ABSTRACT
It was shown previously that the disruption of the ahrC gene encoding a predicted ArgR family transcription factor results in a severe defect in biofilm formation in vitro, as well as a significant attenuation of virulence of Enterococcus faecalis strain OG1RF in multiple experimental infection models. Using transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq), we observed ahrC-dependent changes in the expression of more than 20 genes. AhrC-repressed genes included predicted determinants of arginine catabolism and several other metabolic genes and predicted transporters, while AhrC-activated genes included determinants involved in the production of surface protein adhesins. Most notably, the structural and regulatory genes of the ebp locus encoding adhesive pili were positively regulated, as well as the ace gene, encoding a collagen-binding adhesin. Using lacZ transcription reporter fusions, we determined that ahrC and a second argR transcription factor gene, argR2, both function to activate the expression of ebpR, which directly activates the transcription of the pilus structural genes. Our data suggest that in the wild-type E. faecalis, the low levels of EbpR limit the expression of pili and that biofilm biomass is also limited by the amount of pili expressed by the bacteria. The expression of ace is similarly enhanced by AhrC and ArgR2, but ace expression is not dependent on EbpR. Our results demonstrate the existence of novel regulatory cascades controlled by a pair of ArgR family transcription factors that might function as a heteromeric protein complex.
IMPORTANCE Cell surface adhesins play critical roles in the formation of biofilms, host colonization, and the pathogenesis of opportunistic infections by Enterococcus faecalis. Here, we present new results showing that the expression of two major enterococcal surface adhesins, ebp pili, and the collagen-binding protein Ace is positively regulated at the transcription level by two argR family transcription factors, AhrC and ArgR2. In the case of pili, the direct target of regulation is the ebpR gene, previously shown to activate the transcription of the pilus structural genes, while the activation of ace transcription appears to be directly impacted by the two ArgR proteins. These transcription factors may represent new targets for blocking enterococcal infections.
INTRODUCTION
Enterococci are common gut commensals of terrestrial species ranging from insects and other invertebrates to humans (1), but they are also capable of causing life-threatening systemic infections in immunocompromised hosts. Their high level of resistance to antimicrobials (via both innate and acquired mechanisms) places them among the most problematic nosocomial pathogens (2). Enterococcus faecalis strain OG1RF, which lacks plasmids and many known lysogenic phages and genomic islands found in clinical isolates, serves as a model for the analysis of the functions of the core genome (3). Several significant conserved core genome-encoded cell surface components contributing to the adherence to host tissues, biofilm formation, virulence in experimental infections, and intrinsic resistance to antibiotics have been identified in this strain. Importantly, convalescent-phase sera from patients with enterococcal bloodstream infections contain antibodies reactive to surface structures produced by OG1RF, indicative of their expression in the infected host (4). The genetic determinants for these structures include ace, which encodes a collagen-binding protein of the microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM) family (5), the epa locus encoding for the production of a cell wall polysaccharide (6), and the ebp locus (7–10). The latter includes structural genes for the components of adhesive pili, a linked positive regulator, ebpR, and srtC-bps, encoding a specialized sortase that assembles subunits into extended pili (7, 11).
A collection of approximately 15,000 independent derivatives of OG1RF containing Himar-derived transposon insertions generated in our laboratory has been used in several genetic screens for determinants affecting in vitro biofilm growth (12), polymicrobial infections (13), and resistance to antibiotics (14, 15). Interestingly, ebp was the most frequently identified locus in the initial screen for mutants defective in biofilm development (12). We also identified insertions in diverse regulatory genes, including several argR family transcription factors, which resulted in biofilm defects. These included the ahrC gene (OG1RF_RS03710, corresponding to EF0983 in the V583 genome), whose disruption had dramatic effects on in vitro biofilm formation on plastic, biofilm formation on porcine cardiac valve explants (16), virulence in experimental rabbit endocarditis (17), and virulence in experimental urinary tract infections (17) and in experimental osteomyelitis (18) in mouse models. Overall, ahrC mutants of OG1RF are more attenuated for virulence trait expression than strains with any other single mutation we have identified. Insertions in a paralogous gene, argR2 (OG1RF_RS02215, corresponding to EF0676 in V583), had similar but less severe effects on biofilm formation and virulence (12, 17).
In this report, we describe the use of transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) to identify the ahrC regulon of OG1RF. Our subsequent analyses revealed that both AhrC and ArgR2 act as positive regulators of ebp pili via the activation of expression of ebpR, previously shown to activate the transcription of the operon harboring the ebp structural genes (11). Our data also show that in wild-type strains, EbpR is likely a limiting factor for pilus expression. Interestingly, the independently transcribed ace gene is also positively coregulated by AhrC and ArgR2, but the activation of ace expression does not require EbpR. We suggest that these two ArgR family transcription factors might directly interact to form a functional complex and that the main phenotypic effects of mutations in these genes on biofilm formation and on the pathogenesis of experimental infections relate to the reduced expression of adhesins.
RESULTS
Identification of the AhrC regulon of E. faecalis OG1RF by RNA-seq.ArgR family transcription factors regulate numerous functions in the “low GC” branch of the firmicutes, but the specific targets and the mechanistic features of the ArgR-controlled regulatory circuits are quite diverse among the phylogenetic relatives of enterococci, such as Listeria (19), streptococci (20) and lactococci (21, 22). Therefore, we used an unbiased RNA-seq approach to identify the ahrC regulon of E. faecalis OG1RF under both biofilm and planktonic growth conditions using the CDC biofilm reactor (CBR) system (23). We compared the transcriptomes of the wild-type OG1RF and an isogenic derivative with an in-frame deletion of ahrC. The genes showing significant differential expression in both biofilm and planktonic cells of the ahrC mutant are listed in Tables 1 and 2, and the complete data sets from these experiments are presented in Tables S1 to S4 in the supplemental material. The genes whose expression was most reduced in the ahrC deletion strain include several encoding predicted transporters, a predicted decarboxylase, and the machinery for the production of pili (ebp genes) and for the collagen-binding surface adhesin Ace (Table 1). The expression of a distinct set of several predicted transporters and enzymes involved in arginine catabolism and purine scavenging showed increased expression in the ahrC deletion strain (Table 2), suggesting that these genes were directly or indirectly repressed by AhrC in the wild-type OG1RF. Several genes from each group were selected for independent confirmation of RNA-seq results by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and the differential expression patterns identified were generally consistent between the two methods. Figure 1 displays the cumulative results of the RNA-seq analysis of planktonic and biofilm cells as volcano plots. The best statistical significance of the data was obtained for genes showing the highest levels of differential expression, further supporting the validity of this analysis. Although we did detect some modest quantitative differences in the levels of differential regulation of ebp genes by ahrC in biofilms versus planktonic growth (Fig. 1 and Table 1), the effects of AhrC on the transcriptome were not altered substantially by biofilm growth. Thus, the reduction in biofilm formation associated with ahrC disruption may affect the gene products required for planktonic cells to initiate biofilm growth, which is consistent with our previous studies (12, 17). We also carried out RNA-seq analysis of the wild-type OG1RF and the ΔahrC derivative in liquid cultures grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium. The results (see Table S5) were similar to those obtained in M9-YE, suggesting that most of the observed effects of AhrC on gene expression were not medium specific.
Genes activated by AhrC in planktonic and biofilm cells
Genes repressed by AhrC in planktonic and biofilm cells
Volcano plots from RNA-seq data, showing differentially expressed genes between the ΔahrC and OG1RF strains at 6 h in CDC biofilm reactors in planktonic (A) and biofilm (B) cultures. The x axes show the log2 fold change of expression of each gene (represented by dots). The horizontal dashed lines indicate the positions on the vertical axes for a −log10 P value of 2. Points above the line represent differential expression data where there was a high degree of statistical significance. The two vertical dashed lines in each plot represent the positions on the horizontal axis where the experimentally determined transcript levels for the gene were either reduced (left end of the plots; value indicated by the line was −1.37 for panel A and −1.38 for panel B) or increased (right end of the plot; 1.34 for panel A and 1.36 for panel B) in the ahrC mutant relative to that in the wild type. For both panels A and B, the most significantly downregulated genes are displayed in the upper left quadrants and the most significantly upregulated genes are displayed in the upper right quadrants. Some differentially regulated genes described in the text and in Tables 1 and 2 are indicated with arrows or boxes for groups of genes.
Both AhrC and ArgR2 are required for expression of ebpR, the direct regulator of pilus structural genes.The deletion of ahrC resulted in decreased expression of the ebp pilus locus, and the failure to produce pili could result in the defects we observed in biofilm formation on plastic surfaces (12, 16, 17) or heart valve explants (16), as well as the attenuation of virulence in endocarditis and urinary tract infection models (17). Therefore, we hypothesized that the AhrC protein was a direct positive regulator of transcription of either the ebpA-C operon or of epbR, which was previously identified as an activator of ebpA-C (11). We generated lacZ transcriptional reporter gene fusions to both epbR and ebpA and compared their expression in the wild-type OG1RF to that observed in isogenic derivatives carrying complemented (cloned wild-type gene expressed from a plasmid as described in Materials and Methods) or noncomplemented in-frame deletions of ahrC. Because the mutations disrupting the OG1RF argR2 locus also resulted in a similar biofilm defect in vitro and in attenuated virulence (12, 17), we decided to use the same reporter fusions to examine whether argR2 affected the expression of ebp genes.
The ebpR and ebpA genes are divergently transcribed with the previously mapped transcription start sites only 109 bp apart (Fig. 2), making it likely that the upstream regulatory sequences for each gene overlap. We generated reporter constructs where the promoter for each respective target gene was fused to a lacZ allele preceded by a consensus ribosome-binding site (24) and measured the expression of constructs containing various lengths of the upstream sequence. We determined the minimum amount of upstream sequence required for robust expression of fusions in the wild-type OG1RF. We initially grew lac reporter fusion strains on X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside) containing M9-YE agar medium to visually assess expression and quantified the expression levels using β-galactosidase assays. From these results, we chose an ebpR reporter containing 87 bp of DNA upstream from the transcription start and an ebpA reporter containing 100 bp of upstream DNA (Fig. 2).
Maps of the E. faecalis OG1RF pilus locus (ebp genes not drawn to scale) and lacZ transcriptional fusions generated in this study. DNA fragments used to generate transcriptional fusion constructs to the lacZ reporter gene are shown below the maps as bars with arrows; “Vector” refers to a strain carrying a promoterless lacZ gene in the pTCV-LacSpec plasmid used to generate all lacZ reporter fusions tested. The arrows indicate the direction of transcription. The numbers in parenthesis indicate the length of upstream DNA relative to the transcriptional start site (TSS) for each respective gene. Levels of β-galactosidase (β-Gal) activity in the wild-type OG1RF containing the various transcriptional reporter fusions are shown on the right. β-Gal activities (Miller units [MU] ± standard deviations of means) were measured as described in Materials and Methods. β-Gal spot assays (far right) show the same strains spotted on M9-YE plates containing selective antibiotics and 200 μg/ml X-Gal. Inoculated plates were incubated for approximately 20 h at 37°C and photographed. For each individual reporter construct, the same culture was used to inoculate both a plate and a liquid assay. β-Gal assays are representative of two independent experiments. (A) ebpR-lacZ transcriptional reporter fusions. (B) ebpA-lacZ transcriptional reporter fusions. The reporter fusions boxed in red were selected for use in subsequent experiments and are designated “ebpR-lacZ” and “ebpA-lacZ” in Fig. 3 and 4.
When we analyzed the expression in strains carrying single deletions of either ahrC, argR2, or ebpR (Fig. 3), we found that each individual deletion eliminated the expression from both reporter fusions and that the expression from both fusions could be restored by complementation with the cloned cognate wild-type gene expressed in trans from a plasmid. On the basis of these results and previous studies of the ebp locus, we suspected that the direct regulator of ebpA might be EbpR and that AhrC and ArgR2 might act by increasing ebpR expression. This hypothesis was confirmed by complementation studies in strains with multiple deletions. Figure 4 shows the most informative results, obtained in a strain deleted for all three regulatory genes. These data show that the lacZ expression from either reporter was fully restored by in trans expression of ebpR from a heterologous promoter, whereas the expression of either reporter was not restored in an ebpR deletion strain by complementation with either ahrC, argR2, or both. These results provide strong support for a model where the direct activator of pilus expression is EbpR and the two argR family transcription factors function together to increase the transcription of ebpR. The data also indicate that the EbpR protein is a positive autoregulator of ebpR transcription, as well as that of ebpA, as previously reported by Bourgogne et al. (11).
β-Galactosidase activities from ebpR-lacZ and ebpA-lacZ fusions in the wild type, in single deletion strains (ΔahrC, ΔargR, and ΔebpR strains; all carrying an empty pCIE expression vector), and in strains where we tested the abilities of cloned genes expressed in trans (“::”) from the pCIE vector to complement the deletions, e.g., ΔahrC::ahrC, ΔargR2::argR2, and ΔebpR::ebpR strains. β-Gal activities were determined on plates and in liquid as described in Materials and Methods and in the legend to Fig. 2. Control strains carrying empty pTCV-LacSpec produced ≤0.12 ± 0.03 MU of activity, and the single deletion mutants carrying both pCIE and pTCV-LacSpec produced ≤0.08 ± 0.07 MU of activity (not shown).
β-Galactosidase activities from ebpR-lacZ and ebpA-lacZ fusions in the triple mutant ΔahrC ΔargR ΔebpR(pCIE) strain and in strains where various cloned genes expressed from pCIE were used to complement the deleted genes. The same nomenclature is used to indicate deletions and complementing genes as in Fig. 3. β-Gal activities in liquid and plate cultures were measured as described in the legend to Fig. 2 and in Materials and Methods. The control strains for the complemented triple mutants carrying the empty pTCV-LacSpec plasmid produced ≤0.10 ± 0.07 MU of activity (not shown).
Biofilm defects of ahrC mutants correlate with lack of pilus expression.To further confirm the effects of the three regulators on pilus expression at the protein level, we carried out an immunoblotting assay on pilin proteins extracted from various deletion strains and their complemented derivatives. Figure 5 shows a Western blot of proteins extracted from whole-cell lysates of various isogenic strains with deletions in either ahrC, argR2, or ebpR, with or without complementation. Antigenic material reacting with a polyclonal antibody specific for the EbpC pilin protein (kindly provided by Barbara Murray) was visible in a preparation from OG1RF as a high-molecular-weight smear with laddering of distinct bands with apparent masses in the range of 150 to 250 kDa. This is a typical behavior for epb pili extracted from E. faecalis (7, 8). The immunoreactive material was greatly reduced or totally absent in the extracts from the deletion strains and restored in the complementation constructs. Interestingly, the complemented strains for the ahrC and argR2 deletions produced amounts of antigenic material only slightly higher than that of the wild-type OG1RF, whereas the ebpR-complemented strain dramatically overexpressed pilin protein. This suggests that EbpR levels in wild-type cells and in complemented ahrC or argR2 mutant strains are limiting for pilus expression; this was also suggested by RNA-seq (Table S3 and S4).
Pilin protein expression in OG1RF and in the absence and presence of AhrC, ArgR2, and EbpR. (A) Western blot of lysozyme/mutanolysin-treated whole-cell lysates separated on a 3% to 8% gradient Tris-acetate Criterion XT gel and probed with anti-EbpC. Lanes (left to right): OG1RF(pCIE), ΔahrC(pCIE), ΔahrC::ahrC, ΔargR2(pCIE), ΔargR2::argR2, ΔebpR(pCIE), and ΔebpR::ebpR. (B) Ponceau S-stained loading control; the 41- to 62-kDa mass range of the gel is shown.
To directly link pilin protein expression in the various strains to the biofilm phenotype, we carried out assays of biofilm formation in 96-well polystyrene plates. The results are shown in Fig. 6. In this phenotypic assay, the biofilm biomasses of the various strains correlated well with the relative levels of pilus gene transcripts (Fig. 2 to 4) and proteins (Fig. 5). Note that the overexpression of ebpR in all enterococcal strains tested resulted in the production of a biofilm biomass much higher than that of the wild-type OG1RF. This is consistent with the idea that pilin protein expression is limited by intracellular levels of EbpR and, in turn, that biofilm production in this assay is limited by the amount of pilin protein expressed on the bacterial cell surface. Finally, we examined the cellular structures of biofilms produced by the wild-type OG1RF versus those of either the ΔebpR mutant, the complemented ΔebpR mutant, or a transposon insertion mutant in ebpC, the major structural protein of the pilus. These results are shown in Fig. 7. Interestingly, both the ΔebpR and the ΩebpC constructs produced small amounts of biofilm biomass as assessed by staining, with low numbers of attached bacterial cells visible on the submerged surface when examined microscopically. The wild-type OG1RF attached efficiently to the surface, and small multicellular microcolonies were detectable in some areas. In contrast, the biofilms formed by the complemented ebpR strain showed a higher density of attached cells with more extensive microcolony formation. Similar attachment phenotypes were seen with the same cultures in 96-well microtiter biofilm assays (see Fig. S1). The cumulative results of the experiments shown in Fig. 3 to 6 indicate that ebpR levels limit the amount of pilin protein expressed in wild-type cells and that the pilus protein expression levels in turn limit the biofilm biomass and the number of adherent bacterial cells detected by microscopy.
Relative biofilm biomass of OG1RF(pCIE), deletion mutants containing pCIE, and complemented strains. Cells were diluted to an OD600 of 0.05 and grown for 6 h on polystyrene microtiter plates in M9-YE containing 10 ng/ml cCF10 before being processed for biofilm formation. (A and C) Representative safranin-stained wells (1 of 7 replicates) of biofilms formed by each of the strains tested. (B and D) Quantification of biofilm biomass of the wild-type strain and single mutants with or without complementation. (C and D) Overexpression of EbpR in trans rescues deletions of all three regulatory genes. Results are representative of two or three independent experiments with seven replicate wells per strain per experiment. Error bars are the standard deviations of the means.
Fluorescence micrographs showing the effects the ΔebpR mutant and the ΩebpC pilin transposon mutant have on attachment and biofilm growth compared to that of OG1RF and the ΔebpR::ebpR strain. Aclar membranes were incubated with shaking for 6 h in M9-YE plus 10 ng/ml cCF10 and stained with the DNA label Hoechst 33342. Representative images are shown from one of three replicate experiments.
AhrC and ArgR2 also cooperatively enhance ace expression in an EbpR-independent fashion.Given that our transcription analysis showed that the deletion of ahrC produced similar effects on the expression of both ebp pili and ace, we decided to examine whether ArgR2 or EbpR was involved in ace expression. We generated a transcriptional lacZ fusion to the previously identified ace promoter region (25) and used a similar approach to that described for the experiments presented in Fig. 2 to 4 to address these questions. As shown in Fig. 8, the deletion of either ahrC or argR2 but not ebpR reduced lacZ reporter expression to approximately half the level observed in wild-type cells; these phenotypic changes were rescued by inducible expression of the cognate regulator from a plasmid. To further examine the regulation of ace, we also looked at the ability of cloned ahrC, argR2, or both genes together to complement ace expression in a double deletion mutant (see Fig. S4). Interestingly, the level of ace transcription in the uncomplemented mutant was between 10% and 15% of the wild-type level; the reduction in ace expression in the double mutant (Fig. S4) was virtually identical to the reduction observed in the single deletion mutants (Fig. 8), suggesting that the protein products of both genes cooperatively activate ace expression. The expression of either transcription factor alone, especially AhrC, partially complemented the double deletion, whereas the coexpression of both genes restored expression to a level slightly higher than that of the wild type (Fig. S4). These results suggest that a partially functional transcription-activating homo-oligomer might be formed in vivo when either regulator is overexpressed, but a fully functional complex requires both proteins; the results from biofilm assays (data shown in Fig. S5) also support this notion. The cumulative data suggest that AhrC/ArgR2-dependent activation of the ace promoter may occur by a mechanism similar to that for their activation of ebpR but that EbpR is not involved in ace expression. In addition, the basal level of AhrC/ArgR2-independent ace transcription is higher than that observed for ebpR.
Activation of the ace promoter by AhrC and ArgR2. (A) Wild-type OG1RF(pCIE), the ahrC(pCIE), argR2(pCIE), and ebpR(pCIE) deletion mutants, and their complemented derivatives containing an ace-lacZ transcription reporter plasmid were grown for 3 h in M9-YE containing 10 ng/ml cCF10. Cells were collected for β-galactosidase activity as described in Materials and Methods. Data are representative of two independent experiments. Error bars are the standard deviations of the means. The control strains carrying the empty vector, pTCV-LacSpec, produced ≤0.10 ± 0.17 MU of activity, and the single mutants carrying pCIE and pTCV-LacSpec produced ≤0.12 ± 0.18 MU of activity (not shown). (B) Strains were spotted on M9-YE plates containing selective antibiotics, 10 ng/ml cCF10, and 200 μg/ml X-Gal. Plates were incubated for approximately 20 h and photographed.
DISCUSSION
The data presented here provide a plausible explanation for the dramatic reduction of virulence in multiple infection models and in biofilm formation in vitro associated with the disruption of ahrC in E. faecalis. All of these phenotypic assays depend on the initial adherence to either host tissues or an abiotic surface, and both the Ace protein and ebp pili are well-documented surface-displayed adhesins (26). Our results suggest that the lack of expression of these adhesins in ahrC mutants probably accounts for the observed attenuation. Interestingly, the disruption of the argR2 determinant encoding a second ArgR family transcription factor also abolished adhesin expression. In the case of the ebp locus, both ArgR proteins function to activate the expression of ebpR, whose product is the direct activator of the transcription of the pilus subunit and assembly genes ebpA-C. Our epistasis analysis (Fig. 4) showed that ectopic expression of ebpR from a pheromone-inducible promoter eliminated the requirement of the two ArgR proteins for adhesin expression. Both ArgR2 and AhrC (but not EbpR) enhanced the expression of the ace gene, suggesting that the positive regulatory mechanisms for ebpR and ace expression are similar. Since the two corresponding promoter regions show limited sequence homology (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), genetic and biochemical analyses will be required to define the mechanisms.
A working model that is consistent with, but not proven by, our current data is that AhrC and ArgR2 directly interact to form a hetero-oligomer that is a functional sequence-specific transcription activator for ace and ebpR. This type of model is also consistent with our observation that purified AhrC showed strong DNA-binding activity, but the activity was not sequence specific (see Fig. S3). We suspect that the formation of this type of hetero-oligomer may not only impart target sequence specificity but may also enable the cell to fine-tune the regulation of adhesins to global cell physiology through its effects on the levels of the two regulatory proteins. To test this model, we are currently examining the interactions between these two proteins in E. faecalis cells and in vitro. If interactions are detected, we will then design experiments to interrogate the DNA-binding activities of hetero-oligomers of the two proteins. Further understanding of these regulators may also come from genetic approaches to identify the functional target sites for regulation using the reporter strains developed in the present study as the targets for directed and random mutagenesis. While the present study focused in the positive regulation of ebp and ace by AhrC and ArgR2, an important objective for future studies will be the analysis of the AhrC-repressed loci, such as the arc operon (Table 2). We will examine whether this negative-control circuit also requires ArgR2 and whether the molecular mechanism of repression is similar to the activation of adhesin expression but with the critical operator binding sites located differently, such that their occupancy results in the repression rather than the activation of transcription. Since AhrC has been reported to regulate arc transcription in other organisms (19–21, 27, 28), it will be of interest to carry out comparative studies in E. faecalis.
It is interesting that the expression of ebp pili and orthologous pili in other Gram-positive pathogens is tightly controlled (9). It has been suggested that a bistable switch mechanism may control the expression of streptococcal pili, such that individual cells are either “on” or “off” (29, 30). An electron microscopic analysis of OG1RF suggests that a similar expression pattern may occur for ebp pili in OG1RF (7). The results presented in this paper indicate that in wild-type cells, the level of EbpR may be limiting for pilus expression. When we expressed the cloned ebpR gene from a pheromone-inducible promoter in complementation experiments, the levels of pilin protein (Fig. 5) and biofilm produced in vitro (Fig. 6, 7, and S1) were much higher than observed with the wild-type OG1RF. Given the relatively short intergenic distance between ebpR and ebpA (Fig. 2), it seems likely that the protein-binding sites required for the activation of ebpR might overlap those required for EbpR-mediated activation of ebpA-C transcription. The competition between transcription activator proteins for access to DNA-binding sites in this region might contribute to a switch mechanism for pilus expression. The overproduction of EbpR from an ectopic site would override this competition, leading to the hyperexpression of pili. Although the hyperexpression resulted in an increased adherence and biofilm formation in vitro, it might also confer a fitness cost for the organism in its normal environment, selecting for a tighter control of expression in wild-type strains in nature.
The results described here suggest a new and potentially complex mechanism for the transcriptional regulation of enterococcal adhesins involving two different ArgR family transcription factors. Several other global regulatory genes, including fsr (31) and ccp (32), have been reported to modulate the expression of enterococcal adhesin genes and some other proteins whose genes were identified in our study. However, these other regulatory mechanisms are posttranscriptional and likely to be unrelated to our results. An interesting mechanism for the control of pilus expression has been reported by Harvey and colleagues (33, 34), who found that the deletion of the rnjB gene encoding E. faecalis RNase J2 dramatically reduces the levels of pilin gene transcripts and proteins. The available evidence is consistent with a posttranscriptional mechanism, potentially involving a negative regulatory sRNA targeting ebp transcripts and degraded by RNase J2. Since the deletion of rnjB does not alter ace expression (33), this mechanism is probably not related to the ArgR-dependent circuit described here.
It has also been shown that the PrfA-like transcription factor Ers activates the expression of the arc genes and several other loci (35, 36). In a separate paper from the same group, Ers-mediated activation of ace expression was also reported (37). However, these studies were carried out in the unrelated strain JH2-2. A more recent study (38) indicated that the deletion of the ers gene did not affect ace expression in OG1RF; instead, these investigators found that GvrR, a response regulator protein encoded by the gvrRS two-component genes, activated ace transcription. They also found that GvrR activation of ace occurred in organisms grown at 46°C and in the presence of serum, whereas all our experiments employed cultures grown at 37°C in the absence of serum; since several previous studies focused on protein expression, the temperature effects could be posttranscriptional. The complex layers of regulation controlling surface adhesin gene expression may have evolved to maximize the benefits of expression under conditions where the attachment to a surface is critical for colonization or persistence while limiting the potential fitness costs of the overexpression and secretion of surface proteins, especially when they are not needed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Growth conditions and chemicals.E. faecalis strains were grown in M9-YE (39) or in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Becton, Dickenson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ) under static conditions at 37°C or on M9-YE or BHI agar, unless stated otherwise. Escherichia coli strains were cultured in Luria broth (Miller [LB]; Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) or BHI medium. The following concentrations of antibiotics were used when needed: erythromycin (Em), 100 μg/ml for E. coli and 10 μg/ml for E. faecalis; chloramphenicol (Cm), 20 μg/ml; spectinomycin (Sp), 150 μg/ml for E. coli and 500 μg/ml to 1,000 μg/ml for E. faecalis; rifampin (Rif), 200 μg/ml, and fusidic acid (Fus), 25 μg/ml for E. faecalis. All antibiotics were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). When required for E. faecalis, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-Gal; Gold Biotechnology, St. Louis, MO) was added at 150 to 200 μg/ml in M9-YE plates. For the expression of cloned genes in complementation experiments, E. faecalis cultures were induced with 10 ng/ml synthetic cCF10 pheromone (Mimotopes, Victoria, Australia) in M9-YE medium.
Strain and plasmid construction.The bacterial stains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S6 in the supplemental material. E. faecalis strains were all derived from strain OG1RF. To characterize the regulation of pilus expression, we initially used allelic exchange to generate strains containing markerless in-frame gene deletions of ahrC, argR2, and ebpR, either singly or in combination. The construction of individual and combined deletions of ahrC and ebpR was accomplished using pCJK47, as described previously (40); deletions of argR2, singly and in combination with the other loci, were created using allelic exchange with the temperature-sensitive plasmid pCJK218, as described previously (41). To create each deletion construct used for allelic exchange, overlap extension PCR was used. First, two ∼1.0-kb fragments were amplified from OG1RF genomic DNA by using the primers listed in Table S7. Amplicons were annealed together, and the second-step PCR was performed using the primers indicated in Table S7. The resulting products were digested with the enzymes NcoI or SphI and XbaI and ligated into pCJK47 or pCJK218 (digested with the same restriction enzymes), creating pCJK47 ΔahrC, pCJK47 ΔebpR, and pCJK218 ΔargR2. E. coli strain EC1000 was used to propagate pCJK47 derivatives and DH5α was used for pCJK218 derivatives. All deletion mutants were confirmed by PCR amplification and sequenced using the primers listed in Table S7.
We examined the effects of the above deletions using plasmid-borne lacZ transcriptional reporter fusions to either the ebpR [plasmid ebpR-lacZ(−87)] or ebpA [plasmid ebpA-lacZ(−100)] promoter (see Fig. 2 and Results for a description of how the functional 5′ regulatory regions for these promoters were determined). These constructs were derived from the pTCV-LacSpec plasmid (24) (generously provided by Lynn Hancock, University of Kansas). For each reporter construct, we used the background expression of the lacZ reporter from the empty pTCV-LacSpec as a control.
To complement the various deletion mutations, we added a second plasmid carrying the cognate regulatory genes (including their native ribosome binding site [RBS]) cloned into the pheromone-inducible expression plasmid pCIE (42); all complementation experiments used cultures containing cCF10 pheromone as described above. To complement the single mutant (ΔahrC, ΔargR2, and ΔebpR) strains, previously generated plasmids (12) containing ahrC, argR2, and ebpR genes were digested with BamHI and XhoI and ligated to pCIE digested with BamHI and SalI to generate pCIE_ahrC, pCIE_argR2, and pCIE_ebpR, respectively. To create the double complementation vector, ahrC was PCR amplified using the SphI-site-containing primers indicated in Table S7. The amplicon and pCIE_argR2 were digested with SphI and ligated to create pCIE_argR2_ahrC. The constructs were sequenced, and in the case of ahrC, Western blots were performed to determine the expression of AhrC by using an anti-AhrC antibody (17). We compared the reporter expression for each complementation construct to that of an isogenic strain containing the same reporter plasmid but carrying the empty pCIE expression vector.
For the experiment analyzing the regulation of the ace promoter (Fig. 8), we amplified and cloned a 462-bp segment of the OG1RF chromosome containing this promoter (25); the cloned segment extended from the 3′ terminal segment of OG1RF_RS04590 (the gene immediately upstream from ace) through 101 bp of intergenic DNA and the first 9 codons of ace. We ligated this DNA to the RBS/lacZ in pTCV-LacSpec to generate a transcriptional fusion, ace-lacZ. We then assayed reporter activity in complemented and uncomplemented strains carrying single deletions of either ahrC, argR2, or ebpR. The sequence described above containing the functional ace promoter and the sequences of primers used for its amplification and cloning were based on the published data from reference 25.
Table S6 lists the chromosomal genotype and plasmid content for each strain examined in this study. The figure legends show the genotypes of the strains used for genetic analyses.
RNA purification, RNA-seq, and RT-qPCR.E. faecalis biofilm and planktonic cells were obtained from CDC biofilm reactors (CBRs) that were set up as previously described (23). Briefly, OG1RF and the ΔahrC mutant were streaked on BHI plates containing rifampin and fusidic acid. For each reactor, an overnight M9-YE culture was inoculated with three colonies and grown at 37°C. A CBR containing full-strength M9-YE was inoculated with 2 ml of an overnight culture at a cell density of 1.4 × 109 to 2.8 × 109 and incubated with stirring at 37°C for 4 h to enable bacterial attachment. M9-YE (10%) was then pumped through the reactor for additional 2 h. Next, biofilm cells from 24 polycarbonate coupons (BioSurface Technologies Corp., Bozeman, MT) and 8 Aclar fluoropolymer strips (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) from the reactors were washed, treated with RNAprotect (Qiagen), and vortexed as described in reference 23. Planktonic cells (3 ml) were treated with RNAprotect, pelleted, and stored with the biofilm cells at −80°C. Two biological replicates were run for each strain. To recover sufficient RNA from the ΔahrC mutants, two reactors were pooled for each replicate. For one of the OG1RF replicates, two reactors were also pooled.
RNA isolation and RT-qPCR were performed as previously described (23) with minor changes. Briefly, either planktonic or biofilm cells were lysed with lysozyme and mutanolysin for 10 min at 37°C. RNA was purified from the lysate using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For each replicate, 8 μg of total RNA was treated with Turbo DNase using the rigorous method (Ambion/Thermo Fisher Scientific). Universal 16S primers were used to confirm DNA removal. A Superscript III first-strand synthesis system for RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to make cDNA using random hexamers. The RT reactions were diluted 5-fold in sterile water and aliquoted. One microliter of cDNA was used in 25-μl iQ SYBR green Supermix reaction mixtures containing 200 nM each primer. The optimal temperature for each primer pair was determined to be 53°C except for the reference gene, which was 60°C. The following three-step thermal cycling protocol was used: 3 min at 95°C (one cycle); 10 s at 95°C, 30 s at 53°C or 60°C, and 30 s at 75°C (40 cycles); and 50°C to 95°C melt curve with 0.5°C temperature shift. The RT-qPCRs were measured on an iCycler iQ5 (Bio-Rad). The primer pairs and amplicon sizes are listed in Table S7. All experiments met the following specifications: primer efficiency, 80% to 105%; r2 ≥ 0.999; and CT for no-RT control samples of >35. The Pfaffl method was used to analyze data and calculate the relative fold change normalized to OG1RF_RS05010, which was determined in RNA-seq to be unchanged in expression in planktonic and biofilm cells (43). Each reaction was performed in triplicate from each of two biological replicates for planktonic and biofilm cultures for each strain.
RNA-seq experiments were performed according to the methods previously described (42). Briefly, total RNA from planktonic and biofilm cells was treated with Turbo DNase (Ambion/Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the rigorous method. rRNA was removed using a MICROBExpress bacterial mRNA purification kit (Ambion/Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Illumina RNA-seq library creation and sequencing, using the HiSeq 2500 (paired end, 50 bp and 125 bp) platform, were performed at the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (UMGC). The fastq CASAVA (version 1.8, Illumina) sequence files were demultiplexed and deposited at the Minnesota Supercomputing Institute (MSI; University of Minnesota). Sequence analysis on paired-end reads was carried out using the Galaxy server (44–46), maintained by the MSI. Our data analysis followed the same workflow used by Weaver et al. (42) to analyze fastq files with some minor changes. Briefly, the 3′ ends of raw sequences were trimmed using FASTQ Quality Trimmer with the sliding window (47) and Cutadapt (46, 48) to remove adapter sequences. FASTQ interlacer and FASTQ de-interlacer or resync: paired-end resynchronization (MSI program) was used on the trimmed fastqsanger files to remove any unmatched paired-end reads, followed by mapping to the OG1RF reference genome (NC_017316.1 or CP002621.1) using Bowtie for Illumina (49). The SAM files were sorted by chromosome start position using Picard Sortsam (50).
Cuffmerge (51) was used on the GTF files from Cufflinks (51) to assemble the two planktonic and two biofilm files from the ΔahrC (D983) and OG1RF strains. Cuffdiff (51) was used to determine significant differences in the transcriptional expression between planktonic and biofilm cells with a false discovery rate of 0.05. The percentage of mapped reads ranged from 95% to 98% compared to total reads ranging from 22 million to 55 million for each sample and was determined using Flagstat (50, 52). Volcano plots were generated using Microsoft Excel (2016).
Immunoblot analysis of pilin protein.Three colonies from each strain were inoculated in 2 ml M9-YE supplemented with Cm 20 μg/ml and grown at 37°C overnight. The next morning, the cultures were diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.05 in M9-YE containing 10 ng/ml cCF10 and grown for 4 h at 37°C. Whole-cell lysates were extracted from cultures normalized to an OD600 of 1. The cells were pelleted, washed with 10 mM potassium phosphate-buffered saline (KPBS; pH 7.4), and frozen at −80°C. The frozen pellets were resuspended in 50 μl TES (10 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0], 25% sucrose) containing 10 mg/ml lysozyme (Sigma-Aldrich) and 250 U/ml mutanolysin (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Equal volumes of XT sample buffer (Bio-Rad) containing XT Reducing Agent (Bio-Rad) were added to the lysed cells and boiled for 15 min. The resulting lysates were separated on a Criterion XT precast gel, 3% to 8% Tris-acetate (Bio-Rad), and transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane (polyvinylidene difluoride [PVDF]; Millipore) in Towbin buffer (Bio-Rad) containing 0.05% SDS and 5% methanol. The membrane was stained with Ponceau S (Sigma-Aldrich) and scanned for loading uniformity. A Millipore Rapid chemiluminescent detection method was used according to the manufacturer's protocol with minor changes. Briefly, the dried membrane was incubated with primary antibody (1:10,000 dilution of anti-EbpC IgG; kindly supplied by Barbara Murray, University of Texas, Houston) in dilution buffer (5% nonfat dry milk, 10 mM KPBS [pH 7.4], 0.01% Tween 20 [vol/vol] [KPBS-T20]) at room temperature for 1 h. The membrane was washed with KPBS-T20 prior to incubating at room temperature for 30 min with secondary antibody (1:10,000 horseradish peroxidase [HRP]-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgGH+L; Zymo, Invitrogen) resuspended in dilution buffer. The blot was developed after washing with KPBS-T20 using SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific), and the signal was captured on X-ray film (Lumi-Film chemiluminescent detection; Roche/Sigma-Aldrich) by using an automatic processor.
β-Galactosidase assays.Strains were grown overnight in M9-YE with the appropriate antibiotics. For β-galactosidase (β-Gal) spot assays, the cultures were spotted on M9-YE plates containing antibiotics, 200 μg/ml X-Gal, and 10 ng/ml cCF10 and incubated overnight and photographed. For quantitating the β-Gal activity, the cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.05 in M9-YE containing 10 ng/ml cCF10 and incubated at 37°C for 3 h for Fig. 8 and S4 and 4 h for Fig. 2 to 4. The cells were removed and pelleted at 6,500 × g for 15 min. The cell pellets were frozen at −80°C. On the day of the assay, β-galactosidase was measured as described by Miller (53) with the following modifications. The cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of Z-buffer, and 0.01 ml to 0.2 ml of culture was used for the assays and incubated for 38 min for Fig. 8 and 45 min for Fig. 2 to 4. The samples were analyzed in duplicates, and the experiments were repeated twice. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student t test (two-tailed, unequal variances).
Microtiter plate biofilm assay.Biofilm assays in 96-well microtiter plates were based on a previously described protocol (14). Briefly, overnight M9-YE cultures with antibiotics were diluted to an OD600 of 0.05 in M9-YE containing 10 ng/ml cCF10. For each strain, 100 μl was transferred to 7 wells of a 96-well plate (Corning Costar 3595), and sterile medium was used for 7 blank wells. The plates were incubated statically for 6 h in a humidified chamber at 37°C. The cell density was measured at an OD600 on a Modulus microplate multimode reader (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, CA) prior to washing three times with double-distilled water. The plates were air dried for at least 4 h before staining with 100 μl 0.1% safranin for 20 min. The plates were washed five times with double-distilled water and air dried. The safranin-stained wells were quantified by measuring the OD450. Two to three biological replicates were performed for each strain. Biofilm production was calculated as an index of biomass stained with safranin (OD450 values) normalized to the cell density (OD600). The biofilm index values for each of the replicates were averaged and are reported as percent biofilm formation relative to that of OG1RF(pCIE), which was set to 100%.
Microscopy.E. faecalis strains were grown overnight in M9-YE with antibiotic. The next morning, we inoculated 24-well plates containing submerged 11-mm-diameter Aclar fluoropolymer coupons (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) with cultures diluted to an OD600 of 0.025 in M9-YE supplemented with 10 ng/ml cCF10. The biofilms were grown for 6 h at 37°C with shaking (125 rpm). Aclar coupons were processed as previously indicated (23). Briefly, the coupons were washed 3× in KPBS and stained with 5 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes/Thermo Fisher Scientific). The stained coupons were mounted on slides with a cover glass spacer (SecureSeal adhesive; Electron Microscopy Sciences) using SlowFade Diamond antifade mountant (Molecular Probes/Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images were captured with a Zeiss AX10 using Zen 2 (blue edition) software as a wide-field snapshot or z-stack with ×20 0.8-numerical-aperture (NA) and ×100 1.3-NA objectives. The images presented were obtained using the Fiji ImageJ package (54).
Accession number(s).The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus database (55, 56) and are accessible at GEO series accession number GSE112936 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE112936).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Julia Willett for help with the GEO submission.
This work was supported by NIH grant 1 RO1AI122742, awarded to G.M.D.
FOOTNOTES
- Received 2 May 2018.
- Accepted 29 June 2018.
- Accepted manuscript posted online 9 July 2018.
- Address correspondence to Gary M. Dunny, dunny001{at}umn.edu.
Citation Manias DA, Dunny GM. 2018. Expression of adhesive pili and the collagen-binding adhesin Ace is activated by ArgR family transcription factors in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 200:e00269-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00269-18.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00269-18.
REFERENCES
- Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.