to conduct BLAST (17) searches for homologs in the genome sequence of A. longum within the RAST annotation environment (18). A. longum homologs of S. enterica genes were used to conduct reciprocal BLAST searches against the NCBI database to confirm the putative gene identities.

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) of pduC and pduU transcripts.Total RNAs were prepared from 5-ml cultures of A. longum cells by first stabilizing each sample with 2 volumes of RNA Protect reagent for bacteria (Qiagen) and then extracting the samples with RNeasy extraction kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. To ensure removal of DNA from the samples, the RNeasy extraction was performed twice. The first extraction included a 10-min on-column DNA digestion step using Qiagen DNase. This was followed by a 30-min off-column DNase digestion at 37°C, using RQ1 RNase-free DNase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), followed by a stop reaction performed according to the manufacturer's directions. Finally, the sample was run through a second RNeasy column without further DNase digestion. RNA was collected and quantified using absorbance values and ratios at 260 nm and 280 nm. All RNA samples had concentrations between 50 ng/μl and 400 ng/μl and 260-nm/280-nm absorbance ratios of approximately 2. Total RNA (500 ng) from each sample was converted into total cDNA by using am iScript randomly primed cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA).

The transcription levels of pduC and pduU were monitored by quantitative PCR using IQ PCR supermix reagent from Life Technologies and gene-specific primers. The forward and reverse primers used for pduC were 5′-GATATCGCCAAAATGCTGGT and 5′-ACCACGTTCATGGTGTTGAA, respectively, and the forward and reverse primers for pduU were 5′-GGGAGTTATGCGACAAGTT and 5′-GGTCCAGAAAGCCTATTTCC, respectively. Transcription levels of clpX, which encodes the housekeeping enzyme caseinolytic peptidase X, were used as an endogenous control for the cDNA concentration. Forward and reverse primers for clpX were 5′-CGTTGACGGAGTCGGTTAT and 5′-ACAATCCCTTTTTCGGCTTT, respectively.

ECT sample preparation, data collection, and analysis.Cells were frozen and imaged as described previously (16). Data were collected from −60° to 60°, with an angular step of 1°, a total dose of 200 e−/Å2, a defocus value of 10 μm, and a pixel size of 2 nm on a 300-kV FEG G2 Polara transmission electron microscope (TEM) equipped with a lens-coupled 4k-by-4k Ultracam (Gatan, CA) and an energy filter. Data were collected automatically with the UCSF tomography package (19) and reconstructed using the IMOD software package (20). Manual segmentation of the PDU microcompartments was done using Amira (Mercury Computer Systems). Every 2-D slice was contoured individually to ultimately represent a 3-D surface of the whole microcompartment. The surface was additionally smoothened for visual representation.

Culture growth conditions.Acetonema longum APO-1 cells were grown as described previously (16), with the following modifications. Cells were grown anaerobically in 4YACo medium (21) supplemented with different carbon sources at a 20 mM concentration. In order to test how well A. longum grew on 1,2-propanediol (1,2-PD), cultures were started on a combination of glucose and H2 plus CO2, a condition that enhances growth of the strain, presumably through mixotrophism (22) and as described previously (16). The carbon sources tested were glucose, rhamnose, 1,2-PD, and H2 plus CO2 (control). All cultures were grown in the presence of 80% H2 plus 20% CO2 to support mixotrophic growth. Cultures grown in this way were concentrated by gentle centrifugation (approximately 3,000 × g) under anaerobic conditions to remove residual glucose and H2 and were then inoculated into media containing a variety of carbon sources provided at a 20 mM concentration. Cultures were incubated at 27°C in anaerobic Hungate culture tubes (18-mm diameter), and optical densities at 600 nm (OD600) were recorded directly through the tubes. Cells were harvested for imaging and PCR analysis at the 24-h and 48-h time points. The growth of the cultures was also monitored by measuring the OD600 over 8 days.

Only a few bacterial species have been found to grow on 1,2-PD as the sole carbon and energy source, and studies have shown that growth on 1,2-PD depends on the presence of a specific terminal electron acceptor (12, 23, 24). We therefore tested growth of A. longum on 1,2-PD by providing an assortment of potential electron acceptors at a 10 mM concentration. To force the cells to use 1,2-PD as the electron donor in the presence of different terminal electron acceptors, the headspace of the Hungate tubes and the growth medium was flushed with a gas mixture of 80% N2 and 20% CO2. When S. enterica was grown similarly on 1,2-PD under anaerobic conditions, tetrathionate was required as an electron acceptor (provided at a 10 mM concentration) for growth on 1,2-PD (25). Therefore, in addition to tetrathionate (which supports growth of S. enterica on 1,2-PD), we tested nitrate (a strong inorganic electron acceptor), fumarate (a widely utilized organic electron acceptor), and glycine (an electron acceptor utilized by some other members of the phylum Firmicutes in Stickland reactions).

RESULTS

In our previous study of A. longum sporulation (16), microcompartments were observed in just ∼2.5% of the cells imaged. The microcompartments were present in both immature spores and mother cells (Fig. 1) and were clearly smaller and less regularly shaped and contained smaller enzymes than the RubisCO-containing carboxysomes of chemotrophic, carbon-fixing bacteria imaged before by ECT in our lab (11, 26).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Electron cryotomography of a sporulating A. longum cell reveals the presence of microcompartments. Arrows point to structures in the prespore and mother cell consistent with features of bacterial microcompartments. Additional features, such as membrane vesicles inside and outside the cell, are also apparent. The panel is a 20-nm-thick tomographic slice through a 3-D reconstruction. Bar, 200 nm.

PDU-associated genes in A. longum form a putative operon.In order to identify what kind of microcompartments were formed by A. longum, we searched for homologs of two conserved carboxysome shell proteins, CcmK2 and CcmK4. The only homologous proteins in A. longum were found to be encoded within an operon also containing the genes for PduCDE, the main enzyme for 1,2-PD catabolism, suggesting that these were PDU microcompartments. The other 16 genes in the operon were then identified as encoding homologs of all of the major structural and enzymatic components associated with PDU microcompartments in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2, the model organism for PDU microcompartment structure and function (12, 27, 28) (Fig. 2). The operon was flanked upstream by genes predicted to encode a putative sensor kinase and a DNA-binding response regulator likely involved in regulating the expression of the PDU genes. Three PDU genes found in S. enterica were not found within the gene cluster in A. longum. Of these, the genes for propionate kinase (pduW) and a threonine kinase involved in B12 synthesis (pduX) were identified elsewhere in the A. longum genome. The gene for NADPH-dependent propanol dehydrogenase (pduQ) was not identified specifically, but several homologs of unspecified alcohol dehydrogenases were found.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Genes for propanediol utilization (pdu). The genome context of genes involved in forming the PDU microcompartment in A. longum (bottom) is compared to the pdu operon of S. enterica (top). Homologous genes are depicted by the same color. Transcriptional regulators are shown in gray. Striped arrows denote genes in S. enterica found elsewhere in the genome of A. longum. Genes of unknown function and homology are shown in white.

1,2-PD induces transcription and translation of PDU-associated genes.To check whether the appearance of the microcompartments correlated with expression of the PDU genes, the transcription of two PDU-associated genes was assessed using qRT-PCR. We focused on two A. longum genes, pduU and pduC, which are predicted to encode a structural PDU polyhedral body protein and the large subunit of the coenzyme B12-dependent diol dehydratase, respectively. The levels of pduU and pduC transcripts detected at different time points depended on the specific carbon source added to the medium (Fig. 3A). Cells grown on glucose had low transcription levels of both genes at all time points investigated. As expected for PDU microcompartments, when cells were exposed to 1,2-PD, they responded rapidly by increasing transcription of pduU and pduC, by over 23- and 28-fold, respectively, within 24 h. While previous work has shown that, in A. longum, fermentation of fructose, mannose, mannitol, ribose, pyruvate, and oxaloacetate results in the production of butyrate and acetate (15), the major product of rhamnose fermentation was 1,2-PD (15). We therefore tested whether growth on rhamnose would result in transcription of pduU and pduC. Both genes were in fact strongly induced (approximately 18-fold and 20-fold increases, respectively), but only after 48 h of growth on rhamnose.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Transcriptional and structural studies of two major genes associated with 1,2-PD utilization in A. longum. (A) Transcriptional and translational levels of pduU, a gene encoding the microcompartment shell protein PduU, and pduC, encoding a subunit of the PduCDE enzyme comprising the coenzyme B12-dependent diol dehydratase. Samples were collected at 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h, and the signal intensities were compared to those of the samples collected at 0 h. The percentages of cells documented to have PDU microcompartments were normalized to 0.4. (B) Tomographic data collected at the same time points as the transcriptional data reveal the presence of PDU microcompartments after 48 h of growth on rhamnose and within 24 h of growth on 1,2-PD. The dashed line in the top right panel indicates a different slice through the same tomogram. Bars, 150 nm.

Cryotomograms of A. longum cells grown under the conditions described above were then recorded. No microcompartments were observed in cells grown on glucose after 24 and 48 h (n = 20), whereas growth on 1,2-PD for 24 h resulted in microcompartments in 5 of 7 cells. The majority of cells grown on rhamnose (33 of 36 imaged) lacked microcompartments after 24 h, but all the cells (n = 15) imaged after 48 h contained numerous microcompartments (Fig. 3B). We also tested whether growth on H2 plus CO2 alone could induce the synthesis of microcompartments. None of the 7 cells imaged after 48 h demonstrated the production of microcompartments when these culture conditions were used. Because (i) the only microcompartment genes found in A. longum were clustered in a single operon closely resembling (in synteny and homology) the model PDU microcompartment genes of S. enterica, (ii) growth of A. longum cells in 1,2-PD or rhamnose resulted in expression of the putative PDU microcompartment genes, and (iii) transcription of these genes correlated with the appearance of the microcompartments, we concluded that the observed microcompartments were PDU microcompartments.

Structural features of PDU microcompartments.Like the other microcompartments previously observed, A. longum PDU microcompartments were seen to be thin-shelled irregular polyhedra. In cells grown on 1,2-propanediol, 2 to 6 microcompartments were seen in the 2- to 4-μm field of view of each cryotomogram, leading to an estimate of 35 to 210 microcompartments per ∼70-μm cell. The size and shape of the intracellular PDU microcompartments (n = 40) were highly variable (Fig. 4). Manual segmentations of ∼30 PDU microcompartments showed that the longest dimensions ranged from 80 to 200 nm, with surface areas ranging from 1,100 nm2 to 3,100 nm2 and volumes ranging from 2,900 nm3 to 12,000 nm3.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Size and shape variability of intracellular PDU microcompartments in A. longum. Cryotomograms of cells grown under different conditions were manually rendered for visualization purposes. Sections of different cells have their microcompartments depicted in different colors. Each panel is a 20-nm-thick tomographic slice through a 3-D reconstruction. Bar, 50 nm.

All the microcompartments were densely packed, presumably with enzymes involved in 1,2-PD degradation. No empty or partially assembled microcompartments were observed. In some cases, a layer of material was found just inside or outside the microcompartment shell, but not all the way around (Fig. 5), suggesting that the shell was composed of a single proteinaceous layer. The patchy appearance of the additional layers could be indicative of some specific protein-protein interactions rather than a packing-induced order (11).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Organization of PDU microcompartments. The microcompartments appeared to be surrounded by a single layer of proteinaceous shell. Internal (white arrows) and external (black arrows) layers were also observed in some PDU microcompartments, alongside the protein shell (red contour). The continuous yet patchy appearance of the additional layers is likely indicative of some specific protein-protein interactions. Bars, 50 nm.

Growth of A. longum in different media.Compared to glucose or rhamnose, growth on 1,2-PD was dramatically slower and limited to much lower optical densities (Fig. 6A). An increase in optical density was observed when cells were grown on 1,2-PD and H2 plus CO2, but similar increases were observed for controls containing H2 plus CO2 with no additional organic carbon source. Because growth on 1,2-PD may depend on the presence of an appropriate terminal electron acceptor, various candidates were tested. Among these, nitrate supported stronger growth than glycine and fumarate (Fig. 6B). Tetrathionate was apparently lethal to A. longum, as evidenced by the cessation of growth and loss of motility in cultures shortly after addition of this chemical (the growth curve is not shown in Fig. 6B because tetrathionate also immediately oxidized the redox indicator resazurin, which was included in our medium to detect oxygen contamination, turning the culture pink and prohibiting optical density measurements).

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Growth of A. longum on different carbon sources (A) and with different terminal electron acceptors (B). (A) The cultures grew robustly when supplemented with either glucose or rhamnose. Growth on 1,2-PD was similar to that of the control, which received no additional carbon source. (B) The presence of nitrate as an electron acceptor stimulated growth above that of any of the other terminal electron acceptors tested and the control, which received neither 1,2-PD nor an exogenous terminal electron acceptor. None of these conditions resulted in an observed exponential growth phase.

DISCUSSION

Here we have shown that when starved or grown on certain sugars, A. longum synthesizes PDU microcompartments. In the termite gut, where A. longum is naturally found, cellulose hydrolysis and subsequent fermentation of the released sugars are accomplished mainly by flagellate protozoa, which produce large amounts of CO2 and H2 in the process. Acetogenic bacteria such as A. longum then use these gasses to form acetate, thus contributing to the efficiency of the termite gut system by increasing the amount of acetate available for termite metabolism (29–31). In addition, it is known that A. longum can ferment fructose, mannose, mannitol, ribose, pyruvate, and oxaloacetate, resulting in the production of butyrate and acetate (15). The major product of rhamnose fermentation, however, is 1,2-PD (15). In Salmonella enterica, the presence of 1,2-PD induces the assembly of microcompartments, presumably to sequester the toxic by-products of 1,2-PD degradation (such as propionaldehyde) from the rest of the cytoplasm (12, 32–34). The possession and expression of PDU microcompartment genes by A. longum therefore suggest that A. longum is either sometimes involved in rhamnose fermentation or utilizes 1,2-PD that is otherwise available due to the breakdown of plant material within the termite gut (1). The absence of PDU microcompartments in cultures grown on glucose and the delayed assembly of PDU microcompartments in cultures grown on rhamnose (compared to growth on 1,2-PD directly) further suggest that sugars repress microcompartment assembly but that when these sugars are exhausted from the medium (for instance, before sporulation is induced) and/or when 1,2-PD concentrations surpass a regulatory threshold, assembly begins (Fig. 3).

Like purified PDU microcompartments from S. enterica (35), A. longum PDU microcompartments are smaller and less regular than carboxysomes purified from Synechococcus species strain WH8102 (10). When carboxysomes were imaged in whole Halothiobacillus neapolitanus cells, some were only partially assembled (11). In those cases, a layer of RubisCO laid along the inner curvature of the unclosed shell. These observations are consistent with the results of a recent study which showed that the enzymes of the carboxysome microcompartment cluster together before they are encapsulated by the shell (8). While partially assembled PDU microcompartments were not observed in A. longum, our observation of a proteinaceous layer along the inner surface of some microcompartments points again to a coassembly mechanism. The consistent differences in shape and size of PDU microcompartments compared to carboxysomes may therefore be due to differences in the clustering properties of the enzymes they enclose, as well as to differences in the shell proteins.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Department of Energy (grant DE-FG02-07ER64484 to J.R.L.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 13 January 2014.
    • Accepted 7 February 2014.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 14 February 2014.
  • Address correspondence to Grant J. Jensen, Jensen{at}caltech.edu.
  • ↵* Present address: Wesley G. Chen, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kerfeld CA,
    2. Heinhorst S,
    3. Cannon GC
    . 2010. Bacterial microcompartments. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64:391–408. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Yeates TO,
    2. Kerfeld CA,
    3. Heinhorst S,
    4. Cannon GC,
    5. Shively JM
    . 2008. Protein-based organelles in bacteria: carboxysomes and related microcompartments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6:681–691. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1913.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cannon GC,
    2. English RS,
    3. Shively JM
    . 1991. In situ assay of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in Thiobacillus neapolitanus. J. Bacteriol. 173:1565–1568.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Shively JM,
    2. Ball F,
    3. Brown DH,
    4. Saunders RE
    . 1973. Functional organelles in prokaryotes: polyhedral inclusions (carboxysomes) of Thiobacillus neapolitanus. Science 182:584–586. doi:10.1126/science.182.4112.584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Shively JM,
    2. Ball FL,
    3. Kline BW
    . 1973. Electron microscopy of the carboxysomes (polyhedral bodies) of Thiobacillus neapolitanus. J. Bacteriol. 116:1405–1411.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tsai Y,
    2. Sawaya MR,
    3. Cannon GC,
    4. Cai F,
    5. Williams EB,
    6. Heinhorst S,
    7. Kerfeld CA,
    8. Yeates TO
    . 2007. Structural analysis of CsoS1A and the protein shell of the Halothiobacillus neapolitanus carboxysome. PLoS Biol. 5:e144. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tanaka S,
    2. Sawaya MR,
    3. Phillips M,
    4. Yeates TO
    . 2009. Insights from multiple structures of the shell proteins from the beta-carboxysome. Protein Sci. 18:108–120. doi:10.1002/pro.14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cameron JC,
    2. Wilson SC,
    3. Bernstein SL,
    4. Kerfeld CA
    . 2013. Biogenesis of a bacterial organelle: the carboxysome assembly pathway. Cell 155:1131–1140. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.044.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tocheva EI,
    2. Li Z,
    3. Jensen GJ
    . 2010. Electron cryotomography. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2:a003442. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a003442.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Iancu CV,
    2. Ding HJ,
    3. Morris DM,
    4. Dias DP,
    5. Gonzales AD,
    6. Martino A,
    7. Jensen GJ
    . 2007. The structure of isolated Synechococcus strain WH8102 carboxysomes as revealed by electron cryotomography. J. Mol. Biol. 372:764–773. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.059.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Iancu CV,
    2. Morris DM,
    3. Dou Z,
    4. Heinhorst S,
    5. Cannon GC,
    6. Jensen GJ
    . 2010. Organization, structure, and assembly of alpha-carboxysomes determined by electron cryotomography of intact cells. J. Mol. Biol. 396:105–117. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bobik TA,
    2. Havemann GD,
    3. Busch RJ,
    4. Williams DS,
    5. Aldrich HC
    . 1999. The propanediol utilization (pdu) operon of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 includes genes necessary for formation of polyhedral organelles involved in coenzyme B(12)-dependent 1,2-propanediol degradation. J. Bacteriol. 181:5967–5975.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Brinsmade SR,
    2. Paldon T,
    3. Escalante-Semerena JC
    . 2005. Minimal functions and physiological conditions required for growth of Salmonella enterica on ethanolamine in the absence of the metabolosome. J. Bacteriol. 187:8039–8046. doi:10.1128/JB.187.23.8039-8046.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sriramulu DD,
    2. Liang M,
    3. Hernandez-Romero D,
    4. Raux-Deery E,
    5. Lunsdorf H,
    6. Parsons JB,
    7. Warren MJ,
    8. Prentice MB
    . 2008. Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016 produces cobalamin-dependent diol dehydratase in metabolosomes and metabolizes 1,2-propanediol by disproportionation. J. Bacteriol. 190:4559–4567. doi:10.1128/JB.01535-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kane MD,
    2. Breznak JA
    . 1991. Acetonema longum gen. nov. sp. nov., an H2/CO2 acetogenic bacterium from the termite, Pterotermes occidentis. Arch. Microbiol. 156:91–98. doi:10.1007/BF00290979.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Tocheva EI,
    2. Matson EG,
    3. Morris DM,
    4. Moussavi F,
    5. Leadbetter JR,
    6. Jensen GJ
    . 2011. Peptidoglycan remodeling and conversion of an inner membrane into an outer membrane during sporulation. Cell 146:799–812. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.029.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Altschul SF,
    2. Gish W,
    3. Miller W,
    4. Myers EW,
    5. Lipman DJ
    . 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Overbeek R,
    2. Begley T,
    3. Butler RM,
    4. Choudhuri JV,
    5. Chuang HY,
    6. Cohoon M,
    7. de Crecy-Lagard V,
    8. Diaz N,
    9. Disz T,
    10. Edwards R,
    11. Fonstein M,
    12. Frank ED,
    13. Gerdes S,
    14. Glass EM,
    15. Goesmann A,
    16. Hanson A,
    17. Iwata-Reuyl D,
    18. Jensen R,
    19. Jamshidi N,
    20. Krause L,
    21. Kubal M,
    22. Larsen N,
    23. Linke B,
    24. McHardy AC,
    25. Meyer F,
    26. Neuweger H,
    27. Olsen G,
    28. Olson R,
    29. Osterman A,
    30. Portnoy V,
    31. Pusch GD,
    32. Rodionov DA,
    33. Ruckert C,
    34. Steiner J,
    35. Stevens R,
    36. Thiele I,
    37. Vassieva O,
    38. Ye Y,
    39. Zagnitko O,
    40. Vonstein V
    . 2005. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:5691–5702. doi:10.1093/nar/gki866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Zheng SQ,
    2. Keszthelyi B,
    3. Branlund E,
    4. Lyle JM,
    5. Braunfeld MB,
    6. Sedat JW,
    7. Agard DA
    . 2007. UCSF tomography: an integrated software suite for real-time electron microscopic tomographic data collection, alignment, and reconstruction. J. Struct. Biol. 157:138–147. doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2006.06.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kremer JR,
    2. Mastronarde DN,
    3. McIntosh JR
    . 1996. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116:71–76. doi:10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Leadbetter JR,
    2. Schmidt TM,
    3. Graber JR,
    4. Breznak JA
    . 1999. Acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 by spirochetes from termite guts. Science 283:686–689. doi:10.1126/science.283.5402.686.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Graber JR,
    2. Leadbetter JR,
    3. Breznak JA
    . 2004. Description of Treponema azotonutricium sp. nov. and Treponema primitia sp. nov., the first spirochetes isolated from termite guts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1315–1320. doi:10.1128/AEM.70.3.1315-1320.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Krooneman J,
    2. Faber F,
    3. Alderkamp AC,
    4. Elferink SJ,
    5. Driehuis F,
    6. Cleenwerck I,
    7. Swings J,
    8. Gottschal JC,
    9. Vancanneyt M
    . 2002. Lactobacillus diolivorans sp. nov., a 1,2-propanediol-degrading bacterium isolated from aerobically stable maize silage. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:639–646. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.01979-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Toraya T,
    2. Honda S,
    3. Fukui S
    . 1979. Fermentation of 1,2-propanediol with 1,2-ethanediol by some genera of Enterobacteriaceae, involving coenzyme B12-dependent diol dehydratase. J. Bacteriol. 139:39–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Price-Carter M,
    2. Tingey J,
    3. Bobik TA,
    4. Roth JR
    . 2001. The alternative electron acceptor tetrathionate supports B12-dependent anaerobic growth of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium on ethanolamine or 1,2-propanediol. J. Bacteriol. 183:2463–2475. doi:10.1128/JB.183.8.2463-2475.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Morris DM,
    2. Jensen GJ
    . 2008. Toward a biomechanical understanding of whole bacterial cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77:583–613. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061206.173846.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bobik TA,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Jeter RM,
    4. Otto KE,
    5. Roth JR
    . 1997. Propanediol utilization genes (pdu) of Salmonella typhimurium: three genes for the propanediol dehydratase. J. Bacteriol. 179:6633–6639.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Cheng S,
    2. Fan C,
    3. Sinha S,
    4. Bobik TA
    . 2012. The PduQ enzyme is an alcohol dehydrogenase used to recycle NAD+ internally within the Pdu microcompartment of Salmonella enterica. PLoS One 7:e47144. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Breznak JA,
    2. Switzer JM
    . 1986. Acetate synthesis from H(2) plus CO(2) by termite gut microbes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52:623–630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Pester M,
    2. Brune A
    . 2007. Hydrogen is the central free intermediate during lignocellulose degradation by termite gut symbionts. ISME J. 1:551–565. doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Breznak JA,
    2. Kane MD
    . 1990. Microbial H2/CO2 acetogenesis in animal guts: nature and nutritional significance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 7:309–313. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.1990.tb01698.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Sampson EM,
    2. Bobik TA
    . 2008. Microcompartments for B12-dependent 1,2-propanediol degradation provide protection from DNA and cellular damage by a reactive metabolic intermediate. J. Bacteriol. 190:2966–2971. doi:10.1128/JB.01925-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Cheng S,
    2. Sinha S,
    3. Fan C,
    4. Liu Y,
    5. Bobik TA
    . 2011. Genetic analysis of the protein shell of the microcompartments involved in coenzyme B12-dependent 1,2-propanediol degradation by Salmonella. J. Bacteriol. 193:1385–1392. doi:10.1128/JB.01473-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Cheng S,
    2. Bobik TA
    . 2010. Characterization of the PduS cobalamin reductase of Salmonella enterica and its role in the Pdu microcompartment. J. Bacteriol. 192:5071–5080. doi:10.1128/JB.00575-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Crowley CS,
    2. Sawaya MR,
    3. Bobik TA,
    4. Yeates TO
    . 2008. Structure of the PduU shell protein from the Pdu microcompartment of Salmonella. Structure 16:1324–1332. doi:10.1016/j.str.2008.05.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Structure and Expression of Propanediol Utilization Microcompartments in Acetonema longum
Elitza I. Tocheva, Eric G. Matson, Sarah N. Cheng, Wesley G. Chen, Jared R. Leadbetter, Grant J. Jensen
Journal of Bacteriology Apr 2014, 196 (9) 1651-1658; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00049-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Structure and Expression of Propanediol Utilization Microcompartments in Acetonema longum
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Structure and Expression of Propanediol Utilization Microcompartments in Acetonema longum
Elitza I. Tocheva, Eric G. Matson, Sarah N. Cheng, Wesley G. Chen, Jared R. Leadbetter, Grant J. Jensen
Journal of Bacteriology Apr 2014, 196 (9) 1651-1658; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00049-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530