Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Research Article

Measurable Genomic Changes in Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis after Long-Term Adaptation in Acanthamoeba lenticulata and Reduced Persistence in Macrophages

Nabeeh A. Hasan, Grant J. Norton, Ravleen Virdi, L. Elaine Epperson, Charmie K. Vang, Brandon Hellbusch, Xiyuan Bai, Edward D. Chan, Michael Strong, Jennifer R. Honda
Laurie E. Comstock, Editor
Nabeeh A. Hasan
aCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grant J. Norton
aCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ravleen Virdi
aCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Elaine Epperson
aCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charmie K. Vang
aCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon Hellbusch
bAdvanced Diagnostic Laboratories, Complement Lab, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiyuan Bai
cDepartment of Medicine and Academic Affairs, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
dDivision of Pulmonary Science and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
eDepartment of Medicine, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward D. Chan
cDepartment of Medicine and Academic Affairs, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
dDivision of Pulmonary Science and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
eDepartment of Medicine, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Strong
aCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer R. Honda
aCenter for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jennifer R. Honda
Laurie E. Comstock
Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00257-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Free-living amoebae are ubiquitous in aquatic environments and act as environmental reservoirs for nontuberculous mycobacteria. Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis recovered from Acanthamoeba has been demonstrated to be more virulent in both human and murine models. Here, we investigate the persistence of M. avium subsp. hominissuis after short-term (2 weeks) and long-term (42 weeks) coculture in Acanthamoeba lenticulata. We hypothesize that A. lenticulata-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis demonstrates phenotypic and genomic changes facilitating intracellular persistence in naive Acanthamoeba and human macrophages. M. avium subsp. hominissuis CFU in coculture with A. lenticulata were recorded every 2 weeks for up to 60 weeks. While A. lenticulata-associated M. avium subsp. hominissuis CFU did not significantly change across 60 weeks of coculture, longer adaptation time in amoebae reduced the colony size. Isolates recovered after 2 or 42 weeks of amoeba coculture were referred to as “early-adapted” and “late-adapted” M. avium subsp. hominissuis, respectively. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on amoeba-adapted isolates with pan-genome comparisons to the original M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate. Next, amoeba-adapted isolates were assessed for their persistence in A. lenticulata, Acanthamoeba castellanii, and human THP-1 macrophages. Multiplex cytokine/chemokine analyses were conducted on THP-1 culture supernatants. Compared to the original isolate, counts of late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis were reduced in Acanthamoeba and, contrary to expectations, lower counts were also observed in THP-1 macrophages, with concomitant decreases in tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 beta (MIP-1β), suggesting that host adaptation may influence the inflammatory properties of M. avium.

IMPORTANCE Short-term interaction between Acanthamoeba and M. avium has been demonstrated to increase infectivity in human and murine models of infection, establishing the paradigm that amoebae “train” M. avium in the environment by selecting for phenotypes capable of enduring in human cells. We investigated this phenomenon further by determining the consequence of long-term amoeba adaptation on M. avium subsp. hominissuis persistence in host cells. We monitored genomic changes across long-term Acanthamoeba coculture and report significant changes to the M. avium subsp. hominissuis genome in response to amoeba adaptation and reduced colony size. Furthermore, we examined isolates cocultured with A. lenticulata for 2 or 42 weeks and provide biological evidence that long-term coculture in amoebae reduces M. avium persistence in human macrophages.

INTRODUCTION

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are of growing concern globally because of their abundance in the environment (1) and their ability to cause chronic opportunistic pulmonary disease. Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis and other members of the M. avium complex (MAC; i.e., Mycobacterium chimaera and Mycobacterium intracellulare) are predominantly responsible for clinical respiratory disease (2). M. avium subsp. hominissuis is a recognized endosymbiont of unicellular free-living amoebae (FLA), which coexist with NTM in freshwater systems and soil, providing protection from water disinfection processes and antimicrobial agents (3–8). In their trophozoite form, FLA act as environmental phagocytes that engulf debris and bacteria. However, a number of amoeba-resistant mycobacteria, including M. avium subsp. hominissuis, avoid intracellular phagolysosome-mediated killing by FLA, which facilitates their intracellular survival and persistence in the environment (9, 10).

Previous work indicates that FLA function as Trojan horses for dispersal of (myco)bacteria in the environment (11, 12), as well as training fields or biological gyms by exerting selective pressure on endosymbionts toward phenotypes that facilitate survival in human macrophages and evasion of host immune responses (13, 14). After several days of intracellular growth in Acanthamoeba, M. avium subsp. hominissuis shows increased entry and replication in both human monocyte‐derived macrophages and epithelial cells, as well as enhanced virulence in C57BL/6 bg+/bg+ mice (15). FLA may also serve as a cellular hub where genetic material can be exchanged among their bacterial endosymbionts (16).

While previous studies have focused on the interactions between NTM and amoebae after acute infection, e.g., 1 h, 3 days (15, 17), or 4 days postinfection (18), none have examined how M. avium subsp. hominissuis persistence changes after intermediate (2 weeks) and long-term (42 weeks) coculture in Acanthamoeba. While prior reports have suggested selection for more virulent M. avium subsp. hominissuis phenotypes after short-term coculture with Acanthamoeba castellanii (15), the impacts of longer periods of coculture on the persistence of NTM have not been explored. Here, we used bacterial whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to investigate M. avium subsp. hominissuis genomic changes associated with long-term Acanthamoeba lenticulata adaptation. We also demonstrate that extended adaptation time in A. lenticulata significantly decreases the ability of M. avium subsp. hominissuis to survive both in naive Acanthamoeba and human macrophages, with reduced persistence and reduced capacity to elicit host-protective immune responses.

(A portion of this work was published as a conference abstract [19].)

RESULTS

M. avium subsp. hominissuis burden remains stable across extended coculture in A. lenticulata.Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-transformed M. avium subsp. hominissuis was used for long-term adaptation experiments in A. lenticulata. To confirm that the GFP-transformed M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate was comparable to the original M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate, A. lenticulata was cocultured with either isolate. No significant CFU differences were observed (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). Next, the original isolate was inoculated into coculture with A. lenticulata and visualized after 5 h by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1A). M. avium subsp. hominissuis burden within A. lenticulata cells was subsequently quantified every 2 weeks up to 60 weeks of coculture. No significant increase or decrease in the number of cell-associated M. avium subsp. hominissuis cells was observed over the study period (Fig. 1B). At 2 and 42 weeks following coculture, a single colony of A. lenticulata-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis was picked from a plate for subsequent analyses. Isolates recovered from coculture are referred to as “early-adapted” M. avium subsp. hominissuis (recovered 2 weeks postinfection) (Fig. 1C, blue; Fig. 2, “coculture”) and “late-adapted” M. avium subsp. hominissuis (recovered 42 weeks postinfection) (Fig. 1C, red; Fig. 2, “coculture”). While no significant decreases in amoeba-associated CFU were detected, a noticeable reduction in colony size with longer adaptation time in amoebae was observed by comparing the colony size of the original, early-, and late-adapted isolates (Fig. 1C; Fig. S1B). In addition, approximately 10 days were needed to achieve visible colonies of original or early-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates on agar plates, whereas culture times of up to 1 month were needed to count late-adapted colonies that were significantly smaller in size, suggesting qualitatively slower growth under these culture conditions.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Long-term coculture of M. avium subsp. hominissuis and A. lenticulata. (A) Fluorescence microscopy image after 5 h of A. lenticulata and original M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate coculture. (B) Original M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate (green) was used to infect naive A. lenticulata cultures. Cell-associated CFU of M. avium subsp. hominissuis in A. lenticulata coculture were recorded every 2 weeks to monitor long-term persistence across 60 weeks. (C) At 2 and 42 weeks of coculture, the early-adapted and late-adapted isolates were recovered from coculture. Images of representative original, early-adapted, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis colonies after 4 days of A. lenticulata coculture and ∼14 days growth on 7H10 agar plates are shown.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Study schematic of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in Acanthamoeba lenticulata over time and genomic changes following coculture and reinfection in A. lenticulata over a 10-month period. Original M. avium subsp. hominissuis (green) was cocultured with A. lenticulata for 2 weeks or 42 weeks. Early-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis (A, blue) and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates (B, red) were isolated after 2 and 42 weeks of coculture. Early- and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis were subsequently used to infect naive cultures of A. lenticulata and isolated after 24 h (C, purple, and D, yellow). Observed SNPs indicating increased or decreased genetic fixation (FST) between stages are detailed in tables. All genomic changes incurred during coculture were determined using the original M. avium subsp. hominissuis strain as a reference.

WGS of original, early-adapted, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates.Next, WGS was performed on 58 isolates, including six original (Fig. 2, “coculture”), 20 early-adapted, and 20 late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates (Fig. 2, “infection”), as well as six early-adapted, and six late-adapted isolates recovered 24 h postinfection in A. lenticulata (Fig. 2, “24 h postinfection”). Results are summarized in Table S1. One early-adapted and one late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate and one early-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate after 24 h of infection were excluded from downstream analyses. All of the original M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates were genomically identical (0 SNPs). M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates with sufficient data (55/58; 94.8%) were monophyletic, showing common ancestry between the original, early-, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates and the original isolate (Fig. S2).

Adaptation to A. lenticulata influences genomic changes in M. avium subsp. hominissuis.Using WGS of 6 original, 19 early-adapted, and 19 late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates and 5 early- and 6 late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis after isolates 24 h of infection, 155 SNPs were identified between the five different M. avium subsp. hominissuis experimental groups (i.e., original, early-, and late-adapted, and early- and late-adapted at 24 h postinfection). Among the 155 SNPs observed, 44.5% (69/155) were found in 23 genes and 55.5% (85/155) were intergenic (Table S2). The fixation index (FST) was used as a measure of genetic differentiation to quantify the proportion of variance in allele frequencies among populations (i.e., original, early-adapted, and late-adapted isolates recovered from coculture and postinfection) relative to the total variance within and between isolate populations (20). Among the 69 SNPs occurring within genes, 12 SNPs (12/69 = 17.4%) in 8 genes (8/23 = 34.8%) had changes in allele frequency and showed strong genetic differentiation (FST > 0.20) between isolates recovered from A. lenticulata at different time points (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Genes containing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with high differentiation between M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates recovered from A. lenticulata after long-term coculture and 24 h postinfection

Comparing M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates recovered at different times across long-term coculture, we observed an accumulation of SNPs with increasing culture time. For example, when comparing the original M. avium subsp. hominissuis to the early-adapted isolate and the early-adapted to the late-adapted isolate, increases of 3 SNPs/isolate (0 to 10 SNPs) (Fig. 3A) and 5 SNPs/isolate (0 to 12 SNPs) (Fig. 3B) were observed, respectively. When comparing the early-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis recovered from coculture to the early-adapted isolate recovered at 24 h postinfection in A. lenticulata, 6 SNPs/isolate (0 to 31 SNPs) were observed (Fig. 3C). Finally, 5 SNPs/isolate (0 to 25 SNPs) were observed when comparing the late-adapted isolate to the late-adapted isolate recovered from A. lenticulata at 24 h postinfection (Fig. 3D). Excluding low frequency SNPs that occur in a single isolate, the progression of SNPs accumulated at a rate of 6.2 SNPs/year during coculture within A. lenticulata.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

SNPs accumulated during long-term coculture. Plot of SNPs accumulated at each experimental stage using WGS information for 6 original, 19 early-adapted, and 19 late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates recovered from long-term coculture and 5 early-adapted and 6 late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates recovered at 24 h postinfection. The trend line connects the mean SNPs observed at each experimental stage. The timeline shows the experimental stages where isolates were collected for analysis and the SNPs detected at each stage (A to D). The number of SNPs represents the average mutations found in the isolates sampled at that experimental stage. SNPs in red represent the range of SNPs at the corresponding experimental stage.

Because 155 SNPs were identified between the original, early-, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates, we investigated the possibility of microbial contamination in the A. lenticulata used in M. avium subsp. hominissuis coculture. Cell lysates of naive Acanthamoeba cultured contemporaneously in the long-term coculture experiment were examined by PCR amplification of 16S rRNA and mycobacterial rpoB. In addition to ∼900-bp amplicons representing Acanthamoeba, 18S rRNA, faint bands were detected at ∼478 bp, indicating the presence of bacterial 16S rRNA in naive A. lenticulata lysates (Fig. S3A). The same cell lysates failed to amplify using a primer set targeting mycobacterial rpoB (Fig. S3B) and failed to produce visible growth when used to inoculate solid and liquid culture media (Fig. S3C to E). Taken together, these results indicate the presence of nonviable, but detectable, bacteria in the A. lenticulata isolate used in long-term coculture with Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis.

A. lenticulata adaptation does not significantly alter M. avium subsp. hominissuis cell wall lipid or protein profiles.To investigate the effect of long-term adaptation in amoebae on the M. avium subsp. hominissuis cell wall, total lipid extracts (TLE) were prepared from the original, early-adapted, and late-adapted isolates and analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Lipid profiles showed similar banding patterns between all three isolates in terms of total lipids and glycolipids detected (Fig. 4A). In addition, TLE profiles of M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates recovered at 2, 18, 30, 42, 56, and 60 weeks of coculture were evaluated, and no significant differences in total lipid and glycolipid banding patterns were observed (Fig. S4A).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Adaptation to A. lenticulata does not impact M. avium subsp. hominissuis total lipid profiles but modulates lipoarabinomannan (LAM) expression. (A) Thin layer chromatography of total cell wall lipid species or glycolipids from original, early-, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates. Plates were run using 65:24:4 chloroform-methanol-H2O on silica plates. Total lipids were visualized with CuSO4 and glycolipids were visualized with α-naphthol. Samples were loaded at the origin and eluted toward the top (solvent front). Banding indicates polar (bottom) and nonpolar (top) lipids based on affinity to silica. (B) Western blotting performed on 20 μg of M. tuberculosis H37Rv culture filtrate proteins (BEI Resources NR-14825) and original, early-, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis total protein lysates. Immunodetection using polyclonal M. tuberculosis anti-LAM (BEI Resources NR-13821).

As with M. avium subsp. hominissuis cell wall lipids, total protein profiles of the original, early-adapted, and late-adapted isolates were similar (Fig. S4B). However, a 38- to 49-kDa band was observed in the late-adapted isolate that was absent from the original and early-adapted isolates. Additionally, a second band of ∼14 kDa in the original isolate was not present in the early- and late-adapted isolates.

Lipoarabinomannan immunodetection.Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) is a lipoglycan found in the cell wall of mycobacteria and, among other roles in host infection, involved in the persistence in macrophages (21). To specifically probe for differences in LAM associated with amoeba adaptation, LAM immunoblotting was performed using original, early-, and late-adapted protein cell lysates. LAM was detected in all M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates (Fig. 4B). However, when qualitatively compared to the original isolate, less LAM was detected in the early-adapted lysate and more LAM was detected in the late-adapted lysate.

A. lenticulata-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis shows differences in intracellular persistence when used to infect naive Acanthamoeba and human THP-1 macrophage cultures.To determine the impact of A. lenticulata adaptation on the persistence of M. avium subsp. hominissuis within its original host, the original, early-adapted, and late-adapted isolates were used to infect naive cultures of A. lenticulata. At 37°C, the temperature of coculture, the numbers of both early- and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis were significantly reduced compared to the original isolate across 96 h (Fig. 5A). To evaluate whether the incubation temperature impacted M. avium subsp. hominissuis persistence in Acanthamoeba, as other reports have suggested (22, 23), infections were also performed in A. lenticulata incubated at 22°C. Similar to the 37°C data, A. lenticulata-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates showed reduced survival when used to infect naive A. lenticulata compared to the original isolate (Fig. S5A). Early- and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis also showed reduced cell-associated viability in A. castellanii, a different Acanthamoeba host, compared to the original isolate (Fig. S5B).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Amoeba-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates show decreased survival in human macrophages and A. lenticulata. Original, early-adapted, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates were used to infect naive cultures of A. lenticulata (A) or human THP-1 macrophages (B) at an MOI 10:1. (C) THP-1 supernatants were used for multiplex cytokine/chemokine analyses comparing proinflammatory immune responses to the original and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis infection. n = 3 independent CFU experiments.

To verify that the differences in cell-associated growth were not due to decreased viability, the original and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates were inoculated into peptone-yeast-glucose (PYG) culture medium, independent of cells, and incubated at 22°C or 37°C. No significant changes in the growth of the two isolates were observed across 96 h in either temperature condition (Fig. S5C).

Finally, to examine the hypothesis that A. lenticulata adaptation enhances M. avium subsp. hominissuis persistence in human macrophages, the same isolates were used to infect human THP-1 cells. In this context, we considered attributes of NTM persistence to include the ability to survive exposure to THP-1 macrophages and elicit proinflammatory cytokine responses. Compared to the original isolate, the early-adapted isolate was recovered in significantly higher numbers at 96 h postinfection compared to the late-adapted isolate, which was recovered in significantly lower numbers at 24 and 48 h postinfection (Fig. 5B). As associated with reduced bacterial burden, multiplex cytokine/chemokine analyses performed on supernatants of infected THP-1 macrophages showed significantly attenuated proinflammatory cytokine (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], interleukin 6 [IL-6], interferon gamma [IFN-γ], and IFN-α2) and chemokine (macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha [MIP-1α] and MIP-1β) responses to infection with the late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis compared to the original isolate (Fig. 5C).

DISCUSSION

One of the main goals of this study was to investigate the changes of a single M. avium subsp. hominissuis genotype associated with long-term persistence in A. lenticulata and to understand how this influences its persistence in host cells and evasion of host defenses. During the transition between early and late adaptation in amoebae, appreciable levels of SNP variation occurred in mycobacterial genes, such as those involved in catalysis, host cell penetration, respiration, and transcriptional regulation (Table 1) (24, 25). A source of genes for endosymbiotic M. avium subsp. hominissuis may be non-NTM DNA previously degraded by amoebae (26). Our molecular data indicate the presence of trace bacterial DNA that was not of mycobacterial origin within the uninfected A. lenticulata (Fig. S3). Besides mycobacteria, a number of Proteobacteria, Chlamydiae, and Flavobacteria are well-recognized bacterial endosymbionts of Acanthamoeba spp. (10, 27) and may participate in conjugal transfer between mycobacteria while living as amoebic endosymbionts (28). Yet, we cannot discount the possibility that the original infection could have been carried out with a mixture of M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates despite our efforts to start with a single isolate; however, our evidence suggests at least one or more possible taxonomic sources present could have contributed to the gene pool observed over the course of long-term coculture. Further identification of the etiology of the M. avium subsp. hominissuis genome variation was beyond the scope of this study.

A single isolate of M. avium subsp. hominissuis at the early- and late-adapted time points was selected to represent the M. avium subsp. hominissuis population within A. lenticulata at these time points. While choosing one isolate to represent the population is a limitation, we were able to investigate infectivity and biochemical changes between the isolates over time. Mycobacterial cell wall lipids, specifically glycolipids, are known to influence infectivity (29, 30). TLC analyses failed to reveal differences in cell wall lipid profiles between original, early-adapted, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates (Fig. 4A; see Fig. S4A in the supplemental material). However, immunoblotting suggests that long-term coculture within A. lenticulata may increase LAM in the M. avium subsp. hominissuis cell wall (Fig. 4B). LAM is a highly heterogeneous and important virulence factor of mycobacteria, influencing uptake by host cells, intracellular persistence, and host immune responses (31). While further investigation into how amoeba adaptation influences M. avium subsp. hominissuis LAM structure and expression are warranted, our data suggest that cell wall modification may play a role in M. avium subsp. hominissuis persistence during amoeba adaptation.

Our observations demonstrate that M. avium subsp. hominissuis survives extended coculture within A. lenticulata of more than a year (Fig. 1B). But, by 42 weeks of adaptation in A. lenticulata, smaller colonies of M. avium subsp. hominissuis are recovered (Fig. 1C). Colony size reduction upon the transition from a free-living state to an intracellular lifestyle is well described for bacteria; however, to our knowledge, this reduction in colony size has not yet been observed in mycobacteria (26, 32–36). We also discovered that long-term adaptation in A. lenticulata negatively impacted two key components of mycobacterial persistence: survival within phagocytes and induction of proinflammatory cytokine responses (37–41). The bacterial burden of both original and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis decreased over the course of infection in THP-1 macrophages (Fig. 5B). Similar to previous findings (42), cytokine analyses performed on the supernatants collected from the infected THP-1 cells showed significantly less production of proinflammatory cytokines by THP-1 cells in response to the late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate compared to the original M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate (Fig. 5C), illustrating attenuation of the proinflammatory response to M. avium subsp. hominissuis after long-term adaptation to A. lenticulata. High levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ may explain this reduction in CFU in original M. avium subsp. hominissuis infection; however, the absence of these host-protective cytokines in late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis infection fails to explain trends in CFU (43, 44). These data could demonstrate that adaptation in amoebae over long-term coculture reduces the ability of M. avium subsp. hominissuis to replicate and induce host-protective proinflammatory cytokines. However, a more comprehensive analysis of the phenotypic changes should be performed, including characterizing the anti-inflammatory responses by measuring IL-4 and IL-10 levels, as well as other host defense mechanisms, including apoptosis, autophagy, and phagosome-lysosome fusion. Because we were unable to measure cytokines produced after infection with the early-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate at the time, we do not know if these responses would mirror the trends observed for the original or late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates.

This work was originally initiated to test the hypothesis that M. avium subsp. hominissuis infectivity in human macrophages increases with longer “training” time in A. lenticulata (14, 45). However, the opposite was observed in our data and deviated from previous work, which showed increased M. avium subsp. hominissuis replication within human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) after a 10-day adaptation within Acanthamoeba (15). However, our study differs in the following parameters: (i) use of a cell line compared to primary cell cultures, (ii) longer length of time for adaptation in amoebae, and (iii) culturing of the amoeba-adapted isolates and using stocks for infections, whereas previous work used M. avium subsp. hominissuis immediately recovered from amoebae in MDM infections. Importantly, while in vitro macrophage infection is a well-established model for assaying mycobacterial infections, future investigation of in vivo host responses to amoeba-adapted Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis will be needed to better characterize the impacts of long-term coculture on the ability of NTM to infect macrophages. Yet, our work suggests the long-term persistence and endosymbiosis between M. avium subsp. hominissuis and A. lenticulata achieved in our study can occur in the environment, and thus elevates the suspicion that environmental amoebae act as natural reservoirs for M. avium subsp. hominissuis. We posit that it is the ability of amoebae to act as a vector for M. avium subsp. hominissuis transmission and persistence, not reduced M. avium subsp. hominissuis virulence, which may contribute, in part, to the increasing prevalence of NTM pulmonary infection. Most patients infected with M. avium subsp. hominissuis are immunocompromised and susceptible to infection from opportunistic pathogens, so the reduced phenotypes we observed over time is likely not affecting the rate of NTM disease.

Despite the use of different hosts (i.e., amoebae compared to humans), a portion of our study results align with Kannan et al., who showed rapid SNP evolution in M. avium isolates from chronically infected patients and studied the changes in infectivity over time (42). This study revealed higher mutation rates of M. avium during persistent infections and infection of murine macrophages with sequentially collected patient isolates showing downregulation of inflammatory cytokines by host-adapted strains. This group proposed that genetic variation throughout the course of infection might be due to microevolution of the founding strain following the infection, that each patient’s infecting inoculum might have contained mixed strains, or that each patient could have been reinfected with different strains at different times. Instead of an unknown inoculum, our experimental design used a well-characterized isolate of M. avium subsp. hominissuis that was transformed with gfp to infect a variety of host cells. In our work, we found the core genome variation clearly showed that the original, early-, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates collected from the lysed A. lenticulata share most recent common ancestry, diminishing the likelihood of mixed isolates or reinfection with diverse strains. The observed mutation rate of our M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate in amoebae was 6.2 SNPs/year and this is within the range of the observed mutation rates from the patient M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates from the Kannan study, at 4.5 to 7.1 SNPs/year. Because we also observed reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokines by THP-1 macrophages in response to late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis, we concur with Kannan et al. that host adaptation may influence the inflammatory properties of M. avium.

Together, our data illustrate that long-term adaption in A. lenticulata negatively impacts M. avium subsp. hominissuis genomic change, colony morphology, and persistence. Prior to the present study, WGS and population genomics had rarely been used to study the evolution of M. avium subsp. hominissuis over time in amoebae. We believe it will be just as important in future work to understand how M. avium subsp. hominissuis impacts the A. lenticulata genome and define the amoeba-specific innate immune responses produced in response to NTM infection. However, WGS of the much larger and more complex genome of A. lenticulata was beyond the scope of the current study. Further studies into the underpinning mechanism(s) responsible for reduced survival of M. avium subsp. hominissuis in human macrophages with longer adaptation time in amoebae are needed to increase our understanding of the complex molecular relationships and genetic exchanges that exist and take place between NTM and environmental protozoa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

M. avium subsp. hominissuis, Acanthamoeba, and human macrophage cultures.We isolated M. avium subsp. hominissuis strain H87 from an indoor sink faucet (6) and reported its complete genome, NCBI accession number NZ_CP018363 (46). This parent isolate was stably transformed via electroporation with a green-fluorescent protein (GFP) expression plasmid to create a fluorescently labeled isolate used in subsequent Acanthamoeba coculture and referred herein as the “original” M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolate.

Acanthamoeba lenticulata ATCC 30841 and Acanthamoeba castellanii trophozoites were cultured in sterile peptone-yeast-glucose (PYG) broth at 22°C and 37°C for maintenance cultures. To prevent amoeba overgrowth and encystment, maintenance cultures were centrifuged to pellet the amoebae, spent medium was removed, and fresh PYG medium was added every fourth passage day. Human THP-1 monocytes were cultured and differentiated into macrophages as previously described (47, 48).

Visualization of M. avium subsp. hominissuis in amoebae by fluorescence microscopy.A. lenticulata cells (5 × 104) were suspended in 500 μl of PYG medium and seeded into wells of a Nunc Lab-Tek II chamber slide (Thermo Fisher Scientfic, Waltham, MA). Slides were incubated at 37°C overnight and infected with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 original M. avium subsp. hominissuis cells per amoeba. After 5 h of infection, spent medium was removed and the monolayer was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde. Fixing medium was aspirated and the monolayer was washed with PBS. Slides were immediately visualized using fluorescence microscopy.

Long-term coculture of A. lenticulata with M. avium subsp. hominissuis.A. lenticulata cultures were adjusted to a concentration of 1 × 106 amoebae/ml in fresh PYG and original M. avium subsp. hominissuis stock culture was added to achieve an MOI of 1:1. The coculture was incubated at 37°C and spent medium was removed and replaced every 2 weeks with fresh PYG for up to 60 weeks following coculture. At every medium change, the persistence of M. avium subsp. hominissuis within A. lenticulata was monitored by transferring 10 ml of coculture into a conical vial and centrifuging at 771 × g for 5 min at room temperature. To recover amoeba-associated M. avium subsp. hominissuis, cell pellets were lysed by adding 500 μl 0.01% Triton X-100 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and an equal volume of Middlebrook 7H9 plating solution (7H9, oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase [OADC] enrichment, Tween 80). Lysates were serially diluted, plated in duplicate on Middlebrook 7H10 agar, and incubated for 2 weeks at 37°C, and the CFU were counted.

On two occasions (i.e., at 2 and 42 weeks of coculture), a colony of A. lenticulata-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis was picked from CFU plates and subcultured in 7H9 broth and incubated under rotation at 150 rpm at 37°C for 2 weeks to obtain stock cultures. These isolates are referred to throughout this study as “early-adapted” M. avium subsp. hominissuis (2 weeks of coculture) and “late-adapted” M. avium subsp. hominissuis (42 weeks of coculture). Serial dilutions were plated on 7H10 agar to determine the starting stock CFU. M. avium subsp. hominissuis stocks were stored at –80°C until use. Early- and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis were used to infect naive cultures of A. lenticulata (MOI 10:1) for 24 h. Amoebae were lysed and serial dilutions of the lysate were plated onto 7H10 agar to quantify CFU. After 2 weeks of incubation, six early-adapted (see Table S1, 1 through 6, in the supplemental material) and late-adapted (Table S1, 1 through 6) M. avium subsp. hominissuis colonies were picked from CFU plates and grown in 7H9 broth for sequencing.

To semiquantify changes in the size of colonies recovered after amoeba infection, diameters of representative original, early-adapted, and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis colonies plated on 7H10 agar were measured using a Laxco SeBa Pro4B microscope at 4× magnification. Twenty colonies per isolate were measured and averaged.

M. avium subsp. hominissuis gDNA extraction.Prior to genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction, 20 isolated colonies of early-adapted, 20 colonies of late-adapted, and 6 colonies of the original isolate (Table S1) were picked and grown in 7H9 broth and high-quality genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated (49). gDNA was also isolated from early- and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis at 24 h after infection in A. lenticulata to determine the effect of reintroduction to amoebae on the M. avium subsp. hominissuis genome.

M. avium subsp. hominissuis WGS, genomic analyses, and gene annotation.To generate WGS, sequencing libraries were prepared using the Nextera DNA FLEX library preparation kit (Illumina) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq using 2 × 300 paired-end chemistry. Isolate metadata, NCBI Short Read Archive accession, and Bioproject PRJNA587788 accession numbers are detailed in Table S1. Illumina sequence data were analyzed through an in-house workflow. Read files were trimmed of adapter sequences and bases under quality thresholds (q-score < 20) using Skewer (50). Quality-trimmed read files were mapped to the M. avium H87 reference genome to identify SNPs using Bowtie2 (51) and postprocessed using SAMtools (52), outputting SNPs to variant call format (VCF) files. Each isolate’s VCF file was filtered, removing SNPs without at least four FASTQ reads coverage (DP4 ≤ 4) and at least 75% of basecalls supporting the reference or alternative allele (AF ≤ 0.75). A phylogenetic tree was created using RAxML (53), the GTR model and 500 bootstrap replicates.

Population differentiation was identified using the fixation index (FST), a measure of population differentiation wherein 0 indicates no differentiation and a value of 1 implies populations have fixed alternative allelic states and are completely differentiated. FST was calculated at observed SNPs using vcftools v0.1.17 (54) with haploid mode enabled (https://github.com/vcftools/vcftools/pull/69).

Quality-trimmed reads were used to de novo assemble the genomes of each isolate using Unicycler (55) and resultant assembly contigs were reordered against the H87 reference genome using MAUVE (56). The reordered de novo assemblies were annotated using Prokka (57) and analyzed by Roary (58). BLAST analyses were used to compare the translated nucleotide sequences against nonredundant NCBI protein sequences and to annotate hypothetical proteins.

To calculate the SNP accumulation rate during coculture within A. lenticulata, the mean difference between the early-adapted and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis was calculated to be 4.99 SNPs/294 days (days between the early- and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis). To extrapolate the annual mutation rate, the following equation was used: 4.99 SNPs/294 days = x SNPs/365 days, equaling 6.2 SNPs per year.

16S and rpoB amplification.DNA was extracted from A. lenticulata (49) with the inclusion of a bead beating step. DNA concentrations were normalized based on Qubit fluorescent quantitation, and 0.8 ng of each template was used for PCR in duplicate. For 16S amplification, adapter-modified Earth Microbiome Project 16S PCR primers 515F and 926R were used (59). A second mycobacterium-specific amplification used primers against rpoB (60) and resulted in an expected band of 831 bp if mycobacteria were present. Amplifications were performed using LA Taq (TaKaRa) optimized for high GC content, with the following reaction conditions: for 16S, 94°C for 3 min, 28 cycles of amplification (15 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C), and extension of 5 min at 72°C; for rpo, 94°C for 3 min, 35 cycles of amplification (15 s at 94°C, 30 s at 64°C, and 90 s at 72°C), and extension of 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.8% agarose gel with GelRed (Phoenix Research Products) in 1× Tris-acetate-EDTA at 80 V for 75 min and visualized using a Bio-Rad gel imager on the UV setting.

Microbial assessment of uninfected A. lenticulata.Periodic monitoring of uninfected A. lenticulata at weeks 2, 13, and 42 was conducted by lysing A. lenticulata cells in 200 μl of 0.5% SDS. The lysate was neutralized by adding 200 μl of plating solution and 50 μl was spread plated onto two Trypticase soy agar (TSA) plates incubated at either 37°C or 22°C. The remaining lysate was inoculated into Trypticase soy broth (TSB) and the volume was divided for continued incubation at either 37°C or 22°C for up to 10 days.

M. avium subsp. hominissuis lipid analyses.Aliquots of Proskauer-Beck culture medium (50 ml) were inoculated with M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates and incubated at 37°C for up to 1 month. Once turbid, the cultures were centrifuged at 557 × g for 60 min, supernatants were removed, and the pellets were stored at –80°C. For total lipid extraction, thawed pellets were resuspended in 1:1 chloroform-methanol and rocked for 2 h. Samples were centrifuged at 2,637 × g for 10 min; then 4 ml of the supernatant was removed, and 4 ml of 1:1 chloroform-methanol was added back to each sample. These steps were repeated two additional times and the supernatants from each fraction were pooled. After each pooling, the solvent was evaporated under N2. Samples were resuspended in 2:1 chloroform-methanol and 15 μl was spotted onto duplicate silica plates for analysis by TLC using a 65:24:4 chloroform-methanol-H2O solvent system. Plates were sprayed with CuSO4 to visualize total lipids or α-naphthol to visualize glycolipids and developed under dry heat.

Lipoarabinomannan Western blotting.M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates were cultured for 2 weeks in 7H9 broth. Once turbid, the cultures were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 10 min, supernatant was removed, and pellets were stored at –80°C. Extraction of M. avium subsp. hominissuis total proteins was performed using B-PER (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) supplemented with DNase I and lysozyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Twenty micrograms of M. avium subsp. hominissuis total proteins and Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Rv culture filtrate proteins (BEI Resources NR-14825) was separated by SDS-PAGE on a 4 to 12% Bis-Tris–morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES) gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (iBlot, Invitrogen). Membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat milk-PBS with 0.25% Tween 20 (PBST) overnight at 4°C. Polyclonal anti-LAM primary antibody (BEI Resources NR-13821) was diluted 1:1,000 in 5% nonfat milk in PBST and used with 1:1,000 horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific). NR-14825 and 13821 reagents were obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, and the NIH. Blots were visualized using SuperSignal West Femto maximum sensitivity substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on the iBright CL1000 imager (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

Infection of naive Acanthamoeba or THP-1 macrophages cultures with amoeba-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis.To study the possibility that amoeba-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis is better suited to infect the same host when encountered again, “early-adapted “and “late-adapted” M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates were used to infect naive cultures of A. lenticulata. After 1, 24, 48, and 96 h of infection, the cultures were lysed and plated onto 7H10 agar to recover colonies. THP-1 monocytes were seeded at 1 × 106 cells/ml into 6-well plates with 0.1 μg/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 48 h to facilitate differentiation into macrophages. The incubation temperature of 37°C was chosen to most closely mimic M. avium subsp. hominissuis endosymbiosis during human infection; prior studies found no significant different between 37°C and 22°C (61–64). At the time of infection, the spent medium was removed and the cells were washed with PBS and infected with 1 × 107 M. avium subsp. hominissuis/ml (MOI, 10:1) for 1 h. Unphagocytosed M. avium subsp. hominissuis cells were removed by aspiration, washed, and replaced with fresh medium. Cell-associated M. avium subsp. hominissuis cells were recovered at 1, 24, 48, and 96 h postinfection by the addition of equal volumes of 0.025% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 7H9 plating solution. Serial dilutions of the lysate were plated in duplicate and incubated at 37°C for up to 21 days. Conditioned medium collected throughout the THP-1 experiments was used for cytokine and chemokine analysis using the Multiplex Map kit (Millipore, MA) performed by the National Jewish Health Complement Laboratory.

Statistical analyses.The data were analyzed with GraphPad 8.0 using two-way ANOVA to determine statistical significance. For CFU data, all analyses compared the early-adapted and late-adapted M. avium subsp. hominissuis to the original isolate as a control. Values with P of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for three or more independent experiments.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Joseph O. Falkinham III for critical conversations and inspiration for this work.

J.R.H. acknowledges support from the Padosi Foundation.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

We declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

N.A.H. and J.R.H. conceptualized this study. G.J.N., R.V., L.E.E., C.K.V., B.H., X.B., and J.R.H. performed all experiments. N.A.H., L.E.E., and M.S. provided M. avium subsp. hominissuis WGS expertise, and N.A.H., G.J.N., and C.K.V. performed data analyses. N.AH., G.J.N., and J.R.H. drafted the manuscript. E.D.C. and L.E.E. provided critical editing for important intellectual content. J.R.H. and M.S. provided funding for this work. All authors provided edits to the manuscript and approved the final draft.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 29 April 2020.
    • Accepted 18 December 2020.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 11 January 2021.
  • Supplemental material is available online only.

  • Copyright © 2021 Hasan et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Honda JR,
    2. Hasan NA,
    3. Davidson RM,
    4. Williams MD,
    5. Epperson LE,
    6. Reynolds PR,
    7. Smith T,
    8. Iakhiaeva E,
    9. Bankowski MJ,
    10. Wallace RJ, Jr.,
    11. Chan ED,
    12. Falkinham JO, 3rd,
    13. Strong M
    . 2016. Environmental nontuberculous mycobacteria in the Hawaiian Islands. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10:e0005068. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005068.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tran QT,
    2. Han XY
    . 2014. Subspecies identification and significance of 257 clinical strains of Mycobacterium avium. J Clin Microbiol 52:1201–1206. doi:10.1128/JCM.03399-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Thomas V,
    2. McDonnell G
    . 2007. Relationship between mycobacteria and amoebae: ecological and epidemiological concerns. Lett Appl Microbiol 45:349–357. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02206.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Falkinham JO. 3rd
    , 2009. Surrounded by mycobacteria: nontuberculous mycobacteria in the human environment. J Appl Microbiol 107:356–367. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04161.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Thomas V,
    2. Loret JF,
    3. Jousset M,
    4. Greub G
    . 2008. Biodiversity of amoebae and amoebae-resisting bacteria in a drinking water treatment plant. Environ Microbiol 10:2728–2745. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01693.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ovrutsky AR,
    2. Chan ED,
    3. Kartalija M,
    4. Bai X,
    5. Jackson M,
    6. Gibbs S,
    7. Falkinham JO, 3rd,
    8. Iseman MD,
    9. Reynolds PR,
    10. McDonnell G,
    11. Thomas V
    . 2013. Cooccurrence of free-living amoebae and nontuberculous Mycobacteria in hospital water networks, and preferential growth of Mycobacterium avium in Acanthamoeba lenticulata. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3185–3192. doi:10.1128/AEM.03823-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Adékambi T,
    2. Ben Salah S,
    3. Khlif M,
    4. Raoult D,
    5. Drancourt M
    . 2006. Survival of environmental mycobacteria in Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5974–5981. doi:10.1128/AEM.03075-05.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Miltner EC,
    2. Bermudez LE
    . 2000. Mycobacterium avium grown in Acanthamoeba castellani is protected from the effects of antimicrobials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1990–1994. doi:10.1128/aac.44.7.1990-1994.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Philips JA
    . 2008. Mycobacterial manipulation of vacuolar sorting. Cell Microbiol 10:2408–2415. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01239.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Greub G,
    2. Raoult D
    . 2004. Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:413–433. doi:10.1128/cmr.17.2.413-433.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Barker J,
    2. Brown MR
    . 1994. Trojan horses of the microbial world: protozoa and the survival of bacterial pathogens in the environment. Microbiology 140:1253–1259. doi:10.1099/00221287-140-6-1253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Samba-Louaka A,
    2. Robino E,
    3. Cochard T,
    4. Branger M,
    5. Delafont V,
    6. Aucher W,
    7. Wambeke W,
    8. Bannantine JP,
    9. Biet F,
    10. Héchard Y
    . 2018. Environmental Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis hosted by free-living amoebae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:28. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2018.00028.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Rubenina I,
    2. Kirjusina M,
    3. Berzins A,
    4. Valcina O,
    5. Jahundovica I
    . 2017. Relationships between free-living amoeba and their intracellular bacteria. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences 71:259–265. doi:10.1515/prolas-2017-0044.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Salah IB,
    2. Ghigo E,
    3. Drancourt M
    . 2009. Free-living amoebae, a training field for macrophage resistance of mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:894–905. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03011.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cirillo JD,
    2. Falkow S,
    3. Tompkins LS,
    4. Bermudez LE
    . 1997. Interaction of Mycobacterium avium with environmental amoebae enhances virulence. Infect Immun 65:3759–3767. doi:10.1128/IAI.65.9.3759-3767.1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Grillot-Courvalin C,
    2. Goussard S,
    3. Huetz F,
    4. Ojcius DM,
    5. Courvalin P
    . 1998. Functional gene transfer from intracellular bacteria to mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 16:862–866. doi:10.1038/nbt0998-862.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lamrabet O,
    2. Mba Medie F,
    3. Drancourt M
    . 2012. Acanthamoeba polyphaga-enhanced growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis. PLoS One 7:e29833. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029833.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Danelishvili L,
    2. Wu M,
    3. Stang B,
    4. Harriff M,
    5. Cirillo SLG,
    6. Cirillo S,
    7. Cirillo JD,
    8. Cirillo J,
    9. Bildfell R,
    10. Arbogast B,
    11. Bermudez LE
    . 2007. Identification of Mycobacterium avium pathogenicity island important for macrophage and amoeba infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:11038–11043. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610746104.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Honda JR,
    2. Virdi R,
    3. Epperson E,
    4. Hasan NA,
    5. Bai X,
    6. Strong M,
    7. Chan ED
    . 2019. Mycobacterium avium hominissuis virulence and genomic adaptations after long-term co-culture in Acanthamoeba, In Abstracts of the American Thoracic Society International Conference Dallas, Texas, USA, 19 May, 2019. American Thoracic Society, New York, NY. doi:10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2019.199.1_MeetingAbstracts.A2045.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fumagalli M,
    2. Vieira FG,
    3. Korneliussen TS,
    4. Linderoth T,
    5. Huerta-Sanchez E,
    6. Albrechtsen A,
    7. Nielsen R
    . 2013. Quantifying population genetic differentiation from next-generation sequencing data. Genetics 195:979–992. doi:10.1534/genetics.113.154740.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chan J,
    2. Fan XD,
    3. Hunter SW,
    4. Brennan PJ,
    5. Bloom BR
    . 1991. Lipoarabinomannan, a possible virulence factor involved in persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within macrophages. Infect Immun 59:1755–1761. doi:10.1128/IAI.59.5.1755-1761.1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Marciano-Cabral F,
    2. Han K,
    3. Powell E,
    4. Ferguson T,
    5. Cabral G
    . 2003. Interaction of an Acanthamoeba human isolate harboring bacteria with murine peritoneal macrophages. J Eukaryot Microbiol 50 Suppl:516–519. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2003.tb00615.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Anandaiah A,
    2. Sinha S,
    3. Bole M,
    4. Sharma SK,
    5. Kumar N,
    6. Luthra K,
    7. Li X,
    8. Zhou X,
    9. Nelson B,
    10. Han X,
    11. Tachado SD,
    12. Patel NR,
    13. Koziel H
    . 2013. Vitamin D rescues impaired Mycobacterium tuberculosis-mediated tumor necrosis factor release in macrophages of HIV-seropositive individuals through an enhanced Toll-like receptor signaling pathway in vitro. Infect Immun 81:2–10. doi:10.1128/IAI.00666-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Dubois V,
    2. Pawlik A,
    3. Bories A,
    4. Le Moigne V,
    5. Sismeiro O,
    6. Legendre R,
    7. Varet H,
    8. Rodríguez-Ordóñez M.dP,
    9. Gaillard J-L,
    10. Coppée J-Y,
    11. Brosch R,
    12. Herrmann J-L,
    13. Girard-Misguich F
    . 2019. Mycobacterium abscessus virulence traits unraveled by transcriptomic profiling in amoeba and macrophages. PLoS Pathog 15:e1008069. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008069.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Yano H,
    2. Iwamoto T,
    3. Nishiuchi Y,
    4. Nakajima C,
    5. Starkova DA,
    6. Mokrousov I,
    7. Narvskaya O,
    8. Yoshida S,
    9. Arikawa K,
    10. Nakanishi N,
    11. Osaki K,
    12. Nakagawa I,
    13. Ato M,
    14. Suzuki Y,
    15. Maruyama F
    . 2017. Population structure and local adaptation of MAC lung disease agent Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis. Genome Biol Evol 9:2403–2417. doi:10.1093/gbe/evx183.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Moliner C,
    2. Fournier PE,
    3. Raoult D
    . 2010. Genome analysis of microorganisms living in amoebae reveals a melting pot of evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:281–294. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00209.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Horn M,
    2. Fritsche TR,
    3. Linner T,
    4. Gautom RK,
    5. Harzenetter MD,
    6. Wagner M
    . 2002. Obligate bacterial endosymbionts of Acanthamoeba spp. related to the beta-Proteobacteria: proposal of 'Candidatus Procabacter acanthamoebae' gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:599–605. doi:10.1099/00207713-52-2-599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Boritsch EC,
    2. Khanna V,
    3. Pawlik A,
    4. Honoré N,
    5. Navas VH,
    6. Ma L,
    7. Bouchier C,
    8. Seemann T,
    9. Supply P,
    10. Stinear TP,
    11. Brosch R
    . 2016. Key experimental evidence of chromosomal DNA transfer among selected tuberculosis-causing mycobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:9876–9881. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604921113.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Schorey JS,
    2. Sweet L
    . 2008. The mycobacterial glycopeptidolipids: structure, function, and their role in pathogenesis. Glycobiology 18:832–841. doi:10.1093/glycob/cwn076.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Gutierrez AV,
    2. Viljoen A,
    3. Ghigo E,
    4. Herrmann JL,
    5. Kremer L
    . 2018. Glycopeptidolipids, a double-edged sword of the Mycobacterium abscessus complex. Front Microbiol 9:1145. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01145.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Torrelles JB,
    2. Schlesinger LS
    . 2010. Diversity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis mannosylated cell wall determinants impacts adaptation to the host. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 90:84–93. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.02.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Toft C,
    2. Andersson SG
    . 2010. Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 11:465–475. doi:10.1038/nrg2798.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Sapriel G,
    2. Brosch R
    . 2019. Shared pathogenomic patterns characterize a new phylotype, revealing transition toward host-adaptation long before speciation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Genome Biol Evol 11:2420–2438. doi:10.1093/gbe/evz162.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Moran NA
    . 2002. Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens. Cell 108:583–586. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00665-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mira A,
    2. Ochman H,
    3. Moran NA
    . 2001. Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes. Trends Genet 17:589–596. doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02447-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Andersson SG,
    2. Kurland CG
    . 1998. Reductive evolution of resident genomes. Trends Microbiol 6:263–268. doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01312-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Smith I
    . 2003. Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis and molecular determinants of virulence. Clin Microbiol Rev 16:463–496. doi:10.1128/cmr.16.3.463-496.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Feng Z,
    2. Bai X,
    3. Wang T,
    4. Garcia C,
    5. Bai A,
    6. Li L,
    7. Honda JR,
    8. Nie X,
    9. Chan ED
    . 2020. Differential responses by human macrophages to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Front Microbiol 11:116. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00116.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. Song CH,
    2. Lee JS,
    3. Kim HJ,
    4. Park JK,
    5. Paik TH,
    6. Jo EK
    . 2003. Interleukin-8 is differentially expressed by human-derived monocytic cell line U937 infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and Mycobacterium marinum. Infect Immun 71:5480–5487. doi:10.1128/iai.71.10.5480-5487.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Rindi L,
    2. Lari N,
    3. Garzelli C
    . 2018. Virulence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis human isolates in an in vitro macrophage infection model. Int J Mycobacteriol 7:48–52. doi:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_11_18.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Theus SA,
    2. Cave MD,
    3. Eisenach KD
    . 2004. Activated THP-1 cells: an attractive model for the assessment of intracellular growth rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Infect Immun 72:1169–1173. doi:10.1128/iai.72.2.1169-1173.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Kannan N,
    2. Lai Y-P,
    3. Haug M,
    4. Lilleness MK,
    5. Bakke SS,
    6. Marstad A,
    7. Hov H,
    8. Naustdal T,
    9. Afset JE,
    10. Ioerger TR,
    11. Flo TH,
    12. Steigedal M
    . 2019. Genetic variation/evolution and differential host responses resulting from in-patient adaptation of Mycobacterium avium. Infect Immun 87:e00323-18. doi:10.1128/IAI.00323-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Cooper AM,
    2. Mayer-Barber KD,
    3. Sher A
    . 2011. Role of innate cytokines in mycobacterial infection. Mucosal Immunol 4:252–260. doi:10.1038/mi.2011.13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Sasindran SJ,
    2. Torrelles JB
    . 2011. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and inflammation: what is beneficial for the host and for the bacterium? Front Microbiol 2:2. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Molmeret M,
    2. Horn M,
    3. Wagner M,
    4. Santic M,
    5. Kwaik YA
    . 2005. Amoebae as training grounds for intracellular bacterial pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:20–28. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.1.20-28.2005.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Zhao X,
    2. Epperson LE,
    3. Hasan NA,
    4. Honda JR,
    5. Chan ED,
    6. Strong M,
    7. Walter ND,
    8. Davidson RM
    . 2017. Complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis strain H87 isolated from an indoor water sample. Genome Announc 5:e00189-17. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00189-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Bai X,
    2. Oberley-Deegan RE,
    3. Bai A,
    4. Ovrutsky AR,
    5. Kinney WH,
    6. Weaver M,
    7. Zhang G,
    8. Honda JR,
    9. Chan ED
    . 2016. Curcumin enhances human macrophage control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Respirology 21:951–957. doi:10.1111/resp.12762.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    1. Honda JR,
    2. Hess T,
    3. Carlson R,
    4. Kandasamy P,
    5. Nieto Ramirez LM,
    6. Norton GJ,
    7. Virdi R,
    8. Islam MN,
    9. Mehaffy C,
    10. Hasan NA,
    11. Epperson LE,
    12. Hesser D,
    13. Alper S,
    14. Strong M,
    15. Flores SC,
    16. Voelker DR,
    17. Dobos KM,
    18. Chan ED
    . 2020. Nontuberculous mycobacteria show differential infectivity and use phospholipids to antagonize LL-37. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 62:354–363. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2018-0278OC.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    1. Epperson LE,
    2. Strong M
    . 2020. A scalable, efficient, and safe method to prepare high quality DNA from mycobacteria and other challenging cells. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis 19:100150. doi:10.1016/j.jctube.2020.100150.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Jiang H,
    2. Lei R,
    3. Ding S-W,
    4. Zhu S
    . 2014. Skewer: a fast and accurate adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end reads. BMC Bioinformatics 15:182. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Langmead B,
    2. Salzberg SL
    . 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Handsaker B,
    3. Wysoker A,
    4. Fennell T,
    5. Ruan J,
    6. Homer N,
    7. Marth G,
    8. Abecasis G,
    9. Durbin R
    , Subgroup GPDP. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Stamatakis A
    . 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Danecek P,
    2. Auton A,
    3. Abecasis G,
    4. Albers CA,
    5. Banks E,
    6. DePristo MA,
    7. Handsaker RE,
    8. Lunter G,
    9. Marth GT,
    10. Sherry ST,
    11. McVean G,
    12. Durbin R
    , 1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group. 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27:2156–2158. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    1. Wick RR,
    2. Judd LM,
    3. Gorrie CL,
    4. Holt KE
    . 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Rissman AI,
    2. Mau B,
    3. Biehl BS,
    4. Darling AE,
    5. Glasner JD,
    6. Perna NT
    . 2009. Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve Aligner. Bioinformatics 25:2071–2073. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Seemann T
    . 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    1. Page AJ,
    2. Cummins CA,
    3. Hunt M,
    4. Wong VK,
    5. Reuter S,
    6. Holden MT,
    7. Fookes M,
    8. Falush D,
    9. Keane JA,
    10. Parkhill J
    . 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Walters W,
    2. Hyde ER,
    3. Berg-Lyons D,
    4. Ackermann G,
    5. Humphrey G,
    6. Parada A,
    7. Gilbert JA,
    8. Jansson JK,
    9. Caporaso JG,
    10. Fuhrman JA,
    11. Apprill A,
    12. Knight R
    . 2016. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems 1:e00009-15. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00009-15.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. 60.↵
    1. Adekambi T,
    2. Colson P,
    3. Drancourt M
    . 2003. rpoB-based identification of nonpigmented and late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 41:5699–5708. doi:10.1128/JCM.41.12.5699-5708.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Landers P,
    2. Kerr KG,
    3. Rowbotham TJ,
    4. Tipper JL,
    5. Keig PM,
    6. Ingham E,
    7. Denton M
    . 2000. Survival and growth of Burkholderia cepacia within the free-living amoeba Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 19:121–123. doi:10.1007/s100960050442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Medie FM,
    2. Salah IB,
    3. Henrissat B,
    4. Raoult D,
    5. Drancourt M
    . 2011. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex mycobacteria as amoeba-resistant organisms. PLoS One 6:e 20499. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Bui XT,
    2. Winding A,
    3. Qvortrup K,
    4. Wolff A,
    5. Bang DD,
    6. Creuzenet C
    . 2012. Survival of Campylobacter jejuni in co-culture with Acanthamoeba castellanii: role of amoeba-mediated depletion of dissolved oxygen. Environ Microbiol 14:2034–2047. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02655.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Hasni I,
    2. Jarry A,
    3. Quelard B,
    4. Carlino A,
    5. Eberst JB,
    6. Abbe O,
    7. Demaneche S
    . 2020. Intracellular behaviour of three Legionella pneumophila strains within three amoeba strains, including Willaertia magna C2c Maky. Pathogens 9:105. doi:10.3390/pathogens9020105.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Measurable Genomic Changes in Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis after Long-Term Adaptation in Acanthamoeba lenticulata and Reduced Persistence in Macrophages
Nabeeh A. Hasan, Grant J. Norton, Ravleen Virdi, L. Elaine Epperson, Charmie K. Vang, Brandon Hellbusch, Xiyuan Bai, Edward D. Chan, Michael Strong, Jennifer R. Honda
Journal of Bacteriology Feb 2021, 203 (6) e00257-20; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00257-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measurable Genomic Changes in Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis after Long-Term Adaptation in Acanthamoeba lenticulata and Reduced Persistence in Macrophages
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Measurable Genomic Changes in Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis after Long-Term Adaptation in Acanthamoeba lenticulata and Reduced Persistence in Macrophages
Nabeeh A. Hasan, Grant J. Norton, Ravleen Virdi, L. Elaine Epperson, Charmie K. Vang, Brandon Hellbusch, Xiyuan Bai, Edward D. Chan, Michael Strong, Jennifer R. Honda
Journal of Bacteriology Feb 2021, 203 (6) e00257-20; DOI: 10.1128/JB.00257-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis
Acanthamoeba lenticulata
whole-genome sequencing
persistence
human THP-1 macrophages

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530