Table 2.

Comparison of promoter sequences recognized in vitro by EςX, EςX and EςW, or EςW alone

Sequence recognized by:GenePromoter sequenceIn vitro activity
ςXςW
    “−35”                      −10           +1
X sigX aaTGTAACTTttcaagctattcataCGACAAaaaagtGaacg +
csbB atTGTAACAAaaaacaggtttaaaCGACTTtaaaaaAAggaa +
lytR aaTGAAACTTttttttataaaaaaCGACTAttttagGatttc +
X and EςW abh cgGGAAACTTtttcaaagtttcattCGTCTAcgataTAttGa ++
divIC ttTGAAACTTcttcctgtgaaaatgCGTCTAactttTAgacg ++
ywbN taCAAAACAAatgatcagtcctataCGTCTTatgatAaatta ++
yrhH atTGAAACATttttcaatacattgcCGTCTAgttggTacctt ++
W sigW atTGAAACCTtttgaaacgaagctCGTATAcatacaGAccgg +