Table 2.

Key alignments of Eut proteins

TargetSimilar protein(s) foundOrganismP(N)a
EutSPduB (organelle structural?) Salmonella typhimurium 0.10
EutPNone
EutQNone
EutTNone
EutDPta (phosphate acetyltransferase) Paracoccus denitrificans 2.0e-85
EutMPduA (organelle structural?) Salmonella typhimurium 1.1e-37
CcmK (carboxysome structural) Synechocystis sp. strain PCC68037.6e-31
EutK Escherichia coli 5.3e-22
EutNCcmL (carboxysome structural) Synechococcus 3.3e-19
EutESucD (succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase) Clostridium kluyveri 2.0e-36
EutJFtsA (cell division) Bacillus subtilis 6.1e-07
DnaK (heat shock chaperonin) Synechocystis sp. strain PCC68032.2e-05
EutGFucO (lactaldehyde reductase on propanediol oxidoreductase) Escherichia coli 6.7e-66
EutHYxeR (unknown) Bacillus subtilis 2.2e-105
MTCY04C12.24c (ABC sulphate transporter?) Mycobacterium tuberculosis 0.064
EutAFtsA (cell division) Bacillus subtilis 0.25
DnaK (heat shock chaperonin) Thermomicrobium roseum 0.73
EutBEutB (ethanolamine ammonia lyase large subunit) Rhodococcus erythropolis 1.5e-140
EutCEutB (ethanolamine ammonia lyase small subunit) Rhodococcus erythropolis 7.6e-26
EutLPduB (organelle structural?) Salmonella typhimurium 1.4e-07
EutKEutM Escherichia coli 4.4e-22
PduA (organelle structural?) Salmonella typhimurium 4.0e-21
CcmK (carboxysome structural) Synechococcus sp. strain PCC79422.1e-17
EutROxoS (putative regulatory protein) Pseudomonas putida 9.4e-18
ThcR (probable regulatory protein) Rhodococcus NI86/215.0e-14
XylS (transcriptional activator of XylDLEGF operon) Pseudomonas putida 1.9e-12
TmbS (positive regulator oftmb-meta operon) Pseudomonas putida 9.4e-12
HrpB (positive regulation of hypersensitive response) Burkholderia solanacearum 7.7e-09
CbdS (positive regulator of cbd operon) Pseudomonas sp. strain pBAH19.2e-09
HrpXv (positive regulator ofhrp cluster) Xanthomonas campestris 1.6e-06
PocR (positive regulator of pduoperon) Salmonella typhimurium 0.084
  • ↵a This score, given by the BLAST program, is the probability that the observed resemblance between entire sequences could occur by chance. For those alignments with high P(N) scores, the relationship is based on shared motifs discussed in the text.