Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Meeting Review

d-Fining DarR, a LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulator That Responds to d-Aspartate

Mark J. Mandel
Victor J. DiRita, Editor
Mark J. Mandel
aDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark J. Mandel
Victor J. DiRita
Michigan State University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00121-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Work by Jones et al. (R. M. Jones, Jr., D. L. Popham, A. L. Schmidt, E. L. Neidle, and E. V. Stabb, J Bacteriol 200:e00773-17, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00773-17) describes a d-aspartate-sensing system in proteobacteria. d-Amino acids are critical components of peptidoglycan and other structures. The new study identifies the LysR-type transcriptional regulator DarR, which activates the aspartate racemase RacD. The overexpression of RacD enables it to synthesize d-glutamate and restore normal peptidoglycan in a Vibrio fischeri murI mutant. This study contributes to the understanding of emerging roles for d-amino acids and how they are synthesized under distinct conditions.

The views expressed in this Commentary do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.

TEXT

Ribosomes across all domains of life synthesize proteins containing l-amino acids; yet, there is increasing appreciation for significant biological roles for d-amino acids (1). d-Amino acids are synthesized by racemization of the l-form to the d-form, though there are additional enzymes (e.g., d-amino acid transferases) that form d-amino acids from α-keto acids (2). d-Amino acids can be incorporated into proteins by nonribosomal peptide synthetases, or by posttranslational modification of residues in ribosome-synthesized proteins by racemization from the l- to the d-isomer (1, 3). A major function for d-amino acids is as constituents of the peptide stem of peptidoglycan, which contains d-alanine and d-glutamate (4, 5). The recent use of fluorescently labeled analogs of these compounds has enabled the visualization of peptidoglycan synthesis in a wide range of bacteria (6, 7).

Despite our limited knowledge of the mechanisms by which d-amino acids influence biological processes, there has been increasing awareness that they play important functions. l-Alanine stimulates Bacillus subtilis spore germination, yet d-alanine strongly inhibits the process, with the l-isomer likely serving as a signal for nutrient availability (8). Additionally, d-serine is highly abundant in human urine. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains are enriched for the presence of a d-serine deaminase, yet its role during host colonization is unclear (9, 10). Additionally, there may be effects of d-amino acids on biofilm formation, although there has not been clear replication of these effects (11–14).

A new study from the laboratory of Eric Stabb and collaborators presents the discovery of DarR, a d-aspartate-responsive transcription factor in Vibrio fischeri that is likely to exhibit a conserved function across much of the Proteobacteria. A model summarizing the key results from the study is shown in Fig. 1. This work was presented by R. Mark Jones at the ASM Conference on Vibrio in November 2017, in Chicago, IL, and is published in this issue (15).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Key results from Jones et al. (15). DarR is a LysR-type transcription factor (LTTR) that regulates transcription of the VF_1546-racD operon in response to environmental d-aspartate. RacD is an aspartate racemase and likely can interconvert l-Asp and d-Asp, as both DarR and RacD are required for d-aspartate utilization. A DarR(M202I) allele leads to overexpression of the VF_1546-racD transcript and suppression of a d-glutamate auxotrophy. Overexpression of RacD is sufficient to suppress the d-glutamate auxotrophy. There is also evidence for DarR autorepression.

The group previously undertook a clever genetic screen to identify mutants that failed to grow on standard media but could grow upon supplementation with other compounds. Lyell et al. (16) identified 22 independent transposon insertions that mapped to 13 genes. In each case, the mutant could not grow on buffered rich medium but grew upon supplementation with 17 diverse compounds, including hemin, N-acetylglucosamine, d-glutamate, d-alanine, MgSO4, and other biologically relevant compounds. Three of these mutants contained transposon insertions in murI, which encodes a racemase required to generate d-glutamate from l-glutamate for peptidoglycan synthesis. Supplementation with d-glutamate alone enabled growth of the murI mutants.

In their current work, Jones et al. (15) then conducted suppressor analysis, identifying spontaneous suppressors of the murI transposon insertions that were no longer d-glutamate auxotrophs. Three isolated suppressors all exhibited the same amino acid replacement (M202I) in a LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR), which they named DarR (d-aspartate-responsive regulator). DarR(M202I) exhibited suppression of the d-glutamate auxotrophy when expressed in trans, supporting a functional and dominant role for the darR mutation in enabling growth on unsupplemented rich medium.

LTTRs are DNA-binding transcription factors and are typically transcribed divergently from the genes they activate (17). The chromosomal organization of DarR suggested putative target genes, as follows: the divergent two-gene operon included an aspartate racemase that they named RacD (racemase for aspartate, amino acid symbol D). The authors proceeded to demonstrate that RacD (removal or overexpression) is epistatic to the suppressing DarR allele. This set of results supports a hypothesis that the DarR point mutation leads to the upregulation of RacD, and that RacD activity is responsible for the suppression.

How does RacD overexpression suppress a d-glutamate auxotrophy? Given its annotation as an aspartate racemase, the authors posit that at high RacD levels, the racemase is promiscuous and can generate l-glutamate from d-glutamate. This is supported by biochemical analysis of the peptidoglycan; the suppressor's peptidoglycan is indistinguishable from that of the wild type, arguing against the replacement of d-glutamate with another amino acid.

The authors proceed to ask how the DarR-RacD system is regulated. d-Aspartate induces racD in a DarR-dependent manner, and DarR autorepresses independent of d-aspartate. There are two putative LTTR binding sites upstream of the racD operon and a mutation of one abolished induction by d-aspartate. Furthermore, the system is required for full utilization of d-aspartate as a nutrient source. DarR homologs were identified across numerous proteobacterial species, and functional studies in another organism (Acinetobacter baylyi) support a conserved function. In many of the taxa, DarR is transcribed opposite genes connected to racemase activity or aspartate metabolism. A likely interpretation of this observation is that DarR is responsive to d-aspartate in diverse organisms, and there has been evolutionary flexibility in the target gene transcribed opposite the regulator. Whether there are additional DarR targets in V. fischeri or other organisms remains to be elucidated.

The study provides strong support for the use of the model organism V. fischeri to dissect novel biological processes. V. fischeri peptidoglycan has been studied extensively, as it is involved in the specific mutualism with the Hawaiian bobtail squid host, Euprymna scolopes. Peptidoglycan generally is required for stimulating ciliated host appendages that recruit the symbiont to produce mucus, which functions to entrap bacteria from seawater (18). Furthermore, the specific peptidoglycan fragment tracheal cytotoxin signals successful colonization to the host, stimulating host development, including apoptosis and regression of the appendages (19). There are other intriguing responses of the squid host to peptidoglycan (20–22). In previous work, the Stabb laboratory has elucidated peptidoglycan remodeling and recycling pathways that can influence such interactions with the host (23).

Enzymes involved in the construction and degradation of peptidoglycan remain appealing targets for antibiotic development, and MurI inhibitors in particular have been identified (24, 25). Applying a similar approach to identify suppressors of murI in Mycobacterium smegmatis, mutations were identified that activated a d-amino acid transaminase (26). Therefore, these two studies describe distinct mechanisms by which resistance can arise in response to deletion of an essential peptidoglycan biosynthetic enzyme that is a target for antibacterial compounds.

This discovery adds DarR to E. coli DsdC and Pseudomonas aeruginosa DguR as transcription factors that are activated by d-amino acids (d-serine and d-glutamate, respectively). With d-amino acids observed in marine environments, it seems likely that the DarR-RacD system may be useful for the utilization of nutrient sources that V. fischeri encounters (27, 28). Furthermore, in the earlier paper (16), Lyell et al. identified other mutants that could grow on rich medium only with supplementation by peptidoglycan precursors, suggesting that the approach presented here may prove useful for further characterization of d-amino acid regulatory mechanisms in bacteria.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank Rod Welch for helpful comments.

The work in the Mandel Laboratory is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant R35GM119627, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant R21AI117262, and the National Science Foundation grant IOS-1456963.

FOOTNOTES

    • Accepted manuscript posted online 19 March 2018.
  • Address correspondence to mmandel{at}wisc.edu.
  • Citation Mandel MJ. 2018. d-Fining DarR, a LysR-type transcriptional regulator that responds to d-aspartate. J Bacteriol 200:e00121-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00121-18.

  • For the article discussed, see https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00773-17.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cava F,
    2. Lam H,
    3. de Pedro MA,
    4. Waldor MK
    . 2011. Emerging knowledge of regulatory roles of d-amino acids in bacteria. Cell Mol Life Sci 68:817–831. doi:10.1007/s00018-010-0571-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hernández SB,
    2. Cava F
    . 2016. Environmental roles of microbial amino acid racemases. Environ Microbiol 18:1673–1685. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13072.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Walsh CT
    . 2014. Blurring the lines between ribosomal and nonribosomal peptide scaffolds. ACS Chem Biol 9:1653–1661. doi:10.1021/cb5003587.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Izaki K,
    2. Matsuhashi M,
    3. Strominger JL
    . 1968. Biosynthesis of the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls. 8. Peptidoglycan transpeptidase and d-alanine carboxypeptidase: penicillin-sensitive enzymatic reaction in strains of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 243:3180–3192.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ruiz N
    . 2016. Filling holes in peptidoglycan biogenesis of Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Microbiol 34:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2016.07.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kuru E,
    2. Tekkam S,
    3. Hall E,
    4. Brun YV,
    5. Van Nieuwenhze MS
    . 2015. Synthesis of fluorescent d-amino acids and their use for probing peptidoglycan synthesis and bacterial growth in situ. Nat Protoc 10:33–52. doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Fura JM,
    2. Kearns D,
    3. Pires MM
    . 2015. d-Amino acid probes for penicillin binding protein-based bacterial surface labeling. J Biol Chem 290:30540–30550. doi:10.1074/jbc.M115.683342.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Atluri S,
    2. Ragkousi K,
    3. Cortezzo DE,
    4. Setlow P
    . 2006. Cooperativity between different nutrient receptors in germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis and reduction of this cooperativity by alterations in the GerB receptor. J Bacteriol 188:28–36. doi:10.1128/JB.188.1.28-36.2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hryckowian AJ,
    2. Baisa GA,
    3. Schwartz KJ,
    4. Welch RA
    . 2015. dsdA does not affect colonization of the murine urinary tract by Escherichia coli CFT073. PLoS One 10:e0138121. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138121.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Roesch PL,
    2. Redford P,
    3. Batchelet S,
    4. Moritz RL,
    5. Pellett S,
    6. Haugen BJ,
    7. Blattner FR,
    8. Welch RA
    . 2003. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli use d-serine deaminase to modulate infection of the murine urinary tract. Mol Microbiol 49:55–67. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03543.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hochbaum AI,
    2. Kolodkin-Gal I,
    3. Foulston L,
    4. Kolter R,
    5. Aizenberg J,
    6. Losick R
    . 2011. Inhibitory effects of d-amino acids on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm development. J Bacteriol 193:5616–5622. doi:10.1128/JB.05534-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kolodkin-Gal I,
    2. Romero D,
    3. Cao S,
    4. Clardy J,
    5. Kolter R,
    6. Losick R
    . 2010. d-Amino acids trigger biofilm disassembly. Science 328:627–629. doi:10.1126/science.1188628.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kao WTK,
    2. Frye M,
    3. Gagnon P,
    4. Vogel JP,
    5. Chole R
    . 2017. d-Amino acids do not inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. Laryngoscope Invest Otolaryngol 2:4–9. doi:10.1002/lio2.34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sarkar S,
    2. Pires MM
    . 2015. d-Amino acids do not inhibit biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 10:e0117613. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117613.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Jones RM, Jr,
    2. Popham DL,
    3. Schmidt AL,
    4. Neidle EL,
    5. Stabb EV
    . 2018. Vibrio fischeri DarR directs responses to d-aspartate and represents a group of similar LysR-type transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol 200:e00773-17. doi:10.1128/JB.00773-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Lyell NL,
    2. Septer AN,
    3. Dunn AK,
    4. Duckett D,
    5. Stoudenmire JL,
    6. Stabb EV
    . 2017. An expanded transposon mutant library reveals that Vibrio fischeri δ-aminolevulinate auxotrophs can colonize Euprymna scolopes. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e02470-16. doi:10.1128/AEM.02470-16.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Schell MA
    . 1993. Molecular biology of the LysR family of transcriptional regulators. Annu Rev Microbiol 47:597–626. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.003121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Nyholm SV,
    2. Deplancke B,
    3. Gaskins HR,
    4. Apicella MA,
    5. McFall-Ngai MJ
    . 2002. Roles of Vibrio fischeri and nonsymbiotic bacteria in the dynamics of mucus secretion during symbiont colonization of the Euprymna scolopes light organ. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5113–5122. doi:10.1128/AEM.68.10.5113-5122.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Koropatnick TA,
    2. Engle JT,
    3. Apicella MA,
    4. Stabb EV,
    5. Goldman WE,
    6. McFall-Ngai MJ
    . 2004. Microbial factor-mediated development in a host-bacterial mutualism. Science 306:1186–1188. doi:10.1126/science.1102218.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Troll JV,
    2. Adin DM,
    3. Wier AM,
    4. Paquette N,
    5. Silverman N,
    6. Goldman WE,
    7. Stadermann FJ,
    8. Stabb EV,
    9. McFall-Ngai MJ
    . 2009. Peptidoglycan induces loss of a nuclear peptidoglycan recognition protein during host tissue development in a beneficial animal-bacterial symbiosis. Cell Microbiol 11:1114–1127. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01315.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Altura MA,
    2. Stabb E,
    3. Goldman W,
    4. Apicella M,
    5. McFall-Ngai MJ
    . 2011. Attenuation of host NO production by MAMPs potentiates development of the host in the squid-Vibrio symbiosis. Cell Microbiol 13:527–537. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01552.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Troll JV,
    2. Bent EH,
    3. Pacquette N,
    4. Wier AM,
    5. Goldman WE,
    6. Silverman N,
    7. McFall-Ngai MJ
    . 2010. Taming the symbiont for coexistence: a host PGRP neutralizes a bacterial symbiont toxin. Environ Microbiol 12:2190–2203. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02121.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Adin DM,
    2. Engle JT,
    3. Goldman WE,
    4. McFall-Ngai MJ,
    5. Stabb EV
    . 2009. Mutations in ampG and lytic transglycosylase genes affect the net release of peptidoglycan monomers from Vibrio fischeri. J Bacteriol 191:2012–2022. doi:10.1128/JB.01547-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. de Jonge BLM,
    2. Kutschke A,
    3. Uria-Nickelsen M,
    4. Kamp HD,
    5. Mills SD
    . 2009. Pyrazolopyrimidinediones are selective agents for Helicobacter pylori that suppress growth through inhibition of glutamate racemase (MurI). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3331–3336. doi:10.1128/AAC.00226-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Prosser GA,
    2. Rodenburg A,
    3. Khoury H,
    4. de Chiara C,
    5. Howell S,
    6. Snijders AP,
    7. de Carvalho LPS
    . 2016. Glutamate racemase is the primary target of β-chloro-d-alanine in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6091–6099. doi:10.1128/AAC.01249-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Mortuza R,
    2. Aung HL,
    3. Taiaroa G,
    4. Opel-Reading HK,
    5. Kleffmann T,
    6. Cook GM,
    7. Krause KL
    . 2017. Overexpression of a newly identified d-amino acid transaminase in Mycobacterium smegmatis complements glutamate racemase deletion. Mol Microbiol 107:198–213. doi:10.1111/mmi.13877.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. D'Aniello S,
    2. Spinelli P,
    3. Ferrandino G,
    4. Peterson K,
    5. Tsesarskia M,
    6. Fisher G,
    7. D'Aniello A
    . 2005. Cephalopod vision involves dicarboxylic amino acids: d-aspartate, l-aspartate and l-glutamate. Biochem J 386:331–340. doi:10.1042/BJ20041070.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Steen AD,
    2. Jørgensen BB,
    3. Lomstein BA
    . 2013. Abiotic racemization kinetics of amino acids in marine sediments. PLoS One 8:e71648. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071648.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  • Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
d-Fining DarR, a LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulator That Responds to d-Aspartate
Mark J. Mandel
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2018, 200 (15) e00121-18; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00121-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
d-Fining DarR, a LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulator That Responds to d-Aspartate
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
d-Fining DarR, a LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulator That Responds to d-Aspartate
Mark J. Mandel
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2018, 200 (15) e00121-18; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00121-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

d-amino acids
aspartate
LysR-type transcription factor
peptidoglycan
Vibrio fischeri
Aliivibrio fischeri

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530