Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Research Article

Regulatory Targets of the Response Regulator RR_1586 from Clostridioides difficile Identified Using a Bacterial One-Hybrid Screen

Skyler D. Hebdon, Smita K. Menon, George B. Richter-Addo, Elizabeth A. Karr, Ann H. West
Victor J. DiRita, Editor
Skyler D. Hebdon
aPrice Family Foundation Institute of Structural Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
bDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Smita K. Menon
aPrice Family Foundation Institute of Structural Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
bDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George B. Richter-Addo
aPrice Family Foundation Institute of Structural Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
bDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth A. Karr
aPrice Family Foundation Institute of Structural Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
cDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann H. West
aPrice Family Foundation Institute of Structural Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
bDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor J. DiRita
Michigan State University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00351-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    DNA-binding specificity of RR_1586. The motifs were overrepresented in colonies isolated from low-stringency (10 mM 3-AT) (A) or high-stringency (20 mM 3-AT) (B) selection or both data sets (C). Statistical confidence in these motifs increases with stringency and sample sizes. Associated E values are 3.1 × 10−4, 2.6 × 10−15, and 7.7 × 10−24, respectively.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    RR_1586 binds direct repeats in vitro. The presence of RR_1586 shifted direct repeats of the B1H-derived motif (arrow) in EMSAs. Inverting or substituting (cross) one or both of the repeats diminished the shift, suggesting a weakened interaction. The oligonucleotide sequences are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material. The presence (+) or absence (−) of RR_1586 protein is indicated above each lane.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    In vitro validation of conserved binding sites. Titrations of RR_1586 against predicted genomic binding sites upstream of CDR20219_3145 (A) and CDR20291_3121 (B) with 0 or 2 nucleotides, respectively, mismatching the search model were tested. Each gel shows 500 nM DNA alone and in the presence of 1×, 5×, 10×, and 20× molar equivalents of RR_1586. The oligonucleotide sequences are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Expression of GFP from C. difficile R20291 promoters in response to RR_1586. Cell density-normalized fluorescence (relative fluorescence units/optical density at 600 nm, plotted on the y axis) of GFP was observed in E. coli Rosetta cells transformed with a reporter plasmid and/or an RR_1586 expression vector (indicated below each graph). Samples were recorded in the absence (orange) and presence (blue) of 40 μM IPTG, used to induce production of RR_1586. IPTG had no effect on fluorescence in the absence of the RR_1586-harboring vector (A), but a decrease in fluorescence was observed for vectors reporting transcription from the CDR20291_0610 (B) and CDR20291_3145 (C) promoters.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Phosphorylation dependence of oligomeric state analyzed by SEC-MALS. SEC elution (curves) and light-scattering (dots) profiles are shown. Addition of the small-molecule phosphodonor phosphoramidate shifts the molecular weight of wild-type RR_1586 (red) from 57.5 to 119 kDa. In contrast, the apparent molecular weight of nonphosphorylatable RR_1586D50G (blue) shifts the molecular weight only from 59.4 to 52.6 kDa. Monomeric RR_1586 is expected to be 28 kDa.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Phosphorylation dependence of DNA binding also depends on DNA sequence. The presence (*) of phosphoramidate has only minor effects on RR_1586 binding to a site upstream of CDR20291_2142 (A) but disrupts binding to sites with a mismatch to the B1H-derived motif, such as the one upstream of CDR20291_1583 (B). In both cases, use of the phosphorylation mutant RR_1586D50G reverses these effects. The oligonucleotide sequences are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    Working model of the putative RR_1586 regulon. RR_1586 binds a larger set of predicted sites as a dimeric apo protein than it does as a phosphorylated tetramer. Both forms of RR_1586 bind to ideal sites, such as one upstream of CDR20291_0610. Binding sites such as those upstream of CDR20291_0879 (the leader of the operon encoding the PotABDE system) and CDR20291_1583 (the leader of the operon encoding RR_1586 and partner HK_1587) are bound by apo RR_1586 but not by phosphorylated RR_1586. The position of the CDR20291_1583 binding site (from positions −17 to +4 relative to the translational start site) suggests that binding would disrupt transcription, thus creating a phosphorylation-dependent transcription feedback loop.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Locus tags of operon leaders and the upstream RR_1586 binding site

    Operon leaderAnnotationPredicted RR_1586 binding siteaJustification
    CDR20291_2142Hypothetical proteinAATTAAGGTATAATTAAGTTTTRSAT/exact
    CDR20291_3145ProteaseAGTTAAGGTTTAATTAAGATTARSAT/exact
    CDR20291_0818SpeADEBTTTTGAGTTTTAGTAAGCTTTTRSAT
    CDR20291_0879PotABCDAGTAAACAAAATGTTTAGTAAARSAT
    CDR20291_1470Transcriptional regulatorAATCGAGGGAAAGTTAACAAAARSAT
    CDR20291_1527Hypothetical proteinAGTTAAGGTATAATTATTTTATRSAT
    CDR20291_1565Hypothetical proteinATTTAAGCTTTATTTAAGGTTARSAT
    CDR20291_1626Na+/phosphate cotransporterTATTAATGTTTTGTTAAGTATARSAT
    CDR20291_1855Tyrosine recombinaseATTTAGGGAATAGTTAGTGATARSAT
    CDR20291_2009Na+/H+ antiporterGGATATAGAATAGATAAGAAAARSAT
    CDR20291_2188Two-component systemTCTTAAGAAATATTTAAGAATTRSAT
    CDR20291_2890ABC transporterATGTAATATTTACTTAAGGATTRSAT
    CDR20291_3121Phosphate transport (pst)TATTAGGATTAAGTTAAGCAAGRSAT
    CDR20291_3239ABC transporterTGTAAAGGATATATTAAGACAARSAT
    CDR20291_2468Neutral Zn metallopeptidaseAGTTAAGTGAATATTAAGAGGAExact
    CDR20291_0571PeptidaseGATTAAGTATGAATTAAGCATGExact
    CDR20291_0578Chloride ion channel proteinTATTAAGAATGGGTTAAGAGTAExact
    CDR20291_0610ATP-dependent peptidaseGATTAAGTATTTATTAAGTATTExact
    CDR20291_0884Signaling proteinTATTAAGTATTTATTAAGTAAAExact
    CDR20291_2143Signaling proteinAATTAAGGTATAATTAAGTTTTExact
    CDR20291_0477SleBAAATAAGCTAAAAATAAGTAGAGermination
    CDR20291_0523CotJC1TATTAAATATATATTAAGGAGGSporulation
    CDR20291_1583Hypothetical proteinAATTAAGGAGCAATTAAATGATAutoregulation
    CDR20291_3401SpoIIRTATTATGAATAAATTAAATTTASporulation
    ConsensusDRTTAAGNWWWDRTTAAGNWWW
    • ↵a Boldface nucleotides represent the predicted binding sites.

  • TABLE 2

    Strains and plasmids used in this work

    Strain or plasmidUseSource (Addgene no.)
    pSGC-RR_1586Protein expressionSteve Almo
    pSGC-RR_1586_D50GProtein expressionThis work
    USO hisB pyrF rpoZ mutant (E. coli)B1H (selection)Scot Wolfe (18049)
    USO hisB pyrF mutant (E. coli)B1H (counterselection)Scot Wolfe (12614)
    pH3U3-mcsB1H (prey)Scot Wolfe (12609)
    pB1H2w2-Zif268B1H (positive control)Scot Wolfe (18045)
    pB1H2w2-PrdB1H (cloning template)Scot Wolfe (18038)
    pB1H2w2-mutOddB1H (negative control)Scot Wolfe (18044)
    pB1H2w2-1586_FLB1H (selection)This work
    pB1H2w2-1586_R124B1H (selection)This work
    pB1H2w2-1586_S131B1H (selection)This work
    pB1H2w2-1586_Q151B1H (selection)This work
    pJKR-L-tetRGFP reporterGeorge Church (62562)
    p0610-GFPGFP reporterThis work
    p3145-GFPGFP reporterThis work

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Supplemental file 1 -

      Fig. S1 (Secondary structure of RR_1586 as predicted by Phyre2 server) and S2 (Data analysis for motif discovery) and Tables S1 (Random inserts isolated under high- or low-stringency selection conditions), S2 (Oligonucleotides reported in this study), and S3 (Accession numbers of genome assemblies used in RSAT footprint scan)

      PDF, 913K

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Regulatory Targets of the Response Regulator RR_1586 from Clostridioides difficile Identified Using a Bacterial One-Hybrid Screen
Skyler D. Hebdon, Smita K. Menon, George B. Richter-Addo, Elizabeth A. Karr, Ann H. West
Journal of Bacteriology Nov 2018, 200 (23) e00351-18; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00351-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulatory Targets of the Response Regulator RR_1586 from Clostridioides difficile Identified Using a Bacterial One-Hybrid Screen
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Regulatory Targets of the Response Regulator RR_1586 from Clostridioides difficile Identified Using a Bacterial One-Hybrid Screen
Skyler D. Hebdon, Smita K. Menon, George B. Richter-Addo, Elizabeth A. Karr, Ann H. West
Journal of Bacteriology Nov 2018, 200 (23) e00351-18; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00351-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

bacterial one-hybrid assay
Clostridioides difficile
gene regulatory targets
response regulator
two-component signal transduction

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530