Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Two Novel Membrane Proteins, TcpD and TcpE, Are Essential for Conjugative Transfer of pCW3 in Clostridium perfringens

Jessica A. Wisniewski, Wee L. Teng, Trudi L. Bannam, Julian I. Rood
T. J. Silhavy, Editor
Jessica A. Wisniewski
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wee L. Teng
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trudi L. Bannam
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian I. Rood
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Julian I. Rood
T. J. Silhavy
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.02466-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The anaerobic pathogen Clostridium perfringens encodes either toxin genes or antibiotic resistance determinants on a unique family of conjugative plasmids that have a novel conjugation region, the tcp locus. Studies of the paradigm conjugative plasmid from C. perfringens, the 47-kb tetracycline resistance plasmid pCW3, have identified several tcp-encoded proteins that are involved in conjugative transfer and form part of the transfer apparatus. In this study, the role of the conserved hypothetical proteins TcpD, TcpE, and TcpJ was examined. Mutation and complementation analyses showed that TcpD and TcpE were essential for the conjugative transfer of pCW3, whereas TcpJ was not required. To analyze the TcpD and TcpE proteins in C. perfringens, functional hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged derivatives were constructed. Western blots showed that TcpD and TcpE localized to the cell envelope fraction independently of the presence of other pCW3-encoded proteins. Finally, examination of the subcellular localization of TcpD and TcpE by immunofluorescence showed that these proteins were concentrated at both poles of C. perfringens donor cells, where they are postulated to form essential components of the multiprotein complex that comprises the transfer apparatus.

INTRODUCTION

Conjugative transfer of plasmid DNA is an important process that contributes to bacterial genome plasticity and adaption, particularly the spread of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes (1, 2). The translocation of a conjugative plasmid relies on the coupling protein, the relaxosome complex, and a type IV secretion system (T4SS), known as the mating-pair formation (Mpf) apparatus (1). For conjugation systems in Gram-negative bacteria, structural resolution of the outer membrane core complex and the inner membrane complex of the T4SS, as well as information about the pathway of DNA translocation across the T4SS in the donor cell, has been elucidated (3–11). Less is known about conjugation systems in Gram-positive bacteria, with our current understanding based primarily on comparisons to those in Gram-negative bacteria and with the systems in Gram-positive bacteria proposed to involve a “minimized” T4SS (3, 12–18).

The Gram-positive, anaerobic pathogen Clostridium perfringens carries many disease-mediating toxin genes and antibiotic resistance genes on a unique family of large plasmids that have large regions of sequence identity (19–22). Most of these plasmids carry the novel tcp conjugation locus (20, 23). The tcp locus has been identified on all known conjugative plasmids in C. perfringens, and proteins encoded by this locus have been shown to be required for conjugative transfer of the paradigm C. perfringens conjugative plasmid, pCW3 (20, 23–26). The presence of the tcp genes on so many of these toxin plasmids suggests that the transfer of toxin genes by a shared conjugation mechanism in C. perfringens is important in disease dissemination. To this effect, several of these toxin plasmids have been shown experimentally to be conjugative (19, 27, 28).

Mutagenesis and biochemical studies of the Tcp proteins encoded on pCW3 have led to the development of a model of the C. perfringens transfer apparatus (26, 29). Surprising similarities between the components that form the C. perfringens transfer apparatus and the T4SS in Gram-negative bacteria have been identified (26, 29). The C. perfringens transfer apparatus is composed of the core components TcpH and TcpC, which contain domains from VirB6- and VirB8-like proteins that are part of the inner membrane complex of the T4SS in Gram-negative bacteria (26, 30). Furthermore, protein families that are found in conjugation systems in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria are involved in conjugative transfer in C. perfringens (13). These components include two putative hexameric ATPases that are essential for transfer, the coupling protein TcpA and a transmembrane protein, TcpF, as well as a peptidoglycan hydrolase, TcpG, which is required for optimal transfer efficiency (23–25).

The objective of this study was to determine whether hypothetical proteins encoded by the tcp locus were required for the conjugative transfer of pCW3. Three genes encoding the hypothetical proteins TcpD, TcpE, and TcpJ, are highly conserved in tcp loci from C. perfringens plasmids (20, 23). The role of these conserved proteins in conjugative transfer remains unknown, since they have no similarity to proteins of known function (23). In the current study, conjugative mating studies carried out on tcpD, tcpE, and tcpJ mutants of pCW3, and their complemented derivatives, demonstrated that TcpD and TcpE were essential for conjugative transfer, whereas TcpJ was not required. Furthermore, TcpD and TcpE were shown to be membrane-associated proteins that concentrated at the poles of C. perfringens cells, similar to previous findings for TcpH and TcpF (30). These findings support the hypothesis that TcpD and TcpE form part of the transfer apparatus at the poles of C. perfringens donor cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions.Bacterial strains and plasmids are described in Table 1. C. perfringens strains were cultured at 37°C in preboiled fluid thioglycolate (FTG) medium (Difco), TPGY broth (31), brain heart infusion broth or agar (Oxoid), or nutrient agar (32) supplemented with glucose (0.38%, wt/vol) (Amersco) and the appropriate antibiotics following sterilization. The following antibiotics were used (at the final concentrations indicated in parentheses): erythromycin (50 μg/ml), streptomycin (1 mg/ml), tetracycline (10 μg/ml), and thiamphenicol (10 μg/ml). Chlorate-resistant strains were selected on medium containing a 1% (vol/vol) saturated potassium chlorate solution. C. perfringens agar cultures were incubated in an atmosphere of 10% (vol/vol) H2, 10% (vol/vol) CO2, and 80% (vol/vol) N2 in an anaerobic jar (Oxoid). Escherichia coli host strains DH5α and DH12S (Life Technologies) were cultured at 37°C in 2YT medium (33) supplemented with chloramphenicol (30 μg/ml), erythromycin (150 μg/ml), or kanamycin (20 μg/ml) where appropriate.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

C. perfringens strains and plasmids

Molecular techniques.Plasmid DNA from E. coli was isolated by using an alkaline lysis method according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). E. coli cells were made chemically competent and transformed as previously described (34). Electrocompetent cells were prepared for E. coli (35) and C. perfringens (36) as previously described, with slight modifications. TPGY medium was used to culture C. perfringens, and cells were washed three times with SMP buffer (270 mM sucrose, 1 mM MgCl2, 7 mM Na2HPO4 [pH 7.3]). Transformation of electrocompetent cells was carried out by using a BTX ECM-630 Electro Cell Manipulator (BTX Laboratories) with a single pulse of 1.8 kV, a resistance of 200 Ω, and a capacitance of 25 μF. C. perfringens genomic DNA was extracted as previously described (37). PCR amplification was performed by using Taq or Pwo DNA polymerase (Roche) and a final concentration of 0.5 μM each primer. PCR products were purified by using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). Restriction enzymes were used according to the manufacturers' instructions (Roche and New England BioLabs). Sequencing was performed by using Prism BigDye Terminator mix (Applied Biosystems) and was carried out on an Applied Biosystems 3730S capillary sequencer. Sequences were analyzed by using Vector NTI (Invitrogen) and Sequencher 5.1 (Gene Codes Corporation). Amino acid sequences were analyzed and putative functional domains were identified by using PSI-BLAST (38), TopPred2 (39), PSORT Prediction (40), and TOPCONS (41).

Construction of mutants by allelic exchange and complementation.Allelic exchange was performed by using a C. perfringens suicide plasmid, pJIR2715, containing an erm(Q) erythromycin resistance cassette that was flanked by ca. 2 kb of sequence upstream and downstream of the gene to be mutated (23). The flanking regions were generated by PCR and sequentially cloned into pJIR2715 using Asp718/BamHI sites upstream and XhoI/SacI sites downstream of the erm(Q) gene. The pCW3 region from bp 27700 to 29567 (23) was cloned upstream of erm(Q), and the region from bp 29895 to 31897 was cloned downstream of erm(Q), to generate the tcpD suicide vector pJIR3406. The pCW3 regions from bp 27941 to 29940 and from bp 30244 to 32234 were cloned upstream and downstream, respectively, of erm(Q) to generate the tcpE suicide vector pJIR3408. Similarly, the pCW3 regions from bp 35094 to 37000 and from bp 37719 to 39711 were cloned upstream and downstream, respectively, of erm(Q) to generate the tcpJ suicide vector pJIR3415. The suicide vectors were introduced independently into JIR325(pCW3) cells by electroporation. DNA preparations from potential double-crossover events were identified as erythromycin-resistant, thiamphenicol-susceptible colonies and were tested by PCR and Southern blotting to confirm the replacement of the target gene(s) with the erm(Q) cassette and the loss of the suicide plasmid.

For complementation studies, PCR products carrying either the wild-type tcpD or tcpE gene and ca. 50 bp of upstream sequence were cloned into the BamHI/Asp718 sites of the E. coli-C. perfringens shuttle vector pJIR3422 (24, 42) to generate pJIR4203 and pJIR3614, respectively. To generate the C-terminal hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged tcpE complementation vector, the wild-type tcpE gene and ca. 50 bp of upstream sequence were PCR amplified by using a reverse primer that encoded the HA sequence. The PCR product was cloned into the BamHI/Asp718 sites of pJIR3422 to generate pJIR3757. To generate the C-terminal HA-tagged tcpD complementation vector, the wild-type tcpD gene and ca. 50 bp of upstream sequence were PCR amplified by using a reverse primer that encoded a hexaglycine polylinker and the HA sequence. The PCR product generated was cloned into the BamHI/Asp718 sites of pJIR3422 to generate pJIR4204. The complementation plasmids were confirmed by restriction endonuclease and sequence analyses. These plasmids were introduced into C. perfringens by electroporation, and transformants were selected on nutrient agar containing thiamphenicol. The presence of the complementation plasmids in the C. perfringens strains was confirmed by restriction endonuclease and sequence analyses after rescuing the plasmids in E. coli.

Conjugative transfer experiments.Mixed plate matings on solid medium were performed to test conjugative plasmid transfer from C. perfringens donor cells, as previously described (32, 43). The recipient used in all mating studies was a streptomycin- and potassium chlorate-resistant derivative of strain 13, JIR4394 (23). The conjugation frequency is reported as the number of transconjugants per donor cell. To perform statistical analysis, the conjugation frequencies were log transformed, and an unpaired t test was performed on the normalized data, with statistical significance being defined as a P value of <0.05.

Cell fractionation studies.Crude membrane preparations of C. perfringens cells were prepared essentially as described previously (26, 30). Cells resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (10 mM sodium phosphate, 1.8 mM potassium phosphate, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl [pH 7.4]) supplemented with Complete cocktail protease inhibitor (Roche) were disrupted by using an Emulsiflex-C5 high-pressure homogenizer (Avestin). The protein content of the cellular fractions was determined by using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Pierce) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Approximately 2 μg of each fraction was analyzed by performing SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie staining and Western blotting using anti-HA mouse monoclonal antibodies (Cell Signaling) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies (Millipore).

Immunofluorescence studies.Immunofluorescence analysis of HA-tagged Tcp proteins was performed according to a previously reported method, with modifications (44). A single colony of each C. perfringens strain was used to inoculate 6 ml of FTG broth, with selection, and grown overnight at 37°C. The resultant cultures were subcultured into 90 ml of TPGY broth with appropriate antibiotics and incubated for 4 to 5 h. Cells (500 μl) were fixed in 10 ml of methanol (Amersco) for 1 to 2 h at −20°C and then centrifuged at 4,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in 90 μl of GTE (50 mM glucose, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], and 10 mM EDTA). A solution containing lysozyme (Amersco) and lysostaphin (Sigma) was freshly prepared in GTE and added to the cell suspension at final concentrations of 1 mg/ml and 10 μg/ml, respectively. The cell suspension was incubated for 2 h at 37°C, and 10 μl was then spread onto a 0.1% poly-l-lysine (Sigma)-treated slide. The cells were incubated with anti-HA mouse monoclonal antibodies (1:100 dilution in 2% [wt/vol] bovine serum albumin [Sigma] in PBS) overnight at 4°C. After washing 10 times with PBS, the cells were treated with 5% (vol/vol) goat serum (Sigma) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were then incubated in the dark with 2 μg/ml Alexa Fluor 488–goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Molecular Probes) in the presence of 300 nM 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Molecular Probes) in PBS at room temperature for 1 to 2 h. The cells were then washed 10 times with PBS and covered with a coverslip using 50% glycerol (Amersco) in PBS. The stained cells were observed by using an Olympus BX60 microscope with a 100× oil immersion objective (Olympus). Images were captured by using a SPOT RT3 digital camera with SPOT Basic for image capture (Scitech, Australia). Images were pseudocolored (green for Alexa Fluor 488 and blue for DAPI) and merged for analysis and preparation for publication by using Image J (45).

RESULTS

TcpD and TcpE are essential for pCW3 conjugative transfer.To determine whether the hypothetical proteins encoded by tcpD, tcpE, and tcpJ were required for conjugative transfer, null deletion mutants of pCW3 were constructed by allelic exchange for each of these genes independently. The mutants were selected on the basis of the erythromycin resistance conferred by the erm(Q) gene (Fig. 1A), with the genotypes of the mutants being confirmed by PCR analysis and Southern blotting (data not shown). The ability of the pCW3Δtcp derivatives to confer conjugative transfer was determined by a mixed plate mating assay that detected the transfer of the tetracycline resistance encoded by pCW3 to an isogenic tetracycline-sensitive recipient strain. The pCW3ΔtcpJ mutant transferred at levels similar to those of the wild type (Fig. 1B), suggesting that tcpJ is not required for conjugative transfer. In contrast, no transfer was detected for either the pCW3ΔtcpD or pCW3ΔtcpE mutant (Fig. 1B).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Conjugation frequencies of pCW3 mutants and the respective complemented derivatives. (A) Region of the tcp locus spanning tcpC to tcpF from the wild type (pCW3) and the pCW3ΔtcpD::erm(Q) and pCW3ΔtcpE::erm(Q) mutants. In the mutants, most of the tcpD or tcpE gene has been replaced with the erm(Q) gene. (B) Conjugation frequencies of the pCW3ΔtcpD, pCW3ΔtcpE, and pCW3ΔtcpJ mutants and their respective complementation derivatives. Donors shown on the x axis are isogenic strains in a JIR325 background. pCW3, wild-type pCW3 (JIR4195); ΔtcpJ, pCW3ΔtcpJ (JIR12216); ΔtcpD, pCW3ΔtcpD (JIR12212); ΔtcpD(V), JIR12212 with a vector plasmid (pJIR3422); ΔtcpD(tcpD+), JIR12212 with a vector plasmid carrying the wild-type tcpD gene (pJIR4203); ΔtcpD(tcpD-G6-HA), JIR12212 with a vector plasmid carrying the tcpD HA-tagged derivative (pJIR4204); ΔtcpE, pCW3ΔtcpE (JIR12215); ΔtcpE(V), JIR122125 with a vector plasmid (pJIR3422); ΔtcpE(tcpE+), JIR12215 with a vector plasmid carrying the wild-type tcpE gene (pJIR3614); ΔtcpE(tcpE-HA), JIR12215 with a vector plasmid carrying the tcpE HA-tagged derivative (pJIR3757). The transfer frequency is expressed as the number of transconjugants per donor cell. The means ± standard errors of the means are shown, based on results from at least three biological replicates. Statistical analysis was carried out by using an unpaired t test. One asterisk denotes statistical significance (P < 0.05) compared to wild-type pCW3 (positive control). Two asterisks denote statistical significance (P < 0.05) when complemented strains were compared to the respective vector control (V) strain.

To confirm that the transfer-deficient phenotype observed for the tcpD and tcpE mutants was due to the allelic replacement of the respective genes, the wild-type genes were introduced into the respective mutant derivatives in trans under the control of a clostridial promoter on shuttle plasmid pJIR3422. Conjugative transfer of the pCW3 derivatives was restored in both complemented strains (Fig. 1B), leading to the conclusion that both tcpD and tcpE are essential for conjugative transfer of pCW3.

TcpD and TcpE localize to the cell envelope fraction of C. perfringens donor cells.TcpD and TcpE are small proteins of 115 and 122 amino acids, respectively, with TcpE having 27% sequence identity to the ORF17 protein of unknown function from Tn916, the only similarity identified (23). Bioinformatic analysis of the amino acid sequences of TcpD and TcpE identified putative transmembrane domains (TMDs) as the only known functional domains. Three putative TMDs were identified in TcpD, spanning the majority of the protein sequence (residues 20 to 40, 54 to 74, and 78 to 98), while two N-terminal putative TMDs were identified in TcpE (residues 31 to 51 and 59 to 79). The identification of putative TMDs suggests that TcpD and TcpE may localize to the cell membrane in C. perfringens cells, in a manner similar to that of other Tcp proteins that form the C. perfringens transfer apparatus (26, 30).

To determine the location of TcpD and TcpE in C. perfringens cells, the wild-type tcpD and tcpE genes were extended at their 3′ ends with a small, 9-amino-acid hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-encoding tag by PCR. These tagged tcpD and tcpE genes were introduced into the respective C. perfringens pCW3ΔtcpD and pCW3ΔtcpE mutants on shuttle plasmid pJIR3422. To determine whether the TcpD-HA and TcpE-HA derivatives were functional, mixed plate matings were carried out with the mutants complemented with the HA-tagged derivatives. Complementation with tcpE-HA restored transfer in the pCW3ΔtcpE mutant to levels similar to those found for complementation with the wild-type tcpE gene (Fig. 1B), providing evidence that the HA-tagged TcpE protein was functional. In contrast, complementation with the tcpD-HA derivative did not restore transfer in the pCW3ΔtcpD mutant (data not shown). This result indicated that the TcpD-HA protein was nonfunctional and therefore cannot be used to study TcpD localization. To produce a functional TcpD-tagged derivative, a hexaglycine (G6) flexible linker was introduced between the C terminus of TcpD and the HA tag. Complementation with the tcpD-G6-HA derivative restored transfer in the pCW3ΔtcpD mutant to levels similar to those found for complementation with wild-type tcpD (Fig. 1B). Based on these results, we concluded that a functional tagged TcpD derivative had been constructed.

To determine the cellular location of TcpD and TcpE, cellular fractionation was performed on cell lysates from C. perfringens pCW3ΔtcpD or pCW3ΔtcpE mutant strains expressing the wild-type TcpD and TcpE proteins from the complementation plasmids and the equivalent strains carrying the TcpD-G6-HA or TcpE-HA complementation plasmids. In addition, we examined an isogenic pCW3-negative C. perfringens strain expressing TcpD-G6-HA or TcpE-HA. Analysis of whole-cell lysates by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with HA-specific monoclonal antibodies detected bands at the expected masses of 12.7 kDa and 14.5 kDa for TcpD-G6-HA and TcpE-HA, respectively (Fig. 2). No bands were observed for lysates expressing the wild-type TcpD and TcpE proteins (data not shown). Bands corresponding to the TcpD-G6-HA and TcpE-HA proteins were observed in the cell lysate and insoluble cell membrane fractions in the presence and absence of pCW3, with no bands being observed in the soluble fraction (Fig. 2). These results provide evidence that TcpD and TcpE are membrane-associated proteins that localize to the cell membrane independently of other pCW3-encoded proteins.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Localization of TcpD and TcpE HA-tagged derivatives in C. perfringens cells. Cell fractionation and Western blotting using HA antibodies were carried out on strains expressing either the TcpD or TcpE HA-tagged derivative in a pCW3-positive (+) or pCW3-negative (−) background. pTcpE-HA denotes the vector plasmid carrying the tcpE HA-tagged derivative (pJIR3757), pTcpD-G6-HA denotes the vector plasmid carrying the tcpD HA-tagged derivative (pJIR4204), and pTcpD-G6-HA(R) denotes the vector plasmid carrying the tcpD HA-tagged derivative (pJIR4204) rescued from a pCW3-negative background. Expression was examined in a JIR325(pCW3)-positive background in the pCW3ΔtcpE (JIR12215) mutant or the pCW3ΔtcpD (JIR12212) mutant or in a pCW3-negative background in JIR325. The fractions are labeled as follows: L, cell lysate; S, soluble fraction; I, insoluble cell membrane fraction.

The levels of TcpD-G6-HA detected in the cell lysate and insoluble cell membrane fraction of pCW3-negative C. perfringens cells were consistently lower than the those detected in pCW3-positive C. perfringens cells (Fig. 2). To determine whether this reduction was the result of a mutation in the shuttle plasmid, the TcpD-G6-HA plasmid was rescued from the pCW3-negative C. perfringens strain into E. coli and then introduced into the isogenic pCW3-positive C. perfringens pCW3ΔtcpD strain. The levels of TcpD-G6-HA detected in the strain carrying the rescued plasmid were similar to those previously observed for pCW3-positive C. perfringens cells expressing TcpD-G6-HA from the shuttle plasmid (Fig. 2). We conclude that the reduced TcpD levels observed in the absence of pCW3 are not due to a forced mutation in the shuttle plasmid. These results could be explained by postulating that TcpD-G6-HA is less stable in the absence of other pCW3-encoded proteins.

To determine whether the stability of TcpD-G6-HA requires the presence of one of the other Tcp proteins, the TcpD-G6-HA shuttle plasmid was introduced into each of our C. perfringens tcp mutant backgrounds; that is, the shuttle plasmid was used to transform separate intP (J. A. Wisniewski and J. I. Rood, unpublished data), tcpA (25), tcpC (26), tcpE (this study), tcpF (23), tcpG (24), and tcpH (23) mutants. Western blotting of fractionated cell membrane preparations of these strains showed that the levels of TcpD-G6-HA detected in the various tcp mutant backgrounds were similar to those observed in the pCW3ΔtcpD mutant (Fig. 3). We conclude that no single Tcp protein is required to stabilize TcpD in C. perfringens cells.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Localization of TcpD HA-tagged derivatives in C. perfringens tcp mutant backgrounds. Cell fractionation and Western blotting using HA antibodies were carried out on isogenic derivatives of C. perfringens strain JIR325 expressing the TcpD HA-tagged derivative (pTcpD-G6-HA) in a pCW3-positive or pCW3-negative background as well as in tcp mutant backgrounds. pTcpD-G6-HA denotes the vector plasmid carrying the tcpD HA-tagged derivative (pJIR4204) expressed in JIR325 (−) and isogenic strains carrying pCW3 derivatives, abbreviated as follows: ΔD, pCW3ΔtcpD (JIR12212); intP::TT, pCW3intP::TT (JIR12540); ΔA, pCW3ΔtcpA (JIR10251); ΔC, pCW3ΔtcpC (JIR12088); ΔE, pCW3ΔtcpE (JIR12215); ΔF, pCW3ΔtcpF (JIR4940); ΔG, pCW3ΔtcpG (JIR12128); ΔH, pCW3ΔtcpH (JIR4885). The fractions are labeled as follows: L, cell lysate; S, soluble fraction; I, insoluble cell membrane fraction.

TcpD and TcpE are concentrated at the poles of C. perfringens cells.Previous studies have shown that Tcp proteins that are presumed to be part of the transfer apparatus, TcpH and TcpF, are localized to the poles of C. perfringens cells (30). To determine the subcellular localization of TcpD and TcpE, immunofluorescence microscopy was used to detect the HA-tagged derivatives in pCW3ΔtcpD and pCW3ΔtcpE mutants complemented with their respective wild-type genes or functional HA-tagged derivatives. TcpD-G6-HA was localized at both cell poles of C. perfringens cells (Fig. 4). Similarly, the localization of TcpE-HA was concentrated primarily at the poles, although green fluorescence corresponding to the HA epitope was observed across the cell (Fig. 4). As a negative control, cells expressing wild-type TcpD and TcpE were treated similarly. No green fluorescence was observed in these cells, indicating that the fluorescence observed was due to the presence of the HA epitope (Fig. 4). The polar localization of TcpD and TcpE suggests that these proteins are components of the C. perfringens transfer apparatus located or concentrated at the poles of donor cells. However, bacterial two-hybrid analysis did not detect interactions between TcpD and TcpE and the other Tcp proteins (29, 30; J. A. Wisniewski, R. Bantwal, T. L. Bannam, and J. I. Rood, unpublished data).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Localization of TcpD and TcpE HA-tagged derivatives in C. perfringens. TcpD and TcpE localization was detected in the pCW3 tcpD and tcpE mutant strains complemented with the respective wild-type or HA-tagged derivatives. C. perfringens cells were labeled by using monoclonal anti-HA mouse primary antibodies, followed by Alexa Fluor 488–anti-mouse goat secondary antibodies (green) as well as the nuclear stain DAPI (blue). TcpD, pCW3ΔtcpD background (JIR12212) with a vector plasmid carrying the wild-type tcpD gene (pJIR4203); TcpD-G6-HA, pCW3ΔtcpD background (JIR12212) with a vector plasmid carrying the tcpD HA-tagged derivative (pJIR4204); TcpE, pCW3ΔtcpE background (JIR12215) with a vector plasmid carrying the wild-type tcpE gene (pJIR3614); TcpE-HA, pCW3ΔtcpE background (JIR12215) with a vector plasmid carrying the tcpE HA-tagged derivative (pJIR3757).

DISCUSSION

The tcp region is essential for conjugative transfer of pCW3 and is present on all known conjugative toxin and resistance plasmids from C. perfringens, suggesting that these plasmids utilize a similar conjugation mechanism (20). Determination of the functional role and protein-protein interactions of several Tcp proteins has resulted in the development of a model of the C. perfringens transfer apparatus (20). A recent classification of T4SSs involved in conjugation identified the conjugation region from pCW3 as belonging to the MPFFA class that includes Tn916 and other integrative and conjugative elements from the Firmicutes and Actinobacteria (46). Several specific protein profiles were identified in this family, including the unique TcpE protein family, which lacked homologs to components from other conjugation T4SS classes.

To further define the mechanism of conjugation in C. perfringens, and other conjugation systems from the MPFFA class, we examined three highly conserved hypothetical proteins that are encoded by all known tcp regions. TcpD, TcpE, and TcpJ are small protein of unknown function, with the putative TMDs in TcpD and TcpE being the only structural or functional domains identified. Mutagenesis performed in this study showed that both the pCW3ΔtcpD and pCW3ΔtcpE mutants were unable to transfer. Conjugative transfer was restored by complementation with the respective wild-type genes in trans, confirming that tcpD and tcpE are essential for pCW3 conjugative transfer and that the transfer-deficient phenotype was not due to polarity effects. In contrast, the pCW3ΔtcpJ mutant transferred at levels similar to those of wild-type pCW3, and we conclude that the tcpJ gene is not required for conjugative transfer under these conditions.

The addition of an epitope tag to the N or C terminus of a protein has been successfully used to study proteins of interest, such as in localizing the VirB conjugation proteins from the paradigm Gram-negative bacterial conjugation systems of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens (47, 48). To localize TcpD and TcpE in C. perfringens cells, vectors expressing the wild-type protein with a 9-amino-acid HA tag fused directly to the C terminus of each of the proteins were constructed. Expression of a TcpE-HA derivative restored conjugation in the tcpE mutant, proving that the HA-tagged TcpE protein was functional and could be used to localize TcpE. Conversely, a similar HA fusion to TcpD was nonfunctional, presumably as a result of interference of the epitope tag with correct protein folding or potential inhibition of wild-type function (48). The introduction of a flexible polypeptide linker between a protein of interest and an epitope tag has been successfully used to reduce the interference of a tag and to restore protein function (49). The introduction of a hexaglycine linker between the C terminus of TcpD and the HA tag resulted in a functional derivative that complemented the tcpD mutant to levels similar to those for wild-type TcpD.

The cell fractionation and immunofluorescence studies carried out on the HA-tagged TcpD and TcpE proteins provide evidence that both proteins are found predominantly at the poles of C. perfringens cells. These results are consistent with the presence of putative TMDs in both proteins and support the hypothesis that these essential Tcp proteins form part of the transfer apparatus in the donor cell membrane. Note that we cannot rule out the possibility that overexpression of the tagged proteins from the multicopy complementation plasmids perturbed the normal localization of the TcpD and TcpE proteins. However, in a previous study (26), we showed that TcpC overexpressed from the same shuttle vector as the one used here had the same localization pattern as that for TcpC expressed from pCW3, which is a precedent that makes this scenario less likely.

Fractionation studies of T4SSs from Gram-negative bacteria have shown that the small hydrophobic protein VirB3 requires VirB4, VirB7, and VirB8 for correct localization and stabilization (50–52). In contrast, TcpD and TcpE were shown to localize to the membrane fraction in the absence of pCW3-encoded proteins, similar to our previously reported results for TcpC (26). However, a reduction in TcpD levels was observed for cell lysates in the absence of pCW3, a reduction that was not due to reduced TcpD expression from the vector, suggesting that the TcpD protein was less stable in the absence of the other pCW3-encoded proteins. Similarly, others have shown that mutations in VirB4, VirB7, or VirB8 result in a loss of VirB3 accumulation, while VirB9 fails to accumulate to wild-type levels in the absence of VirB7 (51, 53). Recent findings have also shown that the accumulation of the TrwK (VirB4) and TrwD (VirB11) ATPases from the R388 T4SS was dependent on the presence of other core components of the R388 T4SS (54). Since analyses of TcpD levels in tcp mutant backgrounds did not identify any specific Tcp protein that was necessary for TcpD stability, we suggest that the key difference may be the absence of either a Tcp protein complex or an unknown pCW3-encoded factor.

We previously showed that essential conjugation proteins predicted to be key components of the transfer apparatus, TcpH and TcpF, colocalize at the poles of C. perfringens donor cells (30). Based on these findings, it was postulated that the C. perfringens transfer apparatus is formed at the poles, similar to the T4SS from A. tumefaciens (30, 55–57). We now provide evidence that the TcpD and TcpE proteins also are concentrated at the poles of C. perfringens cells. Coupled with our finding that, like TcpH and TcpF (30), TcpD and TcpE are cell membrane associated, we postulate that these proteins form an essential component of the C. perfringens transfer apparatus in the cell membrane.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by a grant from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1048676) and by grants from the Australian Research Council to the ARC Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics (CE0562063). J.A.W. was the receipt of an Australian postgraduate award.

We thank Elizabeth Harry (University of Technology, Sydney), Irene Hatzinisiriou (Monash University), and Miguel Shingu-Vazquez (Monash University) for helpful advice with the immunofluorescence studies.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 3 November 2014.
    • Accepted 27 November 2014.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 8 December 2014.
  • Address correspondence to Julian I. Rood, julian.rood{at}monash.edu.
  • Citation Wisniewski JA, Teng WL, Bannam TL, Rood JI. 2015. Two novel membrane proteins, TcpD and TcpE, are essential for conjugative transfer of pCW3 in Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 197:774–781. doi:10.1128/JB.02466-14.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. de la Cruz F,
    2. Frost LS,
    3. Meyer RJ,
    4. Zechner EL
    . 2010. Conjugative DNA metabolism in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:18–40. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00195.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Williams JJ,
    2. Hergenrother PJ
    . 2008. Exposing plasmids as the Achilles' heel of drug-resistant bacteria. Curr Opin Chem Biol 12:389–399. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.06.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Alvarez-Martinez CE,
    2. Christie PJ
    . 2009. Biological diversity of prokaryotic type IV secretion systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73:775–808. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00023-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cascales E,
    2. Christie PJ
    . 2004. Definition of a bacterial type IV secretion pathway for a DNA substrate. Science 304:1170–1173. doi:10.1126/science.1095211.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chandran V,
    2. Fronzes R,
    3. Duquerroy S,
    4. Cronin N,
    5. Navaza J,
    6. Waksman G
    . 2009. Structure of the outer membrane complex of a type IV secretion system. Nature 462:1011–1015. doi:10.1038/nature08588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fronzes R,
    2. Christie PJ,
    3. Waksman G
    . 2009. The structural biology of type IV secretion systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:703–714. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Fronzes R,
    2. Schafer E,
    3. Wang LC,
    4. Saibil HR,
    5. Orlova EV,
    6. Waksman G
    . 2009. Structure of a type IV secretion system core complex. Science 323:266–268. doi:10.1126/science.1166101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Low HH,
    2. Gubellini F,
    3. Rivera-Calzada A,
    4. Braun N,
    5. Connery S,
    6. Dujeancourt A,
    7. Lu F,
    8. Redzej A,
    9. Fronzes R,
    10. Orlova EV,
    11. Waksman G
    . 2014. Structure of a type IV secretion system. Nature 508:550–553. doi:10.1038/nature13081.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rivera-Calzada A,
    2. Fronzes R,
    3. Savva CG,
    4. Chandran V,
    5. Lian PW,
    6. Laeremans T,
    7. Pardon E,
    8. Steyaert J,
    9. Remaut H,
    10. Waksman G,
    11. Orlova EV
    . 2013. Structure of a bacterial type IV secretion core complex at subnanometre resolution. EMBO J 32:1195–1204. doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wallden K,
    2. Rivera-Calzada A,
    3. Waksman G
    . 2010. Type IV secretion systems: versatility and diversity in function. Cell Microbiol 12:1203–1212. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01499.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Trokter M,
    2. Felisberto-Rodrigues C,
    3. Christie PJ,
    4. Waksman G
    . 2014. Recent advances in the structural and molecular biology of type IV secretion systems. Curr Opin Struct Biol 27:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.02.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Abajy MY,
    2. Kopec J,
    3. Schiwon K,
    4. Burzynski M,
    5. Doring M,
    6. Bohn C,
    7. Grohmann E
    . 2007. A type IV-secretion-like system is required for conjugative DNA transport of broad-host-range plasmid pIP501 in gram-positive bacteria. J Bacteriol 189:2487–2496. doi:10.1128/JB.01491-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bhatty M,
    2. Laverde Gomez JA,
    3. Christie PJ
    . 2013. The expanding bacterial type IV secretion lexicon. Res Microbiol 164:620–639. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2013.03.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Goessweiner-Mohr N,
    2. Arends K,
    3. Walter K,
    4. Grohmann E
    . 2013. Conjugation type IV secretion systems in Gram-positive bacteria. Plasmid 70:289–302. doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2013.09.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Grohmann E,
    2. Muth G,
    3. Espinosa M
    . 2003. Conjugative plasmid transfer in gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:277–301. doi:10.1128/MMBR.67.2.277-301.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zhang W,
    2. Rong C,
    3. Chen C,
    4. Gao GF
    . 2012. Type-IVC secretion system: a novel subclass of type IV secretion system (T4SS) common existing in gram-positive genus Streptococcus. PLoS One 7:e46390. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Arends K,
    2. Celik EK,
    3. Probst I,
    4. Goessweiner-Mohr N,
    5. Fercher C,
    6. Grumet L,
    7. Soellue C,
    8. Abajy MY,
    9. Sakinc T,
    10. Broszat M,
    11. Schiwon K,
    12. Koraimann G,
    13. Keller W,
    14. Grohmann E
    . 2013. TraG encoded by the pIP501 type IV secretion system is a two-domain peptidoglycan-degrading enzyme essential for conjugative transfer. J Bacteriol 195:4436–4444. doi:10.1128/JB.02263-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Goessweiner-Mohr N,
    2. Grumet L,
    3. Arends K,
    4. Pavkov-Keller T,
    5. Gruber CC,
    6. Gruber K,
    7. Birner-Gruenberger R,
    8. Kropec-Huebner A,
    9. Huebner J,
    10. Grohmann E,
    11. Keller W
    . 2013. The 2.5 A structure of the Enterococcus conjugation protein TraM resembles VirB8 type IV secretion proteins. J Biol Chem 288:2018–2028. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.428847.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Bannam TL,
    2. Yan XX,
    3. Harrison PF,
    4. Seemann T,
    5. Keyburn AL,
    6. Stubenrauch C,
    7. Weeramantri LH,
    8. Cheung JK,
    9. McClane BA,
    10. Boyce JD,
    11. Moore RJ,
    12. Rood JI
    . 2011. Necrotic enteritis-derived Clostridium perfringens strain with three closely related independently conjugative toxin and antibiotic resistance plasmids. mBio 2(5):e00190-11. doi:10.1128/mBio.00190-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Adams V,
    3. Bannam TL,
    4. Miyamoto K,
    5. Garcia JP,
    6. Uzal FA,
    7. Rood JI,
    8. McClane BA
    . 2013. Toxin plasmids of Clostridium perfringens. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77:208–233. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00062-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Miyamoto K,
    2. Fisher DJ,
    3. Li JH,
    4. Sayeed S,
    5. Akimoto S,
    6. McClane BA
    . 2006. Complete sequencing and diversity analysis of the enterotoxin-encoding plasmids in Clostridium perfringens type A non-food-borne human gastrointestinal disease isolates. J Bacteriol 188:1585–1598. doi:10.1128/JB.188.4.1585-1598.2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Parreira VR,
    2. Costa M,
    3. Eikmeyer F,
    4. Blom J,
    5. Prescott JF
    . 2012. Sequence of two plasmids from Clostridium perfringens chicken necrotic enteritis isolates and comparison with C. perfringens conjugative plasmids. PLoS One 7:e49753. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049753.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bannam TL,
    2. Teng WL,
    3. Bulach D,
    4. Lyras D,
    5. Rood JI
    . 2006. Functional identification of conjugation and replication regions of the tetracycline resistance plasmid pCW3 from Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 188:4942–4951. doi:10.1128/JB.00298-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Bantwal R,
    2. Bannam TL,
    3. Porter CJ,
    4. Quinsey NS,
    5. Lyras D,
    6. Adams V,
    7. Rood JI
    . 2012. The peptidoglycan hydrolase TcpG is required for efficient conjugative transfer of pCW3 in Clostridium perfringens. Plasmid 67:139–147. doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2011.12.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Parsons JA,
    2. Bannam TL,
    3. Devenish RJ,
    4. Rood JI
    . 2007. TcpA, an FtsK/SpoIIIE homolog, is essential for transfer of the conjugative plasmid pCW3 in Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 189:7782–7790. doi:10.1128/JB.00783-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Porter CJ,
    2. Bantwal R,
    3. Bannam TL,
    4. Rosado CJ,
    5. Pearce MC,
    6. Adams V,
    7. Lyras D,
    8. Whisstock JC,
    9. Rood JI
    . 2012. The conjugation protein TcpC from Clostridium perfringens is structurally related to the type IV secretion system protein VirB8 from Gram-negative bacteria. Mol Microbiol 83:275–288. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07930.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Brynestad S,
    2. Sarker MR,
    3. McClane BA,
    4. Granum PE,
    5. Rood JI
    . 2001. Enterotoxin plasmid from Clostridium perfringens is conjugative. Infect Immun 69:3483–3487. doi:10.1128/IAI.69.5.3483-3487.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hughes ML,
    2. Poon R,
    3. Adams V,
    4. Sayeed S,
    5. Saputo J,
    6. Uzal FA,
    7. McClane BA,
    8. Rood JI
    . 2007. Epsilon-toxin plasmids of Clostridium perfringens type D are conjugative. J Bacteriol 189:7531–7538. doi:10.1128/JB.00767-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Steen JA,
    2. Bannam TL,
    3. Teng WL,
    4. Devenish RJ,
    5. Rood JI
    . 2009. The putative coupling protein TcpA interacts with other pCW3-encoded proteins to form an essential part of the conjugation complex. J Bacteriol 191:2926–2933. doi:10.1128/JB.00032-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Teng WL,
    2. Bannam TL,
    3. Parsons JA,
    4. Rood JI
    . 2008. Functional characterization and localization of the TcpH conjugation protein from Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol 190:5075–5086. doi:10.1128/JB.00386-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Whitmer ME,
    2. Johnson EA
    . 1988. Development of improved defined media for Clostridium botulinum serotypes A, B, and E. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:753–759.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Rood JI
    . 1983. Transferable tetracycline resistance in Clostridium perfringens strains of porcine origin. Can J Microbiol 29:1241–1246. doi:10.1139/m83-193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Sambrook J,
    2. Fritsch EF,
    3. Maniatis T
    . 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  34. 34.↵
    1. Inoue H,
    2. Nojima H,
    3. Okayama H
    . 1990. High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene 96:23–28. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(90)90336-P.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Ausubel FM,
    2. Brent R,
    3. Kingston RE,
    4. Moore DD,
    5. Seidman JG,
    6. Smith JA,
    7. Struhl K
    (ed). 1992. Short protocols in molecular biology, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Czeczulin JR,
    2. Collie RE,
    3. McClane BA
    . 1996. Regulated expression of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin in naturally cpe-negative type A, B, and C isolates of C. perfringens. Infect Immun 64:3301–3309.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. O'Connor JR,
    2. Lyras D,
    3. Farrow KA,
    4. Adams V,
    5. Powell DR,
    6. Hinds J,
    7. Cheung JK,
    8. Rood JI
    . 2006. Construction and analysis of chromosomal Clostridium difficile mutants. Mol Microbiol 61:1335–1351. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05315.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Altschul SF,
    2. Madden TL,
    3. Schaffer AA,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Zhang Z,
    6. Miller W,
    7. Lipman DJ
    . 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Claros MG,
    2. von Heijne G
    . 1994. TopPred II: an improved software for membrane protein structure predictions. Comput Appl Biosci 10:685–686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Nakai K,
    2. Horton P
    . 1999. PSORT: a program for detecting sorting signals in proteins and predicting their subcellular localization. Trends Biochem Sci 24:34–36. doi:10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01336-X.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Bernsel A,
    2. Viklund H,
    3. Hennerdal A,
    4. Elofsson A
    . 2009. TOPCONS: consensus prediction of membrane protein topology. Nucleic Acids Res 37:W465–W468. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Adams V,
    2. Bantwal R,
    3. Stevenson L,
    4. Cheung JK,
    5. Awad MM,
    6. Nicholson J,
    7. Carter GP,
    8. Mackin KE,
    9. Rood JI,
    10. Lyras D
    . 2014. Utility of the clostridial site-specific recombinase TnpX to clone toxic-product-encoding genes and selectively remove genomic DNA fragments. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3597–3603. doi:10.1128/AEM.04285-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Rood JI,
    2. Maher EA,
    3. Somers EB,
    4. Campos E,
    5. Duncan CL
    . 1978. Isolation and characterization of multiply antibiotic-resistant Clostridium perfringens strains from porcine feces. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 13:871–880. doi:10.1128/AAC.13.5.871.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Peters PC,
    2. Migocki MD,
    3. Thoni C,
    4. Harry EJ
    . 2007. A new assembly pathway for the cytokinetic Z ring from a dynamic helical structure in vegetatively growing cells of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 64:487–499. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05673.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Schneider CA,
    2. Rasband WS,
    3. Eliceiri KW
    . 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Guglielmini J,
    2. Neron B,
    3. Abby SS,
    4. Garcillan-Barcia MP,
    5. de la Cruz F,
    6. Rocha EP
    . 2014. Key components of the eight classes of type IV secretion systems involved in bacterial conjugation or protein secretion. Nucleic Acids Res 42:5715–5727. doi:10.1093/nar/gku194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Aguilar J,
    2. Cameron TA,
    3. Zupan J,
    4. Zambryski P
    . 2011. Membrane and core periplasmic Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence type IV secretion system components localize to multiple sites around the bacterial perimeter during lateral attachment to plant cells. mBio 2(6):e00218-11. doi:10.1128/mBio.00218-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Honda S,
    2. Selker EU
    . 2009. Tools for fungal proteomics: multifunctional Neurospora vectors for gene replacement, protein expression and protein purification. Genetics 182:11–23. doi:10.1534/genetics.108.098707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Sabourin M,
    2. Tuzon CT,
    3. Fisher TS,
    4. Zakian VA
    . 2007. A flexible protein linker improves the function of epitope-tagged proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 24:39–45. doi:10.1002/yea.1431.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Jones AL,
    2. Shirasu K,
    3. Kado CI
    . 1994. The product of the virB4 gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens promotes accumulation of VirB3 protein. J Bacteriol 176:5255–5261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Mossey P,
    2. Hudacek A,
    3. Das A
    . 2010. Agrobacterium tumefaciens type IV secretion protein VirB3 is an inner membrane protein and requires VirB4, VirB7, and VirB8 for stabilization. J Bacteriol 192:2830–2838. doi:10.1128/JB.01331-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Yuan Q,
    2. Carle A,
    3. Gao C,
    4. Sivanesan D,
    5. Aly KA,
    6. Hoppner C,
    7. Krall L,
    8. Domke N,
    9. Baron C
    . 2005. Identification of the VirB4-VirB8-VirB5-VirB2 pilus assembly sequence of type IV secretion systems. J Biol Chem 280:26349–26359. doi:10.1074/jbc.M502347200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Fernandez D,
    2. Spudich GM,
    3. Zhou XR,
    4. Christie PJ
    . 1996. The Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB7 lipoprotein is required for stabilization of VirB proteins during assembly of the T-complex transport apparatus. J Bacteriol 178:3168–3176.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Larrea D,
    2. de Paz HD,
    3. Arechaga I,
    4. de la Cruz F,
    5. Llosa M
    . 2013. Structural independence of conjugative coupling protein TrwB from its type IV secretion machinery. Plasmid 70:146–153. doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2013.03.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Atmakuri K,
    2. Cascales E,
    3. Christie PJ
    . 2004. Energetic components VirD4, VirB11 and VirB4 mediate early DNA transfer reactions required for bacterial type IV secretion. Mol Microbiol 54:1199–1211. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04345.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Judd PK,
    2. Kumar RB,
    3. Das A
    . 2005. The type IV secretion apparatus protein VirB6 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens localizes to a cell pole. Mol Microbiol 55:115–124. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04378.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Kumar RB,
    2. Das A
    . 2002. Polar location and functional domains of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA transfer protein VirD4. Mol Microbiol 43:1523–1532. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02829.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.
    1. Lyristis M,
    2. Bryant AE,
    3. Sloan J,
    4. Awad MM,
    5. Nisbet IT,
    6. Stevens DL,
    7. Rood JI
    . 1994. Identification and molecular analysis of a locus that regulates extracellular toxin production in Clostridium perfringens. Mol Microbiol 12:761–777. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01063.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  • Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Two Novel Membrane Proteins, TcpD and TcpE, Are Essential for Conjugative Transfer of pCW3 in Clostridium perfringens
Jessica A. Wisniewski, Wee L. Teng, Trudi L. Bannam, Julian I. Rood
Journal of Bacteriology Jan 2015, 197 (4) 774-781; DOI: 10.1128/JB.02466-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Two Novel Membrane Proteins, TcpD and TcpE, Are Essential for Conjugative Transfer of pCW3 in Clostridium perfringens
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Two Novel Membrane Proteins, TcpD and TcpE, Are Essential for Conjugative Transfer of pCW3 in Clostridium perfringens
Jessica A. Wisniewski, Wee L. Teng, Trudi L. Bannam, Julian I. Rood
Journal of Bacteriology Jan 2015, 197 (4) 774-781; DOI: 10.1128/JB.02466-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530